Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 1 SFD Text for Upper Layers Date: 2012-05-14 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0093r2 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Hitoshi MORIOKAAllied Telesis R&D Center Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0271r1 March 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 1 SFD Text for Big IE Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1167r0 August 2011 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 1 Upper Layer Data IE Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1124r0 August 2011 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 1 Example of IP address assignment using Generic Upper.
Doc.: IEEE /0598r0 Submission May 2012 Steve Grau, Juniper NetworksSlide 1 Layer 3 Setup with Dynamic VLAN Assignment Date: Authors:
Neighbor Discovery for IPv6 Mangesh Kaushikkar. Overview Introduction Terminology Protocol Overview Message Formats Conceptual Model of a Host.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.IP6FD v2.0—2-1 IPv6 Operations Defining and Configuring Neighbor Discovery.
Network Layer IPv6 Slides were original prepared by Dr. Tatsuya Suda.
Doc.: IEEE /0032r0 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Hitoshi MORIOKAAllied Telesis R&D Center Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka
Doc.: IEEE /0567r1 Submission May 2012 Huawei Slide 1 Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1183r0 Submission September 2011 Masataka Ohta, Tokyo Institute of TechnologySlide 1 IP over Congested WLAN Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1000r0 Submission July 2011 Jihyun Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 TGai FILS Proposal Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0550 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Kiseon RyuLG Electronics10225 Willow Creek Rd, San Diego, CA, 92131, USA +1
Doc.: IEEE /1042r3 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang,
Doc.: IEEE /1042 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang, Kyungki,
Doc.: IEEE /0034r0 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Hitoshi MORIOKAAllied Telesis R&D Center Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka
Summary of Certification Process (part 1). IPv6 Client IPv6 packets inside IPv4 packets.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1003r1 July 2011 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 1 Upper Layer Data on Management frames Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1015r1 September 2015 Guido R. Hiertz et al., EricssonSlide 1 Proxy ARP in ax Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r8 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 1 SFD Text for Upper Layers Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0701r0 May 2012 Hitoshi Morioka, Allied Telesis R&D CenterSlide 1 Supplemental Information for HLCF Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1003r2 July 2011 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 1 Upper Layer Data on Management frames Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0977r2 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Hitoshi MORIOKA ROOT INC Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka JAPAN
Doc.: IEEE /0897r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Active Scanning considering Operating Status of APs Date: July 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0547r1 Submission May 2012 Dapeng Liu, China MobileSlide 1 Extend 802.1X for higher layer configuration in FILS Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 September 2012 Jeongki Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Enhanced scanning procedure for FILS Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE ai May 2012 Lei Wang, InterDigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Proposed SFD Text for ai AP/STA Initiated FILS Optimizations.
Doc.: IEEE /1042r1 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang,
Doc.: IEEE /0275r3 Submission March 2012 Hitoshi Morioka, Allied Telesis R&D CenterSlide 1 Higher Layer Configuration Function for TGai SFD Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0977r1 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Hitoshi MORIOKA ROOT INC Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka JAPAN
Doc.: IEEE /0093r0 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Hitoshi MORIOKAAllied Telesis R&D Center Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka
Doc.: IEEE /0133r3 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Hitoshi MORIOKAAllied Telesis R&D Center Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka
Doc.: IEEE /0873r0 Submission July 2010 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 1 Effectiveness of Reduction of Message Exchanges Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1000r1 Submission July 2011 Jihyun Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 TGai FILS Proposal Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0361r0 Submission March 2010 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 1 Fast Initial Authentication Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0568r0 Submission May 2012 Young Hoon Kwon, Huawei Slide 1 AP Discovery Information Broadcasting Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0010r1 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Hitoshi MORIOKAAllied Telesis R&D Center Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r7 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 1 SFD Text for Upper Layers Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1008r0 August 2010Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 1 Parallel processing for upper layer Date: Authors: NameCompanyAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0896r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Probe Request Filtering Criteria Date: July 2012.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r5 March 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 1 SFD Text for Upper Layers Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0977r6 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Hitoshi MORIOKA Allied Telesis R&D Center Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka
Doc.: IEEE /1426r00 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone ChengYan FengZTE Corporation No.800, Middle Tianfu Avenue, Hi- tech District,
Doc.: IEEE /0977r4 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Hitoshi MORIOKA Allied Telesis R&D Center Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka
Doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 Submission Nov Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 1 Rapid Scanning Procedure Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /484r0 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone George Cherian Santosh Abraham Qualcomm 5775 Morehouse Dr, San Diego, CA, USA +1.
CHAPTER 10: DHCP Routing & Switching. Objectives 10.0 Introduction 10.1 Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol v Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol.
Doc.: IEEE /1183r1 Submission September 2011 Masataka Ohta, Tokyo Institute of TechnologySlide 1 IP over Congested WLAN Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r10 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 1 SFD Text for Upper Layers Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Lecture 13 IP V4 & IP V6. Figure Protocols at network layer.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1146r0 Hitoshi Morioka, ROOT INC. Jun 2010 Feasibility Study of FIA Date: Authors: NameCompanyAddressPhone .
Fast Initial Authentication
Instructor Materials Chapter 8: DHCP
Higher Layer Packet Container Proposal Presentation
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2012
Proposed SFD Text for ai Link Setup Procedure
AP Discovery Information Broadcasting
SFD Text for Public Key Cryptography
More Example Ideas around FIA
More Example Ideas around FIA
An Example Idea of FIA Authors: Date: May 2010 Name Company
An Example Idea of FIA Authors: Date: May 2010 Name Company
IP Address assignment: Offline discussion summary
An Example Idea of FIA Authors: Date: May 2010 Name Company
An Example Protocol for FastAKM
An Example Idea of FIA Authors: Date: May 2010 Name Company
Fast Authentication in TGai
An Example Protocol for FastAKM
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2012
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 1 SFD Text for Upper Layers Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Hiroki NakanoTrans New Technology, Inc. Sumitomo Seimei Kyoto Bldg. 8F, 62 Tukiboko-cho, Shimogyo, Kyoto JAPAN nt.com Hitoshi Morioka Allied Telesis R&D Center Tenjin, Chuo- ku Fukuoka JAPAN hq.com

