Nutrition Data Webinar January 14, 2014 Kim W. La Croix MPH, RD State Unit on Aging Oregon Public Health Division Rhonda Buedefeldt OAA NAPIS Program Analyst State Unit on Aging
Improve data reporting to accurately capture nutrition risk and maximize program effectiveness and funding opportunities Understand federal reporting requirements for OAA Nutrition programs Objective:
Importance of reporting nutrition data Review of current numbers How to report and pull nutrition data Tips to improve reporting Agenda
OAA Nutrition Program Purpose: Section 330 Reduce hunger & food insecurity Promote socialization of older individuals Promote the health & well-being of older individuals
Important for SUA Nutrition & Health Health Functionality Independence Quality of life
Increased aging population More older people living longer More women than men More “healthy” older people Baby boomers, diverse expectations Managing chronic conditions More home and community based services, less facility-based care Demographics
Grant reporting requirements Maximize funding Reach those most in need Tailor nutrition interventions Leverage funds/marketing promotion Why report nutrition data?
STATISTICAL DATA –Hunger/Obesity/Chronic Disease –National –Oregon
Older Oregonians and Hunger Show symptoms of dementia More prone to falling injuries More likely to be Diabetic Far less likely to be in excellent or very good health 5x more likely to suffer from depression Twice as likely to have at least 1 ADL limitation. 5% of OR seniors are food insecure (29 th ) Ziliak, J., & Gundersen, C. (2009, Sept.) Senior hunger in the United States: Differences across states and rural and urban areas. University of Kentucky Center for Poverty Research Special Reports. 11% of years in OR are food insecure (8 th ) 89% of food-insecure older adults receive neither HDM nor congregate meals GAO Nutrition Assistance: Additional Efficienceis Could Improve Services to Older Adults. Washington, DC: GAO. http: ww.gao.gov/new.items/d11782t.pdf.
2000 Obesity Trends* Among U.S. Adults BRFSS, 1990, 2000, 2010 (*BMI 30, or about 30 lbs. overweight for 5’4” person) No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% 25%–29% ≥30% Source: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC
Obesity Prevalence by County, ages 55+ PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION Health Promotion & Chronic Disease Prevention Source: Oregon BRFSS
Prevalence of Selected Chronic Conditions Among Older Oregonians
OAA Meals in Oregon FY 2011 & 2012 FY 2011 Congregate: 983, 439 HDM: 1, 705, Total: 2, 688, % 36.5% FY 2012 Congregate: 945, 861 HDM: 1, 705, Total: 2, 650, 871 total meals: -38, 051 /-1.5% congregate meals -37, 578/4% 64.3% FY 2011
Data can leverage funding opportunities CCOs: communicate, coordinate and partner with nutrition programs for services –Better nourished patients mean improved performance outcomes –Focus intervention on those with the highest need
Funding/Resource Streams Decreasing public funding Competition for limited public funding Trend towards social entrepreneurism Need to develop efficiency, community partnership, alternative funding, more volunteer efforts Public/private sources demanding performance data State Program Reports
Gather required NAPIS (National Aging Program Information System) information Ensure confidentiality Framing the message, “peer pressure” to encourage people to register Process and Systems Improvements Tips to improve reporting
Let’s look at important nutritional service data Oregon is required to report annually to the federal government STATE PROGRAM REPORT (SPR)
Q: Why is the client’s answers on the NAPIS registration important? Q: What does the AAA do with the NAPIS information? Q: What happens to the information? Oregon’s Performance Report
The Older Americans Act funds are to be targeted to “…older individuals who have the greatest economic need, with particular attention to low-income older individuals, including low-income minority, older individuals with limited English proficiency, those at risk for institutional placement, and older individuals residing in rural areas” OAA 306 (a)(1) Federal Requirements
The following demographics reported in the annual State Program Report (SPR) is our evidence that the TARGET population is being served: Age Gender Rural (Zipcode) Poverty Live alone (# in Household) Race and Ethnicity Evidencing TARGET population
Nutritional Risk/ADLs/IADLs Why are those “nutrition data questions” from NAPIS registration so darn important? Let’s take a CLOSER look at Oregon’s 2013 SPR
Total Clients Served – FYE 2013
Section IIA - Number of Clients, At-Risk Clients and Meals provided – Congregate
Congregate Client Demographics
Data Flow 1) AAA and Nutrition Site aids client in completion of NAPIS form 2) Collected NAPIS Registration information in input into OACCESS – The State’s data collection application 3) OACCESS uploads data to RAIN at midnight 4) RAIN uploads to the federal State Program Report
NAPIS Registration Form
Important OACCESS Screens Person Details – Gender, Age, Race/Ethnicity
Important OACCESS Screens Rural determination
Important OACCESS Screens # in Household and Poverty
Now let’s look at 2013’s Home- Delivered Meal (HDM) data
Section IIA - Number of Clients, At-Risk Clients and Meals provided – Home-delivered
Assessing Nutritional Risk
Client demographics for a Home- Delivered Meal (HDM) include the level of impairment. Meal Preparation Shopping Rx Management Managing $ Housework (light or heavy) Transportation EatingDressing BathingToileting Transferring (in/out of bed/chair) Walking Instrumental Activities of Daily LivingActivities of Daily Living
ADL/IADLs
HDM Client IADL levels – 2013 report
HDM Client ADL levels – 2013 report
Other nutrition service data
Special Diets
Helpful REPORTS
Nutritional Risk Report
Service & Unit report
Service & Billing Report
Reflection The Data you report substantiate’s the V A L U E of your program and service trends
Need Technical Assistance?
Contact information: Kim La Croix (desk) (cell) Rhonda Buedefeldt Questions?