NSW background studies Max Bellomo, Nektarios Benekos, Niels van Eldik, Andrew Haas, Peter Kluit, Jochen Meyer, Felix Rauscher 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam-plug and shielding studies related to HCAL and M2 Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt November 25,
Advertisements

Beam-plug under M2 and HCAL shielding studies Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt October 9,
Giuseppe Roselli (CMS-RPC) Università degli Studi di Bari – INFN RPC Efficiency with Track Reconstruction Giuseppe Roselli.
Electromagnetic shower in the AHCAL selection criteria data / MonteCarlo comparison of: handling linearity shower shapes CALICE collaboration meeting may.
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
Status of Tracking at DESY Paul Dauncey, Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Hakan Yilmaz, Anne Marie Magnan, George Mavromanolakis, Fabrizio Salvatore.
CMS Physics Meeting, Dec. 6, Analysis Note on the Validation of the ORCA Simulation of the Endcap Muon CSC Front-end Electronics S. Durkin -- Ohio.
1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
GEM DHCAL Simulation Studies J. Yu* Univ. of Texas at Arlington ALCW, July 15, 2003 Cornell University (*on behalf of the UTA team; S. Habib, V. Kaushik,
Striplet option of Super Belle Silicon Vertex Detector Talk at Joint Super B factory workshop, Honolulu 20 April 2005 T.Tsuboyama.
1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.
The digitization procedure occurs separately for each Muon technology, MDT, CSC, RPC and TGC. Here the main steps of each MuonHits to Muon Digits conversion.
W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.
PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.
Muon momentum scale odd / even effects Peter Kluit, MATF/MCP meeting 23 October 1.
T. Kawamoto1 Small Wheel upgrade project Muon week, upgrade meeting T. Kawamoto.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Energy loss improvements and tracking Niels van Eldik, Peter Kluit, Alan Poppleton, Andi Salzburger, Sharka Todorova Common Tracking Meeting 4 July 2013.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
Barrel RPC Chamber consists of 2 double-gaps, each equipped with a common plane of 96 strips read-out by 6 front-end boards. The two double- gaps have.
Ratio of Three over Two Jet Cross Sections: Update 36 pb -1 P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas University of Ioannina, Greece QCD High p T Meeting 17.
Point Source Search with 2007 & 2008 data Claudio Bogazzi AWG videconference 03 / 09 / 2010.
Hadronic Interaction Studies for LHCb Nigel Watson/Birmingham [Thanks to Silvia M., Jeroen v T.]
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
CALICE Digital Hadron Calorimeter: Calibration and Response to Pions and Positrons International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders LCWS 2013 November.
M. Bianco On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration
T. Kawamoto1 ATLAS muon small wheels for ATLAS phase-1 upgrade LHCC T. Kawamoto (New) small wheels ? Why new small wheels for high.
Positional and Angular Resolution of the CALICE Pre-Prototype ECAL Hakan Yilmaz.
/MuID status report on behalf of the Moore/MuID group. Status in the releases ( Units Migrations DC1/G3 MuonGeoModel Migration DC2/G4) MuID updates Trig.
HFT-prototype BUR considerations (Quantitative) What physics is possible in Run-13 assuming some (prototype) sectors are there? Relates to how long would.
Min-DHCAL: Measurements with Pions Benjamin Freund and José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting Max-Planck-Institute, Munich.
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
Status of the hadronic cross section (small angle) Federico Nguyen February 22 nd 2005  the 2002 data sample and available MC sets  trigger efficiency.
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
T. Lari – INFN Milan Status of ATLAS Pixel Test beam simulation Status of the validation studies with test-beam data of the Geant4 simulation and Pixel.
Samir Guragain, Marcus Hohlmann Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL Z′ Mass Reach MC Analysis USCMS meeting Brown University May 6 – 8, 2010.
DN/d  and dN/dp T analysis status Gabor Veres for the working group QCD meeting, Jan 12, 2010.
Fabiola Gianotti, 14/10/20031  s = 28 TeV upgrade L = upgrade “SLHC = Super-LHC” vs Question : do we want to consider also the energy upgrade option.
Joerg Dubert’s Questions as you all aware we currently do not yet know how the final mechanical design of the new Small Wheel will look like. Nevertheless,
( ATLAS was designed for LHC: L=10 34 cm -2 s -1 ) [ Now we expect 7.5 x instantaneous and 10 x integrated luminosity ] PILEUP: from ~30  >200 proton.
Comparison of different chamber configurations for the high luminosity upgrade of M2R2 G. Martellotti - LNF - 13/03/2015 Roma1 + Alessia.
Hadron production in C+C at 2 A GeV measured by the HADES spectrometer Nov02 gen3 analysis and results for spline tracks (shown in Dubna) changes - removing.
M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Wednesday 27th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.
Effects of Endcap Staging/Descoping D.Acosta University of Florida.
RPCs with Ar-CO2 mix G. Aielli; R.Cardarelli; A. Zerbini For the ATLAS ROMA2 group.
Photon purity measurement on JF17 Di jet sample using Direct photon working Group ntuple Z.Liang (Academia Sinica,TaiWan) 6/24/20161.
Status of the measurement of K L lifetime - Data sample (old): ~ 440 pb -1 ( ) - MC sample: ~125 pb -1 ( mk0 stream ) Selection: standard tag (|
L. Pontecorvo1 The Muon New Small Wheels INFN CSN L. Pontecorvo.
June 4, 2009 STAR TPC review Estimation of TPC Aging Based on dE/dx Measurements Yuri Fisyak.
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
SCT readout limitation estimate with data
Studies for Phase-II Muon Detector (|η| = ) – Plans
Optical data transmission for
for the transition region on behalf of the RPC upgrade group
Issues with Simulating High Luminosities in ATLAS
CMS Feedback on the High pileup (PU) Fill
Revisions and Updates, December 13. Some technical details:
Radiation Backgrounds in the ATLAS New Small Wheel
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
M.Biglietti (Univ. Naples and INFN Naples)
Presentation transcript:

NSW background studies Max Bellomo, Nektarios Benekos, Niels van Eldik, Andrew Haas, Peter Kluit, Jochen Meyer, Felix Rauscher 1

Introduction 2 Summary of the results for three background studies: 1.Overlay method 2.Injection method 3.Full pile up NSW simulation

NSW background modeling: overlay Max Bellomo, Niels van Eldik, Andrew Haas, Jochen Meyer, Peter Kluit Muons NSW 25 April, Simulation PP 22 April Muon NSW 18 April 3

Overlay modeling 4 Details have been presented in the Simulation PP meeting Slides 5-7: TDR plot for EI 2.6e34 cm-2s-1 Contains now 100 events with each 10 events overlaid. Backup material for the method: Slides 809 Cross check Data-Data 2012: overlay of 3 times for run vs run Overlay of 3 times for run and comparison to run shows that on average the clusters multiplicities in the Inner wheel agree at the 20% level. Slides Other cross check plots: -Validation of the EM and EO rate with the 5% - Limitations of the present software: CSC are a factor 1.4 too high

MDT EI occupancy: saturation and non-linearity 5 Occupancy is the number of times a tube fires per event For the overlay data (Zero Bias) is used.

TDR text 6 caption: a) The occupancy vs the MDT tube number for the EI chamber for Overlay data (black) and Zero Bias data scale up by a factor 10. b) The ratio of the Overlay to Zero Bias (x 10) occupancy vs MDT tube number. A study has been performed overlaying events to determine the impact on the current EI detector. The overlay method is described in detail ATL-SOFT-SLIDE Here 10 Zero Bias events are overlaid to produce 1 event. The Zero Bias events have been collected in 2012 with a dedicated trigger. The instantanuous luminosity corresponded to 2.6e33 cm-2s-1. The overlayed events correspond to the background one would expect for a luminosity of 2.6e34 cm-2s-1.

TDR text 7 The results for this study are shown in Figure ~xxxx. Only the EI MDT chambers closest to the beamline were selected. The black curve corresponds to the Zero bias occupancy in these chambers detector averaged over the sectors and the two endcaps scaled up by a factor of 10. The red curve the result of the overlay with 10 Zero bias events. One can observe - in particular in the ratio plot - that the red curve does not scale to the black curve at high occupancies. At high tube nrs and low occupancies below 20% it does scale. This effect is due to the fact that at high occupancy MDT hits get masked: the total number of hits will not scale linearly with the background level and saturation takes place. This saturation effect that will lead to MDT hit efficiency losses is one of the reasons to replace the EI MDTs by the proposed NSW.

Data-Data 2012 cross check 8

9 Overlay of 3 times for run and comparison to run shows that on average the clusters multiplicities in the Inner wheel agree at the 20% level. The scale factor for the MDT = 1.22 the TGC 1.27 and the CSC The numbers are dominated by systematic errors that are at the level of 20%.

MDT EM occupancy: 10 Occupancy is the number of times a tube fires per event Here –as expected - no saturation is observed. The ratio should go to 1-occupancy = This is indeed observed

MDT EO occupancy: 11 Here –as expected - no saturation is observed. The ratio should go to 1-occupancy = This is indeed observed. Conclusion: Overlay method in MDT Endcaps is OK at the 5% level.

CSC phi occupancy: 12 Here a discrepancy is found: the overlay produces a 40% too much background.

CSC eta occupancy: 13 Conclusion: Overlay method for the CSC produces about 40% too much background in eta and phi.