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 Abstract DCN: IEEE11-12/0273r9 Title: SFD Text for Higher Layers Authors and Companies: Hiroki Nakano (Trans New Technology, Inc.) Hitoshi Morioka (Allied Telesis R&D Center) Scope: Upper layer Motivation: page 3 (abstract) Background information: page 4-31 Motion: page including five motions Slide 2Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc. May 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc. Slide 3 Motivation An IP(v4) address are normally assigned by DHCP(v4) and the specification of DHCP is stable. DHCP includes definition of state transition and have lots of extensions derived from lots of past discussions. Non-AP STA should be still a DHCP client. The discussions of IPv6 address assignment are still going on actively in IETF and its specification is being changed. We should provide a framework for them. In addition, TGai should not deny the other protocols because we are the link layer.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 Background Information for IPv4 RFC Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol RFC Rapid Commit Option for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 4 (DHCPv4) Slide 4Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc. May 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 Background Information for IPv6 RFC Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) RFC Optimistic Duplicate Address Detection (DAD) for IPv6 RFC IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration RFC IPv6 Router Advertisement Options for DNS Configuration RFC IPv6 Node Requirements Slide 5Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc. May 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 6 The past Straw poll 1 Do you support to add the following text to the clause 4 of SFD: “The TGai amendment defines a method of IP(v4) address assignment which works as a transport of DHCP.” Yes:5No:3Don’t care:17(Mar 15 AM1)

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 7 The past Straw poll 2 Do you support to add the following text to the clause 4 of SFD: “The TGai amendment defines a generalized method for upper layer transport encapsulation during FILS to enable higher layer services.” Yes:7No:1Don’t care:22(Mar 15 AM1)

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 8 Proposed Amendment 1 Clause to amend: Section 3 Add to the last of Section 3: 3.x Encapsulation Framework for HLCF The TGai amendment defines a generalized method for upper layer transport encapsulation during FILS to enable higher layer services.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 9 Motivation of Proposed Amendment 1 This sentence intends TGai to support IPv4, IPv6 and other upper layer protocols. Transparency as a link layer is important in order to support various upper layer protocols.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 Possibly Encrypted Generalized Sequence May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 10 Non-AP STAAP Conf. server Higher Layer Configuration Service Processing for security Configuration Request Configuration Reply AS At this point, Non- AP STA has been authenticated. AP keeps a HLCF data. Maximum time is assumed to be less than 100 msec. less than 100ms (See TGai Functional Requirements) Possibly Encrypted AS and Conf. server can reside inside AP.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 11 Proposed Amendment 2 Clause to amend: Section 5 Add the following text: 5.x Forwarding of HLCF information The TGai amendment defines HLCF as an AP forwards information carried from an non-AP STA by HLCF to the others than the non-AP STA only either after successful authentication or with assurances of the same security level as the existing security framework.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 Possibly Encrypted Sequence Example by DHCP with RCO May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 12 Non-AP STAAP DHCP server DHCP Client Software Processing for security DHCP Discover w/ RCO DHCP Ack AS At this point, Non- AP STA has been authenticated. AP keeps a DHCP packet. Maximum time is assumed to be less than 100 msec. less than 100ms (See TGai Functional Requirements) Possibly Encrypted

