STATE ACTION FOR EDUCATION LEADERSHIP PROJECT Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Project Director.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Superintendent Program Review Committee February 26, 2010.
Advertisements

State Literacy Teams An opportunity for IRA state councils to become more involved.
STATE ACTION FOR EDUCATION LEADERSHIP PROJECT STATE BOARD PRESENTATION AUGUST 18, 2005 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Project Director.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Succession Planning November 3, 2006 Presented By: Lou Ann Carlson.
STATE ACTION FOR EDUCATION LEADERSHIP PROJECT SUCCESSION PLANNING Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D Coordinator of Graduate Education Wilmington College SAELP.
STATE ACTION FOR EDUCATION LEADERSHIP PROJECT THIRD ANNUAL POLICY & PRACTICE INSTITUTE JUNE 28, 2005.
Leadership for Learning Building the System to Help All Students Succeed Fourth Annual Policy and Practice Institute – Richard Laine Director of Education.
STATE ACTION FOR EDUCATION LEADERSHIP PROJECT FOURTH ANNUAL POLICY & PRACTICE INSTITUTE Jacquelyn O. Wilson JUNE 28, 2006.
On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
Open Future Doors through Succession Planning Principal? Curriculum Supervisor? Assistant Superintendent? Special Services Director?
STATE ACTION FOR EDUCATION LEADERSHIP PROJECT I & II Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. SAELP Project Director.
SCHOOL LEADER PREPARATION: A BLUEPRINT FOR CHANGE Submitted to the Illinois Board of Higher Education by the Commission on School Leader Preparation in.
Career and College Readiness Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Assessment Literacy MODULE 1.
Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 1.
Education leadership: How districts can grow and support a pipeline of highly effective leaders The Wallace Foundation July 2012.
Reinventing Education Act of 2004 School Community Councils.
NJDOE TALENT DIVISION OVERVIEW prepared for: New Jersey Association of School Administrators April 30,
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
District Leadership Team Stakeholder Involvement in the District Strategic Plan! Session #4 April 12th, 2011.
Developing Educational Leaders Building a learning-centered leadership system.
Teacher Evaluation and Rewards OECD Mexico Joint Workshop December 1-2, 2009 Susan Sclafani National Center on Education and the Economy.
TOSS 2014 Legislative ConferenceTOSS 2014 Legislative Conference Dr. Sara HeyburnDr. Sara Heyburn Dr. Paul FlemingDr. Paul Fleming Teachers and Leaders.
2012 State Board of Directors Orientation “Its good business to do business with an AGC member”
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
Southern Regional Education Board Learning- Centered Leadership Program Preparing Highly Qualified School Leaders Illinois Benchmarking Report November.
Continuum of Teacher Development and Shared Accountability Leading to Increased Student Performance Teaching Quality Policy Center Education Commission.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Developing Principals One State’s Initiative Dr. Sharon Brittingham RTTT Project Director, Development Coaches Dr. Jacquelyn Wilson Director, Delaware.
NJDOE TALENT DIVISION OVERVIEW prepared for: NJPSA ANNUAL LEGISLATIVE CONFRENCE AND MEMBERSHIP MEETING March 30,
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Education Renewal Zone Advisory Board Meeting October 23, 2012.
Illinois P-20 Council January 27, ISBE MISSION STATEMENT The Illinois State Board of Education will provide leadership, assistance, resources.
Transforming Education in Kentucky EPSB and TEK 1.
Education Leadership How districts can grow and support a pipeline of highly effective leaders Presentation to: SREB Leadership Forum Jody Spiro Senior.
Jennifer K. Foster Associate Vice President of Adult Education and Workforce Development Illinois Community College Board 0.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014.
EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION UPDATE Michigan Association of School Personnel Administrators Conference December 3, 2010 Flora L. Jenkins, Director Office of.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
META Alternate Licensure Program for Special Education Teachers Terry Dozier, Director VCU Center for Teacher Leadership Wednesday, May 24, 2006 National.
1 Council of the Great City Schools October 27, 2012 Succession Planning and Leadership Development.
Succession Planning Hosted By: John Nori NASSP Consultant.
21 st Century Maricopa Review of Process Human Resources Projects Steering Team Meeting May 12, 2010.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Education Leadership Lessons Learned by The Wallace Foundation Presentation to: CCSSO National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Jody Spiro Senior Program.
Growth, Not Gotcha: Evaluating and Supporting Beginning Teachers INTC 8 th Annual Induction and Mentoring Conference February 26, 2013 Liam Goldrick Director.
LICENSING CODE READOPTION N.J.A.C. 6A:9 Sunset Date: January 20, 2009.
HEAD OF THE CLASS A Quality Teacher in Every Pennsylvania Classroom.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
Click to edit Master subtitle style New Evaluation Assessment for Principals and School Leaders Jan Hammond Jan Hammond
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools: Novice Principals Hired SY Hiring and Placement 2. Pre-Service 4.Evaluation and Professional Development Supports.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
APRIL 2, 2012 EDUCATOR PREPARATION POLICY & PRACTICE UPDATE.
CCSSO Task Force Recommendations on Educator Preparation Idaho State Department of Education December 14, 2013 Webinar.
NH Professional Development Center Network Task Force Report to State Board of Education on August 21, 2002.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Connection to Build Leadership: State Leadership Academies October 18, 2011 The Maryland Experience Martha J. Fields, Ed.D. Carol Ann Heath-Baglin, Ed.D.
CSC Meeting School Leader Selection Process. Welcome Overview of school leader selection process Activities and timeline Roles & responsibilities Q&A.
A Comprehensive Principal Development Program for Minnesota Presentation to the BOSA Advisory Committee Friday, September 13, 2013.
INTRODUCTION: Tim Discussion predicated on multiple years of Engagement with the Principal Pipeline Initiative This webinar highlights several collaborations.
The Wallace Foundation July 2012
Q3 Academic Year (January – March 2018)
Workforce Development Goal
State Examples and Follow-up Data Requests for SOQ Proposals
Presentation transcript:

STATE ACTION FOR EDUCATION LEADERSHIP PROJECT Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Project Director

FOCUS OF THE WALLACE FOUNDATION OVERALL VISION OVERALL VISION Has the state defined high quality leadership? Has the state defined high quality leadership? Is the state leadership vision linked to teaching and learning? Is the state leadership vision linked to teaching and learning? Is the Governor, legislature, state board and Department of Education working to make leadership a state priority? Is the Governor, legislature, state board and Department of Education working to make leadership a state priority? Has the state reviewed current policies related to education leadership to assess their validity? Has the state reviewed current policies related to education leadership to assess their validity?

FOCUS OF THE WALLACE FOUNDATION Does the media write positive stories on education leadership? Does the media write positive stories on education leadership? What is the public perception of the job? What is the public perception of the job? Is a broad range of stakeholders involved in thinking about, defining and developing leadership policy? Is a broad range of stakeholders involved in thinking about, defining and developing leadership policy? Is there a buzz about leadership? Is there a buzz about leadership?

FOCUS OF THE WALLACE FOUNDATION EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL LEARNING EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL LEARNING Does the state have high-quality standards for school leaders? Does the state have high-quality standards for school leaders? Is there a valid way to assess the standards? Is there a valid way to assess the standards? Are there professional development standards for leaders? Are there professional development standards for leaders? Do leaders participate in high quality professional development? Are there state policies that ensure this? Do leaders participate in high quality professional development? Are there state policies that ensure this?

FOCUS OF THE WALLACE FOUNDATION Do new leaders have pre-service opportunities? Do new leaders have pre-service opportunities? Does the state have induction or mentoring policies? Does the state have induction or mentoring policies? Does the state have a mentoring or induction system that has been evaluated for effectiveness? Does the state have a mentoring or induction system that has been evaluated for effectiveness? Are leaders evaluated in a way that is aligned with the standards they are expected to meet? Are leaders evaluated in a way that is aligned with the standards they are expected to meet?

FOCUS OF THE WALLACE FOUNDATION CONDITIONS OF PRACTICE*** CONDITIONS OF PRACTICE*** Are salaries competitive for the job required? Are salaries competitive for the job required? Do leaders have the authority for hiring and firing staff? Do leaders have the authority for hiring and firing staff? Do leaders have authority over their school and district budgets? Do leaders have authority over their school and district budgets? Are there other incentives that make the job worthwhile? Are there other incentives that make the job worthwhile? Does the state offer pension portability? Does the state offer pension portability? Do leaders have ongoing support such as mentoring? Do leaders have ongoing support such as mentoring? Are the school and district building conditions clean and safe? Are the school and district building conditions clean and safe?

FOCUS OF THE WALLACE FOUNDATION Does the state allow for distributed leadership models? Does the state allow for distributed leadership models? Has the state helped to develop community and political support for leadership roles in schools? Has the state helped to develop community and political support for leadership roles in schools? Have the roles and responsibilities of principals, school boards and superintendents been clearly delineated and communicated? Have the roles and responsibilities of principals, school boards and superintendents been clearly delineated and communicated? Have issues of retention been investigated in the state? Do you know what particular issues your principals face? Have issues of retention been investigated in the state? Do you know what particular issues your principals face? Do district offices serve as customer service providers to schools? Do district offices serve as customer service providers to schools? Do leaders have high-quality professional development time and opportunities? Do leaders have high-quality professional development time and opportunities?

FOCUS OF THE WALLACE FOUNDATION CANDIDATE POOL*** CANDIDATE POOL*** Are data systems in place where shortages can be identified? Are data systems in place where shortages can be identified? Does the state have a representative balance in leadership positions? Is there a strategy to recruit diverse people to leadership positions? Does the state have a representative balance in leadership positions? Is there a strategy to recruit diverse people to leadership positions? Is there state data on leader retention and tenure? Is there state data on leader retention and tenure? Is there a mechanism for ensuring that high- quality candidates are being recruited to leadership positions? Is there a mechanism for ensuring that high- quality candidates are being recruited to leadership positions?

FOCUS OF THE WALLACE FOUNDATION Are leaders expected to succession plan? Are leaders expected to succession plan? Is there a statewide strategy for recruitment of the best leaders to hard-to-staff schools? Is there a statewide strategy for recruitment of the best leaders to hard-to-staff schools? Are there alternative ways for high-quality candidates to enter the system? Are there alternative ways for high-quality candidates to enter the system? Are the proper incentives in place to attract and keep high-quality candidates? Are the proper incentives in place to attract and keep high-quality candidates?

FOCUS OF THE WALLACE FOUNDATION LICENSURE, CERTIFICATION, PROGRAM ACCREDITATION LICENSURE, CERTIFICATION, PROGRAM ACCREDITATION Are preparation programs linked to standards? Are preparation programs linked to standards? Are programs evaluated on how well the candidates meet the standards? Are programs evaluated on how well the candidates meet the standards? Are programs successful at preparing 21 st century leaders? Are programs successful at preparing 21 st century leaders? Are program accreditation standards aligned with leader standards? Are program accreditation standards aligned with leader standards?

FOCUS OF THE WALLACE FOUNDATION Is the program accreditation process comprehensive and does it ensure program quality? Is the program accreditation process comprehensive and does it ensure program quality? Does licensure ensure high-quality candidates? Does licensure ensure high-quality candidates? Are licensure requirements easy to navigate? Are licensure requirements easy to navigate? Are there certification opportunities for leaders to get advances stature and compensation? Are there certification opportunities for leaders to get advances stature and compensation? Are there alternative ways to enter the education leadership profession? Are there alternative ways to enter the education leadership profession?

FOCUS OF THE WALLACE FOUNDATION GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES** GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES** Is there an appropriate balance of power between state-district-school? Is there an appropriate balance of power between state-district-school? Are there clear line-of-sight from policy and its implementation? Are there clear line-of-sight from policy and its implementation? Are the roles and responsibilities of boards and superintendents clearly defined? Are the roles and responsibilities of boards and superintendents clearly defined? Is there enough legal authority for principals to do their jobs? Is there enough legal authority for principals to do their jobs?

FOCUS OF THE WALLACE FOUNDATION Is there an appropriate balance of accountability and authority? Is there an appropriate balance of accountability and authority? Do school governance structures allow for distributed leadership? Do school governance structures allow for distributed leadership? Are many stakeholders involved in the policy development process? Are many stakeholders involved in the policy development process? Is accountability clear for each leadership role in the system? Is accountability clear for each leadership role in the system? Are fair and valid evaluation systems in place to assess superintendents, boards, principals, and other leaders? Are fair and valid evaluation systems in place to assess superintendents, boards, principals, and other leaders?

