1 General Structural Equation (LISREL) Models Week 2 #3 LISREL Matrices The LISREL Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing up results from Structural Equation Models
Advertisements

1 General Structural Equation (LISREL) Models Week 3 #2 A.Multiple Group Models with > 2 groups B.Relationship to ANOVA, ANCOVA models C.Introduction to.
Need to check (e.g., cov) and pretty-up: The LISREL software may be obtained at Other software packages include Eqs (
1 Regression as Moment Structure. 2 Regression Equation Y =  X + v Observable Variables Y z = X Moment matrix  YY  YX  =  YX  XX Moment structure.
SEM PURPOSE Model phenomena from observed or theoretical stances
Canonical Correlation
General Structural Equations Week 2 #5 Different forms of constraints Introduction for models estimated in multiple groups.
Structural Equation Modeling Mgmt 290 Lecture 6 – LISREL Nov 2, 2009.
General Structural Equation (LISREL) Models
Structural Equation Modeling
Structural Equation Modeling: An Overview P. Paxton.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
1 General Structural Equation (LISREL) Models Week #2 Class #2.
Quantitative Marketing Seminar
Structural Equation Modeling Mgmt 291 Lecture 8 – Model Diagnostics And Model Validation Nov. 16, 2009.
Matrix Algebra Matrix algebra is a means of expressing large numbers of calculations made upon ordered sets of numbers. Often referred to as Linear Algebra.
Structural Equation Models An Overview
Slide B.1 LISREL MathematicalMarketing Appendix B: The LISREL Software In this section we will cover how to run LISREL, software designed to run the covariance.
Multiple regression analysis
The General LISREL MODEL and Non-normality Ulf H. Olsson Professor of Statistics.
The General LISREL Model Ulf H. Olsson. Making Numbers Loyalty Branch Loan Savings Satisfaction.
Structural Equation Modeling
GRA 6020 Multivariate Statistics Factor Analysis Ulf H. Olsson Professor of Statistics.
G Lect 31 G Lecture 3 SEM Model notation Review of mediation Estimating SEM models Moderation.
G Lecture 111 SEM analogue of General Linear Model Fitting structure of mean vector in SEM Numerical Example Growth models in SEM Willett and Sayer.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring
Arithmetic Operations on Matrices. 1. Definition of Matrix 2. Column, Row and Square Matrix 3. Addition and Subtraction of Matrices 4. Multiplying Row.
Structural Equation Modeling Continued: Lecture 2 Psy 524 Ainsworth.
Path Analysis. Figure 1 Exogenous Variables Causally influenced only by variables outside of the model. SES and IQ in Figure 1. The two-headed arrow.
G Lecture 61 G SEM Lecture 6 An Example Measures of Fit Complex nonrecursive models How can we tell if a model is identified? Direct and.
Introduction to CFA. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: Upon completing this chapter, you should be able to do the following: Distinguish between exploratory factor.
Path analysis: Observed variables Much has been written about path analysis; has been around for over 20 years; started in sociology. Usually has been.
Structural Equation Modeling 3 Psy 524 Andrew Ainsworth.
Moderation in Structural Equation Modeling: Specification, Estimation, and Interpretation Using Quadratic Structural Equations Jeffrey R. Edwards University.
Geo479/579: Geostatistics Ch17. Cokriging
Structural Equation Modeling
MathematicalMarketing Slide 2.1 Descriptive Statistics Chapter 2: Descriptive Statistics We will be comparing the univariate and matrix formulae for common.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis Psych 818 DeShon. Purpose ● Takes factor analysis a few steps further. ● Impose theoretically interesting constraints on.
Some matrix stuff.
1 General Structural Equation (LISREL) Models Week 1 Class #3.
General Structural Equations (LISREL) Week 3 #4 Mean Models Reviewed Non-parallel slopes Non-normal data.
LISREL: The short course Paul Jose Nov. 8, 15, 22, 29 Victoria University.
Slide 10.1 Structural Equation Models MathematicalMarketing Chapter 10 Structural Equation Models In This Chapter We Will Cover The theme of this chapter.
4.7 Identity and Inverse Matrices and Solving Systems of Equations Objectives: 1.Determine whether two matrices are inverses. 2.Find the inverse of a 2x2.
Multivariate Statistics Matrix Algebra I W. M. van der Veld University of Amsterdam.
ICPSR General Structural Equation Models Week 4 # 3 Panel Data (including Growth Curve Models)
1 General Structural Equations (LISREL) Week 1 #4.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 12: Wrap Up: Latent Growth Models, Pitfalls, Critique and Future Directions for SEM.
Advanced Statistics Factor Analysis, II. Last lecture 1. What causes what, ξ → Xs, Xs→ ξ ? 2. Do we explore the relation of Xs to ξs, or do we test (try.
Multivariate Statistics Confirmatory Factor Analysis I W. M. van der Veld University of Amsterdam.
General Structural Equation (LISREL) Models Week 3 # 3 MODELS FOR MEANS AND INTERCEPTS.
Measurement Models: Identification and Estimation James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
G Lecture 81 Comparing Measurement Models across Groups Reducing Bias with Hybrid Models Setting the Scale of Latent Variables Thinking about Hybrid.
Α Α. a Alpha “short a” as in father β Β b beta.
CFA: Basics Beaujean Chapter 3. Other readings Kline 9 – a good reference, but lumps this entire section into one chapter.
G Lecture 3 Review of mediation Moderation SEM Model notation
SEM Basics 2 Byrne Chapter 2 Kline pg 7-15, 50-51, ,
1 ICPSR General Structural Equation Models Week 4 #4 (last class) Interactions in latent variable models An introduction to MPLUS software An introduction.
Social Capital [III] Exercise for the Research Master Multivariate Statistics W. M. van der Veld University of Amsterdam.
Structural Equation Modeling Mgmt 291 Lecture 3 – CFA and Hybrid Models Oct. 12, 2009.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Final Lecture: Multiple-Group Models, a Word about Latent Growth Models, Pitfalls, Critique and Future Directions.
1 General Structural Equation (LISREL) Models Week 4 #1 Non-normal data: summary of approaches Missing data approaches: summary, review and computer examples.
“Beginning New Testament Greek” “Beginning New Testament Greek”
Donde Esta Lisrel. ssicentral
The regression model in matrix form
MKFM6: multivariate stationary state-space time-series
LISREL matrices, LISREL programming
Structural Equation Modeling
General Structural Equation (LISREL) Models
Causal Relationships with measurement error in the data
Presentation transcript:

1 General Structural Equation (LISREL) Models Week 2 #3 LISREL Matrices The LISREL Program

2 The LISREL matrices The variables: Manifest:X, Y Latent: Eta ηKsi ξ Error:construct equations: zeta ζ measurement equations delta δ, epsilon ε

3 The LISREL matrices The variables: Manifest:X, YLatent: Eta ηKsi ξ Error:construct equations: zeta ζ measurement equations delta δ, epsilon ε Coefficient matrices: x = λ ξ + δ Lambda-X Measurement equation for X-variables (exogenous LV’s) Y = λ η + ε Lambda –Y Measurement equation for Y-variables (endogenous LV’s) η = γ ξ + ζ Gamma Construct equation connecting ksi (exogenous), eta (endogenous) LV’s η = β η + γ ξ + ζ Construct equation connecting eta with eta LV’s

4 The LISREL matrices The variables: Manifest:X, YLatent: Eta ηKsi ξ Error:construct equations: zeta ζ measurement equations delta δ, epsilon ε Variance-covariance matrices: PHI ( Φ) Variance covariance matrix of Ksi ( ξ) exogenous LVs PSI (Ψ) Variance covariance matrix of Zeta ( ζ) error terms (errors associated with eta (η) LVs Theta-delta (Θ δ ) Variance covariance matrix of δ (measurement) error terms associated with X-variables Theta-epsilon (Θ ε )Variance covariance matrix of ε (measurement) error terms associated with Y-variables Also: Theta-epsilon-delta

5 Matrix form: LISREL M EASUREMENT MODEL MATRICES Manifest variables: X’s Measurement errors: DELTA ( δ ) Coefficients in measurement equations: LAMBDA ( λ ) Sample equation: X 1 = λ 1 ξ 1 + δ 1 MATRICES: LAMBDA-x THETA-DELTAPHI (slides 5-11 from handout for 1 st class this week:)

