SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA021 The Story of MT/A02 Stephen Senn.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SJS SDI_71 Design of Statistical Investigations Stephen Senn 7. Orthogonal Designs Two (plus) Blocking Factors.
Advertisements

SJS SDI_101 Design of Statistical Investigations Stephen Senn 10 Random Effects.
SJS SDI_111 Design of Statistical Investigations Stephen Senn 11 Nested Factors.
SJS SDI_181 Design of Statistical Investigations 18 Sample Size Determination Stephen Senn.
SJS SDI_151 Design of Statistical Investigations Stephen Senn Introduction to Sampling.
Hypothesis Testing Goal: Make statement(s) regarding unknown population parameter values based on sample data Elements of a hypothesis test: Null hypothesis.
Fall 2013Biostat 5110 (Biostatistics 511) Discussion Section Week 4 Sandrine Moutou Medical Biometry I.
some observations on the
Confidence Intervals for Population Means
Statistical considerations Alfredo García – Arieta, PhD Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
Parallelism in practice USP Bioassay Workshop August 2010
Variance reduction techniques. 2 Introduction Simulation models should be coded such that they are efficient. Efficiency in terms of programming ensures.
Inference for a population mean BPS chapter 18 © 2006 W. H. Freeman and Company.
Role of Pharmacoeconomics in a Developing country context Gavin Steel for Anban Pillay Cluster Manager: Health Economics National Department of Health.
Output analyses for single system
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Introduction to the Discussion of Bioequivalence.
Part I – MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS
Introduction to Inference Estimating with Confidence Chapter 6.1.
Plenary Data Analysis Session PSI Conference Bristol 2006 John Matthews School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
Incomplete Block Designs
Hanoi, WORKSHOP ON PREQUALIFICATION OF ARV: BIOEQUIVALENCE Introduction to the Discussion of Bioequivalence Study Design and Conduct Presented.
Artemisinin combined medicines, Kampala, February |1 | Training workshop on regulatory requirements for registration of Artemisinin based combined.
WHO Prequalification Program Workshop, Kiev, Ukraine, June 25-27,2007.
(a.k.a. Phase I trials) Dose Finding Studies. Dose Finding  Dose finding trials: broad class of early development trial designs whose purpose is to find.
Inference in practice BPS chapter 16 © 2006 W.H. Freeman and Company.
Fixed vs. Random Effects Fixed effect –we are interested in the effects of the treatments (or blocks) per se –if the experiment were repeated, the levels.
Department of Pharmacology L. M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad-09.
CI-1 Foradil ® (formoterol fumarate inhalation powder) FDA Advisory Committee Meeting July 13, 2005 FDA Advisory Committee Meeting July 13,
The Pharmaceutical Industry in Turkey
Week 6- Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
Review of Binomial Concepts A single experiment, with probability of success p, is repeated n independent times X = number of successes the discrete random.
Simplicity, Complexity and Modelling Stephen Senn (c) Stephen Senn1.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 10 Inferences Involving Two Populations.
SJS Harpenden: Competence and Equivalence 1 Competence and Equivalence Stephen Senn Department of Statistical Science UCL.
4/26/001 Clinical Studies for Local Delivery of Nasal Aerosols and Sprays Izabela J. Roman, MD, PhD Founder & Medical Director Target Research Associates,
STA305 week 51 Two-Factor Fixed Effects Model The model usually used for this design includes effects for both factors A and B. In addition, it includes.
1 ORALLY INHALED AND NASAL DRUG PRODUCTS FOR LOCAL ACTION Current FDA BA/BE Background and Issues Wallace P. Adams, Ph.D. OPS/CDER/FDA OINDP Subcommittee.
1 Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing. 2 Chapter Outline  Developing Null and Alternative Hypothesis  Type I and Type II Errors  Population Mean: Known 
Confidence intervals: The basics BPS chapter 14 © 2006 W.H. Freeman and Company.
1 Is it potent? Can these results tell me? Statistics for assays Ann Yellowlees PhD Quantics Consulting Limited.
Bioequivalence Dr Mohammad Issa Saleh.
WHO Prequalification Programme June 2007 Training Workshop on Dissolution, Pharmaceutical Product Interchangeability and Biopharmaceutical Classification.
Model-based dose selection for next dose- finding trial 1. Introduction Exploratory clinical development trials often include biomarkers or clinical readout.
Math 3680 Lecture #15 Confidence Intervals. Review: Suppose that E(X) =  and SD(X) = . Recall the following two facts about the average of n observations.
The Mixed Effects Model - Introduction In many situations, one of the factors of interest will have its levels chosen because they are of specific interest.
Course: Research in Biomedicine and Health III Seminar 5: Critical assessment of evidence.
Biostatistics Case Studies Peter D. Christenson Biostatistician Session 3: Missing Data in Longitudinal Studies.
Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products Subcommittee Introduction and Objectives Eric B. Sheinin Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science Center.
ANOVA and Multiple Comparison Tests
1 Statistics 262: Intermediate Biostatistics Mixed models; Modeling change.
Biostatistics Case Studies 2006 Peter D. Christenson Biostatistician Session 1: Demonstrating Equivalence of Active Treatments:
Review Design of experiments, histograms, average and standard deviation, normal approximation, measurement error, and probability.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved Chapter Hypothesis Tests Regarding a Parameter 10.
A Parametrized Strategy of Gatekeeping, Keeping Untouched the Probability of Having at Least One Significant Result Analysis of Primary and Secondary Endpoints.
Taper DPI FeatureImpact Efficacy Safety Compliance Cost High Efficiency  Equivalent lung dose achieved in- vitro with approximately 50% lower delivered.
1 Once-daily indacaterol versus twice-daily salmeterol for COPD ; a placebo-controlled comparison R2 정명화 Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 273–279.
Safety of long-acting β-agonists for the treatment of asthma : clearing the air 장 나 은 Gustavo J Rodrigo, Jose A Castro-Rodrıguez Thorax 2012;
Simulation setup Model parameters for simulations were tuned using repeated measurement data from multiple in-house completed studies and baseline data.
20. Comparing two proportions
Summary of t-Test for Testing a Single Population Mean (m)
Introduction to inference Estimating with confidence
Conclusions Purpose Results Results Discussion Methods Conclusions
EXPERIMENT DESIGN.
Chapter 8: Selecting an appropriate price level
Design and Analysis of Crossover Study Designs
Chapter 25: Paired Samples and Blocks
Confidence intervals: The basics
Comparing Populations
Confidence intervals: The basics
Objectives 6.1 Estimating with confidence Statistical confidence
Presentation transcript:

