USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Towards Modeling and Prediction of Energy Consumption for a Campus Micro-Grid Saima Aman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sustainable Construction Markets B. CORNUT: Policy, New Buildings, Med Experience 1 Policy for Sustainability in New Buildings INSTRUCTIVE DEFICITS or.
Advertisements

eQuest Quick Energy Simulation Tool
How to lower the energy use of your home David Parker Building Analyst/ Energy Auditor Parker Energy Solutions David Parker Building Analyst/ Energy Auditor.
Make the most of your energy Head Office – Case Study.
SunCast: Fine-grained Prediction of Natural Sunlight Levels for Improved Daylight Harvesting Jiakang Lu and Kamin Whitehouse Department of Computer Science,
Ductless Heat Pumps in Residential Applications Proposed Research Plan.
Energy Performance Analysis with RETScreen
MENG 547 LECTURE 3 By Dr. O Phillips Agboola. C OMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ENERGY AUDIT Why do we audit Commercial/Industrial buildings Important.
Environmental Controls I/IG Lecture 12 Cooling Loads Cooling Degree Hours Energy Performance Ratings Annual Fuel Consumption Lecture 12 Cooling Loads Cooling.
Lecture 7: Building Modeling Questions Material prepared by GARD Analytics, Inc. and University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign under contract to the National.
Estimating Energy Efficiency of Buildings Matthew Wysocki.
Dr. Yukun Bao School of Management, HUST Business Forecasting: Experiments and Case Studies.
A Parallel Statistical Learning Approach to the Prediction of Building Energy Consumption Based on Large Datasets Hai Xiang ZHAO, Phd candidate Frédéric.
TURBULENCE IN THE LIBRARY. ABSTRACT: There is a small library in the south west corner of the second floor in the AJLC center. The 400 sq. ft. room features.
Burton D. Morgan Entrepreneurial Competition Are you the entrepreneurial type? Do you want to start your own business and be your own boss? Do you have.
SINTEF Energy Research 1 Remodece meeting January 2007 Nicolai Feilberg.
Stanford Equipment Inventory & Plug Load Reduction Project
CHANGES IN THERMAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN APARTMENT BUILDINGS OF ESTONIA Teet-Andrus Kõiv,
SEEM Tool Overview Regional Technical Forum Member Orientation January 22, 2013.
Electric / Gas / Water Eric Fox Oleg Moskatov Itron, Inc. April 17, 2008 VELCO Long-Term Demand Forecast Methodology Overview.
ERCOT 2003 UFE ANALYSIS By William Boswell & Carl Raish AEIC Load Research Conference July 13, 2005.
Building an Information Community: IT and Research Working Together Web Tools for Enrollment Management By Ken Meehan, Research, Fullerton College Bob.
J.B. Speed School of Engineering University of Louisville KEEPS Energy Management Toolkit Step 2: Assess Performance & Opportunities Toolkit 2C: School.
“Seasonality and Weather Effects on Electricity Loads” Crowley and Joutz, GWU Sept. 02 MetrixND Forecasters User Meeting September 23-25, 2002, San Diego,
Building Simulation. BMEABMEA uilding odeling nergy nalysis.
CALRES Update Phase 1 Progress Report April 22, 2009 Bruce Wilcox Phil Niles Ken Nittler.
Foothill College & Space Science Center Bill Kelly Viron Energy Services (510) ext 13,
Energy Agency of Plovdiv Awareness raising and energy education as a priority for end user mobilization Integration of Active Learning and Energy Monitoring.
THERMAL INERTIA FOR SMALL SCALE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING STIJN VERBEKE UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP UNIVERSITY COLLEGE BAUSIM 2010 CONFERENCE.
CT108 – Energy Audit Assignment. Top Down And Bottom Up Approach The Top Down Approach The “top down” approach assesses the total energy inputs which.
