An International Fund for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ships INTERTANKO ISTEC & Executive Committees Dubai, 20 -21 January 2009 Christian BREINHOLT Director.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The CBDR Principle and GHG emissions from International Shipping Per Kågeson.

Advertisements

1 The European Environment Agency and emissions from international maritime transport John van Aardenne, Air and Climate Change Programme February 9, 2011.

CDM – LULUCF Project Cycle Winrock International Sandra Brown Training Seminar for BioCarbon Fund Projects.

Module 1: Introduction and recap M1. M1. Introduction and recap This first workshop covers all the following contents – as per work plan: CDM modalities.

Programming directions for GEF-6 Climate Change Mitigation

Assessing the MBM EG’s report Dr Per Kågeson MEPC September 2010.

The EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) Rationale and Lessons learnt Artur Runge-Metzger Head of International Climate Negotiations, European Commission.

Sustainable Energy Roundtable Series January, 2005 Pfizer Greenhouse Gas Management Program Experience.

EU views on greenhouse gases and global warming potentials and options for addressing GHG emissions from international aviation and maritime transport.

| 1 | 1 REDUCING THE IMPACT OF SHIPPING ON THE ENVIRONMENT DECARBONISATION.

CONFIDENTIAL THE DOHA AMENDMENT TO THE KYOTO PROTOCOL TO THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE (UNFCCC) SELECT committee 25 NOVEMBER.

International cooperation Part IV. The UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol Session 7.

International cooperation Part IV. The UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol Session 7.

In-session workshop on means to reach emission reduction targets (Kyoto AWG) Bangkok 1-3 April 2008 Topic 4: Greenhouse gases, sectors and source categories.

National circumstances and inventories of GHG emissions Mirja Kosonen UNFCCC WS, Dublin.

Latin American Panel September, 2010 Lima, Perú GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPPING Peter M. Swift.

Latin American Panel October 2009 Vina Del Mar, Chile Peter M. Swift.

IMO activities on control of GHG emissions from ships IMO activities on control of GHG emissions from ships Eivind S. Vagslid Head, Chemical and Air Pollution.

CDM National Authorities : an Example Prepared for the National Workshop on Capacity Development for Clean Development Mechanism (CD4CDM) March 2003,

UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Reducing poverty through sustainable industrial growth Power-Gen PAK rd International Conference.

IMO GHG REGULATIONS Latin American Panel Cartagena, Columbia November 1, 2011.

Introduction to Climate Change: - global warming - basis steps in a clean development project - connection of CDM with European Trading Scheme Wim Maaskant.

Climate Change and CDM in Thailand

Brief Overview of Legal Framework: UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol M.J.Mace Climate Change and Energy Programme, FIELD LDC Workshop Nairobi, Kenya 2-3 November.

Breaking Legal Grounds…. Implementing a PCF Project Sao Paulo, Brazil - November 20, 2002 Charlotte Streck, PCF.

ASIAN PANEL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS ASIAN PANEL March 2, 2010 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.

Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.

CD4CDM Suriname, First National Workshop, April 2008 Climate Change and CDM Institutional Architecture Glenn S. Hodes UNEP Risø Center.

Leading the way; making a difference INTERTANKO Council November 15, 2012 UPDATE ON GHG MARKET BASED MEASURES JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.

1 DEDICATED TO MAKING A DIFFERENCE Vincent Mages Climate Change Initiatives VP Lafarge Greenhouse gas mitigation in the cement.

International Framework and Kyoto Protocol. UNFCCC Conference of the parties (annual meeting) –Review implementation –Consider new needs –Subgroups Creates.

EU Climate Action EU – Central Asia Working Group on

CLEAN ENERGY MECHANISMS IN CONVENTIONAL POWER GENERATION H.AZOUZ, CDM Project Management Officer at STEG

CLIMATE CHANGE – NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR SUBSOIL USERS Yerzhan Yessimkhanov Director, Subsoil Use Department Grata Law Firm 1.

1 “Using Carbon Markets to Encourage the Uptake of Low Carbon Vehicles” Meeting the Low Carbon Challenge The Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership Third Annual.

Overview Understanding compliance Compliance in the new 2015 agreement – Mitigation – Other areas Some draft options.

1 UNFCCC Workshop on Enabling Environments for Technology Transfer Ghent, Belgium, 9-10 April 2003.

Presentation “Green Investment Schemes – greenhouse gas emissions quotas trading mechanisms in Ukraine according to the Kyoto Protocol to the Convention.

L/O/G/O ประเสริฐสุข จามรมาน รองผู้อำนวยการองค์การบริหาร จัดการก๊าซเรือนกระจก ยุทธศาสตร์การเติบโต แบบสีเขียว (Green Growth) 1.

GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants the.

CD4CDM Review of Workshop 1 ….innovating energy solutions…. KITE, SSN & UNEP.

Financial Mechanism under the UNFCCC Maria Netto United Nations Development Programme 3 September 2008.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions and INTERTANKO Policy Position Members’ Meeting Singapore 2 November 2009 Peter M. Swift.

SOGE, 05/16-17/05, Bonn, Germany Switzerland. SOGE, 05/16-17/05, Bonn, Germany Switzerland, as a Party to the UNFCCC and a member of the international.

Convention of Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol of 1997 Shaina Conners Period 6 4/30/2009.

Market-Based Measures Presented by WG 5 Co-Rapporteurs: Stephen Seidel Michael Rossell to ICAO Environmental Colloquium April 9-11, 2001.

Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.

CDM Project Cycle LGED Bhaban, Dhaka 8 – 9 April 2008 Presented by Khandaker Mainuddin Fellow, BCAS.

International Shipping and Climate Change Michael Sutton A/g Executive Director Infrastructure and Surface Transport Policy.

North American Panel 4 November 2010 Houston Reducing GHG Emissions from Shipping Peter M. Swift.

Ch. 6. Externality Examples Cap and Trade –Acid rain and SO2 –CO2 and greenhouse gases.

Regional perspectives under the Clean Development Mechanism Jose Domingos Gonzalez Miguez, Ministry of Science and Technology, Brazil.

The EU Emissions Trading Scheme and its review Thomas Bernheim DG Environment, unit C.2 European Commission.

Leading the way; making a difference GHG EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING LATIN AMERICAN PANEL Buenos Aires.

Informal Thematic Debate of the General Assembly Climate Change as a Global Challenge 31 July 2007, United Nations The way forward: International Context.

Clean Development Mechanisms and New Market Developments Presentation at the Regional Conference on Gas Flare Reductions Tashkent, 15 th June 2012.

Asian Panel 3 December 2010 Hong Kong Reducing GHG Emissions from Shipping Peter M. Swift.

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS UPDATE ON IMO DEVELOPMENTS NORTH AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 7, 2009 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS UPDATE ON IMO DEVELOPMENTS.

 Cap and Trade Application: Global Warming 6. 2.

Sustainable Seaborne Transport — Our Common Challenge Shipping Emissions — What are the next steps? Peter M. Swift Managing Director, INTERTANKO.

BACKGROUND TO THE CDM By Philip M. Gwage. Structure of Presentation Background  Climate Change Convention  Kyoto Protocol The Clean Development Mechanism.

Standards Development for Climate Change  Consensus reached between UNFCCC & ISO that internationally accepted standards will be promoted globally  Include.

Global, National and Provincial Climate Change Commitments

NORTH AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 14, 2008

Market-Based Measures

International Transport and the Paris Agreement

The European Environment Agency and emissions from international maritime transport John van Aardenne, Air and Climate Change Programme February.

Convention of Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol

Market-Based Measures

IMO work to address GHG emissions from ships

Presentation transcript:

An International Fund for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ships INTERTANKO ISTEC & Executive Committees Dubai, January 2009 Christian BREINHOLT Director Danish Maritime Authority

IMO - The Specialised Agency - No More Favourable Treatment UNFCCC - A new global agreement in 2009 (COP 15) - Common but Differentiated Responsibilities What is the situation?