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 Possibly Encrypted Sequence Example by ICMPv6 RS/RA May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 13 Non-AP STAAP Router Stateless Configuration Software Processing for security Router Solicitation Router Advertisement AS At this point, Non- AP STA has been authenticated. AP keeps a RS packet. Maximum time is assumed to be less than 100 msec. less than 100ms (See TGai Functional Requirements) Possibly Encrypted

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 Possibly Encrypted Sequence Example by DHCPv6 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 14 Non-AP STAAP Router Stateful Configuration Software Processing for security Router Solicitation ICMPv6 RA with M flag AS At this point, Non- AP STA has been authenticated. AP keeps a RS packet. Maximum time is assumed to be less than 100 msec. less than 100ms (See TGai Functional Requirements) Possibly Encrypted DHCPv6 on Data frames

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 Sequence Example by DHCPv6 with RCO (challenging framework) May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 15 Non-AP STAAP DHCP server Stateful Configuration Software Processing for security DHCPv6 Solicit w/ RCO RA & DHCPv6 Reply AS At this point, Non- AP STA has been authenticated. AP keeps a DHCP packet. Maximum time is assumed to be less than 100 msec. less than 100ms (See TGai Functional Requirements) Possibly Encrypted Possibly Encrypted

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 Comments & Answers Frames get bigger. It’s the problem. TGai intends to reduce exchanges of packets, not reduce information itself. Therefore, it is natural that less exchanges leads to bigger packets. A round trip of 1000-byte-long frames is obviously preferable to 10 round trips of 100-byte-length packets. TGai can provide special “compression” encodings for specific upper layer protocols, such as DHCP. For instance, most of DHCP packets have about 200-byte-long consecutive zeros and a generic data compression technique or a special encoding for DHCP can compress DHCP packets without changing information. Slide 16Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc. May 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 Comments & Answers What packets should be forwarded or not? Does it affect security? Basically, piggybacked frames of upper layers should be forwarded after authentication is finished. Essentially, non-AP STA can throw any kind of packets for upper layers after authentication. If you want a further optimization such as a premature start of IP address assignment processing before completion of authentication, you must consider security mechanism such as packet filtering. However, this is out of our scope, although TGai does not prevent such techniques. Slide 17Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc. May 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 Comments & Answers How long does an AP wait for a response from DHCP server? The TGai Functional Requirements document requests to provide a secure link set-up in less than 100 ms. Therefore, Maximum time for an AP to wait is 100ms. DHCP packets transfer between an AP and a non-AP STA in a normal manner after ai link setup. If a response from DHCP server reaches an AP after the AP sends a response to non-AP STA, DHCP packets can be sent in the same manner as Data frames. Slide 18Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc. May 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 Possibly Encrypted A Case with late Reply from Conf. server May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 19 Non-AP STAAP Conf. server Higher Layer Configuration Service Processing for security Configuration Request Configuration Reply AS AP can abandon piggybacking after waiting for configured period. less than 100ms (See TGai Functional Requirements) Possibly Encrypted Normal data frame Association Response

