Www.FLDOE.org © 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 2015 Annual District Assessment Coordinator Meeting 9-8-15 VAM Update.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roster Verification Tool Teacher Evaluation System Intended Outcomes – Basic understanding of the teacher roster verification tool – Awareness of resources.
Advertisements

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Update on the State’s English Language Proficiency Assessments.
OTES & OPES DEADLINES/REQUIREMENTS/CHANGES
Completing the Classroom Teacher and Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluations for Presented by: The Office of Talent Development Employee Evaluations.
Student Learning Targets (SLT)
Components of the 2015 Texas Assessment Program State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) –STAAR Spanish –STAAR A –STAAR L –STAAR Alternate.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
Florida Department of Education Value-added Model (VAM) FY2012 Using Student Growth in Teacher and School Based Administrator Evaluations.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
The State of the State TOTOM Conference September 10, 2010 Jim Leigh Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
Monitoring Accommodations in South Dakota Linda Turner Special Education Programs.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update School Grades Technical Assistance Meeting April 8 and.
March, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Rule Development Workshop: School Accountability for Exceptional Student Education (ESE) Center Schools Rule 6A , Florida Administrative Code August.
March 28, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Progress Monitoring Plan Information and Procedures August Part 2.
DRE Agenda Student Learning Growth – Teacher VAM – School Growth PYG Area Scorecards. PYG, and other Performance Indicators.
Overview of SB 736 Legislation Pertaining to Personnel Evaluation Systems and Race to the Top 1.
Whiteboard Zoom Out Surveying Year One of the Oklahoma Value-Added Model.
Our Shared Agenda: Empowering Effective Teaching Florida Educational Negotiators Annual Conference.
Student Learning Growth Details November 27 th and November 29th.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
Top-performing urban school district in Florida State Assessment & Accountability.
Florida Department of Education Value-added Model (VAM) FY2012 Using Student Growth in Teacher and School Based Administrator Evaluations.
Roster Verification RV Presentation to School Administrators Spring 2012.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. District Assessment Coordinators Annual Meeting September 8, 2015.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Prekindergarten Contacts' Meeting February 3, 2015 Bureau Update.
Measuring Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Name of School.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Progress Monitoring Plan Information and Procedures August Part 2.
DOE STAFF DATABASE: Overview of Changes Presenter : Teresa R. Sancho FAMIS 2011 CONFERENCE Tallahassee, Florida June 2011.
DRE FLDOE “Value-Added Model” School District of Palm Beach County Performance Accountability.
Student Growth Percentiles Basics Fall Outcomes Share information on the role of Category 1 assessments in evaluations Outline steps for districts.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Charter Schools in Florida Friday, February 13, 2015 Mid-Year Transportation.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA PRINCIPAL’S CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.
Release of Preliminary Value-Added Data Webinar August 13, 2012 Florida Department of Education.
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA LAW CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.
School Improvement Activities Accreditation (AdvancED) Process Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.
Value Added Model and Evaluations: Keeping It Simple Polk County Schools – November 2015.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
S.B Municipality Fees. S.B – Environment Budget Reconciliation Bill Enacted during the 2011 regular legislative session and becomes effective.
Florida Department of Education’s Florida Department of Education’s Teacher Evaluation System Student Learning Growth.
VAM Training. Florida’s value-added model developed by Florida educators  The Department convened a committee of stakeholders (Student Growth Implementation.
Value Added Model Value Added Model. New Standard for Teacher EvaluationsNew Standard for Teacher Evaluations Performance of Students. At least 50% of.
Federal Accountability/ AYP Update Accountability TETN April 19, 2011 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update School Grades Technical Assistance Meeting.
 Mark D. Reckase.  Student achievement is a result of the interaction of the student and the educational environment including each teacher.  Teachers.
Florida Department of Education Briefing Kathy Hebda, Deputy Chancellor for Educator Quality Juan Copa, Director of Research and Analysis in Educator Performance.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation June 2012 PRESENTATION as of 6/14/12.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. VAM and DJJ Accountability Rating System Update Assessment and Accountability.
Annual Assessment and Accountability Meeting Updates
Accountability Update
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
DJJ Accountability Rating System
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
VAM Primer.
Accountability Overview Measures and Results
Teacher Evaluation System
Federal Accountability/ AYP Update
SB 1664 Changes to Personnel Evaluations
FY17 Evaluation Overview: Student Performance Rating
How do we carry out the election process last year?
SCHOOL TRAINING District Contact Information Dr. Peter Straker: ext Rachelle Fougere:
School Improvement Ratings Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Statewide Accountability
ESSA State Plan Amendment
School Finance Update CASE Nuts & Bolts
Presentation transcript:

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved Annual District Assessment Coordinator Meeting VAM Update

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 2 Topics HB 7069 Rule Timeline for Questions

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. HB 7069

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 4 House Bill 7069 Changes to component proportions Validity study Annual report Rules

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Student Learning Growth Measurement Using Statewide Assessment Data for Use in School Personnel Evaluations 6A , FAC Student Learning Growth Measurement Using Statewide Assessment Data for Use in School Personnel Evaluations