6 Matrix form: LISREL M EASUREMENT MODEL MATRICES A slightly more complex example:

7 Matrix form: LISREL M EASUREMENT MODEL MATRICES Labeling shown here applies ONLY if this matrix is specified as “diagonal” Otherwise, the elements would be: Theta-delta 1, 2, 5, 9, 15. OR, using double-subscript notation: Theta-delta 1,1 Theta-delta 2,2 Theta-delta 3,3 Etc.

8 Matrix form: LISREL M EASUREMENT MODEL MATRICES While this numbering is common in some journal articles, the LISREL program itself does not use it. Two subscript notations possible: Single subscriptDouble subscript

9 Matrix form: LISREL M EASUREMENT MODEL MATRICES Models with correlated measurement errors:

10 Matrix form: LISREL M EASUREMENT MODEL MATRICES Measurement models for endogenous latent variables (ETA) are similar: Manifest variables are Ys Measurement error terms: EPSILON ( ε ) Coefficients in measurement equations: LAMBDA (λ) same as KSI/X side to differentiate, will sometimes refer to LAMBDAs as Lambda-Y (vs. Lambda-X) Equations Y 1 = λ 1 η 1 + ε 1

11 Matrix form: LISREL M EASUREMENT MODEL MATRICES Measurement models for endogenous latent variables (ETA) are similar:

12 Class Exercise #1 Provide labels for each of the variables Slides not on handout; see handout for yesterday’s class

13 #2

14 #1 delta epsilon ksi eta zeta

15 #2

16 Lisrel Matrices for examples. No Beta Matrix in this model

17 Lisrel Matrices for examples.

18 Lisrel Matrices for examples (example #2)

19 Lisrel Matrices for examples (example #2)

20 Special Cases Single-indicator variables This model must be re-expressed as…. (see next slide)

21 Special Case: single indicators Error terms with 0 variance

22 Special Case: single indicators LISREL will issue an error message: matrix not positive definite (theta-delta has 0s in diagonal). Can “override” this.

23 Special Case: single indicators Case where all exogenous construct equation variables are manifest

24 Special Case: single indicators Case where all exogenous construct equation variables are manifest

25 Special Case: correlated errors across delta,epsilon Special matrix: Theta delta-epsilon (TH)

26 Special Case: correlated errors across exogenous,endogenous variables Simply re-specify the model so that all variables are Y-variables Ksi variables must be completely exogenous but Eta variables can be either (only small issue: there will still be a construct equation for Eta 1 above  Eta 1 = Zeta 1 (no other exogenous variables).

27 Exercise: going from matrix contents to diagrams Matrices: LY 8 x 3 BE 3 x 3 100Free elements: ly2,100BE 2,1 ly3,10LY3,3BE 3,1 ly4,1ly4,20 ly5,1ly5,20PS 3 X 3 010Free elements: 001- PS(3,2), all diagonals 00LY8,3 (other off-diag’s = 0)

28 Exercise: going from matrix contents to diagrams Matrices: LX is a 4 x 4 identity matrix! TE is a diagonal matrix with 0’s in the diagonal PH 4 x 4 all elements are free (diagonals and off –diagonals TE 8 x 8 diagonals free off-diagonals all zero GAMMA 3 x 4 ga1,1ga1,20 0 ga2,10ga2,3ga2,4 0ga3,2ga3,3 ga3,4

29

30 2 key elements in the LISREL program The MO (modelparameters) statement Statements used to alter an “initial specification” –FI (fix a parameter initially specified as free) –FR (free a parameter initially specified as fixed) –VA (set a value to a parameter) Not normally necessary for free parameters, though it can be used to provide start values in cases where program-supplied start values are not very good

31 2 key elements in the LISREL program Statements used to alter an “initial specification” –FI (fix a parameter initially specified as free) –FR (free a parameter initially specified as fixed) –VA (set a value to a parameter) Not normally necessary for free parameters, though it can be used to provide start values in cases where program-supplied start values are not very good – EQ (equality constraint)

