Tuning Educational Structures in Europe, Asia and the World Tuning: A New Strategy for Modernising Higher Education Degree Programmes Robert WAGENAAR,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE
Advertisements

Lifelong learning: Taking Bologna to the labour market Lars Lynge Nielsen President of EURASHE Leuven Ministerial Conference 28 April 2009.
The Bologna Process: Implementational Issues UNICA Contributions.
HERODOT International Conference: Torun, Poland 2-5 September Tuning and European Higher Education Geography Kevin Crawford & Karl Donert Liverpool.
TUNING Methodology and Quality in study programmmes LEFIS Annual Assembly Florence, 11 February 2006 Ann Katherine Isaacs University of Pisa Tuning Management.
Towards 2010 – Common Themes and Approaches across Higher Education and Vocational Education and Training in Europe - New and emerging models in vocational.
GENERAL PRESENTATION The Tuning Methodology TUNING PROJECT
HERODOT Network meeting: Doing a better job for Geographers? Sofia 2-5 April Some impacts of the Bologna Process in European Higher Education Karl.
State of Play and Main Challenges Related to Armenian National Qualifications Framework (ANQF) Armen Ashotyan Minister of Education and Science Strasbourg,
Learning outcomes in the context of the Bologna reforms Сейдахметова Римма Ганиевна Bologna Process and Academic Mobility Center Ministry of Education.
Employability in context of the Bologna Process Gayane Harutyunyan Bologna Secretariat Yerevan, May 2014.
IMPROVING THE RECOGNITION SYSTEM Developments along subject lines and their impact on Recognition December 3rd, University of Latvia, Riga Dr. Julia González,
CHUGD November 2005 The Bologna Process and Geology The Tuning Project
ECTS-A COMMON LANGUAGE FOR RECOGNITION Gayane Harutyunayn, Head of Bologna Secretariat, Armenia 4 December 2014, Yerevan, Armenia Baghdad, Iraq Online.
Carolyn Bew Anne Boddington University of Brighton
Where would higher education be without Erasmus? AEF Europe- Focus sur les IP 14 mai 2009 Patricia De Smet Unit Higher Education; « Erasmus » European.
ECTS – The European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System Michael Hörig European University Association Moscow, 12 December 2007.
Tuning IV: European Physics Education Network (EUPEN) Julia González & Robert Wagenaar (Joint coordinators of the Socrates-Erasmus, Tempus.
Universidad de Deusto - Rijksuniversiteit Groningen Dra. Julia María González Ferreras - Vice-rector of International Relations - UD Thematic Networks.
Universidad de Deusto - Rijksuniversiteit Groningen Legal Studies and the Tuning Project 19 th February 2005 Julia González – Robert Wagenaar.
Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Learning Outcomes Are formulated by the academic staff, preferably involving student representatives in the.
EUA Higher Education Convention, Graz, May 29-31, 2003 Group 5A First discussion: overriding principles of the two-cycle structure overriding structural.
1 Education in Europe: Quality Enhancement and Setting Standards Dr Marie Donaghy Head of School of Health Sciences.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
The Modernisation of Higher Education Introduction to LOLA methodology Anthony Vickers 27 th June 2012.
© 2006, Tod O’ Dot Productions Introducing EUI-Net: European University-Industry Network to Develop and Promote the Entrepreneurship of Students in Technology.
11 CEIBAL:Capacity Enhancement for Implementing Bologna Action Lines in Georgia Regional Academic Summit „New trends in Medical Education & Bologna Process.
“Three Cycle System in the Framework of Bologna Process”, Summer School, Yerevan, Armenia, 2008 European qualifications framework Algirdas Vaclovas Valiulis,
“What will bring the Future for Universities in the European Higher Education Area ?” Robert Wagenaar Conference on Innovative Curricula Design „Higher.
“Tuning in Perspective: profiles, learning outcomes, competences, ECTS and quality assurance” Vilnius 25 March 2010 Robert Wagenaar (Joint-Coordinator.
Tuning Educational Structures in Europe and beyond: from project to process Tuning Management Committee TUNING INTRODUCED.
ECTS definition : Student centred system, Student centred system, Based on student workload required to : Based on student workload required to : Achieve.
Management Committee UK BOLOGNA SEMINAR USING LEARNING OUTCOMES Heriot-Watt University Edinburgh 1-2 July 2004 The Tuning Approach A Case Study Robert.
Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO): Update Deborah Roseveare Head, Skills beyond School Division Directorate for Education OECD 31.
Management Committee TUNING methodology and tools for curricula design: II part - Questionnaires Fausta Ludovici.
Management Committee WELCOME TO TUNING 3. Management Committee A SPECIAL WELCOME TO OUR SPEAKERS, GUESTS, NEW MEMBERS AND THEMATIC NETWORK REPRESENTATIVES.
The Qualification Frameworks Pros et Contras Sigmund Grønmo University of Bergen SIU Seminar Gardermoen June 17, 2011.
KNU - Bishkek (KS) 21 April 2015 DOQUP PROJECT FINAL DISSEMINATION CONFERENCE 1 Tempus Project n TEMPUS IT-SMGR Documentation for QA of.
national qualification framework and the learning outcomes based education Petar Bezinović University of Rijeka and Institute for Social Research in Zagreb.
ECTS Users’ Guide 2015 Approved at Yerevan Ministers’ Meeting May 2015.
ACE Opening Session 2002 News from the Recognition Field Lesley Wilson Secretary General European University Association (EUA)
Dublin, 22 February 2011 I.EU Higher Education Policy and The Bologna Process II.ECTS and DS Labels 2011 Ruard Wallis de Vries European Commission Directorate.
General introduction about Tuning GE project; aims, achievements and activities Reforming Curricula – Preparing for one European Higher Education Area.
WHAT MAKES A SUCCESSFUL QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCY? CEENQA WORKSHOP FRIDAY, 23 MAY 2014 Hotel Sirius-Pristina.
Realising the European Union Lisbon Goal The Copenhagen process and the Maaastricht Communiqué: Martina Ní Cheallaigh DG Education and Culture.
Tuning of Higher Education Programmes on the Basis of Profiles, Competences and Learning Outcomes WHYHOWWHAT.
PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Curriculum and Programme Objectives: Mapping of Learning Outcomes Oleg V. Boev, Accreditation Centre, Russian.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
Curriculum reform Tirana 16th-17th March. A bit about ESIB ESIB-the National Unions of students in Europe is an umbrella organization representing over.
Thematic Networks and the Tuning Project 1 st February 2005 Julia González – Robert Wagenaar.
The European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) More details in the site: Dr Michalis Glampedakis Professor Technological Institution (University)
New Collaborative Practices in Aligning SCHE in Europe and the USA, two representative cases in Europe Golden Sands 15 June 2009 Ivelina Yoveva, IUC Bulgaria.
The TUNING Russia project outcomes Maria Seninets DSTU Tuning Centre.
“Three Cycle System in the Framework of Bologna Process”, Summer School, Erevan, Armenia, 2008 The Three-Cycle System Algirdas Vaclovas Valiulis, Bologna.
Andy Gibbs Yerevan 2009 Winter School “Promoting European Dimension in Higher Education”
Management Committee Thematic Networks and Tuning: How to adapt and how to adopt the Tuning methodology? Tuning II ( )
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Education and Culture Life Long Learning: Education and Training policies School Education and Higher education.
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Skopje, June 2009 Nadezda Uzelac MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA.
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
The Bologna Process and Tuning Project: Educational Structures in Europe Dag Wiese Schartum.
GENERAL PRESENTATION The Tuning Methodology TUNING PROJECT
XXIV Konferencja Metodyczna
Tuning II ( ) Thematic Networks and Tuning: How to adapt and how to adopt the Tuning methodology? Management Committee.
International Information Seminar Seminar, Minsk October 2016, Minsk State Linguistics University MODULE BASED EDUCATION. ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING.
Student Study and Work Placement Mobility
Senior project leader at CIEP Former President of ENQA
The Malta Qualifications Framework (MQF)
University of Groningen, the Netherlands
Presentation transcript:

Tuning Educational Structures in Europe, Asia and the World Tuning: A New Strategy for Modernising Higher Education Degree Programmes Robert WAGENAAR, University of Groningen (NL) Joint co-ordinator Tuning Process Co-director International Tuning Academy International Conference: Cooperation Between HEI and Business – Why do we need to cooperate? University Business Cooperation, Employability & Higher Education Policy. Ljubljana, 25 October 2013

Outline of presentation TUNING Process i.What is Tuning? ii.Contribution of Tuning to Modernize HE programmes The Tuning Process is coordinated by the University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain and the University of Groningen, the Netherlands

1. Tuning Process i. What is Tuning? TUNING is an initiative for and by academics to reform the Higher Education Area throughout the World. It started as the Universities’ response to the challenge of the Bologna Process, but has evolved into a world wide Process TUNING MOTTO: Tuning of educational structures and programmes on the basis of diversity and autonomy

Why Tuning?  To develop one language understood worldwide by all stakeholders: competences and learning outcomes  To stress the importance of general academic competences and skills for society  To involve stakeholders in the process of curriculum design and enhancement  To develop shared international reference points at disciplinary / subject area level  To give academics a key role in the process of reforming Higher Education structures and its degree programmes and qualifications  To focus on diversity by promoting flexibility  To facilitate (inter)national mobility and recognition of studies

Why Tuning? What is in it for the student and graduates of our degree programmes? Learner-centred degree programmes:  Well structured and transparent:  clear identification of the generic and subject competences which are developed  based on well described measurable Learning Outcomes  Preparing to be (better) employable  Preparing to take (social) responsibility  Stimulating Personal development  Facilitating (inter)national mobility and recognition

Student centred learning: An approach or system that supports the design of learning programmes which focus on learners’ achievements, accommodate different learners’ priorities and are consistent with reasonable students’ workload (i.e workload that is feasible within the duration of the learning programme). It’s accommodates for learners’ greater involvement in the choice of content, mode, pace and place of learning. Tuning Definitions

What is a competence according to Tuning? Tuning definition of competences Competences represent a dynamic combination of knowledge, understanding, skills and abilities. Fostering competences is the object of educational programmes. Competences are formed in various course units and assessed at different stages. [competences are obtained by the student] Tuning Definitions

Academic area vs. professional area and competences Academic field Employment profile Competence Circle Academic field TUNING Philosophy

What is a learning outcome according to Tuning? Level of competence is expressed in terms of Learning outcomes: Statements of what a learner is expected to know, understand and be able to demonstrate after completion a period of learning. They can refer to a single course unit or module or else to a period of studies, for example, a first or a second cycle programme. Learning outcomes specify the requirements for award of credit. [learning outcomes are formulated by academic staff] Tuning Definitions

Source: Jeremy Cox (Polifonia Network) for Tuning TUNING Philosophy

Why Tuning? TUNING: What is in it for Society? Universities which contribute effectively to the welfare of society by offering:  High quality, cost-effective state-of-the-art degree programmes  Highly employable graduates (right set of skills and wider competences)  Graduates well aware of the social needs of society  Full involvement in social and economic local, regional and (inter)national debates (no ivory tower)

Why Tuning? What is required? Degree programmes which are up-to-date, relevant and based on competence development and Learning Outcomes How do we know? Outcomes Tuning consultation process among stakeholders Open discussions with main stakeholders

Relevance of degree programmes According to more than Human Resource recruiters and International chief executives consulted in the framework of the NT Times /Herald Tribune University Ranking for Employability of Graduates’, ‘What the job market wants’: Focus should be on general/generic competences and skills in close conjunction with academic field.

University Ranking for Employability of Graduates

Set of practical TOOLS for academics / institutions to develop and enhance degree programmes a.A methodology to design / enhance, deliver student centred degree programmes (for all three cycles) based on the Competences and Learning Outcome approach b.Meta-profiles for a growing number of Sectors and Subject Areas c.A Guide to formulating degree programme profiles. Including Programme Competences and Programme Learning Outcomes d.A methodology to calculate LOs and workload based credits (ECTS, CLAR, ACTS) e.A platform for academics to discuss the implications of higher education reforms ii Main Contributions of Tuning to Modernize HE Programmes

Tuning approach based on 6 consistent features for degree programmes: an identified and agreed need a well described profile corresponding learning outcomes phrased in terms of generic and subject specific competence (lines 1 and 2) the correct allocation of ECTS credits to units (line 3) appropriate approaches to learning, teaching and assessment (line 4) methodology for quality enhancement (line 5) TUNING focuses on: > (meets expectations) and > (meets aims) TUNING focuses on: > (meets expectations) and > (meets aims) a. Methodology to design / deliver student centred degree programmes Large scale consultations among stakeholders (academics, employers, graduates and students) to identify most relevant competences and levels of achievement in degree programmes

Consultation of stakeholder groups Tuning global consultation of stakeholders: Europe Latin-America Russia Africa Central Asian Republics China

Some outcomes of Tuning Consultations Two levels: generic/general competences/skills and subject specific ones Groups consulted: employers, academics, graduates and students Variables used: Importance versus Achievement Ranking of Competences

Europe versus Latin America

Which general competences / skills are most important? Analyzing and Synthesizing Applying knowledge in practice Leadership Working in a team Problem solving Learning abilities Creativity Communication skills