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 6 Rule Adoption Timeline April 14, 2015: HB 7069 Became law, requiring rules be adopted by the State Board of Education by August 1, 2015 April 27, 2015: Notice of Rule Development posted May , 2015: Rule Development workshops and web conference conducted for public input on draft text May 15 – June 16, 2015: Review public comments and revise rule text based on feedback submitted June 17, 2015: Additional rule development workshop conducted for public input on revised draft text June 19, 2015 Rule submitted for consideration by State Board of Education July 23, 2015: State Board meeting for consideration of rule for adoption August 20, 2015: Rules filed with Department of State September 9, 2015 – Rule becomes effective

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 7 Sections of Proposed Rule 6A Purpose of the Rule 2.Definitions 3.Formulas for Measuring Student Learning Growth 4.Data Collected and Reported for Calculation of Student Learning Growth Formulas 5.Performance Level Standards

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 8 Section 1 - Purpose The purpose of this rule is to provide the formulas for measuring student learning growth, the statewide standards for determining each performance level for use in each school district instructional personnel and school administrator evaluation systems developed under section , Florida Statutes, and procedures associated with implementing the formulas and standards.

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 9 Section 2 - Definitions Confidence interval Courses associated Covariate Covariate adjustment model Expected score Observed score Staff information system Standard error Student information system. Value-added model

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 10 Section 3 - Formulas for Measuring Student Learning Growth Two subsections a)ELA/Mathematics b)Algebra I Describes the covariates used and directs the reader to forthcoming documentation drawn from technical reports and analysis specifications used to produce annual model results

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 11 Section 3 - Formulas for Measuring Student Learning Growth ELA/Mathematics Covariates a.Number of subject relevant courses b.Up to 2 prior test scores c.Disabilities d.English language learner status e.Gifted status f.Attendance g.Mobility h.Difference from modal age of peers in the same grade i.Class size j.Similarity of prior test scores among students in the class

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 12 Section 3 - Formulas for Measuring Student Learning Growth Algebra I covariates – same as ELA and Mathematics except 3 more are added: k.Average prior test score on most recent test among students in the class l.Percent of students in the class who are gifted m.Percent of students in the class who are younger or older than the majority of students in the grade

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 13 Section 3 - Formulas for Measuring Student Learning Growth For ELA and Mathematics : VAM score = Teacher effect + (0.5 x School Component) For Algebra I: VAM score = Teacher effect

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 14 Section 4 - Section 4 - Data Collected and Reported for Calculation of Student Learning Growth Formulas 1.3 year aggregate combined VAM score - ELA/Mathematics 2.Individual grade and subject VAM score - Algebra I 3.Standard errors

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 15 Exclusions Use of VAM becomes optional in the following situations: A teacher has one or more assessments included in their score where the expected score for the student exceeded the highest score it was possible to achieve on the assessment. Number of assessments included in the calculation is fewer than 10. Teacher is not in the classroom for more than 50% of the days in the course. The teacher teaches Advanced Academics

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 16 Value-Added Results and Scores The formula produces a value-added score for a teacher, which reflects the average amount of learning growth of the teacher’s students above or below the expected learning growth of similar students in the state, using the variables accounted for in the model. A score of “0” indicates that, on average, students performed no better or worse than expected based on the factors in the model A positive score indicates that students, on average, performed better than expected A negative score indicates that students, on average, performed worse than expected

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 17 Standard Error An estimate of a teacher’s impact on student learning (the score) contains some variability. The standard error is a statistical term that describes that variability. Using the standard error to construct a confidence interval around a score (like the +/-3 points in an opinion poll) is a good statistical practice that can assist in increasing the accuracy of classification decisions.

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 18 Section 5 - Performance-Level Standards

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 19 Section 5 - Performance Level Standards Use the standard error to construct confidence intervals. Use these confidence intervals to establish performance standards. Give teachers the benefit of the doubt when there is below-threshold statistical uncertainty. Place a larger share of teachers statewide into higher performance categories than student-level metrics using the same assessment results.

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Impact and Simulation Data

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved VAM Model Impact Data

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 22

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 23

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 24

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 25

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved Year Aggregate Combined VAM Score Averages by Performance Level

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 27 Comparison of Distribution Between 3 Year Aggregate Combined VAM Score and Student Achievement Levels

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved VAM Process Timeline

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. 29 Timeline DateActivity September  Vendor selection. October  RVT UAT for migration to SSO. November  Fall Survey 2 RVT opens. December 31, 2015  All evaluations due via Survey 5 Staff Database submission for inclusion in annual legislative report. Mid-March  Spring Survey 3 RVT opens. April 15, 2015  Survey 2/3 match request list files from posted to sharefile for districts to update. April 29, 2015  All districts requesting any changes from the prior year to their Survey 2-3 match conditions for VAM calculation purposes must have updated the document in their sharefile directory to reflect changes. May 13, 2015  Fall Survey 2 and Spring Survey 3 Roster Verification Tools close.  Districts electing to use Survey 2 and 3 data instead of RVT for VAM purposes must have those data files finalized. Week of June 3, 2015  FDOE posts files to sharefile site with Survey 2-3 requests applied for district review.  Districts verify that Survey 2-3 requests were applied correctly.  The district accountability contact in every district replies to FDOE that files were compiled accurately. July 2015  Processes VAM calculations for FSA ELA,FSA Mathematics, and Algebra I. September, 2015  FLDOE posts VAM results for teachers to school districts via sharefile website.

© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved.