NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

Title One Parent Involvement
1 © 2008 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association Valenzuela/California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Lawsuit Settlement California.
West Virginia Department of Education
5-Year Strategic Plan Title I Compliance. Assurances Assurances must be signed, dated and submitted to Jan Stanley, State Title I Director on or before.
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
Creating a Shared Vision: 21 st Century Learning for Students with Limited English Proficiency Title I Conference October 2011.
TITLE III UPDATETITLE III UPDATE Planning for Success In Webinar September 6 &7, 2007 WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONWEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT.
Creating a Shared Vision: 21 st Century Learning for Students with Limited English proficiency Title III Conference May 5, 2009.
September 14, 2005Amelia Courts, WV Dept. of Education TITLE III UPDATE Web-Conference September 14, 2005.
Title III Update Planning for Success In
NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.
TITLE III UPDATETITLE III UPDATE Planning for Success In Webinar September 2009 WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONWEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF.
May 3, 2006WV Department of Education Annual Measurable Objectives for Improving the Achievement of LEP Students Title III AMAOs.
Title III: Continuous Improvement Update on Program Developments for LEP Students.
February 18, 2004 Amelia Courts, Assessing Limited English Proficient (LEP) Student Achievement.
WV Department of Education Amelia Courts and Linda Palenchar
Title III: Strategic Planning & Consolidated Monitoring May 4, 2010.
Presented By WVDE Federal Programs Staff July 15, 2009 Title III Monitoring and Fiscal Updates.
Title III: Strategic Planning & Consolidated Monitoring May 5, 2009.
Some slides in this presentation were excerpted from US Eds February 2009 PowerPoint presentation titled: Help! Im a New Title I Director. What Do I Need.
Federal Title III Monitoring Findings Illinois State Board of Education Division of English Language Learning Seng Naohlu, Dr. Seon Hwa Eun, Ilyse Leland,
Plotting Your Course for Comprehensive Monitoring.
Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Targeted Assistance & Schoolwide Programs NCLB Technical Assistance Audio April 18, :30 PM April 19, :30 AM Alaska Department of Education.
Orientation to EVALUATION PROCEDURES August, 2006.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Title I, Part A Schoolwide and Targeted Assistance.
1 New Hampshire’s preK-16 Literacy Action Plan for the 21 st Century Deb Wiswell & Linda Stimson NH Literacy Task Force July 23, 2007.
World’s Largest Educational Community
ESEA Title III AMAOs Ensuring Academic Success for English Learners Dr. Shereen Tabrizi, Manager Special Populations Unit Maria Silva, EL Consultant Office.
The Monitoring Process
The 10 Components of a Schoolwide Title I Program Presented by: Dr. Denise Ellis Director State and Federal Programs Dr. Ken Wagner Principal Rancho Mirage.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
New Title III Director’s Meeting September 10, 2010 Presented by Mami Itamochi Title III Coordinator.
TITLE III UPDATES Planning for Success October 26 th, 2010.
Title III: Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient and Immigrant Students Serving English Language Learners – It’s the Law VAFEPA: October.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
» September 3, 2015 » December 3, 2015 » February 4, 2016.
Title IA Planning, Fiscal, and Parental Involvement Workshops Maine Department of Education Kathryn Manning Jackie Godbout Rachelle Tome May 2006.
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
FEDERAL PROGRAMS What a Parent Needs to Know Decatur County School System achieved accreditation by SACS during the school year.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Petraine Johnson, Moderator, Presenters: Millie Bentley-Memon, Fengju Zhang, Elizabeth Judd Office of English Language Acquisition Language Enhancement.
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results Reviewed & Revised with COP April 2011.
Arizona Department of Education Office of English Language Acquisition Services.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Office of Federal Programs December 10, 2013.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY14 Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III, VI and X.
Title III: 101 Jacqueline A. Iribarren Ph.D. Title III, ESL & Bilingual Ed. Consultant October 20, 2011.
Virginia Department of Education November 5, 2015.
Discussion of W-APT, ACCESS Testing, Adequate Yearly Progress and Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives.
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
ESEA Consolidated Pre-Monitoring Meeting
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
ESL/Title III Consultants
Welcome! Title III, Part A Meeting
Presentation transcript:

NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring

Overview of the Presentation Overview of Consolidated Monitoring Monitoring Summary for –# Counties monitored –Common findings Procedures –Desk monitoring Standards –Onsite monitoring School Visits Samples Best Practices

Overview Definition NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Process of collecting information from grantees to ensure compliance for federal programs in accordance with EDGAR 34 CFR Programs that have monitoring requirements under NCLB: –Title I –Title II, A and D –Title III –Title V –Title VI –McKinney Vento Act

Overview Procedures for On Site Monitoring Conducted in three year cycle, unless more frequent monitoring is determined necessary by WVDE Conducted by a team of WVDE staff, county level administrators and/or other educators to conduct the on site review

