Transit Priority Strategies for Multiple Routes under Headway-based Operations Shandong University, China & University of Maryland at College Park, USA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet Orange Grove Boulevard Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias Engineering Associate Kittelson & Associates Bill Cisco Senior.
Advertisements

Transit Signal Priority Applications New Technologies, New Opportunities Peter Koonce, PE APTA BRT Conference – Seattle, WA Wednesday, May 5, 2009 Technology.
WMATA Bus ITS Project Update Transit Signal Priority Briefing to the Traffic Signals and Operations Working Group April 21, 2005.
Yu Stephanie Sun 1, Lei Xie 1, Qi Alfred Chen 2, Sanglu Lu 1, Daoxu Chen 1 1 State Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University, China.
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSPORT Lecture 7 Introduction to Transport Lecture 7: Signal Coordination.
Miroslav Vujic University of Zagreb Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences Zagreb, 10 October 2013 CIVITAS-ELAN 8.2. Public Transport Priority and Traveler.
11October 19, 2011 Comparison of Queue Estimation Models at Traffic Signals Jingcheng Wu October 19, 2011 Presented at the 18th World Congress on ITS.
Transportation Engineering
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSPORT Lecture 3 Introduction to Transport Lecture 4: Traffic Signal.
Geometry information from Liufang Ave. North in Beijing Green phase (s): 99,77,66,75,60 Dwell time distribution: N (30,9), N (27,7), N (24,6) Maximal bandwidth:
Transit Signal Priority Work Group Report 7/30/13
Chapter 221 Chapter 22: Fundamentals of Signal Timing: Actuated Signals Explain terms related to actuated signals Explain why and where actuated signals.
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSPORT Lecture 4 Introduction to Transport Lecture 4: Signal Timing.
CTC-340 Signals - Basics. Terms & Definitions (review) Cycle - Cycle Length - Interval -. change interval - clearance interval- change + clearance = Yi.
TRANSPORT MODELLING Lecture 4 TRANSPORT MODELLING Lecture 4 26-Sep-08 Transport Modelling Microsimulation Software.
2015/6/161 Traffic Flow Theory 2. Traffic Stream Characteristics.
Introduction to Transport
Signals. Laneage Coding Examples.
Highway Capacity Software Based on the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Special Report 209 Transportation Research Board (TRB), National Research Council.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
Lec 20, Ch.18, pp : Analysis of signalized intersections, HCM (Objectives) Understand the conceptual framework for the HCM 2000 method Understand.
Measuring the Effects of Congestion and Request Location on Transit Signal Priority Matt Dorado Erin Qureshi River Hwang Portland State University.
TSP Must Fit Within An Overall Agency ITS Plan. Transit Priority Data Needs Vehicle Location –Speed Door & Lift Status –Predictions Passenger Counting.
Optimal Adaptive Signal Control for Diamond Interchanges Using Dynamic Programming Optimal Adaptive Signal Control for Diamond Interchanges Using Dynamic.
Customized Simulation Modeling Using PARAMICS Application Programming Interface Henry Liu, Lianyu Chu & Will Recker.
Queue evolutions Queue evolution is one of the most important factors in design of intersection signals. The evaluation compares the model-estimated and.
Transportation Engineering
Adaptive Traffic Light Control For Traffic Network.
3rd Street Light Rail Process and Challenges of Developing Transit Signal Priority Javad Mirabdal, Jack Fleck & Britt Thesen Department of Parking and.
RT-TRACS A daptive Control Algorithms VFC-OPAC Farhad Pooran PB Farradyne Inc. TRB A3A18 Mid-Year Meeting and Adaptive Control Workshop July 12-14, 1998.
Transit Signal Prioritization (TSP) and RTS RTS Transit Signal Priority Work Group A Path to Successful Implementation 1 July 16, 2013.
University of Maryland Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering By G.L. Chang, M.L. Franz, Y. Liu, Y. Lu & R. Tao BACKGROUND SYSTEM DESIGN DATA.
ADAPTIVE SIGNAL CONTROL TECHNOLOGY MODEL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS 1 December 20, 2012.
Chapter 9: Speed, travel time, and delay studies
Chapter 20: Actuated Signal Control and Detection
0 Christopher A. Pangilinan, P.E. Special Assistant to the Deputy Administrator Research and Innovative Technology Administration, ITS Joint Program Office.
Bus Lane with Intermittent Priority
Guidelines for the Planning and Deployment of EVP and TSP Presented by: Hesham Rakha Associate Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering Director,
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Introduction to Transport
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP): Deployment Issues and R&D Needs as Identified by Practitioners Hallie Smith Brendon Hemily.
Real-time Bus Arrival Time Prediction: An Application to the Case of Chinese Cities Shandong University, China & University of Maryland at College Park,
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING Proactive Optimal Variable Speed Limit Control for Recurrently Congested Freeway Bottlenecks by Xianfeng.
 Links the optimized settings to VISSIM, the operational analysis results is: Synchronization of Intersections This study employs the core logic of MAXBAND.
Line 22 BRT: Summary Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority May 2003.
Use of HITL in Bus Priority Design Kevin Balke, Ph.D., P.E. TransLink ® Research Center Director Texas Transportation Institute Hardware-in-the-Loop Symposium.
Micro-Simulation of Automated Vehicles with Minimal Central Control Advanced Transit Association Annual Technical Meeting January 12, 2008 Washington,
Enlarging the Options in the Strategy-based Transit Assignment TRB Applications Conference Reno 2011 Isabelle Constantin and Michael Florian INRO.
