Work Package 2 Giacomo Grasso ENEA UTFISSM-PRONOC LEADER Work Package 2 meeting Madrid, May 8, 2012 Current status and organization of the work.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fieldwork assessment The difference between AS and A2 David Redfern
Advertisements

The PMBR steady-state and Coupled kinetics core thermal-hydraulics benchmark test problems PBMR (Pty) Ltd. – NRG – Penn State Univ. – Purdeu Univ. - INL.
TRANSIENT EVALUATION OF A GEN-IV LFR DEMONSTRATION PLANT THROUGH A LUMPED-PARAMETER ANALYSIS OF COUPLED KINETICS AND THERMALHYDRAULICS ANALYSIS OF COUPLED.
Fp7 - LEADER Slide 1 ALFRED C&S rods mechanical design FA_ ppt Task 2.4 – Mechanical Design & Drawings of LFR and ETDR Fuel Assemblies (mech. Design)
1 WASTE CHARACTERIZATION METHODS S. Vanderperre Belgatom Vanderperre, Belgatom, chapter 7.
LEADER Project: Task 5.4 Analysis of Representative DBC Events of the ETDR with RELAP5 G. Bandini - ENEA/Bologna LEADER 5 th WP5 Meeting JRC-IET, Petten,
Outlook for the Requirements of the Nuclear Power Plant Irradiation Test in China SONG DANRONG Nuclear Power Institute of China.
May 22nd & 23rd 2007 Stockholm EUROTRANS: WP 1.5 Task Containment Assessment IP-EUROTRANS DOMAIN 1 Design WP 1.5 Safety Assessment of the Transmutation.
AREVA NP EUROTRANS WP1.5 Technical Meeting Task – Safety approach Madrid, November Sophie EHSTER.
“Design and safety analysis of ALFRED”
AREVA NP EUROTRANS WP1.5 Technical Meeting Task – ETD Safety approach Safety approach for EFIT: Deliverable 1.21 Stockholm, May Sophie.
EVALUATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE STRATEGY PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
Project Management and Scheduling
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Protection of the environment from ionising radiation - views of a regulator.
EUROPEAN LEAD FAST REACTOR The LEADER project aims to define an European Lead Fast Reactor configuration for an industrial-sized (600 MWe, the ELFR) reactor,
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
LEADER, Task 5.5 ETDR Transient Analyses with SPECTRA Code LEADER Project JRC, Petten, February 26, 2013 M.M. Stempniewicz NRG-22694/
IRSN STRATEGY TO ASSESS A NEW MAINTENANCE POLICY / Nesebar, Bulgaria Presented by Naoëlle MATAHRI, IRSN.
Analyses of representative DEC events of the ETDR
MA and LLFP Transmutation Performance Assessment in the MYRRHA eXperimental ADS P&T: 8th IEM, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 9-11, 2004 E. Malambu, W.
Reporting during the lifetime of the project Moldova – Research Horizon 30 January 2013 Kristin Kraav.
D29 - Roadmap for LFR development Davide Mattioli ENEA UTFISSM-PRONOC LEADER (Lead-cooled European Advanced DEmonstration Reactor) WP 1 - Task 1.1 Amsterdam.
National Spent Nuclear Fuel Strategy Meeting April 15, 2009 Dawn Gillas Federal Program Manager Nuclear Material Programs Division DOE-SR SRS Spent Nuclear.
KICK-OFF MEETING - Brindisi 21 July 2011 EcoPlasBrick Work Package 4 Environmental compatibility analysis The environmental compatibility analysis, based.
Rev. 0 CONFIDENTIAL Mod.19 02/00 Rev.2 Mobile Terminals S.p.A. Trieste Author: M.Fragiacomo, D.Protti, M.Torelli 31 Project Idea Feasibility.
LEADER WP3 Conceptual Design Status KIT Town Office Ostendorfhaus Weberstraße 5, Karlsruhe, Luigi Mansani
Development of a RELAP5-3D thermal-hydraulic model for a Gas Cooled Fast Reactor D. Castelliti, C. Parisi, G. M. Galassi, N. Cerullo (San Piero A Grado.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
1 Massimo SALVATORESiemtp 8 – November th Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation University.
1 Kaspar Kööp, Marti Jeltsov Division of Nuclear Power Safety Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Stockholm, Sweden LEADER 4 th WP5 MEETING, Karlsruhe.
Please insert a figure in the master transparency. KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association.
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE Transport Division 1 TRANS-EUROPEAN RAILWAY (TER) PROJECT 2 nd Expert Group Meeting (Budapest, 23 September.
LEADER meeting WP2 – Task 2.5 DPA, dose and activation calculations D. Gugiu (INR) – C. Petrovich (ENEA) Karlsruhe, November 21 st 2012.
