LIGO-G070082-00-Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 S5 Environmental Disturbances: August ‘06 Robert Schofield, U of O Erik Katsavounidis (MIT), Laura Cadonati (MIT), Michele Zanolin (MIT), Dennis Ugolini.
Advertisements

For the Collaboration GWDAW 2005 Status of inspiral search in C6 and C7 Virgo data Frédérique MARION.
Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W E2 Amplitude Calibration of the Hanford Recombined 2km IFO Michael Landry, LIGO Hanford Observatory Luca Matone, Benoit.
G Z 1 Block-Normal, Event Display and Q-scan Based Glitch and Veto Studies Shantanu Desai for Penn. State Burst Group And Glitch Working Group.
S5 Data Quality Investigation Status John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LSC/Virgo DetChar Session Baton Rouge, March 21, 2007.
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R Upconversion Study with the Hilbert-Huang Transform Jordan Camp Kenji Numata John Cannizzo Robert Schofield.
1 S4 Environmental Disturbances Robert Schofield, U of O John Worden, Richard McCarthy, Doug Cook, Hugh Radkins, LHO Josh Dalrymple, SU I.Pre-S4 “fixes”
S4 Environmental Disturbances Robert Schofield, U of O I.Pre-S4 “fixes” II.Some S4 veto issues III. Early coupling results from S4 PEM injections.
1 Environmental Disturbances: S4 and Pre-S5 Robert Schofield, U of O Doug Cook, Fred Raab, Richard McCarthy, LHO I.Seismic up-conversion II.Some peak identification.
1 Environmental Disturbances: Early S5 and S4 Robert Schofield, U of O Rana Adhikari, CIT, Richard McCarthy, John Worden, LHO I.HVAC flow rate reduction.
1 S4 Environmental Disturbances Robert Schofield, U of O John Worden, Richard McCarthy, Doug Cook, Hugh Radkins, LHO Josh Dalrymple, SU I.Pre-S4 “fixes”
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
Glitch Group S5 Activities LSC LSU, Baton Rouge August 15, 2006 G Z L. Blackburn, L. Cadonati, S. Chatterji, J. Dalrymple, S. Desai,
D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting1 Status of Data Quality in Virgo D. Verkindt, LAPP-CNRS on behalf of the Virgo DQ team (M. Bizouard, L. Bosi, S. Chatterji,
LIGO-G Z NSF Review LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan 1 LSC Participation in Initial LIGO Detector Characterization.
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Amaldi5 July 9, 2003 Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory Monitoring LIGO Data During the S2 Science Run Michael.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
Virgo Commissioning update Gabriele Vajente for the Virgo Collaboration LSC/VIRGO Meeting – MIT 2007, July LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization NeedsK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Detector Characterization Needs Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
3 May 2011 VESF DA schoolD. Verkindt 1 Didier Verkindt Virgo-LAPP CNRS - Université de Savoie VESF Data Analysis School Data Quality and vetos.
LIGO- G Z 03/23/2005LSC Meeting March BlockNormal Near-Online S4 Burst Analysis Keith Thorne Penn State University Relativity Group (Shantanu.
LIGO-G I S5 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the LSC Calibration Committee LSC/Virgo Meeting May 22, 2007 Cascina,
THE EVENT DISPLAY TOOL Shantanu Desai Penn. State University Scimon Camp, Livingston, LA August 18, 2006.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
1 Environmental Coupling During S5 Robert Schofield (University of Oregon) I. PEM injection overview II.Acoustic/seismic coupling III.Seismic upconversion.
1 Data quality and veto studies for the S4 burst search: Where do we stand? Alessandra Di Credico Syracuse University LSC Meeting, Ann Arbor (UM) June.
S2 and S3 Correlation Studies Nelson Christensen Sarah Vigeland Physics and Astronomy Carleton College Detector Characterization Session LSC Meeting August.
Glitch Group S5 Activities Laura Cadonati for the Glitch Working Group LSC meeting, Hanford March 21, 2006 G Z.
LIGO-G Z Detchar Introduction (8/16/06)K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 StrainBandsMon and SixtyHertzMon Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