DELAWARES STATE ACTION FOR EDUCATION LEADERSHIP PROJECT

SAELP I Legislation passed that Legislation passed that Provided a three-tiered licensure system for all educators Provided a three-tiered licensure system for all educators Adopted ISLLC standards as Delaware School Leader Standards Adopted ISLLC standards as Delaware School Leader Standards Funded a mentoring program for all educators during the first three years Funded a mentoring program for all educators during the first three years Mandated 90-clock hours of professional development to maintain the license Mandated 90-clock hours of professional development to maintain the license Streamlined the certification for school leaders from 37 to three administrative certificates and made it easier for school leaders from other states to become licensed and certified in Delaware Streamlined the certification for school leaders from 37 to three administrative certificates and made it easier for school leaders from other states to become licensed and certified in Delaware

SAELP I School Leader Induction Program School Leader Induction Program Assessment Center Assessment Center Mentoring Program Mentoring Program Professional Development Professional Development

SAELP I Task Force on Recruitment and Retention of School Leaders Task Force on Recruitment and Retention of School Leaders Task Force Enhancing Working Conditions For School Leaders Task Force Enhancing Working Conditions For School Leaders Task Force for the Recruitment and Retention of Minority School Leaders Task Force for the Recruitment and Retention of Minority School Leaders

SAELP I Development of 19 policy recommendations for Strengthening School Leadership in Delaware Development of 19 policy recommendations for Strengthening School Leadership in Delaware Policy Recommendations were shared, discussed and prioritized at the First Annual Policy and Practice Institute, June 2003 Policy Recommendations were shared, discussed and prioritized at the First Annual Policy and Practice Institute, June 2003

SAELP I First Annual Policy and Practice Institute (June 2003) First Annual Policy and Practice Institute (June 2003) 67 aspiring school leaders 67 aspiring school leaders 210 school leaders, policy makers, and representatives from business and higher education 210 school leaders, policy makers, and representatives from business and higher education Keynote speakers included: Dr. Tim Quinn, Dr. Eddie VanMeter, Dr. Joe Murphy, and Maree Sneed Keynote speakers included: Dr. Tim Quinn, Dr. Eddie VanMeter, Dr. Joe Murphy, and Maree Sneed Topics for key note sessions included: NCLB, national issues related to school leadership, and conditions of work related to school leadership Topics for key note sessions included: NCLB, national issues related to school leadership, and conditions of work related to school leadership Break-out sessions to discuss 19 policy recommendations that came from task forces Break-out sessions to discuss 19 policy recommendations that came from task forces Panel discussions included: DPAS II, ISSLLC Standards, recruitment and retention of school leaders, and conditions of work. Panel discussions included: DPAS II, ISSLLC Standards, recruitment and retention of school leaders, and conditions of work.

SAELP I Second Annual Policy and Practice Institute (June 2004) Second Annual Policy and Practice Institute (June 2004) 75 aspiring school leaders 75 aspiring school leaders 250 school leaders, policy makers, and representatives from business and higher education 250 school leaders, policy makers, and representatives from business and higher education Keynote speakers included: Dr. Jim Spillane, Dr. Tim Waters, Dr. Joe Murphy, Dr. Gerry Tirrazzi, and Dr. Vince Ferrandino Keynote speakers included: Dr. Jim Spillane, Dr. Tim Waters, Dr. Joe Murphy, Dr. Gerry Tirrazzi, and Dr. Vince Ferrandino Topics for key note sessions included: national issues related to school leadership, conditions of work related to school leadership; MCRELs research on school leaders, and Spillanes research on distributed leadership Topics for key note sessions included: national issues related to school leadership, conditions of work related to school leadership; MCRELs research on school leaders, and Spillanes research on distributed leadership Break-out sessions to discuss conditions of work and distributed leadership Break-out sessions to discuss conditions of work and distributed leadership Town Meeting to share work from breakout sessions Town Meeting to share work from breakout sessions

SAELP I Critical Friends-Pre-service Preparation for School Leaders Critical Friends-Pre-service Preparation for School Leaders Dr. Joe Murphy and Dr. Eddie VanMeter served as consultants on the project Dr. Joe Murphy and Dr. Eddie VanMeter served as consultants on the project Wilmington College, Delaware State University, and the University of Delaware agreed to participate in the self- assessment Wilmington College, Delaware State University, and the University of Delaware agreed to participate in the self- assessment Two Delaware administrators, Dr. Linda Rogers and Dr. Diane Sole, joined the consultants in reviewing the self-assessment materials, scoring the materials using a rubric, and meeting with the universities to discuss the review Two Delaware administrators, Dr. Linda Rogers and Dr. Diane Sole, joined the consultants in reviewing the self-assessment materials, scoring the materials using a rubric, and meeting with the universities to discuss the review Follow-up activities have resulted from the review and changes in Educational Leadership Programs have resulted from the process Follow-up activities have resulted from the review and changes in Educational Leadership Programs have resulted from the process Wilmington College and University of Delaware have revised/ or are in the process of revising both the masters and doctorate in education leadership programs Wilmington College and University of Delaware have revised/ or are in the process of revising both the masters and doctorate in education leadership programs Delaware State is developing both a masters and doctorate in educational leadership program Delaware State is developing both a masters and doctorate in educational leadership program