Repository Design Overview Presented to: NSNFP Meeting Presented by: Joe Price Office of Repository Development April 13, 2005 Bethesda, MD.
WP1: Reference design objectives and specifications Didier De Bruyn SCKCEN Fourth PCC meeting FP7 LEADER Bologna, 27 October.
Advanced Heavy Water Reactor Amit Thakur Reactor Physics Design Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, INDIA.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Technology of Transmutation TETRA - Preparation for FP6 - Presented by X. Cheng ADOPT meeting,
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
Radiation Protection optimisation 3D planning tools and their applicability to occupational exposure at a fusion power plant F.Vermeersch SCKCEN EFDA 27.
LEADER WP3 Conceptual Design Status KIT Campus North, Karlsruhe, Luigi Mansani
November, 2008 Lunar Fission Surface Power Design - Relap5 Point Kinetics D. S. Lucas INL.
Analysis of Representative DEC Events of the ETDR with RELAP5 LEADER Project: Task 5.5 G. Bandini - ENEA/Bologna LEADER 5 th WP5 Meeting JRC-IET, Petten,
LEADER Work Package 2 Status of activities Giacomo Grasso on behalf of Carlo Artioli – Work Package 2 leader UTFISSM-PRONOC ENEA LEADER PCC meeting Bologna,
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT V. MASSAUT 1 Monitoring Meeting TW5-TSW-001, -001B and -002 Mol 27/06/2006 Participants: ENEA, NNC, STUDSVIK,
СRCD NSC KIPT DiFis 2.0 – 3D Finite Element Neutron Kinetic Code A.I. Zhukov and A.M. Abdullayev NSC Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology September.
Task 2.1: Review of ELSY and Conceptual design & neutronic characterization of the ELFR Industrial Plant Kamil Tuček on behalf of Task 2.1 contributors.
KIT TOWN OFFICE OSTENDORFHAUS Karlsruhe, 21 st November 2012 CIRTEN Consorzio universitario per la ricerca tecnologica nucleare Antonio Cammi, Stefano.
Risk Analysis P. Cennini AB-ATB on behalf of the n_TOF Team  Procedure  Documents in preparation  Conclusions Second n_TOF External Panel Review, CERN,
The FDES revision process: progress so far, state of the art, the way forward United Nations Statistics Division.
IHM/ KIT/ Campus Nord 1 | Georg Müller | LEADER Bologna November 17, 2010 LEADER WP6 AGENDA Bologna, November 17th, 2010 ENEA, Aula Magna 14.00Agenda (G.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
Study on the Neutronic Characteristics of Subcritical Reactors Driven by an Accelerated Pulsed Proton Beam Ali Ahmad.
FP 6 Integrated Project: FUETRA Proposal TWG-ADS Roadmap, Fuel Cycle sub-group report recommendations, Fuel Cycle studies (CEA, ITU, NEA...) EFTTRA collaboration.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
1 State Scientific and Technical Center on Nuclear and Radiation Safety THE THERMAL-MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF FUEL PINS DURING POWER'S MANEUVERING REGIME.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF MODELING OF MOST LOADED FUEL PIN IN TRANSIENTS Y.Ovdiyenko, V.Khalimonchuk, M. Ieremenko State Scientific.
NRG Contribution to LEADER WP1.1 Status LEADER Petten, Netherlands Ferry Roelofs
1DEN/CAD/DTN/DIR Genova 2010 April 22nd LEADER WP6 Task 6.3 Assessment, validation and adaptation of oxygen control and purification strategy (CEA-5, ENEA-1,
NEAR-COMPLETE TRANSURANIC WASTE INCINERATION IN THORIUM-FUELLED LIGHT WATER REACTORS Ben Lindley.
Expert Review of the Licensing Documentation of the Centralized Facility for Long-Term Storage of Disused Sealed Radiation Sources Oleksii Tokarevskyi.
November 19th 2010, Bologna LEADER 1 1st LEADER PCC MEETING WP4 PLANT OPERATION, INSTRUMENTATION, CONTROL AND PROTECTION SYSTEM DESIGN.
Progress Meeting 20 Nov 2012, Karlsruhe LEADER 1LEADER1 WP1 REFERENCE DESIGN OBJETIVES AND SPECIFICATION (SCK-CEN)
Camera PDR/CD1 Planning 19 September 2008
Panel Discussion: Discussion on Trends in Multi-Physics Simulation
Overview of Serpent related activities at HZDR E. Fridman
The University of Missouri Research Reactor
Jordan University of Science and Technology
Presentation transcript:

Work Package 2 Giacomo Grasso ENEA UTFISSM-PRONOC LEADER Work Package 2 meeting Madrid, May 8, 2012 Current status and organization of the work

