Pol Sc 341 Winter term 2013 Case Study Presentations and Papers Purpose Topics/ Dates Team Process Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Guy Daly and Kevin Gulliver
Advertisements

State Testing PARCC, LEAP, iLEAP. What State Assessments will your children take this year? When will they take them ? All students grades 3-8 will take.
Infrastructure and development planning Sectoral specialization of government agencies affects process of identifying development projects (planning system)
Public Private Partnerships MUNICIPAL PPP CONFERENCE Date: 18 February 2010.
The Bureaucracy Pol Sci 220 St Francis Xavier University.
S N R E University of Michigan Master’s Project Planning Seminar Winter 2004.
Individual Project (20%) P1 Submit by Week 3 (21/7) 5 Marks P2 Submit by Week 6 (13/8) 5 Marks P3 Submit by Week 9 (3/9) 5 Marks P4 Submit by Week12 (8/10)
University of Delaware Problem-Based Learning: Getting Started Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education Courtesy of Hal White.
Team Contracts. Purpose of Team Contract Clarifies team goals & strategies used to meet them Clarifies team goals & strategies used to meet them Increases.
© 2005 John Wiley & Sons PPT1 Midterm Essay – Sharing my comments Negative: 1.The position could be made clearer and more obvious. 2.There are too many.
University of Delaware Problem-Based Learning: Getting Started Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education Courtesy of Hal White.
Session 4: Reforming Vocational Training to Close the Skills Gap Creating Jobs for Equity and Prosperity April,
Projects CE 311K Introduction to Computer Methods.
“New Public Management” Douglas Brown Pols 341 March 2009.
Work programme: SG’s High-level Advisory Group on Climate Change Financing (AGF) Frank Schroeder Secretary General’s Climate Change Support Team (CCST),
First Nations & Inuit Youth Employment Strategy (FNIYES) Program 2008/2009 CAREER PROMOTION AND AWARENESS PROGRAM (CPAP) APPLICANT GUIDE B.C. REGION.
Endangered Species Pat Sarvis GSL 520 Computer Assisted Language Learning Summer 2002 A Multimedia Encyclopedia Exploration Activity Lesson Plan.
Module 1 Session 1.1 Visual 1 Managing the Implementation of Development Projects Course Overview and Introduction.
CS300 Computers in Society Web- based course Rekha Gupta.
A COORDINATOR ’ S YEAR PLAN Written by Rina AKOTONAS, Head of ACCESS Microscholarship Program AMAL NETWORK.
Fundamentals of PPPs VASCUPP September 25, 2013 Rick Norment, NCPPP.
Z26 Project Management Introduction lecture 1 13 th January 2005
1 TDT4252/DT8802 Assignment Sobah Abbas Petersen Adjunct Associate Professor TDT4252 Modelling of Information Systems Advanced Course TDT4252,
Planned Commission Communication on the role of the Private Sector in Development A contribution to the reflexion on How to Innovate International Cooperation.
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
Programmes of Work Revision lesson 5 Tuesday 29 th March.
Pol Sc 341 Team Presentations Winter 2009 Purpose Topics/ Dates Team Process GuidelinesEvaluation.
Developing your Research Plan for FemNorthNet Community Case Studies 1.
ACE Academy of Long Beach SENIOR PROJECT SUPPORT Educating for Careers Conference March 2015.
PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP) FRAMEWORK AND GUIDELINES Syed M. Ali Zaidi, P.Eng. PM(Stanford), Ph.D. Director, Strategic Partnerships Alberta Infrastructure.
Pol Sc 322 Politics of Atlantic Canada Case Study Team Process, 2010 Purpose Topic Team Process Team Evaluation Individual Research Paper.
Pols 342 Briefing the Cabinet Douglas Brown St. Francis Xavier University March 2008.
International Speedway Boulevard Stakeholders Task Force (STF) Meeting 1 Wednesday, May 19, 2010.
SEVAL WORKSHOP 3 – September 4, 2015 Health Policy Evaluation: what role for independence a perspective from WHO Dr Elil Renganathan DG Representative.
SKILLS WEEK. PAPER 1 PAPER 1: QUESTIONS AND EXAM TECHNIQUE  Paper 1 is worth 3O% (SL).  Because you know the structure and type of questions you.
AP Capstone: Seminar A Brave New YWCPA. Class Overview The AP Capstone is an inquiry-based course that aims to engage students in cross-curricular.
OSAE sets the PACE: Premier Auditing Consulting and Evaluations! American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Readiness Review.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
ACC 548 UOP Course Tutorial For more course tutorials visit
1 Lecture 3a Source of idea. 2 Externally: lead users, experts, product association, patents, etc Internally: focus of this lecture to improve your creativity.
How to answer Paper 1 The Move to Global War. Details You have 5 minutes reading time before the time starts The paper is 1 hour long The paper has 4.
 Comprehensive interviews with administrative staff are complete and findings are being collated and prepared in written form for Full Committee review.
AJS 522 MASTER Leading through innovation/ajs522masterdotcom.
AJS 522 Entire Course (UOP) FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT AJS 522 Week 1 DQ 1 AJS 522 Week 1 DQ 2 AJS 522 Week 1 Individual Assignment.
1 Sobah Abbas Petersen Adjunct Associate Professor TDT4252 Modelling of Information Systems Advanced Course TDT4252, Spring 2011 TDT4252,
Child Friendly Technology Framework and Disabilities Overview Presentation UNICEF - Innovation Unit.
BUILDING STRONG SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE GETTING FAMILIAR WITH SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE During this session you will: Understand what social infrastructure.
Sujata Desai ECONOMICS.
Technical Business Consultancy Project
GCSE science End of Year 10 tests
An Overview of Accounting in the new Junior Cycle Specification
Budget Transparency A New, Global Toolkit
The Move to Global War: 1931 – 1940
CHAPTER 22 Public Relations Project
How to Write A Review (Movie)
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada Leveraging Infrastructure Funds
NEW EXAM FORMAT FOR 2016 AND BEYOND
ECO 572 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
IST 731 Enthusiastic Studysnaptutorial.com
AJS 522 EXPERT Lessons in Excellence-- ajs522expert.com.
IST 731 Education on your terms/tutorialrank.com.
ECO 572 Education for Service/tutorialrank.com
AJS 522 MASTER Education for Service- -ajs522master.com.
Budget Transparency The New Global Toolkit
Problem Solving Lab – Part C
Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)
Essential Instructions (Day 3) (Write on separate sheet of paper)
A Walk in the PARCC Today’s Agenda: Introduction to the PARCC
Management Challenge an exploration of business
Campus Media Consulting Assignment
Presentation transcript:

