Coaching Case 3 Group 4 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pythagorean Theorem Group 7 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Advertisements

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2012 Multiplication and Division Arrays and Strategies.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Multiplication of Fractions Part 1 January 29, 2013 Common.
Comparison Situations and Tape Diagrams
Division of Fractions: Balancing Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge Part 2 January 15, 2013 Common Core Leadership in Mathematics2 (CCLM) This material.
Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for.
Volume Group 5 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Addition and Subtraction of Fractions Part 1 Class 3 October.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2011 Addition and Subtraction of Fractions Part 2 Class.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Shape Group 1 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Exploring Claim 2, 3, and 4 This material was developed for.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Multiplication of Fractions Part 2 February 12, 2013 Common.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2012 Division Common Core Leadership in Mathematics.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2012 What are Fractions? Part 1 Common Core Leadership.
Coaching Case 10 Group 6 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Addition and Subtraction of Fractions Part 2
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Word problems…. No problem! Class 5 November 13, 2012 This.
Understanding Angle Group 3 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2012 Fractions: Teaching with Understanding Part 2 This.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Multiplication of Fractions Part 3.5 March 5, 2013 Common.
Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for.
CCSS-M and Classroom Practice: Reflecting Conversation DECEMBER 13, 2011 Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee,
Part 2: Division of Fractions Balancing Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge Tuesday December 13, 2011 Common Core Leadership in Mathematics (CCLM) Common.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Ant’s Picnic Imagine that you and the other members of your group are a team of picnic basket ants, and you have just reached a picnic basket filled with.
Using Tape Diagrams Multiplicative Structures- Comparison Problems
Using Tape Diagrams and Variables to Develop Algebra Skills
Additive Comparison Situations
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Division with Fractions – Part 3 “Partitive Division Tools”
Ko-Kou and the Peacock’s Tail
Volume of Prisms and Pyramids
Volume Measurement Core Mathematics Partnership
Pathways to Teacher Leadership in Mathematics Monday, July 7, 2014
Classroom Discussions to Support Problem Solving
Pathways to Teacher Leadership in Mathematics Monday, July 7, 2014
Surfacing MP6, MP7 and MP 5 Core Mathematics Partnership
Applications of Angle Measurement
Exploring Symmetry Core Mathematics Partnership
Number Talks: Building Fluency with Division
Developing Linear Thinking & Extending to a Ruler
Multiplication Concept Development & Word Problem Structures
Ratio Reasoning in 6th Grade The Road to Proportional Reasoning
Use the next 10 minutes to share.... Goal…
Number Talks: Focusing in Computational Fluency
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Using Talk Moves to Help Students Engage in the Reasoning of Others
Multiplicative Comparison Problems and Strip Diagrams
Number Talks: Developing Computational Fluency
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
The Power of A Number String Purposeful Number Talks
The Power of A Number String Purposeful Number Talks (part 2)
Understanding Ratios as Percents
Moving From Multiplicative Comparisons to Proportional Reasoning
A Language-Rich Math Class
Unpacking Multiplication of Fractions
Student Work Analysis: Looking for Growth in Thinking
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Presentation transcript:

Coaching Case 3 Group 4 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material was developed for the Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics project through the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Center for Mathematics and Science Education Research (CMSER). This material may be used by schools to support learning of teachers and staff provided appropriate attribution and acknowledgement of its source. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. This project was supported through a grant from the Wisconsin ESEA Title II Improving Teacher Quality Program.

Case # 3: Strategic Coaching Goal Centered Modeling in the Classroom CCLM Group Presentation Group #4: Jenny Kerola, Brenda Osell, Roz Sampson, Jan Brockunier - January 29 th, 2013

Learning Intentions We are learning to… understand student expectations of angles as defined by standard 4.MD.7. improve math instruction by learning how to listen to students’ mathematical ideas.

Success Criteria We will be successful when… we can explain the mathematical content and provide examples of 4.MD.7. we can describe how listening to students helps us understand their learning and plan future instruction.

Agenda 1.Making right angles activity 2.Understanding 4.MD.7 3.Relating 4.MD.7 to Case 3 4.Case 3 5.Coaching Moves

Transformer-Ivan.net

Let’s make some right angles!

Making Right Angles Activity 1.By yourself, use the vertices from 2 polygons and combine them to create a 90 degree angle. 2.With a shoulder partner, use the vertices from 3 polygons and combine them to create a 90 degree angle.

Making Right Angles Activity cont… In your table group, choose one way you found using the vertices from 3 polygons to create a 90 degree angle. Draw it on a white board. Write the corresponding equation. We will share out a few examples with the whole group.

Getting into the Standard

Standard 4.MD.7 Domain- Measurement and Data Cluster- Solve problems involving measurement and conversion of measurements from a larger unit to a smaller unit. Standard 7- – Recognize angle measure as additive. When an angle is decomposed into non-overlapping parts, the angle measure of the whole is the sum of the angle measures of the parts. Solve addition and subtraction problems to find unknown angles on a diagram in real world and mathematical problems, e.g., by using an equation with a symbol for the unknown angle measure.

Understanding 4.MD.7 4.MD.7 Recognize angle measure as additive. When an angle is decomposed into non-overlapping parts, the angle measure of the whole is the sum of the angle measures of the parts. Solve addition and subtraction problems to find unknown angles on a diagram in real world and mathematical problems, e.g., by using an equation with a symbol for the unknown angle measure. In your table group, take a white board and divide it into 2 sections. 1.On the left, re-write the standard in teacher-friendly language (just the blue part of the standard). 2.On the right, explain how this standard was illustrated in the making right angles activity you just completed.

Relating 4.MD.7 to Case 3

Digging in to Case 3 Re-read p. 28 – 29 (stop at figure 3.7 and 3.8). To prepare for a table discussion, note line numbers where you see examples of the math from 4.MD.7 in the case. Thinking about 4.MD.7, discuss examples of the mathematics and of students’ mathematical ideas from the case with your table group.

So far… We have: Engaged in math activities from standard 4.MD.7 Investigated the standard and put it in teacher-friendly language Examined the math activity in case 3

Coaching Moves Review p to recall coaching moves you found. With your shoulder partner, discuss the following: – Thinking about coaching strategies in this case, identify Tina’s coaching moves that would help you coach colleague’s that are in a similar situation as Mr. Gallagher? -We will share out a few coaching moves that you found useful for your own practice.

In Conclusion Here’s what we did today: 1.Engaged in math content related to 4.MD.7. 2.Examined examples of the math from Case 3. 3.Studied the coaching moves that Tina used to help the teacher move forward in his understanding of the importance of listening to students to inform instruction.

Learning Intentions We are learning to… understand student expectations of angles as defined by standard 4.MD.7. improve math instruction by learning how to listen to students’ mathematical ideas.

Success Criteria We will be successful when… we can explain the mathematical content and provide examples of 4.MD.7. we can describe how listening to students helps us understand their learning and plan future instruction.

Resources Power Polygons from Pearson Investigations Grade 4, Unit 4, Lesson 3.1 from Pearson Investigations (making right angles activity) Cultivating a Math Coaching Practice book