These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agile Development : an introduction
Advertisements

1 COSC 4406 Software Engineering COSC 4406 Software Engineering Haibin Zhu, Ph.D. Dept. of Computer Science and mathematics, Nipissing University, 100.
These slides are designed to accompany Web Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach (The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.) by Roger Pressman and David Lowe, copyright.
Agile Development.
Agile Process Models. Prescriptive models don’t work It is unrealistic to not have changes. Why? The Agile Manifesto: Individuals and interactions over.
These slides are designed to accompany Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 7/e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.1.
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.
Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 4 Agile Development copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc. For University.
Coming up: The Manifesto for Agile Software Development 1 Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 7/e Chapter 3 Agile Development Software Engineering:
Chapter 3 CS435: Introduction to Software Engineering Dr. M. Zhu
Agile Process: Overview n Agile software engineering represents a reasonable compromise to conventional software engineering for certain classes of software.
Software Engineering Lecture No:12. Lecture # 7
An Agile View of Process
Software engineering Process models Pavel Agejkin.
Credits: Adopted from Web Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach (The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.) by Roger Pressman and David Lowe, copyright Agile.
SEC 308 Yazılım Mühendisliği Software Process Models
Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 2, 3, &4 Process copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc. For University.
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.
These slides are designed to accompany Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 7/e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.1.
Developed by Reneta Barneva, SUNY Fredonia Agile Development.
Chapter 4 Agile Development
Chapter 5 Agile Development Chapter 5 Agile Development Moonzoo Kim KAIST 1.
Chapter 4 An Agile View of Process
Chapter 4 Agile Development 1. The Manifesto for Agile Software Development 2 “We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 4 Slide 1 Software Processes.
Chapter 5 애자일 개발 Agile Development
Coming up: The Manifesto for Agile Software Development 1 Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 7/e Chapter 3 Agile Development Software Engineering:
Software Engineering Saeed Akhtar The University of Lahore Lecture 5 Originally shared for: mashhoood.webs.com.
1 The Manifesto for Agile Software Development “We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others do it. Through this.
CS 3610: Software Engineering – Fall 2009 Dr. Hisham Haddad – CSIS Dept. Chapter 4 Agile Development Discussion of Agile Development and Agile Process.
Agile Methodology Paul Mohrbacher. Agile Manifesto We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others do it. Through.
Chapter 3 Agile Development
Traditional Process Models A quick overview. 2 Waterfall Model (Diagram) Communication Project initiation Requirements gathering Planning Estimating Scheduling.
1 Chapter 3: Lecture 3 Agile Development Slide Set to accompany Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 7/e by Roger S. Pressman Slides copyright.
Software Engineering (CSI 321) An Agile View of Process 1.
These slides are designed to accompany Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 7/e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.1.
Requirements Engineering Requirements Engineering in Agile Methods Lecture-28.
1 Agile Development. The Manifesto for Agile Software Development 2 “We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others.
Agile. Processes Waterfall Traditional With prototyping Sprial Agile Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM) Scrum Crystal eXtreme Programming (XP)
Chapter 3 Agile Development
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.
CS 4500: Software Development Software Process. Materials Sommmerville Chapters 1, 2 and 3 Software Cycle and Models:
TIK 302 Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak Agile Proses. Agile View of Process Represents a reasonable compromise between conventional software engineering for.
1 The economies of ALL developed nations are dependent on software The economies of ALL developed nations are dependent on software More and more systems.
Software Engineering Principles I (Spring 2017)
Chapter 5 Agile Development Moonzoo Kim KAIST
Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 4 Agile Development copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc. For University.
Chapter 4 & Chapter 5 Important Concepts
Manifesto for Agile Software Development
Chapter 3 An Agile view of process.
Software & Software Engineering Pertemuan-4 Dosen :Kundang K Juman
Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 4 Agile Development copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc. For University.
Agile Development.
Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 7/e Chapter 3 Agile Development copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc. For University.
Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 4 Agile Development copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc. For University.
Chapter 5 Agile Development
Software Engineering (CSI 321)
Agile Software Development
Chapter 3 Agile Development
Chapter 3 Agile Development
Agile Software Processes
Agile Process: Overview
Chapter 3 Agile Development
Chapter 3 Agile Development
Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 4 Agile Development copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc. For University.
Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 4 Agile Development copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc. For University.
The Manifesto for Agile Software Development
Chapter 3 CS435: Introduction to Software Engineering Dr. M. Zhu
Chapter 3 CS435: Introduction to Software Engineering
Chapter 3 Agile Development
Presentation transcript:

These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 4 Agile Development Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 4 Agile Development copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc. For University Use Only May be reproduced ONLY for student use at the university level when used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach. Any other reproduction or use is expressly prohibited.

