Title III Update Planning for Success In 2006-07.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Accountability Title III of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) Presented.
Advertisements

Review and Discussion of AMAO 2 Criteria & Targets NC Department of Public Instruction With WestEd & Wisconsin Center for Education Research Statewide.
Company LOGO Amy Weinmann Education Program Specialist 2009 NCLB Technical Assistance Staying the Course Amidst Change April 1 & 2, 2009.
Federal NCLB Regulations
Creating a Shared Vision: 21 st Century Learning for Students with Limited English Proficiency Title I Conference October 2011.
NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.
TITLE III UPDATETITLE III UPDATE Planning for Success In Webinar September 6 &7, 2007 WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONWEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT.
Creating a Shared Vision: 21 st Century Learning for Students with Limited English proficiency Title III Conference May 5, 2009.
September 14, 2005Amelia Courts, WV Dept. of Education TITLE III UPDATE Web-Conference September 14, 2005.
NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.
TITLE III UPDATETITLE III UPDATE Planning for Success In Webinar September 18 & 19, 2008 WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONWEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT.
Title III: Continuous Improvement Program Update – December 2004.
May 3, 2006WV Department of Education Annual Measurable Objectives for Improving the Achievement of LEP Students Title III AMAOs.
2007 TITLE III DIRECTORS MEETING May 8, 2007 Morgantown, WV.
Title III: Continuous Improvement Update on Program Developments for LEP Students.
February 18, 2004 Amelia Courts, Assessing Limited English Proficient (LEP) Student Achievement.
Title III: Strategic Planning & Consolidated Monitoring May 4, 2010.
Presented By WVDE Federal Programs Staff July 15, 2009 Title III Monitoring and Fiscal Updates.
Title III: Strategic Planning & Consolidated Monitoring May 5, 2009.
Title III AMAO Improvement Plan SY
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Title I and Title III: Partnership for Academic Achievement Virginia Department of Education.
Title III-A All identified English language learners assessed for English language proficiency (ELP) with the ACCESS for ELLs TM, with all 4 domains (Reading,
Annual Title I Program Overview at Williston Sherry Veasey, Principal September, 2011 Parent/Teacher Meeting.
ESEA Title III AMAOs Ensuring Academic Success for English Learners Dr. Shereen Tabrizi, Manager Special Populations Unit Maria Silva, EL Consultant Office.
Title III, Part A Update Texas Education Agency Division of NCLB Program Coordination Institute for Second Language Achievement (ISLA) Texas A&M University.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title III Accountability Update Cathy George Academic Accountability.
Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives AMAOs are achievement objectives for English learners that corporations must meet that receive Title III funds.
Identification of English Language Learners (ELLs) in Wisconsin Jacqueline A. Iribarren, Ph.D. ESL/Bilingual & Title III Consultant.
September, 2010 Accomack County Public Schools. DEFINITION OF AN LEP STUDENT  An LEP student is one: Who was not born in the U.S. or whose native language.
Parents’ Right to Know Their Child’s and School’s Achievement.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations & Implications for California’s Accountability System Robert Linquanti Cathy George Project Director & Sr.
TITLE III UPDATES Planning for Success October 26 th, 2010.
April 14, Title III Updates Shereen Tabrizi, Ph.D. Manager, OFS Special Population Unit, MDE April 26, 2011.
Michael Toole Southwest Plains Regional Service Center.
Title I Annual Meeting Presented by: SCHOOL NAME HERE.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education September 17 &
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations Presentation for LEP SCASS/CCSSO May 7, 2008.
» September 3, 2015 » December 3, 2015 » February 4, 2016.
Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives. Thompson School District Core Values Integrity –We will consistently demonstrate respect, honesty, transparency,
Title III, Part A: Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient (LEP) and Immigrant Students  The purpose of Title III, Part A is to help ensure.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
Title III – General Provisions AREA OF FOCUS: PARENTAL NOTIFICATION.
Annual Measurable Achievement Objective s (AMAOs): Update Jacqueline A. Iribarren, DPI September 27, 2007.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Petraine Johnson, Moderator, Presenters: Millie Bentley-Memon, Fengju Zhang, Elizabeth Judd Office of English Language Acquisition Language Enhancement.
Meeting Private School Student Participation Requirements Under Title III West Virginia Department of Education.
Title III Updates & AMAOs Jacqueline A. Iribarren, Title III Susan Ketchum, Office of Educational Accountability September 24, 2008.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs): LEA Reports and Responsibilities Presented by the Pennsylvania Department of Education Bureau.
Title III: 101 Jacqueline A. Iribarren Ph.D. Title III, ESL & Bilingual Ed. Consultant October 20, 2011.
Title III, Part A, Foundations Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist Shyla Vesitis, Title I/III Specialist Title III University October 8, 2015.
ELL – ACCESS for ELLs PIMS Data Collection School Year.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Discussion of W-APT, ACCESS Testing, Adequate Yearly Progress and Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title III Accountability Update Bilingual Coordinators Network.
ESEA Title III Accountability System. JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 22 Title III Requires States to: Define two annual measurable.
Transition to ESSA WVDE Office of Federal Programs March 8, 2016 Alternate Audio Access: #
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Student Achievement and School Support Division
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Title III Update Planning for Success In

