Thyroid dose estimation for epidemiologic studies André Bouville (NCI, retired) and Vladimir Drozdovitch (NCI) Workshop on Radiation and Thyroid Cancer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Claudia Landman and Wolfgang Raskob
Advertisements

CAC Meeting May 20, 2008 Computer Modeling of Impacts.
1 Consumer Exposure Assessment at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: A ccomplishments and Opportunities for Global Collaboration Thomas Brennan.
NIRS Estimation of Internal Dose to the Thyroid Osamu KURIHARA, Ph.D National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS) The International Workshop on Radiation.
Recommendations on Health Care and Medical Monitoring to the governments of Belarus, Russian Federation and Ukraine Chernobyl Forum Vienna 6-7 September.
Radiologic Terrorism Radiation Exposure Dirty Bombs Atomic Bombs Five decades after the first atomic bomb Terrorist atomic bomb Nuclear Power Plants Three.
Childhood Thyroid Cancer in Russia Following the Chernobyl accident V.K. Ivanov Chairman, Russian Scientific Commission on Radiological Protection Medical.
Environmental Health III. Epidemiology Shu-Chi Chang, Ph.D., P.E., P.A. Assistant Professor 1 and Division Chief 2 1 Department of Environmental Engineering.
Environmental Health XIV. Standards and Monitoring Shu-Chi Chang, Ph.D., P.E., P.A. Assistant Professor 1 and Division Chief 2 1 Department of Environmental.
Adventures in Dose Reconstruction Lynn R. Anspaugh, Ph.D. Research Professor of Radiobiology Radiology Department, School of Medicine University of Utah,
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Emergency Response Protective Actions Day 10 – Lecture 3.
NATO meeting, Kaunas, August 8-10, Chernobyl disaster and experience of population protection from nuclear accident Chernobyl disaster and experience.
SS6G9 The student will discuss environmental issues in Europe
Hanford Thyroid Disease Study (HTDS) Final Report Michael A. McGeehin, Ph.D., M.S.P.H. Director Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects National.
SS6G9 The student will discuss environmental issues in Europe
Manish Chaudhary BPH, MPH
Nonrenewable Energy Sources Learning Goal: I will be able to list various types of nonrenewable energy sources, discuss potential environmental concerns.
Jed Harrison Office of Radiation & Indoor Air.  Review the Incident – What Happened  Describe the EPA Response  Review EPA’s RadNet Monitoring System.
EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency Mike Boyd, Senior Health Physicist EPA/Office of Radiation & Indoor Air Presented at 2011 OAS Annual.
Radiation and Thyroid Cancer Workshop, February 2014, Tokyo, Japan 1 |1 | WHO Thyroid Dose Estimation following the Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident WHO.
Chernobyl disaster April 26, The Chernobyl disaster was a nuclear reactor accident in the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in the Ukraine, which used.
International Workshop on Radiation and Thyroid Cancer Summary/Conclusions and Recommendations – Day 3 From RERF LSS: Excess relative risk goes down with.
International Workshop on Radiation and Thyroid Cancer Concluding Remarks Since 1950 the global incidence of thyroid cancer has been increasing, even without.
Environmental Issues in Europe
Response Overview and Population Monitoring Presentation to: RRVC Hands-On Training Workshop Presented by: Betsy T. Kagey, PhD Date: November 16 th, 2013.
Nuclear Exposure The Role of Potassium Iodide Evelyn R. Hermes-DeSantis, Pharm.D., BCPS Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy Rutgers the State University of.
Internal Emitters Radioactive material within the body.
The political aspects of monitoring radioactive materials in the environment of our region E. Wirth, M Zähringer Federal Office for Radiation Protection,
Thyroid Cancer Risk from In Utero Exposure to Chernobyl Fallout Maureen Hatch Workshop on Radiation and Thyroid Cancer Tokyo, Japan 22 February 2014.
1 Institute of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Kyiv, Ukraine 2 U.S. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, U.S.A 3 Scientific Centre for Radiation Medicine,
Chernobyl disaster The worst man-made disaster in human history.
James A. FitzPatrick NPP Ingestion Pathway Exercise May and June 21-23, 2011 and LHD Radiological Plan Template Kevin Kraus Associate Radiological.
From Chernobyl to Fukushima: introduction Conveners of GI1.4 session M. Yamauchi (Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Sweden) Oleg Voitsekhovych (Ukrainian.
ANALYTICAL X-RAY SAFETY User Training Centre for Environmental Health, Safety and Security Management.
Basic Survey: External dose estimation Radiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University The International.
Incidence of malignant tumors in Republic of Belarus after the Chernobyl accident A. Okeanov, E. Sosnovskaya International Sakharov Environmental University,
11 IAEA 56 th General Conference Senior Regulators’ meeting The French doctrine for the management of the Post-Accident Nuclear Situation André-Claude.
Environmental pollution Chernobyl 1986 Dudyrev Bogdan 8.
Thyroid equivalent doses due to radioiodine(I-131) intake for evacuees caused by the nuclear accident in Fukushima S. Tokonami, M. Hosoda (Hirosaki Univ.)
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Assessment and Response during Radiological Emergency Dose Assessment Overview Lecture IAEA.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Emergency Response Protective Actions Day 10 – Lecture 3.
Chernobyl disaster The worst manmade disaster in human history.
Re-suspension of the radioactive fallout after the Fukushima accident: Risk of internal dose during the first week and the first two months M. Yamauchi,
February 2012 better environment with nuclear energy Nuclear Power: Facts and Fiction Better Environment with Nuclear Energy.
Chernobyl A mass nuclear meltdown. What happened! The Chernobyl disaster reactor accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, or simply "Chernobyl"
1 Chapter 9 Nuclear Radiation 9.1 Natural Radioactivity Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education, Inc.
The International Workshop on Radiation and Thyroid Cancer (Day 2 ) Dose EstimationEffects Identification Dose Response Relationship Risk Estimation.
Part 1d: Exposure Assessment and Modeling Thomas Robins, MD, MPH.
Part X, Module X.2, Lesson X.2.2 Protective Actions Lecture
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 7, 2011.
Ukraine. Background On April 26, 1986, a sudden surge of power during a reactor systems test destroyed Unit 4 of the nuclear power station at Chernobyl,
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 18, 2011.
С hernobyl nuclear power plant accident in Ukraine. С hernobyl nuclear power plant accident in Ukraine.
April 26,  Timeline of the disaster Timeline of the disaster.
By: Jazmine Porter.  Chernobyl is a man made power plant. This power plant was a nuclear disaster.  On April 26,1986, Reactor #4 at the Chernobyl.
Short how nuclear plant works how nuclear power works.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
NS 210 – Unit 3 Seminar Interview Techniques Leslie Young MS RD LDN.
Fukushima: the continuing crisis Dr Ian Fairlie Consultant on Radiation in the Environment London, United Kingdom
The accidents at Fukushima Dai-Ichi Summary of Health Discussions
Fukushima city Kouri city mSv/hr mSv/hr → mSv/year
SS6G9 I can discuss environmental issues in Europe
SS6G9 The student will discuss environmental issues in Europe
Figure 2. Dose distribution function for thyroid cancer cases and for healthy members of the cohort for adults (18 y of age and older at the time of the.
9.5 Nuclear Power Although nuclear power does not come from a fossil fuel, it is fueled by uranium, which is obtained from mining and is non-renewable.
Chernobyl disaster The worst manmade disaster in human history
Radioactive material within the body
Health effects of Chernobyl
SS6G9 The student will discuss environmental issues in Europe
SS6G9 The student will discuss environmental issues in Europe
Presentation transcript:

Thyroid dose estimation for epidemiologic studies André Bouville (NCI, retired) and Vladimir Drozdovitch (NCI) Workshop on Radiation and Thyroid Cancer Tokyo, Japan, 22 February

Outline Background information Principles of dose reconstruction Examples of studies and dose estimates Concluding remarks 2

Background information 3

Analytic epidemiologic studies Requirement: – Unbiased individual dose estimates for a large number of subjects Examples of studies: – Chernobyl: UA-US and BY-US studies among children – Chernobyl: UA-US in utero study – Fallout: Marshall Islands study 4

Exposure Pathways

Pasture-cow-milk pathway ( 131 I)

Principles of thyroid dose reconstruction in a large environmental study 7

Six Principles of Dose Reconstruction 8 ● Perform person-based measurements. ● Administer interviews. ● Conduct environmental measurements. ● Obtain realistic estimates of dose. ● Validate the dose estimates. ● Estimate the uncertainties attached to the dose estimates.

Principle #1: person-based measurements 9 ● Objective: perform as many person-based measurements as possible. ● Rationale: dose estimates are much less uncertain when they are based on: person-based measurements, than on environmental radiation measurements, or on data on activities released into the environment.

Thyroid dose is propor- tional to area under the curve Thyroid Dose Estimation (multiple measurements) 10

Thyroid dose is propor- tional to area under the curve Curve derived from 131 I models plus data from questionnaire Thyroid Dose Estimation (usual case) 11

Principle #2: personal interviews 12 ● Objective: identify the conditions of radioiodine intake as early as possible. ● Rationale: - the internal dose estimates are very sensitive to the conditions of radioiodine intake. It is important to clarify if inhalation occurred in a single day or over several days and if ingestion was a significant mode of exposure, - because of memory loss, the personal interviews should be performed soon after the accident.

Personal interview

Inhalation: residence history (including number of hours spent indoors) during the first two months following the accident Ingestion: consumption rates and origin (market or own garden) of water, milk, and leafy vegetables Countermeasures: sheltering, evacuation, and/or stable iodine administration, if conducted 14 Questions to interviewees (in case of exposure to 131 I)

Principle #3: environmental measurements 15 ● Objective: development of a model predicting the variation with time of the intake rate of 131 I. ● Rationale: - environmental measurements ( 131 I in air, water, soil, vegetation, foodstuffs Cs in air and soil) are the best data that could supplement the person-based measurements, - when environmental measurements are not available, estimates of released activities, combined with models of atmospheric transport, have to be used.

137 Cs deposition map (Chernobyl accident)

Principle #4: realistic dose estimation Principle #5: validation of dose estimates Principle #6: estimation of uncertainties 17 ● Objectives: obtain realistic (unbiased) estimates of dose for all subjects of the epidemiologic study; make sure that the estimated doses are reasonably reliable; and quantify the uncertainties ● Rationale: the dose estimates have to be credible and arguments must exist to defend their credibility.

Examples of studies and dose estimates 18

Chornobyl Accident – 26 April 1986 The most severe accident that ever occurred in the nuclear power industry.

NCI Chornobyl thyroid study Cohort study of about 25,000 subjects (13,000 Ukrainians and 12,000 Belarusians) exposed as children. Lived in contaminated areas of Ukraine and Belarus. All subjects had a person-based measurement ( 131 I activity in the thyroid). 20

Distribution of thyroid dose estimates 21 Thyroid dose interval (Gy) Number of subjects UkraineBelarus N%N% <0.26, , – 0.492, , – 1.992, , – ≥ All13, , Mean (Gy)

Distribution of GSD according to dose (Ukrainian cohort) 22 GSD intervalN% Mean thyroid dose (Gy) ≥ – – 1.994, – 1.497,

In-utero study of thyroid cancer in Ukraine Number of subjects: 2,584, including three groups: Subgroup L1-C: 720 subjects. Their mothers: – lived in a contaminated area in April-June 1986; and – had a person-based measurement ( 131 I activity in thyroid). Subgroup L2-C: 776 subjects. Their mothers: – lived in a contaminated area in April-June 1986; and – did not have a person-based measurement, but a number of women from the same settlement of residence had such a measurement. Subgroup L1-NC: 1088 subjects. Their mothers: – lived in a non-contaminated area in April-June 1986; and – did not have a person-bases measurement, and no other woman from the same settlement of residence had such a measurement. 23

Estimation of doses for the 2,584 in-utero subjects 24 Direct thyroid measurements (for 720 MOTHERS) Subjects of contaminated areas 1496 Subjects of “non-contaminated” areas 1088 Individual Questionnaires History of pregnancy Behavior: milk consumption milk consumption leafy vegetablesleafy vegetables relocation Sets of personal information

25 Results of in utero thyroid dose calculation Thyroid dose, mGy Contaminated areas (L1-C + L2-C) “Non-contaminated” areas (L1-NC) Number of persons % % > Total

: 66 nuclear tests, ~100 MT 66 nuclear tests, ~100 MT Release of 131 I: Release of 131 I: 150 Chernobyl 1500 Fukushima 1954: BRAVO test 1954: BRAVO test Resulted in high doses in northern atolls and to evacuations. Nuclear weapons testing in the Marshall Islands

There are significant differences in estimating internal doses for Marshallese compared to estimating doses to populations exposed to fallout from the Chernobyl or Fukushima accidents: 1)No animal milk products available. 2)Unusual exposure pathways.

Bioassay of urine from Rongelap community members collected within 16 to19 days of fallout exposure from the BRAVO test provided the first ever measurements to confirm 131 I from exposure to fallout. Marshall Islands: person-based measurements

Estimates of thyroid dose (mGy) to adults MajuroKwajaleinUtrikRongelap Internal dose (short-term) ,600 Internal dose (long-term) INTERNAL DOSE (TOTAL) ,600 EXTERNAL DOSE ,600 29

Concluding remarks 30

Concluding remarks (1 of 2) All dose reconstructions are different because: – Radioactive releases are different – Environmental conditions are different – Population habits are different, and – Countermeasures are different. However, there are principles of dose reconstruction that apply to all environmental studies. 31

Concluding remarks (2 of 2) It is important to obtain realistic estimates of dose because: – they may be used in research projects such as epidemiologic studies or risk assessment, – the affected populations have the right to know the extent to which they were exposed to radiation. Multi-agency cooperation and multi-disciplinary expertise is needed to obtain dose estimates of a high degree of reliability. 32

33