UNCLASSIFIED Initial Study of HPAC Modeled Dispersion Driven by MM5 With and Without Urban Canopy Parameterizations Dr. Chris Kiley – NGC Dr. Jason Ching.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
David J. Sailor1 and Hongli Fan2 1. Portland State University
Advertisements

A numerical simulation of urban and regional meteorology and assessment of its impact on pollution transport A. Starchenko Tomsk State University.
A PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE ETA - CMAQ AIR QUALITY FORECAST MODEL FOR THE SUMMER OF 2004 CMAS Workshop Chapel Hill, NC 20 October, 2004.
Intense Spring Sea Breezes Along the New York - New Jersey Coast Stanley David Gedzelman and Kwan-Yin Kong EAS Department and NOAA CREST Center City College.
1 of 11 - OFCM Special Session - Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling Support for Homeland Security Panel 2: ATD Research Needs and Priorities.
Session 11: Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA 1 Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA Prepared by Dr. Erno Sajo, Associate.
REDUCTION OF HIGHLY REACTIVE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS & VARIABLE EMISSIONS IN HOUSTON/GALVESTON: MONITORING, MODELING, MEASURING, RULEMAKING David Allen.
OpenFOAM for Air Quality Ernst Meijer and Ivo Kalkman First Dutch OpenFOAM Seminar Delft, 4 november 2010.
A drag parameterization for extreme wind speeds that leads to improved hurricane simulations Gerrit Burgers Niels Zweers Vladimir Makin Hans de Vries EMS.
Making the World Safer BB05MSB502 – High-Resolution MET Modeling and Probabilistic Weather for Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion (AT&D) Objectives:
The Use of High Resolution Mesoscale Model Fields with the CALPUFF Dispersion Modelling System in Prince George BC Bryan McEwen Master’s project
Will Pendergrass NOAA/ARL/ATDD OAR Senior Research Council Meeting Oak Ridge, TN August 18-19, 2010 Boundary–Layer Dispersion Urban Meteorology 5/20/2015Air.
An initial linkage of the CMAQ modeling system at neighborhood scales with a human exposure model Jason Ching/Thomas Pierce Air-Surface Processes Modeling.
Issues in Very High Resolution Numerical Weather Prediction Over Complex Terrain in Juneau, Alaska Don Morton 1,2, Delia Arnold 3,4, Irene Schicker 3,
Alan H Huber Physical Scientist; PhD, QEP NOAA, ASMD, in partnership with the US EPA, National Exposure Research Laboratory, RTP, NC, USA THE 5TH ANNUAL.
1 AirWare : R elease R5.3 beta AERMOD/AERMET DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen AUSTRIA
Introduction REU is the abbreviation for Research Experience for Undergraduates. The project on Hazard Mitigation is funded by the National Science Foundation.
NATO ADVANCED STUDY INSTITUTE, Kyiv, May 2004 Detailed numerical modeling of local atmospheric dispersion in an idealized urban area M. Milliez, S. Panzarella,
Introduction to the ISC Model Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering.
8 th Conference on Air Quality Modeling – A&WMA AB3 Comments on Nonstandard Modeling Approaches By Ron Petersen, CPP Inc Blue Spruce Drive Fort Collins.
Tanya L. Otte and Robert C. Gilliam NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with U.S. EPA National Exposure Research.
Jerold A. Herwehe Atmospheric Turbulence & Diffusion Division Air Resources Laboratory National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 456 S. Illinois.
Hiromasa Nakayama*, Klara Jurcakova** and Haruyasu Nagai*
ATD Research Needs and Priorities Panelists Dr. Jay Boris – Navy/NRL Mr. Walter Schalk – NOAA/ARL Mr. John Pace – DoD/DTRA Ms. Jocelyn Mitchell - NuRC.
Research and Development to Meet Urban Weather and Climate Needs Dr. Richard D. Rosen NOAA Research September 23, 2004 Presentation at “Challenges in Urban.
OFCM Special Session on Research Needs 19 Jun 03 John Pace Operational Applications Division Technology Development Directorate Defense Threat Reduction.
”On the sensitivity of Building Performance to the Urban Heat Island Effect” By Adil Rasheed, Darren Robinson, Alain Clappier.
Jonathan Pleim 1, Robert Gilliam 1, and Aijun Xiu 2 1 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, NOAA, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with the.
National Security Applications Program Scott Swerdlin Terri Betancourt Tom Warner National Security Applications Program Research Applications Laboratory.
Impacts of Biomass Burning Emissions on Air Quality and Public Health in the United States Daniel Tong $, Rohit Mathur +, George Pouliot +, Kenneth Schere.
Fine scale air quality modeling using dispersion and CMAQ modeling approaches: An example application in Wilmington, DE Jason Ching NOAA/ARL/ASMD RTP,