LIGO-G D Global Diagnostics and Detector Characterization 9 th Marcel Grossmann Meeting Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
G R LSC UL 13 Aug 011 Detector Characterization; Triggers, code infrastructure; Followup Analysis for the UL groups Nelson Christensen, Szabi.
LSC glitch group report Shourov K. Chatterji for the LSC glitch group LSC/Virgo meeting 2007 October 24 Hannover, Germany LIGO-G Z.
LIGO- G Z August 16, 2006August 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 1 Spectral Line Working Group Report Keith Thorne, Chair.
Detector Noise Characterization with the Hilbert-Huang Transform
G Z 1 New Glitches seen/studied in Block-Normal Shantanu Desai Pennsylvania State University for Glitch Working Group and many others Detchar.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Software Tools K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Status Report on CW Discriminator Work Keith.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
July 25, 2007G Z R. Frey1 LHO Cosmic Rays in S5 - update Ray. Frey, U Oregon Detector/readout description (brief) Data availability Goal: Determine.
LIGO-G Z Instrum. Lines and Blind CW Search K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Status Report on Instrumental Line Catalog and Blind.
LIGO-G Z Detchar Introduction (8/16/06)K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 SixtyHertzMon Update Junyi Zhang & Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
LIGO-G Z DMT Status for UL Analysis K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 DMT Monitors -- Status Update for Upper Limits Analysis.
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Issues K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z Introd. to Detect. Charact. Sessions K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to the Detector Characterization.
LIGO-G050197LSC Collab. Mtg, LHO, August 16,20051 S4 Data Quality & S5 Preview John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
LIGO-G E S2 Data Quality Investigation John Zweizig Caltech/LIGO.
LIGO-G D S2 Glitch Investigation Report Laura Cadonati (MIT) on behalf of the Glitch Investigation Team LSC meeting, August 2003, Hannover.
LIGO-G W Interferometer and modecleaner transients during the E2 run Rauha Rahkola and Ray Frey University of Oregon Rick Savage LIGO Hanford.
LIGO-G Z Report on E3/E4 Lock Losses K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Report on E3/E4 Lock Losses David Chin, Dick Gustafson Keith.
LIGO-G Z Report on the S2 RunK. Riles / S. Whitcomb 1 Report on the S2 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan) Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech)
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
3/21/2007 LIGO-G Z S5 Data Quality Investigation Status John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LSC/Virgo DetChar Session MIT, July 25, 2007.
LIGO-G Z March 21, 2007 March 2007 LIGO/Virgo Meeting - DetChar 1 S5 Spectral Line Cataloguing Keith Thorne for the Spectral Line Working Group.
LIGO-G D Glitch Investigation Update Laura Cadonati for the Glitch Investigation Group LSC meeting, Hanford November 12, 2003.
S5 Data Quality John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech Hanover, October 25, 2007.
Calibration and the status of the photon calibrators Evan Goetz University of Michigan with Peter Kalmus (Columbia U.) & Rick Savage (LHO) 17 October 2006.
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
LIGO S6 Detector Characterization Studies
Report on the S2 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
Planning for the S4 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
Progress Report: Noise Storms and Beam Splitter Oscillations
LHO Cosmic Rays in S5 Cosmic ray data for S5 starting 2/06
S2 Bilinear Couplings Study
John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech
LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University of Michigan) LSC-Virgo Meeting MIT – July 23-26, 2007

