The Flixborough, UK, Cyclohexane Disaster, 1 June 74 A Vapor Cloud Explosion (VCE) Case Study Presented to ES-317y at UWO in 1999. Dick Hawrelak.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IGN-ENSG-L.Dalençon Apprehend Industrial Risks from past accidents : 5 World-Known Major Accidents Evaluation Feyzin, France, 1966 Flixhborough, UK, 1974.
Advertisements

Open-Path Gas Detection - Philosophy of Use or The Story of Clouds.
1S25 Arc Fault Monitor. 1S25 Arc Fault Monitor 1S25 Arc Fault Monitor Electrical arc short circuits in metal clad switchgear may occur for many different.
Hazard Survey Dow Fire and Explosion Index is the most popular form of hazard survey. A formal systematized approach using a ranking form (similar to an.
Risk Analysis For: ES-317Y and ES Plant Design Project at UWO By: R.A. Hawrelak, P.Eng. - Lecturer Dept of Chem & Biochem Eng’g Dow Chemical –
1 2.3a The BHOPAL Incident India, 2 Dec 84 Presented to ES-317y at UWO in Dick Hawrelak.
Where We Go Wrong In Distillation Towers Dick Hawrelak Presented to ES317Y in 1999 at UWO.
Where We Go Wrong In Line Sizing Dick Hawrelak Presented to ES317Y in 1999 at UWO.
FIRES, EXPLOSIONS, AND COMBUSTIBLE DUST HAZARDS
The Shell Oil Norco VCE, Louisiana, 5 May 88
Cairo University Faculty of Engineering Petrochemicals Engineering Plant Layout May 2010.
Responsible CarE® Process Safety Code David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.
1 2.3b Potchefstroom, SA, Ammonia Tank Failure, 13 July 73 Presented to ES-317y at UWO in 1999 Dick Hawrelak.
This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium This project is funded by the European Union Projekat finansira.
Reactive and Explosive Materials An Introduction.
Animating Suspended Particle Explosions Presented at SIGGRAPH 2003 by Bryan E. Feldman James F. O’Brien Okan Arikan University of California, Berkeley.
Incident Date:1/11/2012 Time:07:30 AM Fatality: 25 injuries: 131 Total losses:
Fires and Explosions.
Standard 29 CFR Part Welding, Cutting and Brazing Training.
23 killed, 130 Injured, $1,300MM damage
The Problems with Long Bolt Flanges in process pipe connections when exposed to a fire!!
1 Chemical Hazards. 2 Purpose of Lectures on Chemical Safety To understand the hazardous properties of chemicals prior to their use. To transport / handle.
ERT 312 SAFETY & LOSS PREVENTION IN BIOPROCESS ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION Prepared by: Miss Hairul Nazirah Abdul Halim.
Flixborough Explosion 1 st June Workers killed when an explosion occurred in a plant processing Cyclohexane Thanks to Ann-Marie McSweeney &John.
Visual 2.1 Introduction and Unit Overview The role of CERTs in fire safety:  Put out small fires.  Prevent additional fires.  Shutoff utilities  Assist.
Destructive Effects of Nuclear Weapons
FLIXBOROUGH DISASTER.
Pressure Safety Valve Design Presented to ES-317 at UWO in 1999 Dick Hawrelak.
Hazards in Process Industries DR. AA Hazards in Process Industries There are Three Major Hazards: Toxic Release, Fire, Explosion Toxic Release –Impacts.
Where We Go Wrong In Vessel Design Dick Hawrelak Presented to ES-317Y in 1999 at UWO.
Where We Go Wrong In Pump Design Dick Hawrelak Presented to ES317Y in 1999 at UWO.
Where We Go Wrong - With Compressors Dick Hawrelak Presented to ES-317y in 1999 at UWO.
Dow Fire and Explosion Index (FEI) Dick Hawrelak Presented to ES317Y in 2001 at UWO.
Fire Safety.
Hazards Analysis. The Next 55 Minutes... l Overview of Hazards Analysis l Scenarios for EPCRA and RMP l Resources.
Characteristics Of an Explosion.
The Tragedy Of San Juanico, PEMEX, Mexico City, 19 Nov 84 A BLEVE Case Study Presented to ES-317y at UWO in 1999 Dick Hawrelak.
Firework Displays & Safety
Pro-Science 4 th International Conference of Hydrogen Safety, September 12-14, 2011, SAN FRANCISCO, USA EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF IGNITED UNSTEADY HYDROGEN.
ERT 322 SAFETY AND LOSS PREVENTION ACCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS.
ERT 312 SAFETY & LOSS PREVENTION IN BIOPROCESS ACCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS Prepared by: Pn. Hairul Nazirah Abdul Halim.
Hazardous Materials Subpart H. Subpart H Standards Compressed Gases Acetylene Hydrogen Oxygen Nitrous Oxide Flammable.
Skikda, Algiers, Jan. 20, 2004 R.A. Hawrelak CBE 497 CBE 317.
SECTION 2 TERMINOLOGY. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PROPERTIES.
Explosion An explosion is a rapid expansion of gases resulting in a rapid moving pressure or shock wave. The expansion can be mechanical or it can be.
Hazard Identification
3.4.3 Student Book © 2004 Propane Education & Research CouncilPage Bulk Plant Emergency Shutdown Equipment and Periodic Examination Methods One.
CHEE 470 Costing & Design. Agenda n Introduce Myself n Discuss What You Want to Get Out of the Course n Discuss Project Planning / Design n Capital Cost.
© 2012 Delmar, Cengage Learning Chapter 7 Fire and Explosions.
BP AMOCO EXPLOSION MARCH ‘05 15 DEAD 100 INJURED 30 PUBLIC INJURED 8 IN CRITICAL CONDITION.
Ste-Elisabeth-De-Warwick, Que 27 June, 1993 Barn catches fire. 14 firefighters had just arrived at farm. 4,000 Litre propane tank BLEVEs. 3 killed when.
THE LITTLE BOY. Development  The Little Boy bomb was constructed through the Manhattan Project during World War II.  Creation of the bomb started in.
Prepared by : Nishant .A. Raval
Chapter 7 Fire and Explosions. Fires, Explosions, and Detonations The lowest temperature at which an air- hydrocarbon mixture will explode or burn is.
Fire Terms. AFFF Foam A fire fighting foam known as aqueous film forming foam Forms a layer of film between the fuel and the oxygen causing the fire.
Misuse of Combustible Gas Meters Supervisor Training 1/11/08.
CHE441 Lecture: Tank & Vessel. Introduction of Vessel Applications of Vessels:  (1) as a liquid surge drum for liquid storage  (2) as a vapor/liquid.
Case Study: Buncefield Fire What We Have Learned
Dow Fire and Explosion Index (FEI)
Fire Suppression (Fire Fighter II)
Environmental Compliance
Chapter 7 Fire and Explosions
Safety and Health in Process Industries
Risk Management and Mitigation
Les Shirvill1, Mark Royle2 and Terry Roberts2 1Shell Global Solutions
Terminologies on On-site and Off-site Disasters Management
HAZOP Guidewords Base Set
Dow Fire and Explosion Index (FEI)
CONTENTS Background Experimental Arrangements Results / Findings
Phillips 66 Explosion and Fire PassadenA, Texas, 1989
Presentation transcript:

The Flixborough, UK, Cyclohexane Disaster, 1 June 74 A Vapor Cloud Explosion (VCE) Case Study Presented to ES-317y at UWO in Dick Hawrelak

Flammability Hazards Bursting shock wave - TNT equiv. Fireball - thermal hazards BLEVE - flying fragments Flash Fire - thermal hazards Vapor cloud explosions - TNT equiv.

Two Classes Of Hydrocarbon Vapor Cloud Explosions, VCEs Detonation Class VCE - High level explosion. Deflagration Class VCE - Low Level explosion.

Detonation Class VCE Flammable vapor is ignited in a congested plant area with vertical confinement. High flame acceleration leads to detonation. The sharp impulse force can be equivalent to a TNT explosion. Damage will be radial from the explosion epicenter. Overpressure range, PSO, 10 to 5 psig.

Deflagration Class VCE Flammable vapor is ignited in uncongested area with open space. Low flame speed leads to deflagration. Impulse force longer duration and not as damaging as a detonation. Damage may be directional from the explosion epicenter. Overpressure range, PSO, 5 to 0.5 psig.

Flixborough Reactors

Flixborough Flowsheet

The Incident A 20 inch diameter temporary by-pass pipe Jack-knifed and failed under thermal expansion stress. 40 of 120 tonnes of cyclohexane escaped into the congested reactor support structure. Within two minutes, the vapor cloud ignited and a Detonation Class VCE took place (35 tons TNT equiv).

Thermal Expansion Jack-Knife

VCE Results Flammable Hazard V1.2

Plot Plan Showing VCE Impact

The Consequences 28 plant people were killed. 53 people were wounded and required medical treatment. 1,800 houses were damaged in the rural area beyond the plant fence line. Property damage was $425MM in US funds.

Events Leading To The Incident. Two months before the incident, R-5 was found to be leaking. A 6 ft. long crack had developed. A water hose stream was directed to the crack to cool and quench the small cyclohexane leak.

Events Cont’d The cooling water contained nitrates which encourage stress corrosion of certain carbon steels. Thus, by trying to relieve the situation, the quenching was actually acting as a promoter of corrosion. Ultimately, the reactor had to be removed from service.

Events Cont’d There was no experienced works manager, WM, available on site at the time of the removal of R-5. The previous WM, a good maintenance engineer with 25 yrs of experience, had quit because an anticipated promotion was given to an outside person.

Events Cont’d As there was no experienced mechanical engineer on site, those remaining decided to “fast track” or “scratch pad” a solution for the intended by-pass. They sketched a full-scale by-pass line in chalk on the maintenance floor. No stress analyses calculations were performed on the by-pass connection.

Events Cont’d The by-pass line was quickly installed and the plant put into start-up mode. Shortly after start-up, the by-pass line failed causing 40,000 lbs of cylcohexane to leak into the confined spaces of the reactor support structure. Within two minutes, the vapor cloud exploded.

Lessons Learned The main root cause of this incident was the use of cooling water with nitrates to quench cyclohexane leaks on the reactors. Another root cause was installing a by-pass line, or any line for that mater, without stress analysis. This is a recipe for disaster. A third root cause was management must recognize when they are vulnerable to critical manpower changes.

Lessons learned Cont’d More control is required to conduct good engineering practices once the plant is up and running. Poor location and poor construction of the control room. Plant was too congested at the design stage. Must minimize hazardous inventories.

Lessons Learned Cont’d Process hazard review required at regular intervals. Plant must adhere to pressure vessel regulations. Require emergency planning with the community.

Deterministic Pre-planning Flammable Hazard V1.2 Defines vapour cloud characteristics between UEL and LEL. BLEVE shock wave, thermal and fragmentation analysis. Flash Fire thermal analysis. VCE analysis. Space separation (ISBL, OSBL and green belt).

Possible Exam Questions How does a Detonation Class VCE differ from a Deflagration Class VCE? Describe the characteristics of the two type of explosions. What were the three root causes of this incident?