SAELP I Task Force for Developing Skills and Knowledge Clusters for School Leaders Task Force for Developing Skills and Knowledge Clusters for School Leaders Task Force met to discuss the professional development needs of school leaders Task Force met to discuss the professional development needs of school leaders Eight mini-grants were funded at $2,000 each Eight mini-grants were funded at $2,000 each Proposals were requested from districts and IHEs to develop skills and knowledge clusters focused on one or more of the ISLLC Standards for school leaders. Proposals were requested from districts and IHEs to develop skills and knowledge clusters focused on one or more of the ISLLC Standards for school leaders. Ten proposals were received and eight were approved Ten proposals were received and eight were approved Five have received the $2,000 mini-grant for implementation (funding contingent on approval for PSB and SBE) Five have received the $2,000 mini-grant for implementation (funding contingent on approval for PSB and SBE)

SAELP I Collaboration with other agencies/state initiatives Collaboration with other agencies/state initiatives Delaware Principals Academy Delaware Principals Academy Delaware Association for School Administrators Delaware Association for School Administrators Gates Technology Grant for School Leadership Gates Technology Grant for School Leadership Satellite Broadcasting of the Requisites of a School Leader Satellite Broadcasting of the Requisites of a School Leader Delaware Academy for School Leaders Delaware Academy for School Leaders Assessment Center Assessment Center Professional Development SREB Modules Professional Development SREB Modules

SAELP II-Breakthrough Idea MODELS OF DISTRIBUTIVE LEADERSHIP MODELS OF DISTRIBUTIVE LEADERSHIP Partnering with four districts to develop and pilot models of distributed leadership in middle and high schools. Focus on governance issues and contract issues that impede the school community from focusing on teaching and learning. Examples of successful models of distributed leadership will be shared with the other 15 districts. ($25,000+ for piloting districts over a 3 year period) Partnering with four districts to develop and pilot models of distributed leadership in middle and high schools. Focus on governance issues and contract issues that impede the school community from focusing on teaching and learning. Examples of successful models of distributed leadership will be shared with the other 15 districts. ($25,000+ for piloting districts over a 3 year period) Districts selected on January 28, 2005 Districts selected on January 28, 2005 First meeting with pilot districts was February 18, 2005 First meeting with pilot districts was February 18, 2005 Next meeting with districts is April 21, 2005 Next meeting with districts is April 21, 2005

SAELP II-Breakthrough Idea ENSURING A QUALIFIED POOL OF SCHOOL LEADERS THROUGH SUCCESSION PLANNING. ENSURING A QUALIFIED POOL OF SCHOOL LEADERS THROUGH SUCCESSION PLANNING. Districts will be engaged in succession planning to deepen the pool of potential school leaders statewide and increase minority representation in the leadership ranks Districts will be engaged in succession planning to deepen the pool of potential school leaders statewide and increase minority representation in the leadership ranks Kick-Off Conference scheduled for March 11, 2005 Kick-Off Conference scheduled for March 11, 2005 Internship program for aspiring school leaders in all participating school districts that provide clinical experiences in the school district tied to both professional development and preparation programs at the institutions of higher education ($10,000 for districts that participate) Internship program for aspiring school leaders in all participating school districts that provide clinical experiences in the school district tied to both professional development and preparation programs at the institutions of higher education ($10,000 for districts that participate) Advisory Committee meeting on March 24, 2005 to begin process for developing clinical experiences for interns and responsibilities for clinical mentors Advisory Committee meeting on March 24, 2005 to begin process for developing clinical experiences for interns and responsibilities for clinical mentors

MARK YOUR CALENDARS THIRD ANNUAL POLICY AND PRACTICE INSTITUTE THIRD ANNUAL POLICY AND PRACTICE INSTITUTE JUNE JUNE Sheraton Hotel Sheraton Hotel

And….. Succession Planning Conference--March 11, 2005 Local Board Training March 7 and 17, 2005 Advisory Board for Practicum Internship March 24, 2005 Meeting with Distributed Leadership Pilot Districts April 21, 2005 State Board High School Conference April 26, 2005 Two day retreat for district teams involved in distributed leadership pilot –Summer 2005 Two day retreat for district teams involved in distributed leadership pilot –Summer 2005