QA flagging of clouds and atmospheric anomalies Fast UV simulation tool - FastRT Ola Engelsen Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SURFACE SOLAR IRRADIANCE FROM SEVIRI SATELLITE DATA
Advertisements

Proposed new uses for the Ceilometer Network
QA/QC of Solar spectral UV-measurements: Checking for wavelength shifts and spectral shape deviations with focus on error flagging Harry Slaper, PN den.
QA flagging of clouds and atmospheric anomalies Fast UV simulation tool - FastRT Ola Engelsen Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU)
Atmospheric Correction Algorithm for the GOCI Jae Hyun Ahn* Joo-Hyung Ryu* Young Jae Park* Yu-Hwan Ahn* Im Sang Oh** Korea Ocean Research & Development.
UPRM Lidar lab for atmospheric research 1- Cross validation of solar radiation using remote sensing equipment & GOES Lidar and Ceilometer validation.
Using a Radiative Transfer Model in Conjunction with UV-MFRSR Irradiance Data for Studying Aerosols in El Paso-Juarez Airshed by Richard Medina Calderón.
RADIATION PROGRAM AT TAMANRASSET ALGERIA RESULTS OF RADIATION MEASURE SINCE 1994 By.O.BOUZIANE.
Surface UV radiation monitoring based on GOME and SCIAMACHY Jos van Geffen 1,2, Ronald van de A 1, Michiel van Weele 1, Marc Allaart 1, Henk Eskes 1 1)
Envisat Symposium, April 23 – 27, 2007, Montreux bremen.de SADDU Meeting, June 2008, IUP-Bremen Cloud sensitivity studies.
UltraViolet Index Craig S. Long National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service National Centers for Environmental Prediction.
Atmospheric effect in the solar spectrum
Extracting Atmospheric and Surface Information from AVIRIS Spectra Vijay Natraj, Daniel Feldman, Xun Jiang, Jack Margolis and Yuk Yung California Institute.
Page 1 1 of 100, L2 Peer Review, 3/24/2006 Level 2 Algorithm Peer Review Polarization Vijay Natraj.
A 21 F A 21 F Parameterization of Aerosol and Cirrus Cloud Effects on Reflected Sunlight Spectra Measured From Space: Application of the.
Page 1 1 of 20, EGU General Assembly, Apr 21, 2009 Vijay Natraj (Caltech), Hartmut Bösch (University of Leicester), Rob Spurr (RT Solutions), Yuk Yung.
ESTEC July 2000 Estimation of Aerosol Properties from CHRIS-PROBA Data Jeff Settle Environmental Systems Science Centre University of Reading.
Development of GEMS Cloud Data Processing Algorithm Yong-Sang Choi 1, Bo-Ram Kim 1, Heeje Cho 2, Myong-Hwan Ahn 1 (Former COMS PI), and Jhoon Kim 3 (GEMS.
WP 3: Absorbing Aerosol Index (AAI) WP 10: Level-1 validation L.G. Tilstra 1, I. Aben 2, and P. Stammes 1 1 Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute.
The IOCCG Atmospheric Correction Working Group Status Report The Eighth IOCCG Committee Meeting Department of Animal Biology and Genetics University.
Now That I Know That… What Do I Do? (Analyzing your Microtop Solar Radiometry Data)
SeaDAS Training ~ NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group 1 Level-2 ocean color data processing basics NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group Goddard Space Flight.
Solar Energy Part 1: Resource San Jose State University FX Rongère January 2009.
Topics of interest in solar UV measurements Berit Kjeldstad Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway Gunther Seckmeyer University of Hanover,
Test simulation of Aerosol impact on solar radiation with WRF-CHEM DustDNI (w/o dust) – DNI (w/ dust) Positive value indicates the decreased DNI due to.
Tasks within WP4 & The EDUCE database - A summary WP1, WP2, WP4 and WP5 tasks Jussi Kaurola, Niilo Siljamo, Antti Arola Ozone and UV-Radiation Research.
Model / Data UV reconstruction Reconstruction of UV-radiation in Norway Contact:Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen Allegaten 70, N-5007 Bergen,
Statement of user requirements for data products from the database Lill Tove Norvang Nilsen and Berit Kjeldstad Department of Physics, Norwegian University.
Is SBDART on Target?: An Analysis of the Radiative Transfer Model to Observations Daniel P. Tyndall Department of Marine and Environmental Systems Florida.
Project Status: Year 1. Milestones and Deliverables Year 1 contained: 25 milestones (from 78) 9 deliverables (from 38) Of these: 22 milestones and 7 deliverables.
Latest results on the comparison between OMI and ground-based data at two European sites (Rome and Villeneuve d’Ascq) Virginie Buchard, Colette Brogniez,
GSFC. Glaciation Level and Vertical Profile of Droplet Size Associated with Cloud-Aerosol Interactions (D. Rosenfeld) Clean Polluted.
 Introduction  Surface Albedo  Albedo on different surfaces  Seasonal change in albedo  Aerosol radiative forcing  Spectrometer (measure the surface.
