Understanding the Earth by Stacking Receiver Functions: The H-K Method

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Asymptotic Ray Theory
Advertisements

Upper mantle of the Bohemian Massif (Central Europe) studied by surface waves from Kurile Islands M8.1 and M8.3 earthquakes Petr Kolinsky Jiri Malek Institute.
Body and Surface Wave Seismic Tomography for Regional Geothermal Assessment of the Western Great Basin Glenn Biasi 1, Leiph Preston 2, and Ileana Tibuleac.
Seismological Crust Models for KamLAND Experiment Nozomu Takeuchi (University of Tokyo)
Reflection Coefficients For a downward travelling P wave, for the most general case: Where the first term on the RHS is the P-wave displacement component.
Lessons we have learned from seismological observations in the Taiwan region Jer-Ming Chiu CERI/Dept. of Earth Sciences University of Memphis March 19,
Geology of the Lithosphere 2. Evidence for the Structure of the Crust & Upper Mantle What is the lithosphere and what is the structure of the lithosphere?
RECEIVER FUNCTIONS analysis for Vs profiles and Moho depth estimations Andrea Licciardi (1,2) Nicola Piana Agostinetti (1) (1)Geophysics Section, Dublin.
Physical processes within Earth’s interior Topics 1.Seismology and Earth structure 2.Plate kinematics and geodesy 3.Gravity 4.Heat flow 5.Geomagnetism.
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology
  The word comes from the Greek word seismic, for shaking.  It is the branch of Geology which has provided the most comprehensive interpretation of.
Advances in Earthquake Location and Tomography William Menke Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Columbia University.
Advances in Earthquake Location and Tomography William Menke Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Columbia University.
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
Heintz et al lateral resolution : km km T > 40s, long paths T > 15s, shorter paths Surface-wave tomography studies: Vs at 100.
Reflection Field Methods
The Basics of Earthquake Location William Menke Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Columbia University.
29 Palms Vehicle Detection (what we wanted to do).
Single station location Multiple station location
GG 450 April 16, 2008 Seismic Reflection 1.
Advances in Earthquake Location and Tomography William Menke Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Columbia University.
Earthquake Location The basic principles Relocation methods
Waves: Phase and group velocities of a wave packet
Earthquakes Susan Bilek Associate Professor of Geophysics New Mexico Tech How to figure out the who, what, where, why… (or the location, size, type)
Geology 5640/6640 Introduction to Seismology 18 Feb 2015 © A.R. Lowry 2015 Last time: Spherical Coordinates; Ray Theory Spherical coordinates express vector.
1 Array Methods for Image Formation Outline 1.Fine scale heterogeneity in the mantle 2.CCP stacking versus scattered wave imaging 3.Scattered wave imaging.
Geology 6600/7600 Signal Analysis 03 Dec 2013 © A.R. Lowry 2013 Last time: Deconvolution in Flexural Isostasy Surface loads can be solved from observed.
Evidence on non-self-similarity source scaling in cluster earthquakes Yen-Yu Lin 1, Kuo -Fong Ma 1, Hiroo Kanamori 2, Teh-Ru Song 3, Nadia Lapusta 2, Victor.
Crustal Thickness and Geodynamics of the Western U.S. (NEW!!! Brought to You By EarthScope) Anthony R. Lowry Department of Geology, Utah State University.
Body Waves and Ray Theory
Geology 5640/6640 Introduction to Seismology 10 Apr 2015 © A.R. Lowry 2015 Last time: Reflection Data Processing Source deconvolution (like filtering methods)
GG 450 March 19, 2008 Stress and Strain Elastic Constants.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 17 Jan 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 22 Jan: Burger (Ch 2.2–2.6) Last time: The Wave Equation; The Seismometer.
