Comprehensive Success Review Overview Presentation August 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
2 Session Objectives Increase participant understanding of effective financial monitoring based upon risk assessments of sub-grantees Increase participant.
West Virginia Department of Education. Overview State Board Mandate Parent and Community (PAC) Focus Areas How Can We Partner Together? Partnering.
Comprehensive Success Review Implementation Training September 2010.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
DELAWARE COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM Presented to District Test Coordinators February 17, 2010.
Open Future Doors through Succession Planning Principal? Curriculum Supervisor? Assistant Superintendent? Special Services Director?
Session Objectives Begin to understand the goals, purpose and rationale for Program Reviews Learn about the components of implementing Program Reviews.
Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
In August, the historic CORE district waiver was approved allowing these districts to pursue a new robust and holistic accountability model for schools.
Coordinating Equitable Services for Private Schools Christine T. Miller Red Clay Consolidated School District December 7, 2010 DSU – Martin Luther King.
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
CIP Overview 1. Purposes of the CIP What Does CIP Success Look Like? Identifying the Team Roles of LEA, Principal, and CIP Team CIP Timeline 2.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
Conducting a Comprehensive Needs Assessment. Objectives Identify the components of a comprehensive needs assessment Classify the types of data collected.
World’s Largest Educational Community
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
NCLB Monitoring Cycle 1 Policies and Procedures. Letter  Explains monitoring process  Lists required documentation  Lists activities  Directions for.
Local Assistance Plan Schools: The Diagnostic Self-Review Document and Report Template August 2013 Presented by Alexandra Pressley, Associate in Education.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Title I Needs Assessment/ Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 5, 2010.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Today’s website:
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction National Center and State Collaborative California Activities Kristen Brown, Ph.D. Common Core.
Presentation Topics School Improvement Plans Combing Title I Schoolwide with SIPs Submitting Plans & Required Documents Districtwide Initiatives Training.
Title I Accountability Grant to Expand the SSOS for Schools in Phases 1 & 2 1.
DE-PBS Cadre Meeting September 21, DE-PBS Phase 1 Recognition School DistrictSchool Name Appoquinimink School District Silver Lake Elementary.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Comprehensive Success Review Overview Presentation March 2013.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Horizonte Instruction and Training Center Salt Lake City School District School Community Council Meeting November 14, 2012.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Webster Public Schools October 8, Goal for AYP in every subject, at every grade level, and for every subgroup. We can do this.
BAGGETT ELEMENTARY Annual Title I Parent Involvement Meeting Baggett Elementary September 16, 2015.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Adapted from guidance presented on August 2013 by Alexandra Pressley, Associate in Education Improvement Services NYSED Local Assistance Plan Schools:
SIT Professional Development- Defining the Consultation Model Permission to reprint granted with appropriate acknowledgement ©2009 DPS.
AYP Regional Meetings Minnesota Department of Education School Improvement Division Southeast Service Cooperative August 18, 2010.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
DESE District Review Center for District and School Accountability Site Visit: April 11-14, 2011.
Annual Title I Parent Involvement Meeting Panter Elementary School September 17, 1:30 p.m. Media Center.
Nevada Department of Education Office of Educational Opportunity Nevada Comprehensive Curriculum Audit Tool for Schools NCCAT-S August
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
New Georgia Elementary Annual Title I Parent Involvement Meeting Tuesday, September 29, 2015, 8:15 a.m. New Georgia Elementary School, Art Room 5800 Mulberry.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Parent Discussion Meeting
Recruitment & Retention Committee Update Job & Task Analysis Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

Comprehensive Success Review Overview Presentation August 2010

History Comprehensive Success Review is based on 1.District Audit Tool: A Method for Determining Level of Need for Support to Improvement –Developed by Comprehensive Assessment Systems for ESEA Title I State Collaborative on Assessment and Student Standards and Region IV Comprehensive Technical Assistance Center at Edvantia Delaware Pilot – Focus Monitoring –3 Districts –11 Schools

What is the Comprehensive Success Review? Comprehensive review of school programming, student performance and processes –based on analysis of quantitative and qualitative measures national research on school improvement

Purpose Improve outcomes for students –by providing feedback for school success planning and implementation of effective practices feedback to improve LEA practices/support to schools

Goal Identify areas of strengths and challenges in the research-based elements Develop strategies to address the areas of need Include these needs, strategies and associated measures in the School Success Plan Inform continuous improvement process