Outline Status of the activities ELFR domain ALFRED domain Planning (and timing) of future work

The objectives of WP2 have been declared in the “LEADER Work Package 2 Work Program” The same document also lists the activities required to reach these objectives, and the timing originally foreseen for the project. Parallel activities are needed for the core design of the ELFR and ALFRED. Significant delay has been accumulated so far in both domains. Status of the activities

ELFR domain Core design performed Complete core characterization completed Core data provided to WP5 (“LFR database for safety analyses”)  Complete Thermal/Hydraulic analysis not yet finished Mechanical design performed  Radiation damage analysis not yet performed  Transition from start-up to equilibrium core underway Task 2.1 Task 2.3 Task 2.4 Task 2.5 Task 2.1

ALFRED domain Core design performed Complete core characterization completed Core data provided to WP5 (“ALFRED database for safety analyses”)  Complete Thermal/Hydraulic analysis almost done, report in progress Mechanical design performed  Radiation damage analysis performed, finalizing the report Task 2.2 Task 2.3 Task 2.4 Task 2.5

DocumentResponsibleEMMDueOther participants Del 05Task 2.1 (JRC-IE)15March 31 st, 2011ANN, AGH, ENEA, KIT-G, INR Del 07Task 2.2 (ENEA)26September 30 th, 2011ANN, CEA, CIRTEN, KIT-G, INR, SCKCEN Del 27Task 2.2 (ENEA)1March 31 st, Del 28Task 2.1 (JRC-IE)3March 31 st, 2013ENEA Doc 54Task 2.4 (SRS)5.5December 31 st, Doc 55Task 2.1 (JRC-IE)13March 31 st, 2012ENEA, KIT-G, INR Doc 56Task 2.3 (PSI)13March 31 st, 2012CIRTEN, ENEA, NRG, SRS, UJV Doc 60Task 2.4 (SRS)5.5June 30 th, Doc 61Task 2.5 (INR)11June 30 th, 2012ENEA Doc 62Task 2.3 (PSI)13September 30 th, 2012CIRTEN, ENEA, NRG, SRS, UJV Doc 65Task 2.5 (INR)11December 31 st, 2012SCKCEN Docs organization

WP2 timing Mil 02 Mil 03Mil 09

Coming up to an end…

Annex I Task 2.1 ELSY review and conceptual ELFR industrial plant neutronic characterization The activities of Task 2.1 will take the move from a critical review of the final FP6 ELSY core configuration, in conjunction with WP1, so as to point out the open issues and possible solutions/strategies to overcome these. A new reference configuration – at conceptual level – of the LFR industrial plant will be then proposed, taking also into account the aim at operating such system as an adiabatic reactor. Two alternative configurations will be also conceived about the reference core (fuelled by reference MOX), at first supposing the fuel is added by an equilibrium content of MA (expected 1.1% on HM), and then assuming all the transuranic elements (TRU) have come to complete equilibrium, as stated by the adiabaticity criterion (expected 1.3% MA on HM). These alternative configurations will be analysed focusing on the outlining of possible cycle strategies (in conjunction with WP1), evaluating the corresponding flow of wastes and related radiological and thermal loads; and on the estimation of the impact of the inclusion of MA on the core kinetics, by determining the dependence of the main reactivity coefficients (such as the void effect, the coolant temperature coefficient, the Doppler coefficient and core expansion coefficients) on the abundance of MA in the fuel.

Annex I Task 2.2 Criteria for scaling down to the ETDR and its neutronic characterization The preliminary activities of Task 2.2 (in conjunction with WP1) will be focused on the definition of the criteria for the consistency between ALFRED and LFR core parameters, according to the demonstration aims and main goals of the ETDR. The ALFRED core will be characterized neutronically at Beginning of Life (BoL), Beginning of Cycle (BoC) and End of Cycle (EoC), assessing the power distribution, control rods positioning (and strategy), burn up reactivity swing and cycle strategy for the system. Finally, the main reactivity coefficients (such as void coefficient, coolant temperature coefficient, Doppler coefficient and core expansion coefficients) will be evaluated at BoC and EoC, and simplified point kinetic analyses will be performed to investigate the dynamic behaviour of the system to what concerns its stability. Sensitivity analyses of the main core parameters vs nuclear data will be made in order to estimate their contributions to the uncertainties affecting the safety-related and performance coefficients.

Annex I Task 2.3 Thermal-hydraulics analysis of the LFR and ETDR The activity of Task 2.3 is the thermal-hydraulic assessment of the cores of both the LFR industrial plant and ALFRED, so as to provide an updated feedback to the fuel pin and fuel assembly design of such systems. In particular, static and transient analyses of the cores will be performed, focused on the identification of possible hot spots – both on the cladding and the fuel – and on the evaluation of natural circulation regimes in case of loss of flow. Task 2.4 Mechanical design and drawings of LFR and ETDR The main activity of Task 2.4 is the mechanical design – up to the production of detailed mechanical drawings – of the fuel pin, fuel assembly and whole core of both the LFR industrial plant and ALFRED, complying with the physical and technological requirements issued by all the Tasks of this Work Package (and WP3).