NSW background modeling: hits and segment Injection Niels van Eldik, Peter Kluit, Felix Rauscher Muon NSW 26 April 2013 e.g. 14

Introduction 15 Method: use the injection of hits segments in the Inner wheel for the estimation of the background This is done in three steps: 1) Validate and parametrize the hits and segments MDTs and TGCs in the Inner wheel using the high mu single bunch run. No out of time pile up is present here. Sim hits are produced and run though the standard digitization and analyzed. 2) Apply time wrapping BCs to these hits and segments and compare this to the backgrounds in the Z mumu period D data. This is a crucial test of the injection method. Note that the Z data doesnot only contain pile up but also cavern background. 3) Simulate these hits and segments in the NSW detectors using a 25 nsec bunch spacing. The generated Sim hits are run through the fast digitization for the NSW detectors and analyzed.

Cross checks step 1 TGC clusters 16 Note the target for Data/MC is 0.5 Because only 1 endcap is simulated In step 2 the TGC will increased by a factor of 3

Cross checks step 1 MDT clusters / TGC confirmed 17 In step 2 the TGC will increased by a factor of 3

Cross checks step 1 MDT segment clusters 18 Conclusions: reasonable description of the in time pile up in the MDTs and TGCs both for high and low cluster multiplicities. A more quantitative statement will be given at the next step.

Cross checks step II TGC clusters 19 Note the target for Data/MC is 0.5 Because only 1 endcap is simulated Here time wrapping BC is applied and the “SimInjection” data is compared to the Z data that includes pile up and cavern background TGC rate is 0.39/0.5 = 0.78

Cross checks step 1I MDT clusters / TGC confirmed 20 MDT cluster rate is too low: 0.148/0.5 = 0.30

Cross checks step 1I MDT segment clusters 21 Cluster segment rate is too low by a factor: 0.443/0.5 = 0.88

Conclusions from step The injection method: works reasonably The step 2 test shows that: TGC injected clusters are OK at the 20% level MDT injected segments rates are OK at the 20% level However the MDT clusters rate are about a factor 3 too low This could be due to the presence of cavern background

NSW background modeling: Simulations Pile up vs Injection Nektarios Benekos, Niels van Eldik, Peter Kluit, Felix Rauscher Muon NSW 12 May

Introduction 24 The results of two NSW simulations will be compared. 1)Full pile up simulation chain with new NSW detectors and fast digitisation. The sample was generated by Nektarios: sLHC, pileups ~120 to 140 with 25ns bunch spacing /eos/atlas/user/n/nectar/NSW/PileUpProduction_sLHC/MC Parti cleGenerator_dimu_Pt10_100.atlasG4.0001/ See also: erialId=slides&confId= erialId=slides&confId= This corresponds – my calculation - to a luminosity of 3e34 cm- 2s-1. In the plots sample 1) is scaled to a luminosity of 2.6e34 cm-2s-1.

Introduction 25 The second sample is: 2) The hit and segment Injection method. Background hits and segments are added in the Inner wheel using a 25 nsec bunch spacing. The injected background is increased by a factor of 10 (wrt the 2012 period D data), it corresponds a luminosity of 2.6e34 cm-2s-1. The samples was produced by Felix. wget [pcphmpi00] bash download_all.sh NOTE: this works only in the CERN network. The files with 1x the background are digi_rt1_evt*.nSW_DigitizationOutput.pool.root ant the ones with 10x the background are digi_rt01_evt*.nSW_DigitizationOutput.pool.root In both cases the generated Sim hits are run through the fast digitization for the NSW detectors and analyzed. In the fast digitization the energy thresholds for the sTgc and MicroMegas were put to the value of 1 MeV.

Comparison PileUp vs Injection MDT and MicroMegas 26 NSW layout EI MDTs: the |eta|>2 chambers on the Inner wheel The MDTs and CSC near beamline are replaced by MM and sTgc

Comparison PileUp vs Injection sTGCs 27

Occupancy PileUp 28 STgc only for current BC MM assumes four strips firing per gasgap

Occupancy Injection 29 Odd shape for MicroMegas Bug that shifts the strip nr for odd/even chambers

Conclusions 30 Results for two methods for the occupancy of the NSW Detectors. The injection method predicts rates that are about 30% to 60% higher than the Full Sim. Maximum luminosity of 2.6e34 cm-2s-1: Micromegas 4% sTGC pads 1% sTGC strips 0.4% sTGC wires 0.8% The systematic uncertainty on these numbers is rather large because – mainly because they should include cavern background and the singles that are difficult to predict. A safety factor 3-4 is probably reasonable (see also slide 22). These numbers could be quoted in the TDR. Both the Pile Up and the Injection samples can be used for e.g. NSW segment or track reconstruction studies in a high background environment.