GEO Geohazard Supersites Current Status and key challenges EGU 2013 Vienna Supersites Splinter Meeting.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Claudia de Windt Senior Legal Specialist Department of Sustainable Development Strengthening Humanitarian Assistance and Prevention and Response Coordination.

Advertisements

European Supersites Coordination Workshop Wrapping up the Workshop: Conclusions and recommendations for the effective clustering of Supersites Efthimios.

Remote Sensing at the service of Natural Disasters Warning: the Contribution of the Supersites Concept Professor Stuart Marsh Co-Chair GEO Institutions.

Contribution of Space Earth Observation to the GeoHazard Scientific Community Salvatore Stramondo Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia Workshop.

GEO SB-01 Oceans and Society: Blue Planet An Integrating Oceans Task of GEO GEO-IX Plenary November 2012 Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil on behalf of the Blue.

(The Global Programme of Research On Climate Change Vulnerability, Impacts and Adaptation) Adaptation Knowledge Day V: Climate Change Adaptation Gaps BONN,

Makoto Kajii SIT Chair 2010 – th Annual Report on CEOS Implementation of the GEOSS Space Segment Agenda Item accomplishments and lessons.

Summary of Supersites discussion at FRINGE 2011 meeting Frascati 21 Sept splinter meeting Chair: Falk Amelung (GEO task leader) Craig Dobson, represented.

BELMONT FORUM E-INFRASTRUCTURES AND DATA MANAGEMENT PROJECT Updates and Next Steps to Deliver the final Community Strategy and Implementation Plan Maria.

US Climate Change Science Program Incorporating the US Global Change Research Program and the Climate Change Research Initiative U.S. Climate Change Science.

A Roadmap for the GHCP The GeoHazards Community of Practice (GHCP) Presentation developed during the First GHCP Workshop, Paris, January 18-21, 2010.

Getting involved in Social Innovation Research – participation and experimentation David Ludlow, Centre for Research in Sustainable Planning and Environments,

Context of compilation of the WWQA Thomas Chiramba Chair, UN-Water Thematic Priority Area on Water Quality Chief, UNEP Freshwater Ecosystems Unit.

GEO Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories (GSNL): Building data infrastructures for science Massimo Cocco EPOS PP Coordinator INGV, Rome GEO-X.

The GEO Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories Initiative Objective, Status, Value Chart 1> Geohazard Supersites > Jörn Hoffmann

WP5 Strategy Domenico Giardini SED ETHZ. WP5 Objectives Harmonize national implementation Integrate the European scientific community Establish Centres.

Stefano Salvi Chair of the Supersites Advisory Committee Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction, Sendai, March 2015.

The role of the GEO Geohazards Community of Practice for the Supersites Initiative The role of the GEO Geohazards Community of Practice for the Supersites.

1 Robert S. Webb and Roger S. Pulwarty NOAA Climate Service.

The Preparatory Phase Proposal a first draft to be discussed.

Slide: 1 27 th CEOS Plenary |Montréal | November 2013 Klaus Schmidt, Dr. Jörn Hoffmann, DLR CEOS Support to the Geohazard Supersites The CEOS Supersite.

Report of the Science and Technology Committee GEO Plenary VIII Istanbul, Turkey 16 November 2011.

Presentation to the 26 th CEOS Plenary at Bengaluru, India October, 2012 Accomplishments and Challenges 2012 ….. report from the chair Kiran Kumar.

Geohazard Community of Practice Roadmap and Declaration Professor Stuart Marsh Co-Chair, GEO Science & Technology Committee and GEO Geohazard Community.

IGOS Symposium Programme Committee Telecon

IGOS Geohazards: Status and perspectives 3rd International Geohazards Workshop Frascati, ESRIN, 6th November 2007 Hormoz Modaressi Director IGOS Geohazards.

EPOS Preparatory phase Torild van Eck (ORFEUS) Call INFRA Deadline: December 3, 2009 Funding: between 3 and 6 MEuro Duration: max 4 year.

EPOS & EarthScope 1 Progress report WP5 Torild van Eck (ORFEUS/EPOS) Tim Ahern (IRIS/EarthScope/SAGE) Chuck Meertens (UNAVCO/EarthScope/GAGE) Fran Boler.

Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories Jörn Hoffmann, Klaus Schmidt German Aerospace Center (DLR) CEOS SIT-29 Meeting CNES, Toulouse, France 9 th.

TEMPLATE DESIGN © An increasing world population, industrial development, globalization and changing weather and climate.

EPOS a long term integration plan of research infrastructures for solid Earth Science in Europe Preparatory Phase Project

© GEO Secretariat GEO Work Plan 2nd GEOSS Science and Technology Stakeholder Workshop "GEOSS: Supporting Science for the Millennium Development.

Geohazard Super Sites Concept & ESA Trial Geohazard objectives / requirements GEO Geohazard Members What is a Super Site? “Super Site” Concept ESA Virtual.

Seismic Hazard Map EPOS European Plate Observing System RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE AND E-SCIENCE FOR DATA AND OBSERVATORIES ON EARTHQUAKES, VOLCANOES, SURFACE.

ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.

ENV proposal meeting, Geneva, Sep. 24, Proposal Objectives Joost van Bemmelen, ESA

Synthesis of Strategic Issues (Climate, Disasters, Water) and a draft European strategic framework.

What is GEO? launched in response to calls for action by the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development, Earth Observation Summits, and by the G8 (Group.

Draft GEO Framework, Chapter 6 “Architecture” Architecture Subgroup / Group on Earth Observations Presented by Ivan DeLoatch (US) Subgroup Co-Chair Earth.