32 2 key elements in the LISREL program MO statement: NY = number of Y-variables in model NX = number of X-variables in model NK = number of Ksi-variables in model NE = number of Eta-variables in model LX = initial specification for lambda-X LY = initial specification for lambda-Y BE = initial specification for Beta GA = initial specification for Gamma

33 2 key elements in the LISREL program MO statement: LX = initial specification for lambda-X LY = initial specification for lambda-Y BE = initial specification for Beta GA = initial specification for Gamma PH = initial specification for Phi PS = initial speicification for Psi TE = initial specification for Theta-epsilon TD = initial specification for Theta-delta [there is no initial spec. for theta-epsilon-delta]

34 2 key elements in the LISREL program MO specifications Example: NX=6NK =2 LX = FU,FR“full-free” produces a 6 x 2 matrix: lx(1,1)lx(1,2) lx(2,1)lx(2,2) lx(3,1)lx(3,2) lx(4,1)lx(4,2) lx(5,1)lx(5,2) lx(6,1)lx(6,2) - Of course, this will lead to an under-identified model unless some constraints are applied

35 2 key elements in the LISREL program MO specifications Example: NX=6NK =2 LX = FU,FI“full-fixed” produces a 6 x 2 matrix:000000

36 MO specifications Example: With 6 X-variables and 2 Y-variables, we want an LX matrix that looks like this: lx(1,1)0 lx(2,1)0 lx(3,1)lx(3,2) lx(4,1)lx(4,2) 0lx(5,2) 0lx(6,2) MO NX=6 NK=2 LX=FU,FR FI LX(1,2) LX(2,2) LX(5,1) LX(6,1)

37 MO specifications Example: With 6 X-variables and 2 Y-variables, we want an LX matrix that looks like this: 10 lx(2,1)0 lx(3,1)lx(3,2) 0lx(4,2) 0 1 0lx(6,2) MO NX=6 NK=2 LX=FU,FI FR LX(2,1) LX(3,1) LX(3,2) LX(4,2) LX(6,2) VA 1.0 LX(1,1) LX(5,2)

38 MO specifications Special case: All X-variables are single indicator. We will want LX as follows: Ksi-1Ksi-2Ksi-3 X X X And we will want var(delta-1) = var(delta-2) = var(delta-3) = 0 Specification:LX=ID TD=ZE

39 VARIANCE-COVARIANCE MATRICES Initial specifications for PH, PS, TE, TD Option 1: PH=SY,FR - entire matrix has parameters (no fixed elements) Option 2: PH=SY,FI - entire matrix has fixed elements (no free elements) Option 3: PH=DI Diagonal matrix (implicit: zeroes in off-diagonals)

40 VARIANCE-COVARIANCE MATRICES Option 3: PH=DI,FR Diagonal matrix (implicit: zeroes in off-diagonals) -In older versions of LISREL, this specification would not yield modification indices for off-diagonal elements -off-diagonals may not be added later on with FR specifications Option 4: PH=SY (parameters in diagonals, zeroes in off-diagonals) -off-diagonals may be added later with FR specifications Option 5: PH=ZE Zero matrix * * would never do this with PH but perhaps with TD

41 Single Latent variable (CFA) Model Matrices: LX Lambda-X 3 x1 TD Theta delta 3 x 3 PH Phi 1 x 1 Lambda –X 1.0 Lx(2,1) Lx(3,1) PHI Ph(1,1) Theta-delta td(1,1) 0td(2,2) 00td(3,3)

42 Single Latent variable (CFA) Model M0 NX=3 NK=1 LX=FU,FR C PH=SY TD=SY FI LX(1,1) VA 1.0 LX(1,1) Lambda –X 1.0 Lx(2,1) Lx(3,1) PHI Ph(1,1) Theta-delta td(1,1) 0td(2,2) 00td(3,3) C = CONTINUE FROM PREVIOUS LINE

43 Single Latent variable (CFA) Model – Could Also be programmed as Y-Eta M0 NY=3 NE=1 LY=FU,FR C PS=SY TE=SY FI LY(1,1) VA 1.0 LY(1,1) Lambda –Y 1.0 LY(2,1) LY(3,1) PSI PS(1,1) Theta-epsilon te(1,1) 0te(2,2) 00te(3,3) C = CONTINUE FROM PREVIOUS LINE

