Let’s Talk Trash Reducing Solid Waste and Increasing Recycling LVW Public Forum November 20, 2008 Presented by Brooke Nash, MassDEP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INTRODUCTION. WHO WE ARE PAY HOMES FOR RECYCLING REDUCE LANDFILL DISPOSAL FEES PRESERVE OUR ENVIRONMENT INFRASTRUCTURE.
Advertisements

Pay-As-You-Throw Boiler Green Initiative (BGI) EPICS.
Eliot’s PAYT Program July 16 th, 2013 August 13 th, 2013 September 3 rd, 2013.
Single Stream Recycling Brown-Outagamie-Winnebago Counties City of Oshkosh Common Council, June 10, 2008.
WAUKESHA COUNTY RECYCLING Waukesha County Department of Parks & Land Use.
Melissa Cadwell SU Sustainability Division. SU Overview Large Can be 24,000 people on campus Private 4-year, graduate, professional degrees Urban Highly.
GOING SINGLE STREAM USING BINS BLAIR POLLOCK, SOLID WASTE PLANNER FOR CAROLINA RECYCLING ASSOCIATION 4/10/13.
Town of Cape Elizabeth Recycling and Municipal Solid Waste Overview.
Waste Reduction at its best!. Why PAYT? Single most effective tool to reduce waste and increase recycling Equitable – like utilities, you pay for what.
Trash collection Conversion to automation Robert Greenbaum, Mayor Mount Olive Township Sean Canning, Township Administrator Sherry Maniscalco, Chief Financial.
Presented to SWAC February 16, 2012 City of Cleveland Automated Waste Collection And Curbside Recycling Program.
Waste Collection. Lesson Objectives  Understand problems and concerns associated with MSW collection.  Compare and contrast privately and publicly operated.
Paying for Waste Disposal What Are the Choices? Tax Base General Fund Flat Fee User Fee (Pay-As-You-Throw)
ERIN MILLER, ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARD May 17, 2012 Solid Waste Advisory Council Meeting.
Automated Trash Collection
1.  Purchased 9 Garbage and Recycling Trucks in 2001 for $1.012 million. (Loan paid off in 2006)  $251,440 in Yearly Fleet Maintenance Costs.  City.
Albuquerque Recycling Now & In the Future Mayor Martin J. Chávez __ Ed Adams, P.E., Chief Administrative Officer Irene García, Chief Operations Officer.
SMART Waste Management Changing the way Americans value trash.
1 Bringing Curbside Recycling to Delaware A Proposal by: The Recycling Public Advisory Council (RPAC) The Delaware Solid Waste Authority (DSWA) The Department.
Boosting Recycling in Tennessee August 13, 14, & 15,
San Juan County Solid Waste Program Rate Workshop 12/10/02.
1 Best Practices in Single Stream Recycling Susan Kinsella & Richard Gertman Conservatree Environmental Planning Consultants CRRA Conference Workshop August.
Rural Waste Collection Options Department of Budget and Management 01/21/2014.
Commercial Waste Reduction Coordinator NEWMOA Conference, Sept 2005
City of Loveland Solid Waste Division Diversion Versus Disposal: Determining the Costs Diversion Versus Disposal: Determining the Costs.
Premier Refuse and Recycling Collection Program for the 21 st Century Pacific Waste in partnership with the City of Chula Vista.
Westford’s Current Solid Waste Program Total costs in FY10 : $1.56 million Trash collection contract with ACME Waste Systems until August 2010 at annual.
1 FY09 Diversion Rates. 2 University City 3 Implementation - Feasibility 5,579 (74%) of University City properties receive municipal trash service $118.
Changing the Way South Carolina Values Trash Kristen Brown – Green Waste Solutions April 10, 2013 Turning waste into new products that can be sold to consumers.
Sustainable Materials Recovery Program Municipal Grant Program Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
Pay As You Throw – An Incentive Based System Town of West Boylston, MA.
Environmental Science: Toward a Sustainable Future Richard T. Wright
The Pay-As-You-Throw Solution – Increasing Local Recovery of Materials and Recycling Rates Carolina Recycling Association April 10, 2013.
LBA ASSOCIATES 2003 Colorado SWANA Annual Mtg CO SOLID WASTE SURVEY  By LBA Associates (with CAFR)  Collected 2002 program data  Disclaimer – quality.
WASTE TAXES Past Taxes and Projected Changes. Solid Waste Operators of Solid Waste facilities and Transfer facilities pay a $6 per ton tipping fee. Vermonters.
SOLID WASTE ADVISORY COMMITTEE March 23-24, 2010 What is a Waste Reduction Program?
1 An Overview of EPR Jim Frey, CEO of Resource Recycling Systems What it Means for North Carolina, and What are Viable Alternatives NC SWANA Fall Conference.
Town of Plymouth Solid Waste Management Town of Plymouth Department of Public Works November 26, 2012.
December Recover more recyclable materials Make Recycling Convenient.
WTE & Recycling in Massachusetts Municipal Waste Management Association October 22, 2003 Shawn Worster Executive Director, NESWC Director, KEMA- Xenergy,
2013 RHODE ISLAND COMPOSTING CONFERENCE Gretel Clark Recycle Committee Chair, Hamilton, MA.
California Roundtable May 23, 2005 Sacramento, California Donna Perala City of San Jose Single Stream & Beyond.
The Role of Local Government in Improving the Environment Bruce Walker City of Portland Office of Sustainable Development October 20, 2005.
DSM E NVIRONMENTAL S ERVICES, I NC. Analysis of Enhanced Residential Recycling System for New Castle County Prepared for the Delaware Recycling Public.
Five Budget Smart Reasons to Vote for Recycling Education Presented by: Your name here Your here Your phone here This presentation funded by the.
ENTERPRISE FUND City of Springfield Trash Fee. FY12 Solid Waste Services Includes: Weekly Trash Collection Bi-Weekly Recycling Collection Bi-Weekly Curbside.
1 11/8/ Waste Pro of South Carolina and Greenspace Louis J. Diaz Region Vice President South Carolina and Coastal Georgia.
CONVERSION TECHNOLOGIES MARKET IMPACT ASSESSMENT Preliminary Results Workshop April 15, 2004 Susan V. Collins Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC.
9/15/031 Fort Collins, Colorado “ Pay as You Throw” Trash Rates
Single Stream Recycling Material Recovery Facilities
Feasibility of a Pay-As-You-Throw Program for West Lafayette West Lafayette Go Greener Commission.
CASELLA RESOURCE SOLUTIONS ZERO-SORT® RECYCLING COLLECTION ORGANICS ENERGY LANDFILLS casella.com 1 Bob Cappadona Vice President Casella November 5, 2015.
40 by 2020 “Pay As You Throw” A Phased In Approach.
State Perspective on Recycling Trends NC APWA, September 2012 Scott Mouw NC DEAO.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall, Inc.. From Landfill to School.
Recycling of Solid Waste February 10, 2016 Russell Schreiber, P.E. Director of Public Works.
G enesee County: Material Recovery Facility Feasibility Study Michigan State University UP 494: Planning Practicum April 29th, 2016 Vincent Chen Hank Hong.
1 REFUSE AND RECYCLING STUDY COLLECTION ALTERNATIVES AND COST COMPARISONS May 18, 2009.
SUMMIT COUNTY ZERO WASTE TASK FORCE August 27, 2012.
Solid Waste Proposal Options Council Workshop March 5, 2014.
Sauk County Solid Waste Survey Results (a s of ) Rick Eilertson, P.E., Fitchburg Environmental Engineer Chair, APWA WI Solid Waste Management Committee.
Pay-As-You-Throw Presentation to the Belmont Sustainability Committee
Operational Features of Pay As You Throw
Portsmouth Solid Waste Disposal Critical Decisions
Pay-as-You-Throw for Kingston MA
Solid Waste Survey Results As of (Aaron Rodgers Day)
Solid Waste Survey Results As of October 1, 2013
Chair, APWA WI Solid Waste Management Committee
MONMOUTH COUNTY SINGLE STREAM RECYCLING
Central Elgin Waste Management Service Delivery
Presentation transcript:

Let’s Talk Trash Reducing Solid Waste and Increasing Recycling LVW Public Forum November 20, 2008 Presented by Brooke Nash, MassDEP

Overview National trends Regional and Mass trends Programs in action

Crossroads for Newton Market place is very competitive Disposal costs steady, maybe falling Collection and processing technology “revolution” Public concern for environment Tremendous opportunities

Terminology Material Recovery Facility (MRF) Dual stream recycling Single stream recycling Fully and semi-automated collection (carts)

Single Stream Recycling The storage of all recyclables (bottles and cans and all paper) mixed together in a single container Collection and transport of the mixed recyclables in a single compartment on the truck Separation of the mixed recyclables mechanically and with labor at a processing facility

Dual Stream Recycling The storage of residential recyclables in two separate containers Plastic, glass and aluminum cans and bottles Paper: Cardboard, newspaper, mixed paper, boxboard Collection and transport of recyclables in two separate compartments on the truck Tipping of each compartment separately at the MRF with two lines that mechanically and manually separate the materials at the processing facility

National Trends West coast leading East Coast (reversal from 20 years ago) Single stream Single stream Automated collection Automated collection Organics collection, 3 cart system Organics collection, 3 cart system Zero Waste Extended Producer Responsibility

In the Northeast… First curbside recycling programs in the U.S. Mass is leader in Pay-As-You-Throw First single stream MRF in 2007 Today, 4 of 6 Mass MRFs are single stream Boston pilot – May SSR curbside programs today; many more in planning phases Automated collection is here