Hcm 2010: BASIC CONCEPTS praveen edara, ph.d., p.e., PTOE
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Frequency Determination Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
Abstract The City of Portland, in collaboration with TriMet (Portland’s regional transit service provider) and the Oregon Department of Transportation,
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative ITS JPO Lead: Mike Freitas Technical Lead: John Harding, Office of Transportation Management.
I-270/MD 355 Simulator: An Intelligent Online Traffic Management System Dr. Gang-Len Chang Nan Zou Xiaorong Lai University of Maryland Saed Rahwanji Maryland.
Overview of King County Transit Signal Priority Program T3 Webinar January 22, 2008.
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data David T. Crout Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) Presented at Transportation.
12/08/ J/ESD.204J1 Real-Time Control Strategies for Rail Transit Outline: Problem Description and Motivation Model Formulation Model Application.
Chapter 9 Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments
Chapter 191 Chapter 19: Elements of Intersection Design and Layout Make an initial sizing of the intersection Make an initial sizing of the intersection.
Design and Evaluation of An Advanced Dilemma Zone Protection System: Advanced Warning Sign and All-Red Extension by Sung Yoon Park, Liu Xu, Gang-Len Chang.
Signal timing CTC-340. Key Elements Development of safe and effective phase plan and sequence Determination of vehicle signal needs –Timing of yellow.
Mission Street Voyage Advanced Features Test Facility Mission street is a major arterial corridor that was re-timed 10 years prior to our project. Our.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Service Guidelines and Standards Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Board of Directors Meeting September 2015 capmetro.org |1.
Urban Traffic Management System OPTIMIZATION OF URBAN TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM Riza Atiq Abdullah bin O.K. Rahmat.
Red Line Customer Capacity Update
Applied Technology and Traffic Analysis Program(ATTAP) MIDCAP & MUID
Maryland Unconventional Intersection Design Analysis Tool
Highway capacity and Level of Service Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Transit Priority Strategies for Multiple Routes under Headway-based Operations Shandong University, China & University of Maryland at College Park, USA AbstractAbstract  This paper presents a transit signal priority (TSP) model designed to consider the benefits of both bus riders and all intersection passenger car users.  The proposed strategy, mainly for headway-based bus operations, offers the responsible agency a reliable way to determine the optimal green extension or red truncation duration in response to multiple bus priority requests from different routes.  The control objective is to minimize bus passenger waiting time at the downstream bus stop while ensuring that the delays for all passengers are not increased. Research Background  The conventional “first-come-first-served” strategy may improve the schedule reliability of some buses but at the cost of others, that is, to reduce the headway between some buses which are either on their scheduled headways or even ahead of the required arrival time at the next stop.  More specifically, the objectives of this study are to: 1) Design a control system to handle multiple priority requests of buses from different routes, based on various measures of effectiveness, and 2) Identify critical factors or relations that may impact the TSP’s efficiency under different traffic conditions. Signal control logic of the proposed TSP system Model Development Case Study Scenario description: The total travel distance of bus routes is about km; The length of the arterial is about 3km with two-way 6 lanes; The mean headway is about 4 min, the variance observed on the target arterial ranges from 2 to 6 minutes; There are 8 bus routes in two directions; No bus exclusive lane is available on the arterial; There are 6 intersections along the arterial, and only 2 have the function to offer the bus priority function; The duration of simulation time is about 3600 seconds. ConclusionsConclusions  The proposed model utilizes the variable priority time technique, which is capable to perform a more precise control so as to give partial priority to detected buses. To minimize the negative impact to the entire intersection, the proposed TSP strategy also computes the total person delay to ensure its efficiency.  Using the field data from Jinan, the performance evaluation under a simulated platform clearly shows that the proposed TSP control can significantly reduce the passenger waiting time in the scenario of having multiple priority requests from multiple transit routes.  An extensive sensitivity analysis has also revealed that the proposed TSP can yield significant benefits to both bus passengers and all users in the system if the ratio between bus and traffic volumes exceeds 2 percent. Such benefits are generally expected to increase with total intersection volume. The entire decision-making process for TSP in response to multiple requests includes the following steps: Step 1: Collect bus location data and current signal settings from the available communication system. Step 2: Estimate the maximal allowable duration for green extension or red truncation in terms of traffic conditions. Step 3: Detect the approaching buses and their current locations a few seconds (the sum of communication time and reaction time plus the maximal allowable duration) prior to the end of a green phase. Step 4: Estimate the potential benefits if granting the priority to a different number of detected buses. Step 4.1: Calculate the headway of each detected buses under an intended green extension or red truncation. Step 4.2: Estimate the average passenger waiting time at bus stops. Step 4.3: Compute the delay reduction for bus passengers and passenger-car drivers in the target arterial segment. Step 4.4: Estimate the increased delay for passenger-car riders on the crossing street.  Step 5: Determine the priority strategies and the optimized green duration for the priority requests.  Step 6: Execute the TSP control strategy. by Yongjie Lin, Xianfeng Yang, Gang-Len Chang, and Nan Zou Impacts of bus sequences over different routes at the intersection Distribution of absolute headway deviation of route 35 in Jinan, China Flow chart of simulation evaluation using VISSIM This system will grant a bus priority to major road with the extended green seconds, caused by green extension or red truncation, if the following criteria are satisfied: To limit traffic disruptions on the cross street, a red truncation and green extension cannot be taken simultaneously in one signal cycle; The total bus passenger waiting time will be reduced; The total person delay will not be increased by a TSP execution. The total passenger waiting time at the next stop: The total person delay reduction during the TSP execution period: