NIH Grant Project ChemEng 590B 2/21/13. Outline of Project 1.Come up with a creative tissue engineering topic to study, advance, and present via an NIH-style.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.
Advertisements

Case Studies M.Sc. in Applied Statistics Dr. Órlaith Burke Michaelmas Term 2012.
Why R03? Something is better than nothing The R03 (Small Grant) mechanism supports small research projects that can be carried out in a short period of.
NIH Grant Project ChemEng 575 3/12/15.
Understanding the Writing Process: The Seven Steps
LS504: Applied Research in Legal Studies Unit 1
2IF03: Seminar Information Security Technology
Computational Biology Journal Club aka “Current Topics in Computational Biology” aka “02-701” William Cohen Organizational Meeting Sept 6, 2007.
Writing a research application Ewa Ehrenborg 1. 2 Research application Write a grant application 3-4 students/group Send in title by Thursday November.
Welcome to Turnitin.com’s Peer Review! This tour will take you through the basics of Turnitin.com’s Peer Review. The goal of this tour is to give you.
Advanced Topics in Next- Generation Wireless Networks Qian Zhang Department of Computer Science HKUST.
Introduce the Peer Review Project
Decoding RFAs and PAs Charlotte FlippDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health (EpiCH) Anne EverettDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health (EpiCH)
COMP 14 Introduction to Programming Miguel A. Otaduy Summer Session I, 2004 MTWRF 9:45-11:15 am Sitterson Hall 014.
CSE 322: Software Reliability Engineering Topics covered: Course outline and schedule Introduction, Motivation and Basic Concepts.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 4
Psychology 366 Research Project Jen St.Onge Kenny Building, Room #3506 Website:
ENGL 1302: WEEK 7 (BRIEF ASSIGNMENT 4) SECTION 001 AND 006 MR. LABRIOLA.
Getting Funded: How to write a good grant
Formulating an important research question Susan Furth, MD, PhD Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research
Monday, August 31st Warm Up Read Aloud
The R21 Mechanism. Your guide through the R21 jungle* Patricia Parmelee, PhD (Pat to you) * jun’ gle, n.: a confused or disordered mass of objects; something.
A Roadmap to Success Writing an Effective Research Grant Proposal Bob Miller, PhD Regents Professor Oklahoma State University 2011 Bob Miller, PhD Regents.
Writing a research application Ewa Ehrenborg 1. 2 Research application Write a grant application 3-4 students/group Follow-up November 14 th, 21 st and.
 Getting started  Elements of a research proposal  Tips  Timeline  Submitting your document as an NIH Individual Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research.
From the Initial Idea to the Finished Product. How to Produce an Effective Essay.
Prof. Matthew Hertz WTC 207D /
CSCI 51 Introduction to Computer Science Dr. Joshua Stough January 20, 2009.
Final Presentation Take out Sr. Project Handbooks Page 24.
Research and Writing Seminar Thursday, – 16 35, room C To find an up-to-date version of the schedule and to read the papers check the website
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
Presubmission Proposal Reviews at the College of Nursing (CON) Nancy T. Artinian, PhD, RN, FAAN Associate Dean for Research and Professor.
What Makes a Good Project Michael A. Mackey August 27, 2004.
CS 858 – Hot Topics in Computer and Communications Security Winter 2009 Introduction.
INTRODUCTION The observance of Earth Day began in 1970 to increase awareness of problems with the environment. April 22 nd has been set aside for Americans.
Where are you joining us from
EDP 389H: Educational Disabilities in the Schools January 22nd, 2009.
Tips on Fellowship Writing A Reviewer’s Perspective Wendy Havran.
Writing a research application Ewa Ehrenborg 1. 2 Research application Write a grant application 3-4 students/group Send in title by Friday November 23.
Using the NCBI SciENcv application to generate NIH Biosketches in new format Hermanie Pierre-Noel and Silvia Pulido, Ph.D University of Central Florida.
Senior Project Presentation Guidelines. When Will My Presentation Be? Determine how many days of presentations we need College Now students sign up first.
Ian F. C. Smith Writing a Journal Paper. 2 Disclaimer / Preamble This is mostly opinion. Suggestions are incomplete. There are other strategies. A good.
Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.
Insider Guide to Peer Review for Applicants Dr. Valerie Durrant Acting Director CSR Division of Neuroscience, Development and Aging.
CM220 College Composition II Friday, January 29, Unit 1: Introduction to Effective Academic and Professional Writing Unit 1 Lori Martindale, Instructor.
How to prepare for the future, within and outside the course Ewa Ehrenborg 1.
Program Assessment – an overview Karen E. Dennis O: sasoue.rutgers.edu.
R01? R03? R21? How to choose the right funding mechanism Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Navigating the Proposal Process Keys to Successful Submission.
Completing the Proposal: Understanding our Process and Requirements October 11, 2012 EPD 397 Sections 8 and 9.
Dissertation Guidelines for Students MSc in Econ; MSc EIFE 2016/2017
MMW 15 TA: Kyle Knabb Week 1.
NATA Foundation Student Grants Process
02086 Writing Inspirations Aalto University
02086 Writing Inspirations Aalto University
Structure of Homework Assignments
ECE361 Engineering Practice
CPSC : Collaborative Computing & Personal Informatics
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
How to write an empirical research project in (labor) economics
02086 Writing Inspirations Aalto University
NIH Grant Project ChemEng 575 3/10/16.
NIH Grant Project ChemEng 575 3/23/17.
Grant Writing Information Session
EDU5810 EDUCATIONAL POLICY AND PLANNING DR. RAMLI BIN BASRI
Senior Action Research Project
Paper Expectations PSY 475.
Homework Reading Machine Projects Labs
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Presentation transcript:

NIH Grant Project ChemEng 590B 2/21/13

Outline of Project 1.Come up with a creative tissue engineering topic to study, advance, and present via an NIH-style grant and class presentation. 2.3 groups of 4: after everything is graded: 50% of your individual, final grade. 3.Project involves 4 major parts: 1.A grant review panel, April 2 nd, in class (10%) 2.A specific aims page, which introduces me to your proposed topic, due April 11 th (10%) 3.A full paper grant, that must adhere to the guidelines for an NIH R03, R21, or R01 mechanism, due April 23rd (20%) 4.A presentation (sales pitch!) on your tissue engineering idea in front of the class. 2 days of presentations: April 23 rd and 25 th, in class. (10%)

Groups (I have pre-assigned you) Group 1: April 23 rd Ryan Colombo, Matthew Osso, Stephanie Polgar, Julia Tomaszewski Group 2: April 23 rd Lenny Brandon, Chris Carr, Manuel Escanciano, Timothy Ma Group 3: April 25 th Matthew McNulty, Adam Ramey, Kyle Reed, Anthony Valle ALL PAPERS DUE ON APRIL 23RD

How does one create a new idea? Lectures and Readings: ideas we discuss in class – Stem cells for building new replacement tissue – Driving or studying cell movement, growth, differentiation – Driving or studying cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions – Disease specific! – I HIGHLY RECOMMEND: you come talk to me in office hours about the feasibility of your idea New literature research: Library Resources

3 Grant Types to Choose From (NIH) These are your choices for style R03, – discrete, well-defined projects that realistically can be completed in two years and that require limited levels of funding ($50,000 per year) – Pilot or feasibility studies – Secondary analysis of existing data – Small, self-contained research projects – Development of research methodology – Development of new research technology – research plan is restricted to 6 pages R21, – introduction of novel scientific ideas, model systems, tools, agents, targets, and technologies that have the potential to substantially advance biomedical research – new exploratory and developmental research projects (Think: high-risk) – Also a two-year grant, at $275,000 over two years. – unique and innovative use of an existing methodology to explore a new scientific area – may involve considerable risk but may lead to a breakthrough in a particular area – should break new ground or extend previous discoveries toward new directions or applications R01, – the original and historically the oldest grant mechanism used by the NIH to support health-related research and development – Large research projects, involving multiple students, and often multiple PIs – Anywhere from 2-5 years, at a maximum of $250,000 per year. – Must also be innovative and novel, but not necessarily high-risk. i.e. your preliminary data, literature knowledge, and other expertise makes it seem that you will definitely be able to complete all objectives – Major cash-cows of big research labs.

Your NIH Grant MUST Include: Go here for formatting (margins, font size, etc.): Biosketch for each team member. Research Plan. – 1 Page: Specific Aims. – 6 Pages (R03 and R21), or 12 Pages (R01), including: Significance (background, relevance to human health) Innovation (why it’s so novel, creative, what it will lead to) Approach (research methods planned), and including Preliminary Data Optional idea: Benchmarks for success Optional idea: potential pitfalls and solutions Optional idea: Future directions Optional idea: Timeline – References (not part of page limit)

Grant Review Day: 10% In class, we will spend 1 lecture acting like a grant panel (April 2 nd ). I have 3 of last year’s grants. Everyone in class can see each of the 3 grants. (posted online) Each group has been formally assigned to review just one of these grants. Before class (April 2 nd ), each member of the group should independently prepare ~1 page of notes (that you won’t turn in), that include the pros and cons of the grant idea. Each person should bring a copy of the grant as well to facilitate discussion. In class, we will go through each grant. For the grant you are officially assigned, you will talk, in class, from your seat, for about 5min, giving a short summary of what was good and bad about the grant. During this discussion, anyone in class can comment, but you’re only required to talk about the grant you were assigned. Within your group, assign one person to be the “scribe” for the group. During the discussion, the scribe will take notes on their laptop about what was discussed about the grant. This will be read aloud, at the end of the lecture, to the whole group. Please me this summary page for your grade by midnight, April 2 nd (same day). I’m looking for how detailed your reviews were. The summary should be no more than 1 page! Use this review to help you write your own grants!

Specific Aims Page: 10% Due April 11 th, in class – 1 page introduction of project. No more than 1 page! – It’s a good idea to come talk to me about your idea before you write this up and turn it in. – I have an example of a funded specific aims page (handout) – You can modify this after the graded feedback, because you will turn it in again with your final grant.

Note about Presentation Dates Dates: April 23 rd and 25 th Remember, this is a sales pitch for your idea. You need to get across: – The human health problem is real and needs novel solutions, approaches – The literature backs up the fact that your idea will work – That your idea is awesome and novel – That your idea will work if you are funded! (find preliminary data from the literature) Everyone must be at all the presentations. Groups will be partly graded by classmates, and turning your evaluation of the other groups is mandatory.

The most important thing you can do is….. 1.Proofread. Not just you, but get it done early and send to a peer. They can catch mistakes that you will miss. 1.Come talk to me!! This is what office hours are for. Send a group member (or even better, all of you) to talk to me once a week. I will give you critical feedback. Better during office hours then on your grade! a)I can also show you examples of my grants to help you with organization.