Special Education Leadership Meeting November 30, 2010 An Update on Special Education Compliance Monitoring Jennifer L. Kline, Esq. Education Associate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nice and EC Does It Beginning of Year Information for Administrators Leadership Academy Week 2010.
Advertisements

Accommodations Updates Carrie Perkis Division of Accountability Services March 9, 2011.
General Supervision Overview of State Performance Plan Indicators 15 – General Supervision 20 – Timely and Accurate Data.
Disproportionality in Special Education
Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education Special Education Self-
Annual Register Verification Training Presented By: OFFICE OF AUDITOR GENERAL New York City Department of Education.
Angela Tanner-Dean Diana Chang OSEP October 14, 2010.
Issue Identification, Tracking, Escalation, and Resolution.
Pre-test Please come in and complete your pre-test.
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx October 18, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Indicator 4A & 4B Rates of Suspension & Expulsion Revised Methodology Identification of Significant Discrepancy DE-PBS Cadre December 1, 2011.
AUDITING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY USING COMPUTER ASSISTED AUDIT TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES.
Administrative Reviews Determining Compliance. Administrative Review Basics Formal “full” reviews – At least once every 3 years – Announced or unannounced.
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013 Monitoring and Program Effectiveness.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
Bibb County School District Program for Exceptional Children Paired Zone Meeting November 7 and 9, 2011.
Verification. What is Verification? Verification is confirmation of eligibility for free and reduced price meals under NSLP and SBP. -Verification is.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education Verification Review (VR) 2013−14 TRAINING.
A Review of the Special Education Integrated Monitoring Process BIE Special Education Academy September 12-15, 2011 Tampa, Florida.
1 Supplemental Regulations to 34 CFR Part 300 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with.
TITLE I COMPARABILITY Determinations & Reporting Title I Technical Assistance Session School Improvement Grant Programs October 6, 2011.
BIE Special Education Academy September 2011 Tampa Bay, Florida Presenter: Donald Griffin Education Specialist, Special Education Bureau of Indian Education.
Michael Cagle and Holly Langer-Evans | Nov U.S. Department of Education 2012 Fall Conference FSA Assessments: Find It, Fix It, and Enhance Compliance.
Procedural Compliance Self- Assessment Webcast Section 5: Correcting Noncompliance and Systems of Internal Control.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Intensive Technical Assistance Schools Identified with Continued Findings of Noncompliance for SY March 10, 2011.
Complaints Information Santina Thibedeau March 5, 2009.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education Self Review (SESR) Activity Three: Corrective.
B 13 Secondary Transition Preparing for the 2015 IEP Review and Data Collection.
REEVALUATION: BEST PRACTICES M-DCPS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN BEESS 037.
Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007
1 Coordinated Program Review: School Staff Overview Sutton Public Schools Frequently Asked Questions: Faculty Information
March’s Special Education Coordinator Meeting March 12, 2013.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
Focused Review of Improvement Indicators A Self-Assessment Process SPP Stakeholder Meeting December 16, 2009.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Accessing and Completing Fiscal Accountability Self- Assessment (FASA) on BIE Native Star Link Tips -Please place your phone.
FREQUENCY and DURATION SPED Monitoring TETN December 16, 2010 Event # 8222.
2009 Post-school Survey Webinar #7 June 2, 2010 Presented by: Center for Change in Transition Services Cinda Johnson, Wendy Iwaszuk, Denny Hasko
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education Self Review (SESR) Activity Three: Corrective.
Climate Survey Training Training for Planning and Administration Leader Keys Effectiveness System 1.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
Staging Training Region 4 ESC January 16, Data Validation Acronyms  DVM – Data Validation Monitoring  DA – Data Analysis (Intervention document)
Significant Discrepancy in Suspension and Expulsion Rates in West Virginia: Barriers to Implementation of Discipline Policy and Procedures November 15,
Categorical Findings of Noncompliance March 24, 2011 Guidance & Intensive Technical Assistance Related to Correction of Noncompliance for SY
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
January 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 Noncompliance.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs General Supervision: Developing an Effective System Implications for States.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA General Supervision.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Presented by: The SMAA Workgroup
THURSDAY TARGETED TRAINING: Reporting Regulations and Requirements
Welcome! The September COP call will begin in a few moments.
New SELPA Directors November 2016 Presented by Heather DiFede
Compliance Committee (3C)
Welcome! The B-13 CAP Webinar will begin in a few moments.
How to Use the Continuous Improvement and Monitoring System (CIMS)
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section
Assessment, Evaluation and Support
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section
Update on the TEA Sped corrective action plan
Quality Assurance in Clinical Trials
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
December Count Data Entry Training
Presentation transcript:

Special Education Leadership Meeting November 30, 2010 An Update on Special Education Compliance Monitoring Jennifer L. Kline, Esq. Education Associate Procedural Safeguards & Monitoring

Compliance Monitoring Reports Will Be Issued to LEAs in December Reports Will Be Provided to LEAs Electronically (Excel-based) and in Paper Format All Questions and Reports of Corrections Should Be Directed to the DOE Contacts Listed on First Page of Report

On or Before June 1, 2011, LEAs Must: (1) Correct All Noncompliance at the Student and LEA Level, as Applicable (2) Submit to the DOE Evidence of Correction for Individual Student Level Noncompliance (3) Complete, Sign, and Submit the Monitoring Report to the DOE

Student Level Corrective Action All Individual Student Level Noncompliance Must Be Corrected When?As soon as possible please, but no later than June 1, 2011

Student Level Corrective Action Correction Is Not Required If: (1) Student Is No Longer Enrolled in the LEA (2) Student No Longer Receives Special Education Services (3)Student No Longer in School Due to Graduation, for example

Student Level Corrective Action And, Remember, the State Selected Just Goal #1 For Compliance Monitoring In Each Student IEP So, Findings of Noncompliance For Measurability of Annual IEP Goals (Item # IEP 26) Apply to Goal #1

LEA Level Corrective Action LEA Level Corrective Action Must Occur if Noncompliance for A Particular Item is Less than 95% The LEA Should Conduct a Root Cause Analysis and Design Steps to Correct the Noncompliance Within the LEA Based on the Root of the Problem

LEA Level Corrective Action At a Minimum, the State is Requiring Training to Occur Within the LEA But.. the LEA Can Do More As Needed Why? The LEA Is Responsible for Ensuring Staff Are Adequately Trained and Properly Implementing the Regulations

LEA Level Corrective Action LEAs Can Implement Corrective Actions to Include: Self-Audits and Review of Student Records Review of Compliance Data By Teacher/School and Requirement of Specific Staff Trainings Review of Policies and Practices At LEA and School Levels

LEA Level Corrective Action Discuss LEA Corrective Action Plans and Technical Assistance Options With Your DOE Contacts

LEA Level Corrective Action On or Before June 1, 2011, Report All LEA Corrective Action Steps to the DOE in the Monitoring Report Through a Narrative Description The DOE Will Ask for Evidence of Corrective Action Steps If Needed

State Verification Activities After June 1, 2011, the State Will Begin to Review Additional Student Records for Compliance Verification The Number of Additional Records Will Depend Upon the % Level of Noncompliance and Other Factors

And One More Note…. Item # 23 on the States File Review Protocol Relates to the Requirement IEPs Contain A Statement of the Frequency, Duration, and Location of Services and Modifications Item #23 Was Removed from the States Monitoring Activities This Year No Compliance Findings Were Made For Item #23