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 2 DC Parallel Session Highlights S5 environmental disturbances – Robert Schofield Investigations of table floating effects; periodic H2 glitches; wind farm tests; magnetic storms; vacuum flange backscatter S5 timing stability – Szabi Marka Timing in good shape, odd periodicities at sub-  s level; making plans for LIGO/Virgo synchronization check) Listening to glitches – Peter Saulson If you’ve heard one H1 glitch, you’ve heard all H1 glitches; ditto for H2 & L1, but different IFO’s have different audio characters

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 3 Why? Test mass roll mode excited every 30 minutes. Frequency shifting seismic peak (black) doesn’t affect DARM until it hits the roll mode (red) Seismic DARM R. Schofield

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 4 Can back-scattering produce H1-H2 events that are not present in auxiliary channels? These events during H2 malfunction (in science mode), but show that multi-bounce back-scattering paths exist between H1 and H2 H1 H2 R. Schofield

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 5 DC Parallel Session Highlights S5 environmental disturbances – Robert Schofield Investigations of table floating effects; periodic H2 glitches; wind farm tests; magnetic storms; vacuum flange backscatter S5 timing stability – Szabi Marka Timing in good shape, odd periodicities at sub-  s level; making plans for LIGO/Virgo synchronization check) Listening to glitches – Peter Saulson If you’ve heard one H1 glitch, you’ve heard all H1 glitches; ditto for H2 & L1, but different IFO’s have different audio characters

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 6 Injection sample

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 7 Glitch sample

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 8 DC Parallel Session Highlights New kinds of Block-Normal triggers – Shantanu Desai New creatures keep popping up to populate the zoo; many old friends linger Barkhausen noise studies – Rai Weiss Strong evidence that domain-flipping in actuation magnets causing upconversion – proposal to replace NdFeB with SmCo S5 Data Quality Investigations – John Zweizig New and updated DQ flags; more on the horizon; some issues still pending

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 9 S. Desai

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 10 DC Parallel Session Highlights New kinds of Block-Normal triggers – Shantanu Desai New creatures keep popping up to populate the zoo; many old friends linger Barkhausen noise studies – Rai Weiss Strong evidence that domain-flipping in actuation magnets causing upconversion – proposal to replace NdFeB with SmCo S5 Data Quality Investigations – John Zweizig New and updated DQ flags; more on the horizon; some issues still pending

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 11 R. Weiss

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 12 DC Parallel Session Highlights New kinds of Block-Normal triggers – Shantanu Desai New creatures keep popping up to populate the zoo; many old friends linger Barkhausen noise studies – Rai Weiss Strong evidence that domain-flipping in actuation magnets causing upconversion – proposal to replace NdFeB with SmCo S5 Data Quality Investigations – John Zweizig New and updated DQ flags; more on the horizon; some issues still pending

LIGO-G Z 3/21/2007 ETM Side Coils Side coil dirvers go into seismically initiated osciallations at ~6 Hz »Mechanical resonances ~1Hz »Unknown driving mechanism –Servo instability? Diagnosis »Laura creates ETMY_SIDE flags based on Vmon channel (16Hz) »Overflow channels don't work »Coil readback at LHO only and doesn't cover full range (readback ±2V, DAC ±5V) »Extrapolate from coils assuming sinusoid. J. Zweizig

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 14 DC Parallel Session Highlights S5 cosmic ray studies – Ray Frey Data compiled from scintillators at Hanford – list of intervals for DQ flagging  Look for effects in GW channel DMT infrastructure updates – John Zweizig New release with many fixes and upgrades; some new monitors and utilities [PD asymmetry, online-h(t)] S5 coherence investigations – Nelson Christensen New automated infrastructure for following up on spectral lines; month-by-month coherence signals allow tracking of wandering lines (examples shown by Keith Thorne)

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 15 Fast rise  GPS time stamp (  10 ns resolution) AB CD R. Frey A typical CR event – pulse height vs time(sample) Slow falloff (80 kHz sampling)

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 16 DC Parallel Session Highlights S5 cosmic ray studies – Ray Frey Data compiled from scintillators at Hanford – list of intervals for DQ flagging  Look for effects in GW channel DMT infrastructure updates – John Zweizig New release with many fixes and upgrades; some new monitors and utilities [PD asymmetry, online-h(t)] S5 coherence investigations – Nelson Christensen New automated infrastructure for following up on spectral lines; month-by-month coherence signals allow tracking of wandering lines (examples shown by Keith Thorne)