The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers August 2013 Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.

Advertisements

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers August 2013 Training Module 4 Component Five – Student Improvement.

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.

Training Overview For separate modules:

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for.

Training for Teachers and Specialists

Danielson Framework: Review and Card Sort Activity

Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.

DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.

Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility

Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.

C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST

SEED MAT Mentor Training MAT Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internship Realities Internship Rotation Cycles Danielson Frameworks.

Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching

Imagine you are in the classroom of a highly effective teacher:  What would you see?  What would you hear?  What would the students be doing or saying?

August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 4 Component Five – Student Improvement.

Matrix 101: The Oregon Matrix and Summative Evaluations Spring 2015 Technical Assistance Webinar.

The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.

Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson

Differentiated Supervision

The Framework for Teaching

Domain II Creating and Environment for Learning

M EASURING T EACHER E FFECTIVENESS (MTE). H OW DID WE GET HERE ? Video from the Arizona School Administrators PUSD Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Committee.

Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.

Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor

The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.

CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.

General Instructions 1. Save the Power Pt template to your desktop and a flashdrive used only for your portfolio. Using SAVE AS rename the portfolio with.

An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.

Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.

Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,

Your Name Teaching Portfolio (Begin Year-End Year)

DPAS II, Component 5 for School Nurses Linda C. Wolfe, RN, MEd Director, School Support Services Facilitator, DPAS II Component 5, School Nurses June 2013.

Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.

THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.

The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.

Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District

Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.

Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.

Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our teachers and those in school districts,

 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.

BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.

PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.

A framework for teaching (Danielson, 1996) Domain 2: The classroom environment – 2a: Creating an environment of respect and rapport – 2b: Establishing.

The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning.

A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)

NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness B. Examining the Framework

DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.

Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/

Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.

1 Teacher Performance Assessment Lynn Sawyer Director of Professional Development P.O. Box Reno, NV December.

FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.

Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment

Challenges and Opportunities: Growing at Maret PERSONAL LIFEPLANNING/PREPARATIONCLASSROOMCOMMUNITYREFLECTION.

Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.

Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.

DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.

Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.

NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.

Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.

Welcome Learning Targets for Today I will build schema for Danielson’s Framework for Teaching. I will connect Framework principles to powerful planning.

Framework For Teaching (FFT)

An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation

Teacher Evaluation Process School Year

Introduction to Core Professionalism

The Unannounced observation

Presentation transcript:

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers August 2013 Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers

Training Overview For separate modules: Module 1: Introduction to DPAS II Module 2: DPAS II and the Delaware Framework Module 3: The DPAS II Process Module 4: Component Five – Student Improvement DRAFT

Materials for this module Power Point Presentation DPAS II Guide for Teachers DRAFT

Review: Five Components of DPAS II TeachersSpecialistsAdministrators Component IPlanning & Preparation Vision & Goals Component 2Classroom Environment Professional Practice & Delivery of Services Culture of Learning Component 3InstructionProfessional Collaboration & Consultation Management Component 4Professional Responsibilities Component 5Student Improvement DRAFT

Review The DPAS II framework has three tiers Components – broad areas of teacher practice and responsibility Criteria – essential knowledge and skills related to each component Elements – observable areas of knowledge and skills related to each criterion DRAFT

Whats new in related to Criteria? Opportunity for LEAs to utilize one less criterion in each Component DRAFT

Component 1 – Planning and Preparation Component 1 focuses on how a teacher selects and organizes programs and/or services provided to students. Component 1 Criteria: 1a. Selecting Instructional Goals (Optional) 1b. Designing Coherent Instruction 1c. Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy (Optional) 1d. Demonstrating Knowledge of Students 1e. Designing Student Assessments DRAFT

Component 2 – The Classroom Environment Component 2 focuses on interactions with students that reflect genuine respect and caring for individuals as well as the group. Component 2 Criteria: 2a. Managing Classroom Procedures 2a. Managing Student Behavior 2c. Creating an environment to support learning (Optional) 2d. Organizing Physical Space (Optional) DRAFT

Component 3 – Instruction Component 3 focuses on how a teacher engages students in learning. Component 3 Criteria: 3a. Engaging Students in Learning 3b. Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness (Optional) 3c. Communicating Clearly and Accurately (Optional) 3d. Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques 3e. Using Assessment in Instruction DRAFT

Component 4: Professional Responsibilities Component 4 focuses on the teachers duties and professional growth activities. Component 4 Criteria: 4a. Communicating with Family (Optional) 4b. Recording Data in a Student Record System 4c. Growing and Developing Professionally (Optional) 4d. Reflecting on Professional Practice DRAFT

Component 5: Student Improvement Component Five Framework Three Educator Groups Group I, II, and III Three Measures Measure A, Measure B, and Measure C Component Five Ratings Exceeds, Satisfactory, Unsatisfactory DRAFT