Sponsored Educational Group Participation in Abilene Laurie Burns Director, Member Activities, Internet2 EDUCAUSE Gathering of State Networks Denver, Colorado.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FRGP – NLR/I2 Marla Meehl Manager of the FRGP 3/4/08.
Advertisements

High Performance Internet Service at the University of Michigan December 1999 Internet2 These slides are available from the U-M I2 Web page:
National Networking Going Forward Scenarios Larry Conrad Florida State University Florida LambdaRail February 20-21, 2007.
Internet2 Update Gathering of State Networks 2005 Heather Bruning, Program Manager, Network Services Heather Boyles, Director, Member and Partner Relations.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
| University of Missouri Copyright ©2007 MOREnet and The Curators of the University of Missouri 1 Telehealth in Missouri Annual Meeting.
High Performance Internet Service at the University of Michigan April 2000 Internet2 These slides are available from the U-M I2 Web page:
Copyright Dikran Kassabian and Gregory Palmer, This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material to.
Healthcare Connect Fund and Remote Areas Fund Chris Barron Alexicon.
Abilene Transit Security Policy Joint Techs Summer ’05 Vancouver, BC, CA Steve Cotter Director, Network Services Steve Cotter Director,
Internet2 A Project of the University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development Ted Hanss Director, Applications Development VIEWNET April 1998.
Current Status of Abilene Sponsored Education Group Participants (SEGPs) Internet2 K-20 Initiative Heather Bruning, Abilene Project Coordinator 7 February.
Internet2 K20 Initiative & SEGP Update  2003 Gathering of State Networks  Heather Bruning, Abilene Program Manager February 5, 2003 Copyright Heather.
Advanced Networking and Internet2: The Role of Regional, State and Local Participants Laurie Burns Director of Member Activities EDUCAUSE Gathering of.
July 9, 2015 Georgia Department of Behavioral Health & Developmental Disabilities Residential and Respite Cost Study Overview of Proposed Rate Models.
WELCOME! We will begin our webinar at the top of the hour As you log on, do not be surprised if you don’t hear anyone else; participants are placed on.
NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program CTRP User Meeting May 2, 2012 Gene Kraus CTRP Program Director.
Developing and Sustaining a Part C Finance System: Connecticut.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. Title I - Part A In a nutshell….a primer.
BCNET Security Policies Jens Haeusser Information Security Officer, UBC and Chair, Security Working Group, BCNET Internet2 Joint Techs Vancouver, BC July.
1 California Teleconnect Fund (CTF) Communications Division California Public Utilities Commission September 2011.
Innovating the commodity Internet Update to CENIC 14-Mar-2007.
K-20 Education Network Update for the NWESD Districts May 9, 2013.
RI Telecommunications Education Access Fund (RITEAF) RI Department of Education June 12, 2015.
Presentation to Qwest Travel Services Meeting and Events Commodity Meetings Where Everything Works.
1 The Quilt Wendy Huntoon Executive Director, The Quilt I2 Members Meeting May 8, 2002.
Internet2 & the Internet2 K20 Initiative  CHECO Spring 2002 Conference  Heather Bruning, Abilene Program Manager April 16, 2002.
August 2010 Jeff Reel. KANSAS CALIFORNIA FLORIDA COLORADO INDIANA ILLINOIS CONNECTICUT MASSACHUSETTS RHODE ISLAND OREGON OHIO WISCONSIN IDAHO TEXAS LOUISIANA.
Abilene Update Joint Techs Summer ’05 Vancouver, CA Steve Cotter Director, Network Services Steve Cotter Director, Network Services.
Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Grant Program Tate Gould, Program Officer US Department of Education.
Quality Assurance. Identified Benefits that the Core Skills Programme is expected to Deliver 1.Increased efficiency in the delivery of Core Skills Training.
Current Status of Abilene Sponsored Education Group Participants Internet2 K-20 Initiative Heather Bruning, Abilene Project Coordinator 4 August 2001.
Policy Committee Meeting Fiscal Year 2004 Budget Considerations: Dark Fiber November 13, 2002.
The Research and Education Network: Platform for Innovation Heather Boyles, Next Generation Network Symposium Malaysia 2007-March-15.
Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment Program (DSRIP), Transforming the Medicaid Health Care System.