44 Two latent variable CFA model Lambda-X 6 x LX(2,1)0 LX(3,1) LX(5,2) 0LX(6,2) Phi 2 x 2 Ph(1,1) Ph(2,1)Ph(2,2) Theta-delta -- expressed as diagonal TD(1) TD(2) TD(3) TD(4) TD(5) TD(6)

45 Two latent variable CFA model Lambda-X 6 x LX(2,1)0 LX(3,1) LX(5,2) 0LX(6,2) Phi 2 x 2 Ph(1,1) Ph(2,1)Ph(2,2) Theta-delta -- expressed as diagonal TD(1) TD(2) TD(3) TD(4) TD(5) TD(6) MO NX=6 NK=2 LX=FU,FI PH=SY,FR TD=DI,FR VA 1.0 LX(1,1) LX(4,2) FR LX(2,1) LX(3,1) LX(5,2) LX(6,2)

46 Two latent variable CFA model Theta-delta -- expressed as symmetric matrix TD(1,1) TD(2,2) TD(3,3) TD(4,4) TD(5,5) TD(6,6) Theta-delta Td(1,1) 0td(2,2) 00td(3,3) 000td(4,4) 0000td(5,5) 00000td(6,6) MO NX=6 NK=2 LX=FU,FI PH=SY,FR TD=SY VA 1.0 LX(1,1) LX(4,2) FR LX(2,1) LX(3,1) LX(5,2) LX(6,2)

47 Two latent variable CFA model – a couple of complications MO NX=6 NK=2 LX=FU,FI PH=SY,FR TD=SY VA 1.0 LX(1,1) LX(4,2) FR LX(2,1) LX(3,1) LX(5,2) LX(6,2) FR LX(2,2) FR TD(5,3) Correlated error: td(5,3) Added path: LX(2,2)

48 A model with an exogenous latent variable Lambda-y = same as lambda x previous model Psi 2 x 2 symmetric, free Gamma = 2 x 1 Phi 1 x 1 Lambda-x 3 x 1Theta delta 3 x 3

49 A model with an exogenous latent variable Gamma 1 x 2 GA(1,1)GA(2,2) Phi 1 x 1 PH(1,1) PSI 2 x 2 PS(1,1) PS(2,1) PS(2,2) Lambda-Y LY(2,1)LY(2,2) LY(3,1) LY(5,2) 0LY(6,2) Theta delta – diagonal TD(1) TD(2) TD(3) Theta-eps: See previous example TD

50 A model with an exogenous latent variable MO NX=3 NY=6 NK=1 NE=2 LX=FU,FR LY=FU,FI GA=FU,FR C PS=SY,FR PH=SY,FR TD=DI,FR TE=SY VA 1.0 LY(1,1) LY(4,2) LX(1,1) FR LY(2,1) LY(2,2) LY(3,1) LY(5,2) LY(6,2) LX(2,1) LX(3,1) FR TE(5,3)

51 A model with intervening variables (a non-zero BETA matrix) BETA is 4 x 4 GAMMA is 4 x 1 BETA 0000 BE(2,1)000 0BE(3,2)00 0BE(4,2)00 Zeta1, zeta2 not shown Gamma GA(1,1) GA(2,1) 0

52 A model with intervening variables (a non-zero BETA matrix) MO NX=3 NY=13 NE=4 NK=1 LX=FU,FR LY=FU,FI PS=SY PH=SY,FR C TD=SY TE=SY BE=FU,FI GA=FU,FI FR BE(2,1) BE(4,2) BE(3,2) GA(1,1) GA(1,2) …. Plus LY and LX specifications

53 Single-indicator exogenous variables Special features: MO NX=5 NK=5 LX=ID TD=ZE PH=SY,FR –LX is identity matrix MO NX=5 NK=5 FIXEDX –Special specification if all of the variables in X are single-indicator and measured without error –Specify Gamma and Y-variable matrices as usual

54 Class Exercise (if time permits)