Counties Monitored in County Jefferson Webster Hampshire Boone Marshall Hardy Fayette McDowell Monongalia Mason – follow up Roane Marion Lincoln Pleasants Grant Wirt Ritchie Tyler Wetzel

Document Components Monitored by Title III Highly Qualified Personnel – 2.8 Professional Development – 3.2 Parent/Community Involvement –4.1 Parent/Community Notification – 5.2, 5.3 a-g Title III Requirements –Identification procedures – 14.1 –High quality services –14.2 –Fiscal Requirements – 14.3 –AMAOs –14.4 –Parental Involvement/Notification – 14.5, 14.6 –WESTELL – 14.8

Required Student File Documentation Woodcock Munoz (or WESTELL) screening results Eligibility Parent Notification (within 30 days of enrollment) Documentation of LEP Committee Meeting Classroom Modification Form LEP Assessment Participation Form (*if appropriate) WESTELL scores WESTEST scores (*not required)

Common Findings & Recommendations 14.1 Identification (monitored in all counties) 2.8 Highly Qualified in Low-Incidence counties (ESL certified teacher is not present or endorsement is in- process) need to apply for waiver from Office of Prof. Prep. 5.2 Parental Notification 403_002.doc 403_002.doc 14.2 Increased Achievement (school visits) –Providing high quality programs –Scientifically-based research –Linked to ELP standards

Activities During On Site Monitoring Conduct an entrance conference Review of documentation to ensure compliance with federal requirements Interview county staff to verify compliance Conduct school visits as applicable Conduct an exit conference to provide an opportunity for clarifications and provide technical assistance for program improvement

Activities During On Site Monitoring- ESL Classroom Observation In order to effectively and comprehensively monitor standard 14.2, school visits observing ESL classes will be scheduled Purpose of the visit is to make programmatic observations Observation Protocol will be used for school visits County Title III Directors are encouraged to participate in school visits

14.2 Has the LEA increased the English proficiency of limited English proficient children by providing high-quality language instruction educational programs that are based on scientifically based research and linked to state ELP standards? NCLB Title III, Part A, Section3115 (c) (1) Scientifically-based Research (SBR) Elements Notes SBR Instruction (positive, engaging, high-yield strategies, Content ESL) SBR Curriculum (linked to ELP & CSO standards) SBR School Effectiveness (environment, culture) SBR Student/Parent Support (parent education & involvement) Other: Observation Protocol Title III School-based Programs County Schools, ______________, 2006 Schools: _______________________________________________

Response to Monitoring Report Required for all grantees with identified recommendations and/or findings Includes an outline for implementation of corrective actions identified for findings and a response to all recommendations Submit to the Assistant Director of the Office of Federal Programs and Accountability within 30 business days from receipt of the written monitoring report (attention: Jan Stanley) Confirmation of receipt of monitoring response will be provided by WVDE Withholding of federal funding will occur for failure to provide a written response within the required time frame

Summary of Best Practices 1.Ongoing, detailed assessment of student language proficiency (see Skills Matrix) 2.Appropriate instructional balance between: direct (language) instruction and academic support –Clear, specific goals for both included in lesson plans (see Academic Support Log) 3.Focus on parental involvement both at the programmatic and individual level (see Parent Newsletter) 4.Coordinated professional development plan for ESL and classroom teachers

3 Year Monitoring Schedule BarbourBerkeleyBoone 2 BrookeCabellFayette 3 BraxtonHancockGrant 4 CalhounHarrisonHampshire 5 ClayJacksonHardy 6 DoddridgeKanawhaJefferson 7 GilmerLewisLincoln 8 GreenbrierLoganMarion 9 MercerMasonMarshall 10 MineralMingoMcDowell 11 PendletonMonroeMonongalia 12 PrestonMorganPleasants 13 PutnamNicholasRitchie 14 RaleighOhioRoane 15 SummersPocahontasTyler 16 UpshurRandolphWebster 17 WayneTaylorWetzel 18 WoodTuckerWirt 19 Wyoming

Changes for Monitoring Title III Directors will be asked to submit LEP student data using Student Data Form in advance of monitoring (see next slide) WVDE will draft a visiting schedule with the following considerations: Stick to regularly scheduled ESL classes (aim is not to disrupt student services) Include a variety of schools (Title I, non-Title I, elementary, middle HS, low-incidence, high- incidence) and a variety of the ESL students (beginner through advanced) in the visits as possible The purpose of the visit is to make programmatic observations (not individual teacher observations)

Title III Student Service Data County Name School Name Student Name Grade (K-12) Proficiency Level (1-5) ESL Services Teacher Name Days (M,T,W,TH,F, Monitor) Times (start - end)

______________ County Title III School-based Monitoring Schedule _______day, JUNE 30, 2009 TimeSchool# Students/ LevelsTeacher lunch

Contact Information Amelia Courts, Executive Director Office of ESL/International School Nancy Griffith, Consultant