Nine fundamental principles Technical measures Operational measures Market based measures IMO action on GHG emissions from ships

Nine fundamental principles Effective in contributing to the reduction of total global GHG emissions Binding & equally applicable to all flag States Cost-effective Able to limit or effectively minimize competitive distortion Based on sustainable environmental development without penalizing global trade and growth Based on a goal-based approach and not prescribe specific methods Supportive of promoting and facilitating technical innovation and R&D in the entire shipping sector Accommodating to leading technologies in the field of energy efficiency Practical, transparent, fraud free and easy to administer

Principal debate in IMO IMO or UNFCCC principles? Before or after COP 15? Mandatory or voluntary? Technical and/or market based?

IMO GHG WG II: 9-13 March 2009 MEPC 59: July 2009 Assembly: 23 November - 4 December COP 15: December 2009 Future work in IMO

An International GHG Fund - rationale for the proposal Long life of ships Growth in international shipping Contributions from all sectors Offsetting GHG emissions

Bunker fuel contribution: - Mandatory registration of Bunker Fuel Suppliers - Based on the Bunker Delivery Note as evidence - Collection by registered Bunker Fuel Suppliers - Direct transfer to the International GHG Fund - Ships in international trade – all marine fuels Revenues: - Mitigation, Adaption and Technology Projects - Non-vessel Specific R&D Projects - Technological Cooperation within IMO A global, binding, separate legal entity – a new Convention An International GHG Fund – Key Elements

The Ship Owners/Operators: Purchase fuel from registered Bunker Fuel Suppliers Keep the Bunker Delivery Note on board The Bunker Fuel Suppliers: Mandatory/voluntary registration Provide a certified Bunker Delivery Note Collect and transfer directly to the International GHG Fund Electronic report and recordkeeping of bunker fuel sold The States Parties: Port State Control Inspections of Bunker Fuel Suppliers An International GHG Fund - Obligations

Legal Structure based on the IOPC Funds: Assembly Secretariat Tasks and responsibilities: Receive, record and monitor information Maintain and allocate revenues Keep a ship specific registry Keep a global registry of Bunker Fuel Suppliers Submit an annual report An International GHG Fund - Organisation and Administration

CO 2 offsetting impacts through a contribution Key figures Total emissions from international shipping: approx. 1,100 Mt. CO2 (BLG 12/6/1) Consumed bunker fuel: approx. 365 million tons Actual price for a JI/CDM-credit: approx. EUR (approx. $ ) Expected future price for JI/CDM credit: approx. EUR (approx $30-45) Different scenarios GHG contribution at a given US dollar per ton bunker fuel: Contribution size in USD per ton bunker fuel Collected contribution in USD (million)/yr JI/CDM (MT CO2 eq.) at 15 USD. JI/CDM (MT CO2 eq.) at 30 USD JI/CDM (MT CO2 eq.) at 45 USD 7.52, , , ,4251,

An International GHG Fund - Virtues Meet all nine fundamental principles: - Contribute to reductions in global GHG emissions - Equally applicable to ships – regardless of flag - Allow growth in international shipping - Support technical innovation and R&D - Easy to administer Assist solving the challenges of climate change Revenues for the benefit of developing countries Embrace Common but Differentiated Responsibilities (States) and respect No More Favourable Treatment (ships) Emission baseline established for free Eliminates any need for allocating GHG emissions Rely on well-established conceptual approaches

An International GHG Fund Main points of concern addressed by INTERTANKO: Kyoto compatibility? GHG reductions through offsetting? Varying contributions according to bunker fuel? Enforcement mechanisms for Bunker fuel suppliers? Non-compliance by ships and/or Bunker Fuel Suppliers? Practicality of the existing Bunker Delivery Note System?