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA021 The Story of MT/A02 Stephen Senn

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA022 Background Formoterol is a long-acting extremely potent beta-agonist used in the treatment of asthma. Originally patented by Yamanouchi, who, however only developed an oral form, it was licensed in the mid 1980s to CIBA-Geigy. At the time of my arrival at, C-G Basle in 1987 it had just been scheduled for international development in solution form delivered by metered-dose inhaler. In the course of the next few years various other formulations: suspension, single-dose dry-powder inhaler and multi-dose inhaler were developed. MTA/02 was a trial designed as part of a programme to show equivalence of a new multi-dose dry powder form (MT&A) to an existing single-dose form (ISF).

SJS Dundonald Road3

The Story of MTA024 Context Many trials had been run with formoterol solution –This formulation could, however, only be kept stable using a cold chain for delivery and was not widely marketed. The suspension formulation had been abandoned because creaming tendency made it too potent. The dry powder ISF formulation was a technical success but required priming anew every time it was used. A multi-dose formulation was desirable from the patient and marketing point of view. There was no desire from the company’s point of view to start all over again. Hence an equivalence route was sought.

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA025 Bioequivalence of two bronchodilators given by inhalation Bronchodilators are inhaled hence classical bioequivalence impossible. A pharmacodynamic solution is necessary. Standard bronchodilator doses are very often on flat part of dose-response curve. Hence what is really required is a parallel dose assay.

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA026 Problems Three doses of test and reference were required. Placebo should also be included. Patients could not be treated more than 5 times. Very high precision was required. This made a parallel group trial unattractive.

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA027 The Pre-specified Analysis Pre-specified to target log-AUC forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1 ) over 12 hours Model to fit patient & period effects and log- baseline FEV 1 in addition to treatment. All factors to be treated as fixed Main comparison to based on 12  g doses Limit of equivalence targeted at +/- 10% 95% confidence interval to be contained in limits of equivalence

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA028 Solution Incomplete blocks design in seven treatments (three doses test, three doses reference and placebo) and five periods. This required twenty-one sequences in order to balance treatments. Sequences to be replicated 6 times = 126 patients. Trial run in over a dozen centres.