CONSULTING PROFILING DESIGNING LEARNING EVALUATING ENHANCING STUDENT CENTRED LEARNING Construction of relevant curricula

60 ECTS FIRST CYCLE PROGRAMME COURSE UNIT 60 ECTS Degree programme based on the Tuning methodology: Programme based on profile, sets of competences to be obtained, desired learning outcomes to be achieved, ECTS credits to be awarded Programme design is team work, based on consultation, discussion, cooperation Learning outcomes / competences to be developed are basis for credit allocation Teaching, learning and assessment approaches respect credit allocation: feasibility key factor Top-down Programme Design and Delivery

Ten steps for designing/improving new programmes (or improving existing ones) 1. Determine need and potential 2. Define the profile and the key competences 3. Formulate the Programme Learning Outcomes 4. Decide whether to ‘modularise’ or not 5. Identify competences and formulate learning outcomes for each module 6. Determine the approaches to teaching, learning and assessment 7. Check whether the key generic and subject specific competences are covered 8. Describe the programme and the course units 9. Check balance and feasibility 10. Implement, monitor and improve

THE TUNING DYNAMIC QUALITY DEVELOPMENT CIRCLE Definition of academic and professional profiles Identification of resources Programme design: definition of learning outcomes / competences Construction of curricula: content and structure Evaluation and improvement (on the basis of feed back and feed forward) Selection of types of assessement Selection of teaching and learning approaches Quality in Process and Outcomes

TUNING METHODOLOGY in Translation

Degree programmes based on: (Cycle) level descriptors Academic and professional meta-profiles / reference points Competences / Learning outcomes Student workload / time-related and Learning Outcomes based credits b. Meta-profiles for a growing number of Sectors and Subject Areas

International environment Internationally established (subject specific) Tuning reference points NQF European QFs QFs of other world regions Sectorial QF Word wide perspective: Tuning and Qualifications Frameworks OECD- AHELO pilot Qualifications frameworks and Reference points / Standards

OECD-AHELO

Qualifications Frameworks and the National perspective Meta-framework: EQF/ QF for EHEA Europe National QFs Sectoral QFs/ Subject area based reference points DEGREE PROGRAMMES

301 Qualifications Frameworks and Tuning Existing instruments: Meta-Qualifications Frameworks (EQF / QF for EHEA) National Qualifications Frameworks TUNING Sectoral Qualifications Frameworks: Social Sciences, Humanities, Creative and Performing Arts TUNING subject area meta-profiles or reference points for large range of disciplines Diploma Supplement (as an instrument to publish content and outcomes of degree programmes) Instruments under construction: TUNING Sectoral Qualifications Frameworks for other domains/sectors

Qualifications Frameworks and the Subject area perspective QF descriptors TUNING Sectorial reference points TUNING Subject specific Reference Points THE RECOGNITION PYRAMIDE

Role of Tuning Sectorial Qualifications Frameworks Humanities Social Sciences Natural Sciences Health Care Engineering EQF Creative and Performing Disciplines

Tuning innovation: Dimensions (Characteristics) of Sectors

Role of Reference Points / Tuning Meta-profiles Reference Points for the Design and Delivery of Degree Programmes Format 2005: 1. Introduction to the subject area 2. Degree profile(s): overview typical degrees and typical occupations 3. Learning outcomes & Competences – level cycle descriptors 4. Workload and ECTS 5. Learning, Teaching and Assessment 6. Quality enhancement

Tuning Subject Area Meta- Profile publications … Other subject area brochures: Business Administration, Educational Sciences, Gender Studies, History, Mathematics, Nursing, etc. Recent publications: Art History, Linguistics, Literature and Culture, Theology and Religious Studies. Also published: Tuning AHELO conceptual frameworks for Economics and Engineering (first cycle)

From the Tuning glossary Degree profile specific aims “A description of the character of a degree program or qualification. This description gives the main features of the programme which are based on the specific aims of the program, how it fits into the academic map of disciplines or thematic studies and how it relates to the professional world”. Role of the Degree Profiles

Profiles have to serve different purposes A good profile takes into account different users’ perspectives & interests Profile Role of the Degree Profiles

Tuning methodology is of global significance: nearly 100 countries involved CLEAR CONCEPT EASY TO UNDERSTAND WORLDWIDE ACCEPTANCE RESPECTS DIVERSITY Global Significance USAUSAUSAUSA

Thank you for your attention !