Annex I Task 2.5 DPA and radiological protection for LFR and ETDR Task 2.5 activities are related to the evaluation of the standard damage parameter for nuclear materials, the DPA (displacements/atom), and radiological loads for both the LFR industrial plant and the ETDR. In particular, for the LFR industrial plant the DPA rates will be evaluated in a few of the most critical regions of the main system structures, replaceable or not. For ALFRED, the evaluation of the DPA rates will be performed on the main components of the system, as well as the radiological doses will be evaluated in key positions of the system for personnel radioprotection. The activation estimation will allow also the characterization and the classification of the different components for waste management point of view. The results obtained by this analysis will be used for assessing the design of the shielding structures.

Annex II D05 - Reference MOX without MA: definition of the LFR core and neutronic characterization (M 12) This Deliverable reports the reference core configuration for the LFR industrial plant together with its preliminary neutronic characterization, obtained as a result of the critical review of the FP6 ELSY system. This configuration refers to a reactor operating with reference fuel (standard MOX) without MA. D07 - Definition of the ETDR core and neutronic characterization (M 18) This Deliverable reports the ALFRED core configuration, with a complete neutronic characterization to what concerns criticality and power distribution assessment, cycle strategy and related criticality swing, and control rod positioning and operation strategy. D27 - ETDR core. Summary, synoptic tables, conclusions and recommendations (M 36) This Deliverable, intended for public dissemination of the work, collects the main characteristics, features and issues of the final ALFRED core, providing conclusive remarks of the whole activity and recommendations for a further development of the study.

Annex II D28 - LFR cores. Summary, synoptic tables, conclusions and recommendations (M 36) This Deliverable, intended for public dissemination of the work, collects the main characteristics, features and issues of the proposed core configurations of the LFR industrial plant, providing conclusive remarks of the whole activity and recommendations for a further development of the study. T54 - Mechanical design and drawings of ETDR pin/assembly/core (M 21) This Technical Document represents the official reference for the ALFRED reactor design, providing to every Task the detailed mechanical drawings of the fuel pin, fuel assembly and whole core. T55 - Adiabatic-LFR (equilibrium MOX with equilibrium MA): preliminary definition of the core and neutronic characterization (M 24) This Technical Document provides the neutronic characterization of the core for the LFR configuration to be operated as an adiabatic reactor. It also reports the impact of the inclusion of MA in the fuel on the main kinetic parameters by means of preliminary dynamic analyses, as well as a preliminary evaluation of the flow of both feed and waste materials in the related closed fuel cycle, together with the results of their radiological and thermal load evaluations.

Annex II T56 - Thermal-hydraulics assessment of the ETDR core (M 24) This Technical Document provides the results of the detailed static and transient thermal- hydraulic analyses of the ALFRED core to be used for assessing the final configuration of the system. T60 - Mechanical design and drawings of LFR pin/assemblies/cores (M 27) This Technical Document represents the official reference for the different LFR industrial plant designs, providing to every Task the detailed mechanical drawings of the fuel pin, fuel assembly and whole core layout of the LFR configurations. T61 - ETDR core: DPA rates in the main components, activation, doses (M 27) This Technical Document reports the results of the DPA and radiologic analyses on the main components of the ALFRED system, to be used for assessing the design of the shielding structures.

Annex II T62 - Thermal-hydraulics assessment of the LFR cores (M 30) This Technical Document provides the results of the detailed static and transient thermal- hydraulic analyses of the industrial LFR cores to be used for assessing the final configurations of the system. T65 - LFR cores: DPA rates in the main components, activation, doses (M 33) This Technical Document reports the results of the DPA analysis on the main components of the industrial LFR system.

Annex III DocumentResponsible EMM Budget Participant Man Months ANNANN AGHAGH CEACEA CIRTCIRT ENEAENEA KITKIT INRINR JRCJRC NRGNRG PSIPSI SCKSCK SRSSRS UJVUJV Del 05Task 2.1 (JRC-IE) Del 07Task 2.2 (ENEA) Del 27Task 2.2 (ENEA) Del 28Task 2.1 (JRC-IE) Doc 54Task 2.4 (SRS) ½- Doc 55Task 2.1 (JRC-IE) Doc 56Task 2.3 (PSI) Doc 60Task 2.4 (SRS) ½- Doc 61Task 2.5 (INR) Doc 62Task 2.3 (PSI) Doc 65Task 2.5 (INR) TOTAL