Mass. Programs in Action Setting and Enforcing Trash Limits Mandatory Recycling Single Stream Recycling Automated Collection of Trash &/or Recyclables Pay-As-You-Throw Mass Recycles Paper campaign

Setting and Enforcing Trash Limits Many towns set trash limits (3-6 containers), but few enforce. Mansfield reduced trash limit from 6 containers to 3 containers (max 33-gallons) and enforced it Public education campaign: video and mailing Hauler left excess trash at curb with violation sticker Substantial program oversight required In 1 st year of program:  Trash reduced 8% (731 tons)  Recycling increased 4% (90 tons)

Mandatory Recycling 160 municipalities with mandatory recycling ordinances Approx 40 actively enforcing Success in Chelmsford, Andover, North Andover, Billerica, Saugus 10% reduction in trash tonnage Emphasis on cardboard or “visible recyclables” Requires strong hauler partnership, significant outreach, ongoing enforcement

Single Stream Recycling 4 of 6 Mass MRFs are now SSR 25 curbside communities have SSR Ashland, Framingham, Natick, North Attleborough, Norwood Worcester, Quincy, Braintree, Weymouth and pilot in Boston Ashland, Framingham, Natick, North Attleborough, Norwood Worcester, Quincy, Braintree, Weymouth and pilot in Boston Large containers are key to success Automated recycling collection “Modified” single stream (curbside bins or sticker)

Single Stream Results Boston: recycling tonnage up >50%; trash down 20% Springfield pilot: recycling up 90%; trash down 20% Southbridge: recycling up 125% Madison, WI: recycling up 30%

Single Stream Advantages: Significant increase in recycling tonnage Greater number participating households Greater number participating households Greater amount of recyclables per participating household (capture rate) Greater amount of recyclables per participating household (capture rate) Savings in avoided disposal costs Increases collection efficiency (truck capacity, labor, worker injuries) With large cart – may switch to bi-weekly collection Disadvantages: Less revenue than dual stream recycling Capital costs of carts, trucks

Automated Collection Trash or recyclables Fully or semi-automated Carts and mechanical lift arm Trash: capacity of container sets trash limit Recycling: offers greater capacity than set-out b Holden, Mansfield, Easton, North Attleborough, Norwood, Billerica, Burlington, Tewksbury, Tyngsborough Holden, Mansfield, Easton, North Attleborough, Norwood, Billerica, Burlington, Tewksbury, Tyngsborough 1 st year results:  Holden (automated T & R): trash down 30%, recycling up 73%  Mansfield (automated T only): trash down >20 %, recycling up 13 % Mansfield started automated SSR in July 08 Mansfield started automated SSR in July 08

Recycle Bank Recycling incentive program Single stream recycling with cart RFID tag tracks tonnage per household Points converted to coupons – local businesses, national chains Everett (+300%), Revere, Southbridge (+125%) Promotional materials

Pay As You Throw (PAYT): Single most effective program for reducing waste and increasing recycling Like a utility: users pay for amount of waste disposed; unlimited recycling trash tonnage (20-40%) trash tonnage (20-40%) 124 communities in Mass (47curbside) Trash tonnage decreases 20-40% Recycling tonnage increases 10-15% Average recycling rate in PAYT communities 10% points higher

PAYT Various models: Bags, stickers, first unit “free” Fixed costs = tax base or annual flat fee Variable costs = bag or sticker fee Very compatible with single stream (8 Mass programs with both) “Modified” PAYT (e.g.Lowell, Burlington, Billerica, Tewksbury, Tyngsboro, Holden, Mansfield)

Recycling and PAYT Research 2005 opinion research survey on recycling Self reported recycling behaviors 60% of PAYT residents “always” recycle across all categories (39% of non-PAYT residents) 75% of non-recyclers: would recycle more if trash cost $, recycling free (59% statewide).

PAYT Works Pre-PAYT tonnagePost-PAYT tonnage% Change TownTrashRecyclingTrashRecyclingTrashRecycling Attleboro %31% *Dartmouth %54% Longmeadow %15% Marshfield %31% **Shrewsbury %35% * Extrapolated from 7 months of data ** First 2 months of the program

PAYT and Single Stream North Attleborough 10 year old PAYT program Flat fee plus bag fee July - SSR with 96 gallon carts (5 yr. contract with Waste Management) Bi-weekly ( curbside recycling Recycling tonnage up 15%-20% Small trash bag sales - up

What are the challenges? Lengthy process to “do it right” Perception it’s a tax Politics Start-up costs (education, staff time) Concerns about illegal dumping

For more information… Brooke Nash, Branch Chief MassDEP MassDEP Municipal Waste Reduction Program Municipal Waste Reduction Program