Pol Sc 341 Winter term 2013 Case Study Presentations and Papers Purpose Topics/ Dates Team Process Evaluation

Purpose To promote class involvement and discussion To research and analyze “case studies” of public management reform To learn and apply team skills To make effective presentations To undertake individual written analysis of selected aspects of the case

Potential Dates for Team Presentations  March 25  March 27  April 1  April 3  April 8

Possible Topics…Federal Accountability post-Gomery report Program review (expenditure reform) Public-Private Partnerships Employment Equity issues Freedom of Information/transparency in government Defence procurement Reforming Indian Band government

Possible topics…provincial Budget Options (revenues, expenditures, balance) Program review (expenditure reform) Municipal mergers Privatization (eg NS Power, Ont Hydro, Alberta liquor stores) P-P-Ps for transportation and other infrastructure Outsourcing

Team Process Select members..sign-up sheet…by March 15 at latest Teams meet to organize their work Decide who is to present what Do a dry run among yourselves Present on the day (30 minutes max) Take questions/ promote class discussion

Individual Papers Each student to write a separate paper covering one aspect of the team’s case  Can follow naturally from student’s research for team effort and their role in presentation.  E.g. a specific example within the overall theme, or results in a specific province Due within a week of the presentation.

Evaluation (overall: 40 % of final mark) Presentation worth 25%; paper 15%. Presentation mark is a group mark, paper mark is individual. Both peer and instructor evaluation of presentations. Presentations evaluated on:  presentation skills (eg. Clarity,Technical skill, On-time)  Content (Comprehension of material; effective argument of the case –pro’s and con’s; issues for discussion).