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 Comments & Answers What happens when lease time of an IP address is expired? Higher layer protocols can use normal data frames to exchange additional packets for DHCP etc. Extension of DHCP lease time will be done in a normal manner. Slide 20Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc. May 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 Comments & Answers Do APs require to keep HLCF (DHCP) packets during processing for security? Does this enable attackers to consume memory of APs? TGai assumes that each authentication for each non-AP STA is finished within 100ms. See Section “Link Set-Up Time” of TGai Functional Requirements (IEEE 11-11/0745r5) Our media can transfer 5000 packets per second at most. The size of a HLCF packet is 1500 byte at most. MTU of is about 2300 byte. Therefore, amount of packets for AP to keep is 750KB at most in case that all packets flying are employed for attacks. Slide 21Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc. May 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 Comments & Answers IPv6 has the DAD (Duplicate Address Detection) mechanism. Does this take a long time? RFC4429 defines Optimistic Duplicate Address Detection (DAD) for IPv6. This mechanism enables us to use IPv6 address before DAD is finished, while DAD is being performed by using normal data frames. Slide 22Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc. May 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 Comments & Answers Is SEcure Neighbor Discovery (RFC3971) available on this framework? Router Solicitation with the unspecified address can be used. Router Advertisement with CGA option, RSA Signature option and the other related options can be used. If a non-AP STA has no certificate enough to verify, further exchanges of packets, for instance, Certification Path Solicitation/Advertisement, are required. Slide 23Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc. May 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 24 Proposed Amendment 3 Clause to amend: Section 5 Add the following text: The TGai amendment defines a mechanism to provide IPv4/IPv6 address assignment to STAs during the authentication procedure.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 25 Proposed Amendment 4 Clause to amend: Section 5 Add the following text: 5.x Indication of availability of IP address configuration during association The TGai amendment defines a method to enable a non-AP STA to know IP address configuration during association prior of the TGai association process.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 26 Proposed Amendment 5 Clause to amend: Section 5 Add the following text: 5.x Indication of availability of higher layer protocols The TGai amendment defines a method to enable a non-AP STA to know availability of higher layer protocols in advance of the TGai association process.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 27 Proposed Amendment 6 Clause to amend: Section 5 Add the following text: 5.x IPv4 support The TGai amendment defines a method of IP(v4) address assignment which works as a transport of DHCP.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 28 Proposed Amendment 7 Clause to amend: Section 5 Add the following text: 5.x IPv6 stateless autoconfiguration support The TGai amendment defines a method of IPv6 stateless address autoconfiguration which works as a transport of ICMPv6 RS/RA.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 29 Proposed Amendment 8 Clause to amend: Section 5 Add the following text: 5.x IPv6 stateful autoconfiguration support The TGai amendment defines a method of IPv6 stateful address autoconfiguration which works as a transport of ICMPv6 RS/RA and DHCPv6.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 30 Proposed Amendment 9 Clause to amend: Section 5 Add the following text: 5.x Miscellaneous protocol support The TGai amendment is open to other higher layer protocols and their services than IPv4 and IPv6.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 Summary of Proposed Amendments HLCF Security: Assure that HLCF works safely. Protocols we support at least: IPv4 and IPv6 Indication of availability in beacons or something: IPv4/IPv6 address assignment higher layer configuration services (generalized text) Supported protocols in detail: IPv4 DHCP IPv6 stateless configuration IPv6 stateful configuration other miscellaneous protocols Slide 31Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc. May 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 32 Motion 2 Move to add the following text to the Section 5 of SFD: “5.x Forwarding of HLCF information The TGai amendment defines HLCF as an AP forwards higher layer information between an non-AP STA and the others than the non-AP STA only either after successful authentication or with assurances of the same security level as the existing security framework.” Moved: Seconded: Yes:No:Abstain:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 33 Motion 3 Move to add the following text to the Section 5 of SFD: “The TGai amendment defines a mechanism to provide IPv4/IPv6 address assignment to STAs during the authentication procedure.” Moved: Seconded: Yes:No:Abstain:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 34 Motion 4 Move to add the following text to the Section 5 of SFD: “5.x Indication of availability of IP address configuration during association The TGai amendment defines a method to enable a non-AP STA to know IP address configuration during association prior of the TGai association process.” Moved: Seconded: Yes:No:Abstain:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 35 Motion 5 Move to add the following text to the Section 5 of SFD: “5.x Indication of availability of higher layer protocols The TGai amendment defines a method to enable a non-AP STA to know availability of higher layer protocols in advance of the TGai association process.” Moved: Seconded: Yes:No:Abstain:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 36 Motion 6 Move to add the following text to the Section 5 of SFD: “5.x IPv4 support The TGai amendment defines a method of IP(v4) address assignment which works as a transport of DHCP.” Moved: Seconded: Yes:No:Abstain:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 37 Motion 7 Move to add the following text to the Section 5 of SFD: “5.x IPv6 stateless autoconfiguration support The TGai amendment defines a method of IPv6 stateless address autoconfiguration which works as a transport of ICMPv6 RS/RA.” Moved: Seconded: Yes:No:Abstain:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 38 Motion 8 Move to add the following text to the Section 5 of SFD: “5.x IPv6 stateful autoconfiguration support The TGai amendment defines a method of IPv6 stateful address autoconfiguration which works as a transport of ICMPv6 RS/RA and DHCPv6.” Moved: Seconded: Yes:No:Abstain:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 39 Motion 9 Move to add the following text to the Section 5 of SFD: “5.x Miscellaneous protocol support The TGai amendment is open to other higher layer protocols and their services than IPv4 and IPv6.” Moved: Seconded: Yes:No:Abstain:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc. Slide 40 Backup

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 New software for new protocol A possible counterproposal May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 41 Non-AP STAAPDHCP server Processing for security TGai new protocol DHCP Discover w/ RCO TGai new protocol DHCP Ack Translation?

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9 Comparison DHCP with RCONew protocol w/ DHCP- like frame format New protocol Frame exchange1 round trip Non-AP STA isDHCP clientTGai client AP isa forwarderoften a DHCP client TGai isa transport a protocol for IP address assignment What information is distributed? DHCP defines DHCP defines (including future extensions?) TGai defines Behavior of non-AP STA DHCP definesTGai defines Behavior of APa forwarderTGai defines AP hasno statesome state(?) When an address assignment expires DHCP uses normal transport to extend TGai defines extending procedure Slide 42Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc. May 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r9May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc. Slide 43 IPv6 Internet Drafts Considerations on M and O Flags of IPv6 Router Advertisement (draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-mo-flags-01) Default Router and Prefix Advertisement Options for DHCPv6 (draft-droms-dhc-dhcpv6-default-router-00)