Www.all4inc.com | Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC Boiler MACT Compliance Plans: Failure to Develop Plans Is Planning to Fail Susie Bowden|

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006.
Advertisements

METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006.
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT QUESTION & ANSWERS
DRAFT IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT FACILITY INSPECTIONS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART EEEEE.
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June 2006.
METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
METAL COIL SURFACE MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006 May 2006.
Compliance Dates The final rule was published on January 25, 1995,
IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT QUESTION & ANSWERS
IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
Boiler GACT Update Georgia AWMA Conference
Harmonization of Parts 60 and 75
RECLAIM Monitoring, Recordkeeping and Reporting (MRR)
CEMTEK CEMS Users Group Meeting and Forum September 24-25, 2009 Santa Ana, California RKI Specific DAHS Training and RECLAIM Updates Presented by Norm Iseri, RKI Engineering.
NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR CHROMIUM EMISSIONS FROM HARD & DECORATIVE CHROMIUM ELECTROPLATING & CHROMIUM ANODIZING TANKS.
Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) Panel Peter Westlin, EMC Barrett Parker, EMC.
Why do we lose analyzer data? Monitor malfunction DAS malfunction Power outages Environmental problems Wildlife damage Vandalism Operator error.
New Federal Regulations for Internal Combustion Engines Doug Parce.
Louisiana Department of EnvironmentalQuality LDEQ CAM Plan Overview LDEQ’s 27 th Annual Conference on the Environment Cajundome Convention Center Lafayette,
State Implementation of Risk-Based MACT Exemptions Region 4 Permit Managers Meeting Rhonda B. Thompson, P.E., Director Engineering Services Division SC.
Boiler MACT and Other Air Developments 2011 Southern Section AWMA Conference Callaway Gardens, GA Boiler MACT and Other Air Developments 2011 Southern.
Implementation and Management of Leak Detection and Repair Programs – New Rules and Other Considerations Nebraska Ethanol Safety & Environmental Coalition.
2015 NCMA EPA Enforcement Policies and How They Affect Your Facility Michael Pjetraj, P.E. DAQ Stationary Source Compliance Branch Supervisor.
Lecture 8. Quality Assurance/Quality Control The Islamic University of Gaza- Environmental Engineering Department Environmental Measurements (EENV 4244)
A History and Status of CEMS Applications in USEPA Regulations Dale Evarts US EPA December 16, 2002 Better Air Quality in Asian Cities 2002
Compliance Update NCMA 2015.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
ADEQ Uses of ICF Modeling Analysis Tony Davis, Branch Manager – Air Planning Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Criteria Pollutant Modeling Analysis.
INDUSTRIAL BOILER MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD)
INDUSTRIAL BOILER MACT RULE (Title 40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD)
© Copyright, Yorke Engineering, LLC 2008 SCAQMD Rule Compliance Steps and Strategies Judy Yorke and Bipul K. Saraf Yorke Engineering, LLC
Particulate Matter Monitoring Required by the Utility MATS Eric Swisher| | ext. 17 August 22, 2012 Presented to ARIPPA.
VALIDATION METHODOLOGY
1 Title V Permitting and CAM Planning Title V Permitting and CAM Planning APPA E&O Technical Conference April 19, 2005 Robert M. Iwanchuk, C.C.M. ENSR.
Indiana New Source Review Reform Plantwide Applicability Limitations (PALs) IDEM/Office of Air Quality September 7, 2004.
FRANKLIN engineering group, inc. Start-up Shutdown Malfunction Plan Development and Implementation Duncan F. Kimbro
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of the Rules and Applications Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
Guidance on Establishing Monitoring to Comply with CAM and Other Title V Requirements A Summary of Technical and Policy Materials Barrett Parker, EPA,
Reviewing the Audit Results. Defining a Quality Base Year is Key to Maximizing Project Value n Base year is the mutually agreed upon pre-retrofit annual.
PA Department of Environmental Protection Continuous Source Monitoring Manual (Manual, Revision 8)
Utility MATS Compliance: Considerations for Emissions Testing
ALTERNATIVES TO BART -TRADING- Lily Wong USEPA – Region 9 September 1, 2005.
Commissioning of New and Existing Buildings Alexander P. Boucher, P.E., CEM, LEED BD+C.
Title V Operating Permit Program 1 Section 1: Intro to Title V Laura McKelvey U.S. EPA.
Control Chart Methodology for Evaluating CEMS Data
MRWS GROUND WATER RULE (GWR) PREPARED BY JOHN CAMDEN MRWS GROUND WATER TECH
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of Rules and Permitting Issues Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
M&V Plan Template Lia Webster, Nexant New Orleans M&V Summit May 2003.
Georgia’s 112(g) Experiences Eric Cornwell Acting Manager Permitting Program.
The Paper and Other Web Coating (POWC) MACT – Executive Summary The executive summary is a power point presentation designed to be used for basic education.
Massachusetts Multi-pollutant Power Plant Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection EPA Utility MACT Working Group.
Virtual Analyser What is it Have you ever faced an analyser failure that requires a plant shut down to repair & wished that there.
Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) November 24, 2009.
Update on Methane Regulations Affecting Landfills Pat Sullivan Senior Vice President SCS Engineers Nov. 10, 2015.
Alternatives to BART Rule Discussion with WRAP Nov , 2006.
1 City of Shelby Wastewater Treatment Division Becomes State’s Second Public Agency to Implement a Certified Environmental Management System CERTIFICATION.
1 Special Information Session on USEPA’s Carbon Rules & Clean Air Act Section 111 North Carolina Division of Air Quality Special Information Session on.
1 City of Shelby Environmental Management System -QUALITY ALWAYS- IT’S ABOUT THE PEOPLE Presented by: Cynthia I.Walters Presented by: Cynthia I.Walters.
George E. Detsis Manager, Analytical Services Program United States Department of Energy Office of Health, Safety and Security Office of Sustainability.
All About Waste Dallas, TX ♦ May 18, 2016 Carrie Yonley, P.E.
RACT 2 – Source Testing and Monitoring Requirements Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee August 4, 2016 Harrisburg, PA Tom Wolf, GovernorPatrick McDonnell,
Complying with Periodic Emissions Monitoring Requirements
Control Chart Methodology for Evaluating CEMS Data
Preparing for Permit Review
What is the Boiler NESHAP?
AWMA Georgia Chapter Regulatory Conference
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
EPA/OAQPS Pollutant Emissions Measurement Update 2019
Presentation transcript:

| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC Boiler MACT Compliance Plans: Failure to Develop Plans Is Planning to Fail Susie Bowden| | August 19, 2015 Presented to A&WMA Southern Section Annual Meeting

2 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business. Agenda  Who Is Required to Develop Plans?  Performance Test Plan  Site-Specific Monitoring Plan  Site-Specific Fuel Sampling Plan  Optional Plans  Proposed Plan  Questions and Open Discussions

3 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  Facilities subject to the emissions limits and/or operating limits in Tables 1 or 2 or 11 through 13 of the Rule  Facilities with Gas 1 boilers do not have emissions limits or operating limits = NO PLANS Who Is Required to Develop Plans?

Performance Test Plan

5 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business. Performance Test Plan  40 CFR § (a) [Develop and submit upon request]  Plan Requirements [§63.7(c)]: Program Contact and Responsibilities Test Program Schedule Test Conditions Test Method Performance Audit (PA) Unit/Process Operation and Parameter Monitoring Control Device Operation and Monitoring Stack Sampling Location Pollutant-specific Reference Methods Emission Test Data Reduction

6 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  If requested, must be submitted at least 60 calendar days before date of the performance test.  The level of complexity will go up depending on the following: Number of worst-case fuel mixtures Number of boilers in the test program Number of control devices Performance Test Plan

Site-Specific Monitoring Plan

8 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business. Site-Specific Monitoring Plan  40 CFR § (d) [Develop and submit upon request]  Required for CMS (i.e., CEMS, COMS, and/or CPMS)  Plan Requirements: Initial and subsequent calibration Determination and adjustment of the calibration drift Preventative maintenance, including spare parts inventory Accuracy audit procedures, including sampling and analysis methods Program of corrective action for a malfunctioning CMS Basis for selection of measurement location relative to each affected source such that the measurement is representative

9 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business. Site-Specific Monitoring Plan Equipment and specifications of the CMS, which include:  Sample interface  Pollutant concentration or parametric signal analyzer  Data collection and reduction systems Procedures for the ongoing Operation and Maintenance (O&M), data quality assurance, and ongoing recordkeeping and reporting  If requested, must be submitted at least 60 calendar days before date of the performance test.

10 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  The level of complexity will go up depending on the following: Lack of existing QA plans Lack of manufacturer/performance specifications Lack of O&M procedures or SOPs Number of control devices Number of boilers Site-Specific Monitoring Plan

Site-Specific Fuel Sampling Plan

12 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business. Site-Specific Fuel Sampling Plan  40 CFR § (b) [Develop and submit for approval if using an alternative analytical method other than those listed in Table 6 of Subpart DDDDD]  Plan Requirements: Identification of the fuels that are to be combusted Determination of who will be conducting the fuel analysis Detailed description of the sample locations and procedures for collecting and preparing the samples Specification of the analytical methods, along with minimum detection levels, to be used Presentation of the calculations and supporting documentation

13 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  The level of complexity will go up depending on the following: Number of fuels Number and type of sampling locations Number of boilers Need to use alternative analytical method, triggering the need to submit to U.S. EPA Using total select metals (TSM) in lieu of PM Site-Specific Fuel Sampling Plan

Optional Plans

15 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  Emissions Averaging Plan [40 CFR § (g)] If emissions averaging is chosen as the compliance option, then plan required that details:  Identification of boilers in averaging group  Identification of monitored process parameter for each group  Specific control technology or pollution prevention methods used for each boiler  Test plan for measurement of emissions Optional Plans

16 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business. Optional Plans  Energy Efficiency Implementation Plan [40 CFR § (d)] If an existing boiler meets the criteria to take credit for implementing energy conservation measures identified during the energy assessment, then an implementation plan must be developed and include:  Identification of boilers to include in applying efficiency credits  Description of the energy conservation measures implemented along with the energy savings  Explanation of the criteria utilized for determining the energy savings

Proposed Plan

18 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  Startup/Shutdown Plan Part of the proposed reconsiderations Plan describing work practices and procedures to be following during periods of startup and shutdown Proposed Plan

| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC Questions & Open Discussions Susie Bowden| | August 19, 2015