Level 0 Topology Trigger Falk Meissner LBNL CTB Readout Topology CTB-DSM Tree Trigger Algorithm UPC Trigger Other Examples Motivation : Level 3 requires.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VETO Analysis Update Michael Wood University of Massachusetts, Amherst Outline Introduction and basics Reconstruction packages Efficiencies Simulation.
Advertisements

MWPC Commissioning: A Status Report What the MWPC’s do and how Data taking Jan-Feb 2000 Results from the Analysis.
PHENIX local RUN9 RHIC meeting Manabu Togawa for the PHENIX 1.
DoE Review June 6-7, 2000 Current Detector Configuration June 6, 2000  Solenoid, Central Preshower installed in central bore  A-layer MDTs installed.
Bunch-by-bunch (relative) polarization measurements using inner annuli of STAR BBC Andrew Gordon April 4, 2008.
Ultra Peripheral Collisions at RHIC Coherent Coupling Coherent Coupling to both nuclei: photon~Z 2, Pomeron~A 4/3 Small transverse momentum p t ~ 2h 
First Results from Tracker 1  Cryostat Commissioning  AFE/VLSB Firmware and Readout  Cosmic Ray Setup  Tracker Readout  Software  Trigger Timing.
Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics, Heavy Ion Physics with CMS: Day-One Measurements Olga Barannikova for the CMS Collaboration.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, MIT, July Interference in Coherent Vector Meson Production in UPC Au+Au Collisions at √s = 200GeV Brooke Haag UC Davis.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, UCD group meeting, February Ultra Peripheral Collisions What is a UPC? Photonuclear interaction Two nuclei “miss” each.
STAR-EMC Trigger A. Vander Molen for the EMC Group.
David L. Winter for the PHENIX Collaboration PHENIX Silicon Detector Upgrades RHIC & AGS Annual Users' Meeting Workshop 3 RHIC Future: New Physics Through.
Report of the NTPC Test Experiment in 2007Sep and Others Yohei Nakatsugawa.
Proposal by the Numbers 3 Trigger layers (plus 2 “short” layers) provide full coverage to eta=??? in 15 degree sectors Hits collected in real time, sent.
Simulation issue Y. Akiba. Main goals stated in LOI Measurement of charm and beauty using DCA in barrel –c  e + X –D  K , K , etc –b  e + X –B 
Diana Parno – July 22, 2008 January PREx Test Run: Compton Photon Analysis Diana Parno Carnegie Mellon University HAPPEX Collaboration Meeting.
Jornadas LIP 2008 – Pedro Ramalhete. 17 m hadron absorber vertex region 8 MWPCs 4 trigger hodoscopes toroidal magnet dipole magnet hadron absorber targets.
1 Ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions Timoshenko S., Emelyanov V. Moscow Engineering Physics Institute (State University) (for the STAR Collaboration)
Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Institute for High Energy Physics Vienna Level-1 Trigger Menu Working Group CERN, 9 November 2000 Global Trigger Overview.
1 MTD Calibration for Cosmic Ray Triggered Data in RUN 10 at STAR Lijuan Ruan (BNL), Liang Li (UT Austin) 04/01/ Workshop on STAR MTD Production.
Run 8 Polarization measurements from STAR BBC Andrew Gordon September 12, 2008.
October 14, 2004 Single Spin Asymmetries 1 Single Spin Asymmetries for charged pions. Overview  One physics slide  What is measured, kinematic variables.
Stephen Trentalange UCLA DIS04 1 Inclusive Jet Asymmetries from STAR Analysis Update Stephen Trentalange for the STAR Collaboration.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
1 PID & FPD Software Gilvan Alves (Lafex/CBPF) Q4Q4 D S Q2Q2 Q2Q2 Q3Q3 Q3Q3 Q4Q4 S A 1Q A1SA1S A 2Q A 2S P 1Q P 2S P 1S P 2Q p p Z(m) A D1 Detector Roman.
Photon 2003Falk Meissner, LBNL Falk Meissner Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory For the STAR Collaboration Photon 2003 April 2003 Coherent Electromagnetic.
Measurements of Transverse Spin Effects with the Forward Pion Detector of STAR Larisa Nogach Institute of High Energy Physics, Protvino for the STAR collaboration.
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
A STUDY OF TRIGGER ALGORITHMS FOR ULTRA PERIPHERAL COLLISIONS WITH THE ALICE DETECTOR Joey Butterworth, Dr. Yury Gorbunov, Dr. Janet Seger Department of.
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Identifier Introduction Calibration with cosmic rays Performance in Au+Au collisions Summary Hiroki Sato, Kyoto University.
ATLAS Trigger Development
PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.
BNL May 17, 2002Falk Meissner, LBNL Jim Thomas for Falk Meissner Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory The STAR Collaboration Workshop on Diffraction and.
STAR pp Run Summary Carl Gagliardi March 11, 2008.
Leo Greiner IPHC beam test Beam tests at the ALS and RHIC with a Mimostar-2 telescope.
1 Plans for first beams - - triggers from the BRM group (BSC, BPTX) Gábor Veres for the BRM group CMS Trigger Technical Coordination Meeting 8 October,
E-EMC developments and plan Jan Balewski IUCF, Indiana Detector status Run 3 goals Calibration Software status STAR Analysis Meeting BNL, October
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
STAR Pixel Detector readout prototyping status. LBNL-IPHC-06/ LG22 Talk Outline Quick review of requirements and system design Status at last meeting.
N. Poljak, FPD++ N. Poljak, U. of Zagreb.
TOFp Status Report Introduction: system overview Functional requirements Analysis status –track extrapolation & matching –start time –stop time –identified.
October 22, 2004 Single Spin Asymmetries at RHIC 1 F.Videbaek Physics Department, Brookhaven National.
Jamaica 11 Jan.8, 2009 Muon Trigger Upgrade at PHENIX RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
S. Dasu, University of Wisconsin February Calorimeter Trigger for Super LHC Electrons, Photons,  -jets, Jets, Missing E T Current Algorithms.
The BTeV Pixel Detector and Trigger System Simon Kwan Fermilab P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA BEACH2002, June 29, 2002 Vancouver, Canada.
Nikhef Scientific Meeting 2000Onne Peters D0 Muon Spectrometer December 14-15, Amsterdam Onne Peters Nikhef Jamboree 2000.
Monitoring and Commissioning the NOνA Far Detector M. Baird 1, J. Bian 2, J. Coelho 4, G. Davies 3, M. Messier 1, M. Muether 5, J. Musser 1 and D. Rocco.
Analysis Meeting, November 9-11, 2003 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez Heavy Flavor Working Group Heavy Flavor in ‘04: Prospects for J/ . Heavy.
1 Local Polarimetry for Proton Beams with the STAR Beam Beam Counters Joanna Kiryluk Massachusetts Institute of Technology for the STAR Collaboration SPIN2004.
High Multiplicity FVTX Trigger Toru Nagashima, Yomei Fukushima (Rikkyo University) Shoichi Hasegwa (J-Parc) Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN and FVTX Group 1.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Alpine, very forward, EOS…
Tracking performances & b-tagging commissioning
Mini-Trigger/DAQ workshop,OCU
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
eXtremely Fast Tracker; An Overview
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
Special edition: Farewell for Valerie Halyo
STAR Geometry and Detectors
Special edition: Farewell for Stephen Bailey
Special edition: Farewell for Eunil Won
TOPO+ ZDC: Trigger word 12290
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Katarzyna Kowalik (LBNL) For the STAR Collaboration
Forward-Backward Asymmetry Study in
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
Inclusive p0 Production in Polarized pp Collisions using the STAR Endcap Calorimeter Jason C. Webb, Valparaiso University, for the STAR Collaboration Outline.
Presentation transcript:

Level 0 Topology Trigger Falk Meissner LBNL CTB Readout Topology CTB-DSM Tree Trigger Algorithm UPC Trigger Other Examples Motivation : Level 3 requires full readout of TPC; it’s a filter not a trigger. Need to identify potentially interesting events in Level 0 to reduce background events where is TPC readout. Why in parrallel, better use of bandwidht /avail;able events, Calibration, Disadvantage: Need to separate events for analysis.

CTB Readout Topology 240 CTB Slats 16 ‘pixels’ of 15 slats read out by one DSM board phi*eta = 1.5 * 0.5 per pixel Basic Topology given by readout: Four rings in eta divided into quadrants. Top, Bottom, South, North symmetry after change of CTB cable map.

CTB-DSM Tree 3 Layers of DSM boards 104 ns per board 16/32 bits between layers Algorithms are limited by time constrain and number of available bits between layers.

Trigger Algorithm for UPC 0nly two oppositely charged tracks at low total p T Back- to-back in transverse plane Multiplicity per pixel: 1 or 2 mips in 1 or 2 slats Good Topology: SE-NE; SW-NW; SE-NW; SW-NE; Veto if: any hit in top or bottom any overflow out of time hit

Level-0 CTB Algorithm 2000 Central Trigger: sum ADC counts of all 240 CTB slats; require minimum count for central trigger 2001 Multiplicity/Topology Trigger: in parallel to central trigger –Convert ADC counts to # of Mips –Sum #of Mips for all slats –Sum #of hit slats –Multiplicity criteria on minimum and maximum # Mips and # hit slats in each of the 16 CTB pixels –Combine 16 pixels to topology decision –Possible veto if any overflow in pixel multiplicities –Veto out of time hits: leading edge within 20 ns (ADC integration time ~60ns) Possible parallel trigger decisions: –Central trigger: MipMin <  Mips –Topology trigger: Pixel topology * No out of time hits * No Pixel overflows

Other Possible Applications SVT Cosmic Trigger Trigger on low multiplicity coincidence in top and bottom Inner pixels only Possible to require crossing of inner membrane Jet Trigger for pp ? high multiplicity in a limited number of slats in one pixel

Summary/Status Code for all 3 layers of DSM’s implemented and tested on mock-up in Berkeley No cosmic test with STAR yet; a.s.a.p. Change of topology requirements simple Create your own burrito; two criteria: – Mip and Slat multiplicity per pixel – Good topology combinations Long write-up with more technical details available

‘Re-Cabling’ of the CTB Reorder cable assignments in the front of the patch-panel – Internal change of cable map 5 slats (30 degrees) in West and 10 slats (60degrees) the East half of the CTB. Get symmetry Top, Bottom, South, North Ultra Peripheral Collisions: Use Top and Bottom quadrants as veto for cosmic rays. Spin: left-right symmetric trigger for single-spin asymmetry measurement with transverse beam polarization

No Impact to Central Trigger Caution: hard-coded indexing of slat numbers in software will cause problems – But, should not be there Proposed Change