These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, The Manifesto for Agile Software Development “We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others do it. Through this work we have come to value: Individuals and interactions over processes and toolsIndividuals and interactions over processes and tools Working software over comprehensive documentationWorking software over comprehensive documentation Customer collaboration over contract negotiationCustomer collaboration over contract negotiation Responding to change over following a planResponding to change over following a plan That is, while there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the left more.” Kent Beck et al.

These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, What is “Agility”? Effective (rapid and adaptive) response to change Effective (rapid and adaptive) response to change Effective communication among all stakeholders Effective communication among all stakeholders Drawing the customer onto the team Drawing the customer onto the team Organizing a team so that it is in control of the work performed Organizing a team so that it is in control of the work performed Yielding … Rapid, incremental delivery of software Rapid, incremental delivery of software

These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, An Agile Process Is driven by customer descriptions of what is required (scenarios) Is driven by customer descriptions of what is required (scenarios) Recognizes that plans are short-lived Recognizes that plans are short-lived Develops software iteratively with a heavy emphasis on construction activities Develops software iteratively with a heavy emphasis on construction activities Delivers frequent, multiple ‘software increments’ Delivers frequent, multiple ‘software increments’ Adapts as changes occur Adapts as changes occur

These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, Agile Team Characteristics Competence Competence Common focus Common focus Collaboration Collaboration Decisiveness Decisiveness Fuzzy problem-solving ability Fuzzy problem-solving ability Mutual trust and respect Mutual trust and respect Self-organization Self-organization

These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, Extreme Programming (XP) The most widely used agile process, originally proposed by Kent Beck The most widely used agile process, originally proposed by Kent Beck XP Planning XP Planning Begins with the creation of “user stories” Begins with the creation of “user stories” Agile team assesses each story and assigns a cost Agile team assesses each story and assigns a cost Stories are grouped to for a deliverable increment Stories are grouped to for a deliverable increment A commitment is made on delivery date A commitment is made on delivery date After the first increment “project velocity”(I.e. No. of “stories” implemented during 1st release) is used to help define subsequent delivery dates for other increments After the first increment “project velocity”(I.e. No. of “stories” implemented during 1st release) is used to help define subsequent delivery dates for other increments

These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, Extreme Programming (XP) XP Design XP Design Follows the KIS principle Follows the KIS principle Encourage the use of CRC (Class-Responsibility Collaborator) cards (see Chapter 8) Encourage the use of CRC (Class-Responsibility Collaborator) cards (see Chapter 8) For difficult design problems, suggests the creation of “spike solutions”—a design prototype (tool for lowering risks) For difficult design problems, suggests the creation of “spike solutions”—a design prototype (tool for lowering risks) Encourages “refactoring”—an iterative refinement of the internal program design Encourages “refactoring”—an iterative refinement of the internal program design XP Coding XP Coding Recommends the construction of a unit test for a store before coding commences Recommends the construction of a unit test for a store before coding commences Encourages “pair programming” Encourages “pair programming” XP Testing XP Testing All unit tests are executed daily All unit tests are executed daily “Acceptance tests” are defined by the customer and executed to assess customer visible functionality “Acceptance tests” are defined by the customer and executed to assess customer visible functionality

These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, Extreme Programming (XP)