CEOS Priorities for 2013 Agenda 3 Kerry Ann Sawyer CEOS Executive Officer CEOS SIT-28 Meeting Hampton, Virginia, USA 12 March 2013.

The UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development Bernard Combes.

Task AR-07-03: Global Geodetic Reference Frames Report to ADC-4 prepared by Hans-Peter Plag (IAG/GGOS) Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological.

EPOS where we are, where we go ! Massimo Cocco INGV Rome September EPOS Meeting.

Committee on Earth Observation Satellites Ivan Petiteville, ESA Plenary Agenda Item # th CEOS Plenary Kyoto International Conference Center Kyoto,

Towards an European Network of Earth Observation Networks (ENEON): Addressing Challenges and Facilitating Collaboration for non-space based Earth Observations.

The ADC, the CBC and the UIC Where Should These Committees Be Interacting? Gary J. Foley, USEPA Co-Chair User Interface Committee July 20, 2006.

Research and Innovation Research and Innovation EU research activities supporting AfriGEOSS AfriGEOSS Side Event, Tuesday 10 November Jose Miguel RUBIO.

WP3 Harmonization & Integration J. Lauterjung & WP 3 Group.

Committee on Earth Observation Satellites CEO Team Plenary Agenda Item #14b 29 th CEOS Plenary Kyoto International Conference Center Kyoto, Japan 5 – 6.

A. Review current infrastructure status within Europe Review and overview (national and European scale) of existing and planned Observational infrastructures.

The Global Cryosphere Watch Jeff Key NOAA/NESDIS, Madison, Wisconsin USA South America GCW Meeting, Santiago, October

Page 1 WGISS Response to GEO/CEOS-SIT WGISS-22 Updates Ken McDonald WGISS/Vice-Chair.

Task AR-07-03: Global Geodetic Reference Frames Report to ADC-6 prepared by Hans-Peter Plag (IAG/GGOS)‏ Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological.

E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nCommunity Research Global Change and Ecosystems Malta, 27 January 2004 Alan Edwards EUROPEAN COMMISSION GMES – Implications.

Waisea Vosa Climate Change Unit Division of Political and Treaties Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation.

25 th CEOS Plenary, Lucca Italy, 8-9 November 2011 CSA report Luc Brûlé, CEOS Principal Canadian Space Agency.

+ Welcome to PAHO/WHO Sustainable Development and Health Toolkit for the UN Global Conference RIO + 20 Welcome to PAHO/WHO Sustainable Development and.

WP9– Evaluation, roadmap & development plan Rupert Lueck EMBL – 26 June

GEO Disaster Resilience Breakout Group Summary GEO Work Programme Symposium 2016 Kerry Ann Sawyer CEOS/NOAA 4 May 2016 Geneva, Switzerland.

GEO 2016 Work Programme Giovanni Rum, GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.

The Geohazard Supersites initiative improving DRR through better science Stefano Salvi Chair of the GSNL Scientific Advisory Committee.

Review of Candidate GEO Initiative “Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories 2.0” Prepared by: Review Team Lead: Jonathon Ross – CEOS Delegation (Alternate)

GSNL 2.0: leveraging on Open Science to promote science-based decision making in Disaster Risk Reduction Stefano Salvi1,Giuliana Rubbia1, Luigi Abruzzese1.

Capacity Building Enhance the coordination of efforts to strengthen individual, institutional and infrastructure capacities, particularly in developing.

Return to First Principles

Access to COSMO-SkyMed data for science

CAPACITY for a Sustainable CEOS

GCOS Strategy: advocate-coordinate-communicate

Work Programme 2012 COOPERATION Theme 6 Environment (including climate change) Challenge 6.4 Protecting citizens from environmental hazards European.

The GEO-GSNL initiative

Presentation transcript:

GEO Geohazard Supersites Current Status and key challenges EGU 2013 Vienna Supersites Splinter Meeting

GEO Supersites Objectives The aim of the Geohazard Supersites is “To enrich our knowledge about geo-hazards by empowering the global scientific community through collaboration of space and in-situ data providers and cross-domain sharing of data knowledge. Policy makers and national agencies will benefit from the new scientific knowledge for the assessment and mitigation of geological risks.“ (GEO-VIII Plenary – November 2011, Istanbul)

EPOS is a GEO participating institution TASK-DI-01 C2: Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories EPOS as a regional federation to provide multidisciplinary services for science innovation in solid Earth EPOS contributes through ORFEUS to the FDSN (IN-01)

Stakeholders The Geohazard Supersites is a partnership of organizations and scientists involved in the monitoring and assessment of geo-hazards. The stakeholders are: In-situ data providers (monitoring of seismic and volcanic areas) space agencies and satellite operators providing the satellite data Scientists working on geophysics (understanding) Global geo-hazard scientific community

Strategy The Objective can be achieved 1 - by improved monitoring through coordination of space and in-situ data providers for selected sites (Geohazard Supersites) and regions (Natural Laboratories) 2 - by an e-infrastructure virtually connecting the data providers and users at local level (to be interoperable with others) 3 - by open access to all relevant data sets according to the GEO data sharing principles (seismic, GPS and InSAR, …..).

Achievements Terms of Reference ( – Permanent Supersites – Candidate Supersites – Event Supersites – Natural Laboratories Proposals’ selection – Selection process by CEOS – Proposal guidelines for in-situ data Strategic Plan White Paper

Issues to discuss Formal submission procedure for in-situ Supersite Website Shared periodic evaluation approach of approved proposals Interoperability among local e-RIs and data discovery through webservices An implementation Roadmap Monitoring and coordinating interactions with decision makers