Compiled by Load Profiling ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation
GREEN FIEND ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT Energy Conservation.
ERCOT Long-Term Demand and Energy Forecasting February 20, 2007 Bill Bojorquez.
EvergreenEcon.com ESA 2011 Impact Evaluation Draft Report Public Workshop #2 August 7, 2013 Presented By: Steve Grover, President.
Modeling Electricity Demand: A Neural Network Approach Christian Crowley GWU Department of Economics INFORMS Meeting October 26, 2004, Denver, CO.
The New Standard for Sustainability. Carleton College Dormitories Northfield, MN.
Center Update Eileen Peppard Center for Smart Building and Community Design.
Pattern Discovery of Fuzzy Time Series for Financial Prediction -IEEE Transaction of Knowledge and Data Engineering Presented by Hong Yancheng For COMP630P,
May 03, UFE ANALYSIS Old – New Model Comparison Compiled by the Load Profiling Group ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation May 03, 2007.
Demand Response and Smart Grid
A Comprehensive Plan for Student Services. Northeast Wisconsin Technical College Two-year technical college in Green Bay, WI Established as a vocational.
“Mapping the current and future risk of overheating in UK homes” London-Loughborough (LoLo) CDT By Argyris Oraiopoulos 1.
2016 Long-Term Load Forecast
Examining Natural Gas Markets C HRIS M C G ILL M ANAGING D IRECTOR, P OLICY A NALYSIS M ARCH 5, 2008.
Project 2: Classification Using Genetic Programming Kim, MinHyeok Biointelligence laboratory Artificial.
Temperature Adjustment of UK Energy Statistics Iain MacLeay.
“Mapping the current and future risk of overheating in UK homes” First Year Progress Report London-Loughborough CDT By Argyris Oraiopoulos 1.
Modeling Electricity Demand: A Neural Network Approach Christian Crowley GWU Department of Economics 28 th Annual IAEE International Conference June 6,
Lecture Objectives: -Define the midterm project -Lean about eQUEST -Review exam problems.
Introduction to Energy Management. Lesson 4 Determining the Loads on the HVAC System.
Eco 6380 Predictive Analytics For Economists Spring 2016 Professor Tom Fomby Department of Economics SMU.
Natural Gas Outlook The Tennessee Regulatory Authority Natural Gas Symposium August 19, 2003 Roy Kass Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Multifamily Energy Calculator Rapid modeling of mid-rise residential projects Greg Arcangeli | Graduate Engineer | LEED AP BD+C Cristina Woodings | Graduate.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute CS548 Spring 2016 Decision Trees Showcase By Yi Jiang and Brandon Boos ---- Showcase work by Zhun Yu, Fariborz Haghighat,
2015 SDG&E PTR/SCTD Evaluation DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impact Workshop George Jiang May 11 th, 2016 Customer Category Mean Active Participants Mean Reference.
Machine Learning Algorithms Predicting Demand Response Potential Utilising a Synthetic Repository Despoina Christantoni, Dimitrios-Stavros Kapetanakis,
BUS 308 Week 4 Quiz Check this A+ tutorial guideline at 1. With reference to problem 1, what.
WDMA Technical Conference Chicago, IL 28 June 2016
Policy Implications and Customer Energy Use
Utilizing PeopleSoft Tools to Streamline Graduation Processes
INVERSE BUILDING MODELING
Solar City: Effect of Solar Technologies on Network Performance
Chapter 10: ANNUAL ENERGY ESTIMATION METHODS
Epuni Primary School LED Lighting Trial 2016 Final Report
Phd Candidate Computational Physiology Lab University of Houston
The impact of occupants’ behaviour on urban energy demand
Thermal Impact of Different Interior Finishing Materials on Energy Consumption YOGESH JATAV
Using Clustering to Make Prediction Intervals For Neural Networks
For JSM July, 2019 | Denver, CO By
Presentation transcript:

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Towards Modeling and Prediction of Energy Consumption for a Campus Micro-Grid Saima Aman

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Energy Consumption  USC has 250 buildings (2009), up by 10% from from 2001  Annual consumption of electricity in 2009 was up by 37% from 2001  Majority of electricity is consumed in buildings  Modeling useful for planning and implementing university energy policies 9-Oct-152

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Overview Goal: Models to predict daily energy use Trained using energy data for two years (2008 & 2009)  Campus-Scale Energy Use Model  Covers 170 buildings on UPC and HSC campuses  Building-Scale Energy Use Model  Covers 23 buildings on the UPC campus

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Related Work  Modeling methods:  Regression models, artificial neural networks, time series models  Data used in Models  Static consumption data  Live data streams  Synthetic data using building simulation programs (e.g., Energy Plus)  Estimation based on utility bills.

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Related Work : Data Attributes  Weather Data  Temperature measurements (max, avg)  Heating degree day, cooling degree day  Building Data  Orientation of buildings; windows  Wall insulation thickness, heat transfer coefficient; window to wall ratio, etc.  Occupancy data  Estimate presence/absence and number of people  Based on sensors in rooms, building entrances  Based on heuristics, such as open/close office door

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Unique Features of our Work  Single unified building energy use model  Applicable to diverse buildings; other works focus on homogeneous buildings  Information driven approach  Indirect indicators of energy use plus domain attributes; data is typically available publicly  Design and Operation phase  Use attributes that can be applied during design phase as well

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu FMS Energy Data  15-min interval energy data available for 3 years (from Jul 09, 2007 to Nov 21, 2010)  Covers 170 buildings on the UPC and HSC campus  Data: One CSV file for each day  24*4 = 96 records for each building per day  Issues: Missing values and timestamps 9-Oct-157

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Model Attributes  ENRG* - Energy Use  TMP* - Max Temperature Value  AVTMP - Average Temperature Value  GAREA - Gross Area  NAREA - Net Area  CYR - Year of construction (1919 – 2006)  BTYP - Type of building (Academic, Residential, Other)  WKDY* - Day of the week (M,T,…Su)  HLDY* - Holiday (None, Academic Holiday, Campus Holiday)  SEM* - Semester (Spring, Summer, Fall) (Sources: FMS, Academic calendar, Weather Underground) ( Attributes marked * are used in campus-scale model)

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Daily consumption for 2009 & Oct-159 SpringSummer Fall

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Academic Buildings (2009) 9-Oct-1510  EEB – Hughes (5F+B, sq. ft., 1990 )  RTH – Tutor Hall (6F+B, sq. ft., 2003)

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Residential Buildings (2009)  WTO – Webb Twr (14F+B, sq.ft., 1972)  PRB – Parkside (4F+B, sq. ft., 2006) 9-Oct-1511

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Campus-scale Model  Training Data  731 records  (for each day of the year 2008 & 2009)  Test Data  325 records  (for the year 2010, up to Nov 21)  Tool: Statistics toolbox of MATLAB

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Decision Tree 1. if TMP =74.5 then node 3 else if WKDY /in/ {6/7} then node 4 else if WKDY/in/ {1/2/3/4/5} then node 5 else if WKDY /in/ {6/7} then node 6 else if WKDY/in/ {1/2/3/4/5} then node 7 else if HLDY /in/ {1/2} then node 8 else if HLDY=0 then node 9 else if HLDY/in/ {1/2} then node 10 else if HLDY=0 then node 11 else

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu 9-Oct-1514

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Campus-scale evaluation  Model used to make prediction for year 2010  Evaluated using observed values  CV-RMSE value = 7.45%.  The predicted values are able to capture the weekly patterns of rise and fall of energy load.

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Campus-scale Energy Prediction 9-Oct-1516 (For the year 2010)

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Building-scale Model  Training Data  records  Test Data  Separate test dataset for each building  Each has 325 records

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Decision Tree 1. if NAREA< then node 2 elseif NAREA>= then node 3 else if CYR = then node 5 else if CYR =1931 then node 7 else if CYR = then node 9 else if WKDY in {6 7} then node 10 elseif WKDY in { } then node 11 else if WKDY in {6 7} then node 12 elseif WKDY in { } then node 13 else if GAREA< then node 14 elseif GAREA>= then node 15 else if GAREA< then node 16 elseif GAREA>= then node 17 else if GAREA< then node 18 elseif GAREA>= then node 19 else if WKDY=7 then node 20 elseif WKDY=6 then node 21 else

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Building-scale evaluation

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Building-scale Prediction  ASC (CV-RMSE = 12.03%)

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Building-scale Prediction  EEB (CV-RMSE = 9.19%)

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Future Work  Include fine-grained information in our model  15-min granularity energy use data  Detailed occupancy data (classroom assignments, course enrolment, room use)

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Thanks

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Academic Buildings (2009)  SAL – Salvatori CS (3F, sq. ft., 1976)  Comparison 9-Oct-1524

USC Center for Energy Informatics cei.usc.edu Residential Buildings (2009)  PTD – Pardee Tower (8F, sq. ft., 1982)  Comparison 9-Oct-1525