Dr. North Larsen, Lockheed Martin IS&S Dr. Knut Stamnes, Stevens Institute Technology Use of Shadows to Retrieve Water Vapor in Hazy Atmospheres Dr. North.
4STAR: Spectrometer for Sky-Scanning, Sun-Tracking Atmospheric Research Development and Results from First Test-flights A collaboration involving: PNNL:
COMPARISON OF RITTER- GELEYN RADIATON CODE TO LBL MODEL RTX PRELIMINARY RESULTS Alessio Bozzo – ADGB Phys. dep. Univ. of Bologna ARPA-SIM 7th COSMO General.
Measuring UV aerosol absorption. Why is aerosol UV absorption important ? Change in boundary layer ozone mixing ratios as a result of direct aerosol forcing.
E.Plagnol - TA/TALE feb Acceptance and Counting Rates of EUSO ë Detecting UHECR from space ë The EUSO detector : Who does what. ë Some characteristics.
Investigation on the possibilities of trend detection of spectral irradiance Merle Glandorf and Gunther Seckmeyer Institute of Meteorology and Climatology.
1 NOAA-UPRM COOP Program in Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology, Department of Physics, University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez, Mayagüez, PR Yaítza.
Intercomparison of SEVIRI data from MSG1 and MSG2 and implications for the GERB data processing Nicolas Clerbaux & RMIB GERB Team. GIST 26, RAL 3 and 4.
Cloud optical properties: modeling and sensitivity study Ping Yang Texas A&M University May 28,2003 Madison, Wisconsin.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Remote Sensing Group Tropospheric ozone retrieval from uv/vis spectrometery RAL Space - Remote Sensing Group Richard Siddans,
TOMS Ozone Retrieval Sensitivity to Assumption of Lambertian Cloud Surface Part 1. Scattering Phase Function Xiong Liu, 1 Mike Newchurch, 1,2 Robert Loughman.
H 2 O retrieval from S5 NIR K. Weigel, M. Reuter, S. Noël, H. Bovensmann, and J. P. Burrows University of Bremen, Institute of Environmental Physics
CIMSS Forward Model Capability to Support GOES-R Measurement Simulations Tom Greenwald, Hung-Lung (Allen) Huang, Dave Tobin, Ping Yang*, Leslie Moy, Erik.
NPI-NILU tasks •Further development of fast simulation tool for UV radiation (Fastrt) •Applications of fast simulation tool for quality assurance of UV.
Meteorologisches Institut Theresienstr. 37 D –80333 Munich Dependence of UV radiation on altitude and aerosol optical.
Jetstream 31 (J31) in INTEX-B/MILAGRO. Campaign Context: In March 2006, INTEX-B/MILAGRO studied pollution from Mexico City and regional biomass burning,
The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) Mission: Retrieval Characterisation and Error Analysis H. Bösch 1, B. Connor 2, B. Sen 1, G. C. Toon 1 1 Jet Propulsion.
NPI-NILU tasks (Ola Engelsen) •Further development of fast simulation tool for UV radiation (Fastrt) •Applications of fast simulation tool for quality.
Interannual Variability and Decadal Change of Solar Reflectance Spectra Zhonghai Jin Costy Loukachine Bruce Wielicki (NASA Langley research Center / SSAI,
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: Initial trade-off: Height-resolved.
NMSC Daytime Cloud Optical and Microphysical Properties (DCOMP) 이은희.
The study of cloud and aerosol properties during CalNex using newly developed spectral methods Patrick J. McBride, Samuel LeBlanc, K. Sebastian Schmidt,
Limitations of ’column physics’ for radiation computations in atmospheric models Bent H Sass Danish Meteorological Institute 1 May 2009 As the horizontal.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC.
1 Synthetic Hyperspectral Radiances for Retrieval Algorithm Development J. E. Davies, J. A. Otkin, E. R. Olson, X. Wang, H-L. Huang, Ping Yang # and Jianguo.
Modeling of spectral fine-structure in GOME spectra Rutger van Deelen Otto Hasekamp Jochen Landgraf KNMI November 29, 2006.
J. C. Stroeve, J. Box, F. Gao, S. Liang, A. Nolin, and C. Schaaf
Aerosol retrieval from spectral measurements in twilight conditions: ground-based and satellite-based cases Nina Mateshvili (1), Didier Fussen (1), Giuli.
Australian report for Atmosphere theme
EASC 11 Chapters 14-18: The Atmosphere
Absolute calibration of sky radiances, colour indices and O4 DSCDs obtained from MAX-DOAS measurements T. Wagner1, S. Beirle1, S. Dörner1, M. Penning de.
Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC Height-resolved aerosol R.Siddans.
Comparison of GOME-2 and OMI surface UV products
DETERMINATION OF PHOTOSYNTHETICALLY ACTIVE RADIATION
Computing cloudy radiances
Computing cloudy radiances
CH 3: The Electromagnetic Spectrum
Presentation transcript:

QA flagging of clouds and atmospheric anomalies Fast UV simulation tool - FastRT Ola Engelsen Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU)

Outline QA software CheckUVSpec FastRT UV simulation tool Applications of FastRT Status of NPI tasks

CheckUVSpec Print & Exit Flexstor Data Compute bands Too low? Too high? Snow/ Br.Cl? Clouds? Cloudy throughout? Clear throughout? Cloud H 2 O Aerosol OD ShicRIVM yes no yes no yes no yes no yes no yes no

Fastrt UV simulation tool Few milliseconds running time Accuracy comparable to UV measurements Large variety of biological action spectra Ozone Slitfunction Aerosol optical depth Cloud liquid water column Surface albedo / type Broken clouds

FastRT error analysis Clear sky: max 4%, mean error 1%, st. dev. 1%. Turbid sky: max 18%, mean 3%, st.dev. 4%. Cloudy: max 35%, mean 8%, st. dev. 9%. CheckUVSpec QA tests: max 1%.

Vitamin D noon

Cod egg mortality – monthly doses

Recent work Installed QA flagging tool at database Updated ”LAP review of cloud flagging” Documentation of FastRT, incl. error analysis Installed interactive FastRT and downloadables on CheckUVSpec QA tool available at zardoz.nilu.no/~olaeng/CheckUVSpec/CheckUVSpec.html

Remaining work All required milestones and deliverables are completed, but: New FastRT scheme for coupling clouds, aerosols and ozone Make CheckUVSpec extract atmospheric visibility? Make CheckUVSpec handle broadband data? Publications The End

Flexstor data extraction Extract following information: Wavelengths Irradiances Slitfunction Ozone column, if available Snow cover info, if available Location Times Compute solar zenith angles Check correctness of input QA-flagging

Compute bands Add n irradiances band1 and band2 The spectral location of band 1 and 2 depend on instrument, nominally 330nm and 390nm If slitfunction is available n = 3, otherwise 9 QA-flagging

Too low? Flag if band 2 irradiance is lower than simulation for very thick clouds (> 4000 g/m2) QA-flagging

Too high? band 2 > thick trapping clouds above snow Thick cloud Snow Sun Clear sky downward total transmittance QA-flagging

Snow/Broken Clouds? Snow + broken clouds > band 2 > Clear sky QA-flagging

Clouds? Thick clouds < band 2 < 5km visib. QA-flagging

Clear throughout? No if: band1 / band2 < simulated (clear band1 / clear band2 ) QA-flagging

Cloudy throughout? No if: band1 / band2 > simulated (thick cloud band1 / thick cloud band2 ) QA-flagging

Cloud H 2 O? Search for cloud thickness scenario which best fits band 2 QA-flagging

Aerosol OD (optical depth)? Search for aerosol optical depth scenario which best fits band 2 QA-flagging

ShicRIVM QC/QA of solar spectral UV measurements and standardized spectral data-analysis 6 quality flags: Shift_1 Shift_2 Start_irradiance Spike+local_shape Transmission_2 Scan_variability_2 Code and documentation: ftp.rivm.nl:/outgoing/shicrivm /shic QA-flagging