1/26 APPLICATION OF THE URBAN VERSION OF MM5 FOR HOUSTON University Corporation for Atmospheric Research Sylvain Dupont Collaborators: Steve Burian, Jason.
1Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology OFCM OFCM Special Session: Challenges of Urban Test Beds Charge to the Joint Action Group for Joint.
Building Aware Flow and T&D Modeling Sensor Data Fusion NCAR/RAL March
A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas O. COCEAL and S. E. BELCHER University of Reading, UK.
Using CMAQ-AIM to Evaluate the Gas-Particle Partitioning Treatment in CMAQ Chris Nolte Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory.
Comparing GEM 15 km, GEM-LAM 2.5 km and RUC 13 km Model Simulations of Mesoscale Features over Southern Ontario 2010 Great Lakes Op Met Workshop Toronto,
CITES 2005, Novosibirsk Modeling and Simulation of Global Structure of Urban Boundary Layer Kurbatskiy A. F. Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics.
Session 5, CMAS 2004 INTRODUCTION: Fine scale modeling for Exposure and risk assessments.
Use of space-based tropospheric NO 2 observations in regional air quality modeling Robert W. Pinder 1, Sergey L. Napelenok 1, Alice B. Gilliland 1, Randall.
U.S. EPA and WIST Rob Gilliam *NOAA/**U.S. EPA
William G. Benjey* Physical Scientist NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC Fifth Annual CMAS.
Diagnostic Study on Fine Particulate Matter Predictions of CMAQ in the Southeastern U.S. Ping Liu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Robert W. Pinder, Alice B. Gilliland, Robert C. Gilliam, K. Wyat Appel Atmospheric Modeling Division, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, in partnership with.
1Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology OFCM OFCM Special Session: Uncertainty in Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion (ATD) Models Setting the.
Page 1© Crown copyright Modelling the stable boundary layer and the role of land surface heterogeneity Anne McCabe, Bob Beare, Andy Brown EMS 2005.
UNCLASSIFIED Defense Threat Reduction Agency Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Mark Flohr Program Manager.
Intro to Modeling – Terms & concepts Marti Blad, Ph.D., P.E. ITEP
Operational Emergency Response Modeling Systems for Use with
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
James S. Ellis Atmospheric Science Division Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Department of Energy (DOE) Workshop on Effective Emergency Response.
Jonathan Pleim NOAA/ARL* RTP, NC A NEW COMBINED LOCAL AND NON-LOCAL PBL MODEL FOR METEOROLOGY AND AIR QUALITY MODELING * In Partnership with the U.S. Environmental.
Using Linked Global and Regional Models to Simulate U.S. Air Quality in the Year 2050 Chris Nolte, Alice Gilliland Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division,
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Master Technical Operations Hub Briefing for the Regional Response Team IX Meeting 4 November 2014.
NOAA Northeast Regional Climate Center Dr. Lee Tryhorn NOAA Climate Literacy Workshop April 2010 NOAA Northeast Regional Climate.
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
Summary of the Report, “Federal Research and Development Needs and Priorities for Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion Modeling” 22 September 2004 Walter.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
Daiwen Kang 1, Rohit Mathur 2, S. Trivikrama Rao 2 1 Science and Technology Corporation 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division ARL/NOAA NERL/U.S. EPA.
PREMAQ: A New Pre-Processor to CMAQ for Air Quality Forecasting Tanya L. Otte*, George Pouliot*, and Jonathan E. Pleim* Atmospheric Modeling Division U.S.
Air Dispersion Modeling: Planning for Airborne Terrorism Release
Development of a Multipollutant Version of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Shawn Roselle, Deborah Luecken, William Hutzell,
Statistical Methods for Model Evaluation – Moving Beyond the Comparison of Matched Observations and Output for Model Grid Cells Kristen M. Foley1, Jenise.
Coupled atmosphere-ocean simulation on hurricane forecast
The Turbulent Structure of the Urban Boundary Layer
DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY
Deborah Luecken and Golam Sarwar U.S. EPA, ORD/NERL
The Value of Nudging in the Meteorology Model for Retrospective CMAQ Simulations Tanya L. Otte NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, RTP, NC (In partnership with.
JEHN-YIH JUANG, Donna Schwede, and Jon Pleim
Presentation transcript:

UNCLASSIFIED Initial Study of HPAC Modeled Dispersion Driven by MM5 With and Without Urban Canopy Parameterizations Dr. Chris Kiley – NGC Dr. Jason Ching - ARL, NOAA, RTP CDR Stephanie Hamilton - DTRA

UNCLASSIFIED 2

3 Outline of Presentation Overview of HPAC Objective of Study Preliminary Results Next Steps

UNCLASSIFIED 4 DTRA Defense Threat Reduction Agency Mission is to safeguard the USA (and its allies) from weapons of mass destruction (WMD) (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and high yield explosives) by providing capabilities to reduce, eliminate, or counter such threats and mitigate its effects. DTRA’s Hazard Prediction and Assessment Capability (HPAC) Automated software system provides the means to accurately predict the effects of hazardous material releases into the atmosphere and its impact on civilian and military populations. The system models hazard areas produced by military or terrorist incidents and industrial accidents using: integrated source terms high-resolution weather forecasts particulate transport analyses

UNCLASSIFIED 5 Weather and Environment Data Input Process for HPAC Land Cover (Landscan) Land Cover (Landscan) Interpolation to Uniform Grid Interpolation to Uniform Grid Terrain Data (Landscan) Terrain Data (Landscan) Weather Data (Many sources) Weather Data (Many sources) Transport & Dispersion Transport & Dispersion Source Data Source Data Concentration in space and time Concentration in space and time Calculate Mass- Consistent Wind Field Calculate Mass- Consistent Wind Field

UNCLASSIFIED 6 Meteorological Input Considerations Primary influence on Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion (ATD) Compatible spatial resolution for the venue of the hazardous release Operational: Rapid calculations Is it Urban? This is the “Problem” we are to address.

UNCLASSIFIED 7 Model Resolution Coarser resolution (5 km) reveals little detail in the wind field Higher resolution (1.67 km) reveals additional wind field structure

UNCLASSIFIED 8 Urban AT&D Urban environment greatly affects local meteorology Wind velocity and direction Turbulence profiles Thermal characteristics NWP models not well suited to simulate urban areas Grid resolutions, detailed building information, parameterization, operational timeliness of forecasts, etc.

UNCLASSIFIED 9 Urban AT&D Urban meteorology and AT&D is a current area of focused R&D Not well understood yet highest probability of terrorist attack NWP does not currently handle urban areas well AT&D systems include simplified assumptions that describe the influence of urban environment Mass consistent adjustments to underlying building topography CFD solutions as computational capabilities advance Coupled CFD/NWP models Urban dispersion models

UNCLASSIFIED 10 UDM and other approaches Urban Dispersion Model (UDM) Dstl (UK) Operationally Fast Current Urban Capability within HPAC

UNCLASSIFIED 11 Urban Dispersion Model (UDM)

UNCLASSIFIED 12 Yellow arrows show wind speed and direction At 50 m above the ground, the flow is from the north or north- northeast at a steady speed UWM 50m Height

UNCLASSIFIED 13 At 7 m above the ground, the flow is channeled around Capitol Hill and down the Mall, with strong winds Weaker winds in built-up parts of the city UWM 7m Height

UNCLASSIFIED 14 HPAC now driven by modeled meteorology (MM5): Sensitivity study to grid size and to urbanization with Reynolds Averaging vs detailed Urban Canopy Parameterization versions. Preliminary results for Houston include: 4 km MM5 4 km MM5 with UDM 1 km MM5 1 km MM5 with UDM 1 km MM5 Urban Canopy Model Date: August 29, 2000 Time of Release:0700 EDT Duration of release:4 hours Study Description

UNCLASSIFIED 15 Houston Case Study 12 UTC (7 AM) 29 August 2000 GB Release, location arbitrarily chosen

UNCLASSIFIED 16 4 km

UNCLASSIFIED 17 4 km with UDM

UNCLASSIFIED 18 1 km

UNCLASSIFIED 19 1 km with UDM

UNCLASSIFIED 20 1 km Urbanized MM5

UNCLASSIFIED 21 Status of Study, Preliminary Findings & Caveats Successfully linked urbanized MM5 with HPAC. Only limited results performed at this time UDM appears to slow spread as expected Relative reduction in agent spread due to enhanced grid resolution not evident for early morning release Urbanized MM5 comparative reduction in spread also not pronounced at 0700 Results pending for different time of day release times

UNCLASSIFIED 22 Future investigations continues to: Examine and understand sensitivity to different times of release, different release locations and different duration of puff travel in order to appreciate differences in flow and turbulence fields due to grid size and urban descriptions. Understand mesoscale modeling abilities to simulate effect of urbanization on land-lake/sea breeze, boundary layer and heat island structures on HPAC simulations. Develop operational (fast) and R&D versions.

UNCLASSIFIED 23 The End Thank you for your attention Disclaimer: The research presented here was performed under the Memorandum of Understanding between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Commerce's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and under agreement number DW This work constitutes a contribution to the NOAA Air Quality Program. Although it has been reviewed by EPA and NOAA and approved for publication, it does not necessarily reflect their policies or views.