Teleseismic Location find direction of signals based on Array algorithms backtrace ray paths through the earth simplifications: flat earth, plane waves.
Seismic reflection Ali K. Abdel-Fattah Geology Dept.,
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics This Week: No new lab assignment… But we’ll go over the previous labs 06 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 07 Feb:
Linear(-ized) Inverse Problems
FUNDAMENTALS of ENGINEERING SEISMOLOGY LOCATING EARTHQUAKES.
1 The Earth’s Shells Quantitative Concepts and Skills Weighted average The nature of a constraint Volume of spherical shells Concept that an integral is.
CRUSTAL THICKNESS ESTIMATES BELOW QUEBEC SEISMIC STATIONS USING RECEIVER FUNCTION STACKING Earthquakes and Earth Structure Presentation By Tiegan Hobbs.
Coherence-weighted Wavepath Migration for Teleseismic Data Coherence-weighted Wavepath Migration for Teleseismic Data J. Sheng, G. T. Schuster, K. L. Pankow,
The Rupture Process of the August 23, 2011 Virginia Earthquake Martin Chapman Virginia Tech.
Usage of joint rating functions for seismic phase association and event location Asming V.E., Prokudina A.V., Nakhshina L.P. Kola Regional Seismological.
Evidence for a low-permeability fluid trap in the Nový Kostel Seismic Zone from double-difference tomography 3rd Annual AIM Workshop I October 10 – 12,
Exploring Planet Earth Larry Braile, Purdue University CSTA Convention, Oct. 2011, Pasadena, CA
IRIS Summer Intern Training Course Wednesday, May 31, 2006 Anne Sheehan Lecture 3: Teleseismic Receiver functions Teleseisms Earth response, convolution.
Geophysics/Tectonics GLY 325. Elastic Waves, as waves in general, can be described spatially...
Seismological Analysis Methods Receiver FunctionsBody Wave Tomography Surface (Rayleigh) wave tomography Good for: Imaging discontinuities (Moho, sed/rock.
Introduction to Seismology
Anomalous Vp/Vs ratios in the focal zone of West/Bohemia earthquake swarms T. Fischer1,2, T. Dahm3 (1) Institute of Geophysics, Czech Academy of Sciences.
Joint 3D relocation of earthquakes by surface and borehole data
P wave amplitudes in 3D Earth Guust Nolet, Caryl Michaelson, Ileana Tibuleac, Ivan Koulakov, Princeton University.
EXPLORING EARTH’S INTERIOR Chapter 14. Seismic rays are refracted away from the normal as they penetrate the earth, which causes them to bend, because.
Introduction to Geophysics Ali Oncel Department of Earth Sciences KFUPM Thin Layer Effect Dipping Layer Refractions Introduction to.
Seismology Part II: Body Waves and Ray Theory. Some definitions: Body Waves: Waves that propagrate through the "body" of a medium (in 3 dimensions) WRONG!
General Properties of Waves Reflection Seismology Geol 4068 Questions and answers to first lecture homework September 8, 2005.
Crustal Structure using the tomography method, in the central part of Itoigawa-Shizuoka Tectonic Line (ISTL), Japan. Presenter: Hirata Naoshi Panayotopoulos.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics Last time: The Refraction Method Cont’d Multiple Horizontal Layers: Using Snell’s law, generalizes simply to: Dipping.
Seismology Dylan Mikesell April 5, 2011 Boise State University.
UWBRAD Modeling Summary KCJ Version 1 Please update and improve.
Reading a Seismograph.  If a P-wave arrives at station A at 9:08, how do we correctly write the time? ________ : _________ : ________  If an S-Wave.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 23 Feb 2016 Lab 3 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Seismic Reflections Next assignment due one week from now Due noon Mar 1.
Seismic phases and earthquake location
Geology 5670/6670 Inverse Theory 20 Mar 2015 © A.R. Lowry 2015 Last time: Cooperative/Joint Inversion Cooperative or Joint Inversion uses two different.
Lithospheric Layering
Does AVO Inversion Really Reveal Rock Properties?
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
Ken Creager, Wendy McClausland and Steve Malone
Velocity and anisotropy parameter scan
Presentation transcript:

Understanding the Earth by Stacking Receiver Functions: The H-K Method Andy Frassetto, IRIS Headquarters Office ASI Kuwait, January 20, 2013

Who Am I? hiker, gardener, cook, softball outfielder, traveler Halfway along a 20 mile walk, Fimmvörðuháls vent, Iceland, April 2010 Who Am I? hiker, gardener, cook, softball outfielder, traveler

From: Florida, USA Schools: U. South Carolina (B.S.) U. Arizona (Ph.D.) Currently (near) here:

Mt. Whitney, California, USA ~3 km ? ? ? ? ?

The tip of the iceberg…

Receiver Functions

Importance of Stacking -Suppresses noise -Emphasizes coherent signals -S/N ratio grows by √# of RFs Svenningsen et al., 2007

Abt et al., 2009

Arrivals vs. Ray Parameter

Arrivals vs. Ray Parameter

Arrivals vs. Ray Parameter B Vp, Vs A B angle of incidence

arrival time of vertically incident S-wave after P-wave Vp, Vs, K H D Easy! Take the integral of the S-wave slowness minus P-wave slowness

Within a layer of constant velocities Vp, Vs H D Find the expected arrival time for vertically traveling P and S waves in layer with Vs=3.5 km/s, Vp=6.4 km/s, H=40 km.

Within a layer of constant velocities Vp, Vs H USUALLY NOT THE CASE! D Find the expected arrival time for vertically traveling P and S waves in layer with Vs=3.5 km/s, Vp=6.4 km/s, H=40 km.

Arrival time of a non-vertically incident Pds wave H Vp, Vs D Need to know Vp, Vs, and p (slowness) of the incident P-wave

p is constant Vp, Vs, K p p vertical component of P slowness vertical component of S slowness Vp, Vs, K vertical component of P slowness p p vertical component of P slowness p is constant vertical component of S slowness

Given depth, Vp, Vs, and p, we found t. we have done examples solving the forward problem of calculating what TIME a phase from a given depth would arrive Given depth, Vp, Vs, and p, we found t.

solving then for depth z now we want to solve for what depth a phase was produced depending on its arrival time with constant Vs and Vp that do not depend on depth arrival time equation becomes: solving then for depth z

Pds arrival time = 5 s, p = 0.06 s/km and Vp=6.4 km/s and Vs =3.5 km/s we pick the arrival time of the Ps phase, calculate p, and assume Vp, and Vs Pds arrival time = 5 s, p = 0.06 s/km and Vp=6.4 km/s and Vs =3.5 km/s

how sensitive is this value of z to our assumptions? z = 37 km how sensitive is this value of z to our assumptions?

Vary Vp to observe the SMALL effect on crustal thickness estimates Vp (km/s) K (Vp/Vs) Vs (km) p (s/km) H (km) 6.10 1.73 3.53 0.06 40.12 6.14 3.55 40.36 6.18 3.57 40.60 6.22 3.60 40.84 6.26 3.62 41.08 6.30 3.64 41.32 6.34 3.66 41.56 6.38 3.69 41.79 6.42 3.71 42.03 6.46 3.73 42.27 6.50 3.76 42.50 6.54 3.78 42.74 6.58 3.80 42.97 6.62 3.83 43.21 6.66 3.85 43.44

Vary Vp/Vs to observe the LARGE effect on crustal thickness estimates

arrival time of vertically incident PpPs-wave after P-wave Vp, Vs, K D

as we saw for the direct Ps wave the arrival time is: following the progression explained for the PpPs reverberation phase, its arrival time is: similarly the PsPs + PpSs arrival time is:

we pick the arrival times of the Pds, PpPs, and PsPs+PpSs phases, calculate p, and assume Vp, and Vs 5 16 21 Pds time = 5 s, PpPs = 16 s, PsPs+PpSs time = 21 s, p= 0.06 s/km and Vp=6.4 km/s and Vs =3.5 km/s

Could we have made an incorrect assumption? How do we account for these differences? Are they all resulting from an interface at the same depth? Were the phases all picked correctly? Could we have made an incorrect assumption?

keep Vp constant and vary Vp/Vs, each system has a different behavior

Only 1 Vp/Vs value leads the travel-times to a unique convergence on a certain thickness.

6-12 months of events needed for good solution Zhu and Kanamori, 2000

W1 = 0.7 W2 = 0.2 W3 = 0.1 or W1 = 0.34 W2 = 0.33 W3 = 0.33 Zhu and Kanamori, 2000

GOOD BAD

A Review: 3 Equations We Know: t and p We Assume: Vp We Calculate: z and Vs (giving us Vp/Vs)

Example: Arizona Temporary Station LEMN GSN Station TUC Me

Example: Arizona

Example: Arizona

Example: California Frassetto et al., 2011

Example: California

Example: California

Example: Norway Frassetto et al., Submitted

Example: Norway

Example: Norway

Example: USArray

http://www.iris.edu/dms/products/ears/

Phase Weighting Schimmel and Paulssen, 1997

Crotwell and Owens, 2005

Interface Resolution

CCP Stacking

Questions?