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA029 A Fraction of an Incomplete Blocks Design

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA0210 It is impossible to balance the design in seven sequences because although every treatment can appear equally often in every period and over the design as a whole, pairs of treatments do not appear equally often within patients. There are (7x6)/2 = 21 possible treatment pairs. Every patient permits (5x4)/2 = 10 possible pairwise comparisons. Hence if 7 patients are used there are 70 possible within-patient comparisons. But 21 does not divide into 70. In fact some 7 pair-wise comparisons appear 4 times and 14 comparisons 3 times in the 7 sequences above. However if 21 sequences are used the design can be balanced.

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA0211 Some People Involved Denise Till – project statistician for formoterol Francesco Patalano – medical advisor Stephen Senn – group leader IBA ex project statistician Jürgen Lillienthal head of Datamap, the CRO analysing the trial

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA0212

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA0213

The Story of MTA0214 Fixed Effects Analysis * run a fixed effects analysis of the data; Title2 'Fixed patient effects'; proc glm data=incomp; class TREAT PERIOD PATIENT; model AUC=PATIENT BASE PERIOD TREAT; estimate "MTA6" TREAT ; estimate "MTA12" TREAT ; estimate "MTA24" TREAT ; estimate "ISF6" TREAT ; estimate "ISF12" TREAT ; estimate "ISF24" TREAT ; estimate "treatment" TREAT / divisor=6; estimate "formulation" TREAT / divisor=3; estimate "dose" TREAT /divisor=2; estimate "parallelism" TREAT ; estimate "curvature" TREAT ; estimate "opposing curvature" TREAT ; run;

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA0215 Fixed Effects Results Parameter Estimate Error t Value Pr > |t| MTA <.0001 MTA <.0001 MTA <.0001 ISF <.0001 ISF <.0001 ISF <.0001 treatment <.0001 formulation <.0001 dose <.0001 parallelism curvature opposing curvature

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA0216

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA0217 Random Effects Analysis *run a random effects analysis of the data; Title2 'Random patient effects'; proc mixed data=incomp; class TREAT PERIOD PATIENT; model AUC=BASE PERIOD TREAT; random patient; estimate "MTA6" TREAT ; estimate "MTA12" TREAT ; estimate "MTA24" TREAT ; estimate "ISF6" TREAT ; estimate "ISF12" TREAT ; estimate "ISF24" TREAT ; estimate "treatment" TREAT / divisor=6; estimate "formulation" TREAT / divisor=3; estimate "dose" TREAT /divisor=2; estimate "parallelism" TREAT ; estimate "curvature" TREAT ; estimate "opposing curvature" TREAT ; run;

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA0218 Random Effects Results Estimates Standard Label Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > |t| MTA <.0001 MTA <.0001 MTA <.0001 ISF <.0001 ISF <.0001 ISF <.0001 treatment <.0001 formulation <.0001 dose <.0001 parallelism curvature opposing curvature

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA0219 Placebo and the 3 doses of the new formulation

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA0220 With the 3 doses of reference formulation added...any d.f.

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA0221

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA0222 Safety Not main purpose of trial However might give some clues regarding potency Clues to cardiac effects can be gained by studying –QTc Typical value 410 milliseconds Prolongation can be a concern –K Typical value 4.3 (3.5 – 5) mmols/L Depression can be a concern

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA0223

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA0224

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA0225 Safety Conclusion Little evidence of dose-effect for QTc –At least as regards average Evidence of effect on Potassium at highest doses –Effect small –However, it is interesting that the effect reflects dose delivered rather than potency Implications for therapeutic ratio

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA0226 Denouement The formulation was abandoned –Despite the initial criterion of equivalence being satisfied –MTA Had ¼ the potency of ISF –It was recognised that the original criterion was too lax The company (now Novartis) continues to market formoterol (Foradil®) ISF and develop new formulations but since the drug is long off patent faces competition from Astra-Zeneca (Oxis®) and generic manufacturers

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA0227 What would I do differently? Look at equivalence in terms of dose-scale rather than response scale –Fieller’s theorem Plus or minus 20% traditional on dose scale but unatainable using FEV 1 and bronchodilators Decision-analytic approach? –Will the regulator agree? NO!

SJS Dundonald RoadThe Story of MTA0228 Relative potency Estimate % CI