Interim Executive Director June  Financial Management Practices Audit Results Fiscal Year Audit Results Fiscal Year Internal.
Internet2 All Staff Meeting November 29, 2001 Financial Review.
Internet2 Fall Conference October 4, 2001 Partnering for Success MAX – Qwest Alliance Builds a High Performance Network in the Washington, D.C. Metro Area.
Update. Internet2 Update2 Brief History Internet2 project 1996 Formed University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development UCAID developed national.
Common Business Models 9/28/2006 What is Your Business? Common Business Models Among RON’s and GigaPoP’s.
Universal Service Support for Rural Health Care Georgia Partnership for TeleHealth Conference – March 26, 2010 Rural Health Care Division Universal Service.
Preparatory projects and funding opportunities 21 st April 2010 – Portrush, Northern Ireland Teresa Lennon and Michael O’Brien European Union European.
Delivering Circuit Services to Researchers: The HOPI Testbed Rick Summerhill Director, Network Research, Architecture, and Technologies, Internet2 Joint.
The Future of the Internet and Internet2 IEC Executive 2001 Douglas E. Van Houweling President and CEO, UCAID IEC Executive
Abilene SEGP Update  Tennessee Statewide Network Planning Meeting  Heather Bruning, Abilene Program Manager May 13, 2003.
The NCI Central IRB Initiative Third Annual Medical Research Summit Washington, D.C. March 2003.
Sponsored Educational Group Participation in Abilene Laurie Burns Director, Member Activities, Internet2 EDUCAUSE Gathering of State Networks Denver, Colorado.
Statenet Project –STAR Schools STATEWIDE K-12 NETWORKS: Cooperation, Collaboration and Convergence EDUCAUSE: A Gathering of State Networks April 18, 2000.
Internet2 Update Copyright Heather Bruning, Internet2, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material.
Introduction to Internet2 Laurie Burns Director of Member Activities, Internet2 AN-MSI Internet 2 Planning Conference University of Texas at El Paso April.
Implementation: Results from the Using Your Regional ITS Architecture Peer Exchange Network Workshop Mac Lister FHWA Resource Center ITS America Annual.
Boulder Research and Administration Network (BRAN), Front Range GigaPoP (FRGP), Bi-State Optical Network (BiSON) 1 Marla Meehl UCAR/FRGP/BiSON Manager.
The Front Range GigaPop (FRGP) Jeff Custard Network Engineer for the Network Engineering and Technology Section at NCAR CHECO Presentation September.
Internet2 End-to-End (e2e) Performance Initiative Laurie Burns Steve Corbató Internet2 Fall Member Meeting Atlanta, Georgia October 31, 2000.
Prepared by Commission staff for presentation purposes only. These slides should not be considered an official summary of the order or an official Commission.
1 California Teleconnect Fund (CTF) Communications Division California Public Utilities Commission September 2009.
Abilene Overview and Connectivity Options NSF-HPNC Proposal Preparation Workshop Heather Bruning, Abilene Program Manager 12 April 2002.
30 November 2001 Advisory Panel on Cyber Infrastructure National Science Foundation Douglas Van Houweling November 30, 2001 National Science Foundation.
7 May 2002 Next Generation Abilene Internet2 Member Meeting Washington DC Internet2 Member Meeting Washington DC.
APNIC Update The state of IP address distribution and its impact to business operations Elly Tawhai Senior Internet Resource Analyst/Liaison Officer, Pacific,
REN-ISAC Research and Education Networking Information Sharing and Analysis Center Doug Pearson REN-ISAC Director Internet2 Security WG BoF October 14,
Director of Membership Activities  Jane Ryland. Applications Strategy Council  Tom DeFanti University of Illinois, Chicago.
Abilene: Everything You’ve Always Wanted to Know, but Couldn’t Find on the Web Site Brown Bag Session Heather Bruning, Abilene Program Manager 13 August.
Timeline to a Successful Implementation of the Community Eligibility Provision.
Ghana Academic and Research Network (GARNET)
Internet Traffic Management and Accounting Workshop
Internet2 Tutorials Everything You Wanted To Know About Internet2 and Where To Find It Lee Perlis, Adam Csillag, Louis Biely This is a general overview.
National R&E networking infrastructure
IPv6 in Internet2 This is a general overview presentation about Internet2. Internet2 is a consortium, led by US universities, which is recreating the partnership.
Abilene Update Rick Summerhill
Presentation transcript:

Sponsored Educational Group Participation in Abilene Laurie Burns Director, Member Activities, Internet2 EDUCAUSE Gathering of State Networks Denver, Colorado April 30, 2001

2 Agenda Background Abilene Expanded Access Sponsored Participation in Abilene Sponsored Individual Institutions Sponsored Educational Groups Q&A

3 Background Internet2 is a membership organization Internet2 members have access to multiple national backbones (Abilene, vBNS, federal NGI networks) Internet2 membership vs. Abilene participation

4 Background Internet2 Began in 1996 Activities in advanced applications development, middleware, advanced network services, end-to-end performance 304 members (186 University members, 8 state or regional networking organizations)

5 Abilene – April, 2001 Current state Announced in April, 1998, launched in February, current and pending connections in 49 states 185 participants in 47 states and D.C. OC-48c (2.5 Gbps) IP-over-SONET backbone Ongoing strong partnership – Cisco, Nortel, Qwest, Indiana University, ITECs (N. Carolina and Ohio) Increasing backbone utilization Characteristic exponential growth O(OC-12c) peak utilization on some links Traffic doubling time: 7 months

6 Abilene Participation Arises from contributions to network development (stakeholder rather than customer model) Is characterized by collaborative use of advanced research, instructional, clinical and content applications

7 Sponsored Participation Mechanism to allow non-members to participate in Abilene Considered first and foremost a member benefit Created in response to expressed member needs Corresponds to Internet2’s tech transfer goal and Expanded Access initiative Supplements Internet2’s core focus on higher education’s advanced networking agenda

8 Abilene Participation Primary Participation University Members Affiliate and Corporate Members with Collaboration Site Status * * Collaboration Site Status allows Affiliate and Corporate Members to designate a physical location, such as a research lab, to connect to Abilene

9 Abilene Participation Sponsored Sponsored Individual Institutions Individual educational or research-oriented institutions, museums, art galleries, libraries, hospitals, etc. who are sponsored by a Regular University member Sponsored Educational Groups State networks of predominantly educational organizations, such as state K-12 networks who are sponsored by a Regular University member in the same state

10 Abilene Participation Fees Primary Participants $20,000/year Sponsored Individual Institution Participants no fees to Internet2 Sponsored Educational Group Participants $30,000/year, plus $2,000/congressional representative, paid by the connector to Internet2

11 Sponsored Participation (individual institutions) Introduced in November, 1999 Over 20 sponsored participants and over 15 sponsors Focused on collaborations between an educational or research organization and Internet2 member(s), or with other sponsored participants

12 Sponsored Education Group Participation Introduced in October, 2000 Designed primarily to accommodate existing and emerging state-based education networks Supplements, does not replace, sponsored individual institution participation Intended to support regional aggregation Focused on supporting advanced application uses by networked aggregates of educational institutions

13 Current SEPG Status Approved: California Michigan Missouri Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Rhode Island Virginia Washington Applied: Georgia Indiana Pennsylvania

14 Sponsorship Only University members can be sponsors for individual sponsored participants or SEGPs One or more member universities may sponsor a networked aggregate of educational organizations in the same state In states with multiple state education networks, one or more sponsors can work with the same Abilene Connector to aggregate these networks’ traffic

15 Role of the Sponsor At the outset, the sponsor(s) works to identify an Abilene connector document the proposed network’s commitment to deploying advanced networking describe at least one advanced application identify any Carnegie Doctoral/Research-Extensive (D/R-E) institutions within the sponsored network upon approval of the SEGP, the sponsor retains overall responsibility for ensuring that the use of the connection is appropriate and supported appropriately, and submits annual updates to Internet2

16 Role of the Abilene Connector A Connector supporting the SEGP(s) must maintain a 7x24 Network Operations Center (NOC) that is accessible to the Abilene NOC register its routing information and that of the Participant(s) in the Internet2 Routing Registry (I2db) or equivalent mediate the Participant’s access to Abilene via at least one router cont’d…

17 Role of the Abilene Connector A Connector supporting the SEGP(s) must provide Internet2 with a quarterly report on the relative utilization of the Abilene connection by the SEGP(s) assure compliance with the Abilene CoU by the SEGP(s) inform the Participant(s) that Abilene does not provide transit to the commodity Internet Upon approval, the Connector assumes fiscal and operational responsibility for the SEGP

18 Requirements for the SEGP A Sponsored Education Group must use a distinct origin Autonomous System Number (ASN) so that the requirement for characterization of relative utilization can be met not use Abilene to transit any intra-state traffic within its own network, in the event that the SEGP is multiply homed to Abilene obtain access through a connection also serving at least one Abilene participant that is a University Member of Internet2

19 Establishing Connectivity The sponsor completes the SEGP application, including a description of at least one advanced application project Internet2 review the application for completeness and accept or continue work on it The Connector completes the Connection Agreement The routes are approved by Internet2 and forwarded to the NOC Traffic flows!

20 SEGP Fee Proportional to state population $30,000 + $2,000 x (Size of state’s U.S. House delegation) Delegation size provides a readily auditable population metric Charged annually on a per-connecting organization, per- state basis Paid directly by the Abilene Connector on behalf of the Sponsored Participant Is not eligible for any discounting under the K-12 Schools and Libraries program of the Universal Service Fund (also known as E-rate) Amount and scaling of this fee will be reassessed on an annual basis

21 Questions? Thank you!

22 Program Changes General end of new OC-3c Abilene backbone connections Effective November 1, 2000 Existing and pending OC-3c connections will be unaffected Revised fee structure for OC-12c and OC-48c connections Objective is to incent bandwidth upgrades for existing connectors Local connection collaboration Collaboration on a single backbone attachment for Abilene participants within the same LATA will be strongly encouraged

23 Revised Abilene annual connection fees PreviousNew OC-3c$110,000($110,000) SONET & ATM OC-12c$320,000$270,000 SONET $280,000 ATM/1 PVC & 1 BGP peering $290,000 ATM OC-48c$495,000$430,000 SONET

24 Abilene Cost Recovery New connection fees take effect upon either agreement renewal or upgrade date Participation fee for Internet2 members remains $20,000 per annum