Overview 2006 WESTELL Results AMAO Status Title III Applications Consolidated Monitoring Accommodation Study

Updates- WESTELL WESTELL Results – expected delivery by August 18 CD delivered to County Central Office Layout and formatting similar to If your CD does not arrive by August 22, please notify my office What to do with results?

Updates- WESTELL Notifications 5.2 Has the LEA notified parents no later than 30 days after the beginning of the school year that their child has been identified for participation in a language instruction educational program? (2 weeks if a child enrolls after the beginning of school). NCLB Title III, Part C, Section Has the LEA failed to make progress on the AMAOs? If so, has the LEA separately informed parents of a child identified for participation in a language instruction educational program, of such failure no later than 30 days after the failure occurs? NCLB Title III, Part C, Section 3302

Updates- WESTELL Measuring LEA Progress 14.2 Has the LEA increased the English proficiency of limited English proficient children by providing high- quality language instruction educational programs that are based on scientifically based research and linked to state ELP standards? NCLB Title III, Part A, Section3115 (c) (1) Measuring Student Progress Exit status Letters to Parents –Not required –Letter from Superintendent

Updates – AMAO Calculating AMAO 1 status Cohort for AMAO 1 is: All LEP students, K-12, who have two years of WESTELL data (compare with 04-05) Percentage Making Progress: Gaining one proficiency level annually for students who were below Level 3 the prior year Gaining one proficiency level every two years for students who the prior year were at Level 3 (requires 3 data points) Maintaining the current level of proficiency for students who are at Levels 4 or 5 and have no sub-skill below Level 3.

Updates - AMAO

Updates – AMAO Calculating AMAO 2 status Cohort for AMAO 2 is: All LEP students, K-12, who have been in U.S. schools for 4 or more years who have two years of WESTELL data AND are at Level 3 or above or who did not reach English proficiency the prior year OR were below Level 3 the prior year who met the English proficient level the second year Percentage Becoming Proficient: Defined proficient as a Level 4 Composite with all sub-skills at Level 3 or above

Updates- AMAO

Updates AMAO AMAO 3 = AYP status of LEP subgroup AMAO status should be determined by early September Counties that fail to make AMAO status will receive written notification and follow up technical assistance

Updates – Title III Applications Planning targets for AMAO improvement 1.Take the ending goal target for (89%) 2.Subtract the difference between your CURRENT score (for example 83%) and end goal (89%) to determine how much increase your county needs to make during the next 8 years (89 – 83 =5%) 3.Divide the total needed increase by 8 years (5 / 8 years =.625) to determine how much annual increase is needed each year

Updates – Accommodation Study Note- Planning targets are NOT your official AMAO targets. All counties must meet the same state-level AMAOs However, appropriate front-end planning and goal setting will eliminate the need for extreme growth toward the end of the trajectory Counties are encouraged, but not required, to set individual county annual growth goals for the next eight years If a county does not meet its own goal, there is no state- level accountability until the county reaches that point where they dont meet the state AMAO target For Reporting purposes any county that has less than 50 matching student scores did not meet the minimum N size of 50

Updates Title III Applications –Reduction in federal funding –Revised amounts –Reviews complete by Sept. 15 Consolidated Monitoring –Inviting cross-monitoring Accommodation Study

Thank you for your participation! Questions Comments? Please contact Amelia Courts or (304)