Quantitative Measures AYP Achievement Metric (Level of Need) –ELA and Math Performance for all subgroups (cells) for which a school is responsible –Standardized distance from the target Performance in other Content Areas Graduation Rates Drop-out Rates Free & Reduced Lunch/Extended Poverty Data HQT Data School Conduct Data Student and Staff Attendance Data Changes in Building Leadership Staff Turnover

Qualitative Measures Interviews Focus Groups Classroom Walk-throughs Document Reviews

Research-based Elements Leadership for Learning 1.Leadership 2.Budget and Resources 3.Teacher and Student Class Assignment Teaching and Learning 4.Curriculum and Instruction 5.Assessment and Accountability 6.Professional Development Connections to Learning 7.School Environment 8.Parents and Community

Activity Count off to form 8 groups Concentrate on your research-based element (corresponds to group #) Discuss why you think the criteria selected is important to school success? –Report out to whole group What evidence can the school provide to determine level of success? –Post on large tablets –Walk around and Review all 8 elements

Major Components of the Comprehensive Success Review Desk Audit –Data Review Site Visit –Gather additional information to determine current practice Scoring Technical Assistance

Desk Audit Review quantitative data Understand school specific characteristics Develop site visit and scoring schedules

Site Visit Protocols Document Review Interviews with School Leadership Interviews with Teachers Classroom Walk-throughs Student Focus Groups Parent Focus Groups

Scoring Process Entire team reviews and discusses evidence for each criterion item under each research-based element Comments are created to provide feedback on strengths and challenges for each criterion

Technical Assistance Interpreting results Prioritizing needs Determining Objectives, Measures, and Strategies Developing Project Management Maps, as appropriate Analyzing Progress Connecting Schools to Resources

Activity In pairs, discuss how this Comprehensive Success Review will –reveal areas of strength –reveal areas of need –improve planning process –improve practices –improve student outcomes

Title 14, Delaware Admin Code (Regulation 103) A school that is in Under Improvement Phase 1 shall: –Utilize the Departments Comprehensive Success Review process, which includes an audit tool, an on-site visit, and feedback on strengths and opportunities for improvement

Which schools are required to utilize the Comprehensive Success Review? All schools in Under Improvement Phase I (School Improvement Year 1) 22 Schools in 10 Districts 3 Charter Schools

LEAs required to participate in the Comprehensive Success Review? Districts –Appoquinimink (2) –Brandywine (1) –Caesar Rodney (3) –Cape Henlopen (1) –Capital (3) –Colonial (5) –Milford (1) –Seaford (3) –Smyrna (1) –Red Clay (2) Charter Schools –Campus Community –Pencader –Thomas Edison

Can other schools participate in a Comprehensive Success Review? Yes, however, time and capacity will determine priority –Schools selected for Partnership Zone –Schools awarded a 1003(g) SIG –Schools within a participating LEA Schools in deeper levels of Improvement Schools at different grade levels –Schools within LEAs not scheduled for reviews Schools in deeper levels of Improvement Schools at different grade levels

Activity Within your LEA team, discuss benefits to conducting review for –Required schools –Other schools in deeper levels of improvement –All schools

What are the steps to conducting a Comprehensive Success Review? 1.Schedule a Review –October through April 2.Attend full day training –September 15 – Kent County –September 16 – New Castle County –September 22 – Sussex County 3.Conduct Desk Audit –2 hours pre-visit meeting per school 4.Participate in Site Visit Review –1 full school day 5.Score Rubric –1 full day

What are the steps to conducting a Comprehensive Success Review? 6.Write, Review, and Finalize Report 7.Report Results –School Administrator(s) –School Leadership Team –School Staff –School Board –School Community 8.Provide Technical Assistance

Implementation Training Overall Process Guidelines and Procedures for Site Visits Protocol Roles Deeper Understanding of Rubric Protocol Training –Review –Model –Practice Document Review Verify/Document Supporting Evidence Scoring Process Site Visit Scheduling Support Next Steps

Who must attend the training? LEA Staff –Curriculum –Special Education –Support Services –Business/Finance –Grant Programs –Family/Community –Professional Development –Technology –Human Resources School Administrator Department of Education Staff Contracted Individuals –DASL –Distinguished Educators –SPAC

Activity Within your LEA team, determine –LEA Contact –LEA Staff to participate in review(s) –Month best to conduct review(s) October through April

Next Steps Convey designated LEA contact –Provide name before leaving session, or – name to Geri Donahue Register for September training –Respond to invite from Geri Donahue Sign-up for School Reviews –Available dates will be sent to LEA Contact – preferred 1 st and 2 nd choice per school to Geri Donahue

Questions???

For More Information - Contact Lori Duerr OR Ted Jarrell