These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, Adaptive Software Development Originally proposed by Jim Highsmith Originally proposed by Jim Highsmith Useful to changing project and business conditions Useful to changing project and business conditions ASD — distinguishing features ASD — distinguishing features Mission-driven planning Mission-driven planning Component-based focus Component-based focus Uses “time-boxing” (See Chapter 24) Uses “time-boxing” (See Chapter 24) Explicit consideration of risks Explicit consideration of risks Emphasizes collaboration for requirements gathering Emphasizes collaboration for requirements gathering Emphasizes “learning” throughout the process (focus groups; technical reviews; postmortems) Emphasizes “learning” throughout the process (focus groups; technical reviews; postmortems)

These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, Adaptive Software Development

These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, Dynamic Systems Development Method Promoted by the DSDM Consortium ( Promoted by the DSDM Consortium ( DSDM—distinguishing features DSDM—distinguishing features Similar in most respects to XP and/or ASD Similar in most respects to XP and/or ASD Nine guiding principles: Nine guiding principles: Active user involvement is imperative. Active user involvement is imperative. DSDM teams must be empowered to make decisions. DSDM teams must be empowered to make decisions. The focus is on frequent delivery of products. The focus is on frequent delivery of products. Fitness for business purpose is the essential criterion for acceptance of deliverables. Fitness for business purpose is the essential criterion for acceptance of deliverables. Iterative and incremental development is necessary to converge on an accurate business solution. Iterative and incremental development is necessary to converge on an accurate business solution. All changes during development are reversible. All changes during development are reversible. Requirements (functional+information; application architecture; maintainability) are baselined at a high level. Requirements (functional+information; application architecture; maintainability) are baselined at a high level. Testing is integrated throughout the life-cycle. Testing is integrated throughout the life-cycle.

These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, Scrum Originally proposed by Schwaber and Beedle Originally proposed by Schwaber and Beedle “Assumes up-front that chaos exists” “Assumes up-front that chaos exists” Scrum — distinguishing features: Scrum — distinguishing features: Small work teams (min. overhead; max. communication) Small work teams (min. overhead; max. communication) Development work is partitioned into “packets” Development work is partitioned into “packets” Testing and documentation are on-going as the product is constructed Testing and documentation are on-going as the product is constructed Work occurs in “sprints” and is derived from a “backlog” of existing requirements (frequent S/W increments) Work occurs in “sprints” and is derived from a “backlog” of existing requirements (frequent S/W increments) Meetings are very short and sometimes conducted without chairs Meetings are very short and sometimes conducted without chairs “demos” are delivered to the customer with the time-box allocated “demos” are delivered to the customer with the time-box allocated Constant testing and documentation Constant testing and documentation

These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, Crystal Proposed by Cockburn and Highsmith Proposed by Cockburn and Highsmith Crystal — distinguishing features: Crystal — distinguishing features: Actually a family of process models that allow “maneuverability” (resource-limited coop. game of invention and communication) based on problem characteristics Actually a family of process models that allow “maneuverability” (resource-limited coop. game of invention and communication) based on problem characteristics Face-to-face communication is emphasized Face-to-face communication is emphasized Suggests the use of “reflection workshops” to review the work habits of the team Suggests the use of “reflection workshops” to review the work habits of the team

These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, Feature Driven Development Originally proposed by Peter Coad et al. Originally proposed by Peter Coad et al. FDD — distinguishing features: FDD — distinguishing features: Emphasis is on defining “features” Emphasis is on defining “features” a feature “is a client-valued function that can be implemented in two weeks or less.” a feature “is a client-valued function that can be implemented in two weeks or less.” Uses a feature template Uses a feature template the a(n), viz: the a(n), viz: Add the product to a shopping cart Add the product to a shopping cart Display the technical specs of a product Display the technical specs of a product A features list is created and “plan by feature” is conducted A features list is created and “plan by feature” is conducted Design and construction merge in FDD Design and construction merge in FDD

These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, Agile Modeling Originally proposed by Scott Ambler Originally proposed by Scott Ambler Suggests a set of agile modeling principles: Suggests a set of agile modeling principles: Model with a purpose Model with a purpose Use multiple models for different aspects of the system Use multiple models for different aspects of the system Travel light (keep only long-term models) Travel light (keep only long-term models) Content is more important than representation Content is more important than representation Know the models and the tools you use to create them Know the models and the tools you use to create them Adapt locally (to the needs of the agile team) Adapt locally (to the needs of the agile team)