Tips for Improvement Planning: Lessons Learned ISBE Innovation and Improvement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RTI 2 ) for Alaska Schools: Scaling Practices to Meet Local Needs Rachel Brown-Chidsey, Ph.D. University of Southern.
Advertisements

EU Presidency Conference Effective policies for the development of competencies of youth in Europe Warsaw, November 2011 Improving basic skills in.
My AmeriCorps Release 3 State Commissions and Programs User Roles and Management – Implementing Presentation developed for the Corporation for National.
Individual Professional Development Planning for Teachers
Educational Consultant
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
Response to Intervention in Illinois November 22, 2008 Presented by: Beth Hanselman and Marica Cullen Illinois State Board of Education.
Todays presentation slides will be available at under the Resources Section Thanks for supporting ISBEs quest to Go Green.
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Writing the Response to Intervention (RtI) District Plan September 4, 2008 Presented by:Beth Hanselman and Marica Cullen Illinois State Board of Education.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Science Subject Leader Training
My AmeriCorps Release 3 AmeriCorps National Programs User Roles and Management – Implementing Presentation developed for the Corporation for National and.
NCATS REDESIGN METHODOLOGY A Menu of Redesign Options Six Models for Course Redesign Five Principles of Successful Course Redesign Four Models for Assessing.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
Welcome to the Webinar. Guidance for Restructuring Broad Strokes ISBE Fall 2009.
AYP and Beyond: Improvement Planning for Successful Implementation DIRECTORS CONFERENCE AUGUST 2009.
Focused Monitoring: The District Improvement Plan Process-- Tips for Improvement Planning Lessons Learned from the District Improvement Plans.
Guidance for Restructuring Broad Strokes Illinois State Board of Education Innovation and Improvement.
A Guided Tour of the 1% Exception Process From Documentation to Approval.
Data Analysis Training PDP Goals & Strategies September, 2012.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Managing the Statutory Requirements for Assessment April 2011.
Raising Achievement. 2 Aims To explore approaches and materials to support the planning of learning. To consider strategies for preparing learners for.
ZMQS ZMQS
What It Means to be a Professional Learning Community Kelly Gillespie, Southwest Plains Regional Service Center.
School Leadership that Works:
Providing Effective Feedback
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
Illinois Interactive Report Card Overview
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
1 Title I Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session May 23, 2011.
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
ABC Technology Project
Technology Integration Plan (TIP) Overview Meeting Welcome TIP Teams.
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Making Data Work for Kids: EVAAS Teacher Reports October 2012 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Focused on Quality; Committed to Excellence Presentation to the Maryland State Board of Education May 22, 2012 Deep Creek Magnet Middle School Dundalk.
Employment Ontario Program Updates EO Leadership Summit – May 13, 2013 Barb Simmons, MTCU.
The Rubric Reality Cobb Keys Classroom Teacher Evaluation System.
1 KEEPING SCORE Building an Internal and External Gang Strategy School, Community & City-Wide Gang Strategies Presenter: Sarah Sunderlin Senior Research.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
1 New Hampshire’s preK-16 Literacy Action Plan for the 21 st Century Deb Wiswell & Linda Stimson NH Literacy Task Force July 23, 2007.
1 Office of New Teacher Induction Introducing NTIMS New Teacher Induction Mentoring System A Tool for Documenting School Based Mentoring Mentors’ Guide.
Educator Evaluation: A Protocol for Developing S.M.A.R.T. Goal Statements.
1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.
Connecting the Process to: -Current Practice -CEP -CIITS/EDS 1.
Utilizing the School Restructuring Resources Lauren Morando Rhim & Bryan C. Hassel Public Impact For Center on Innovation and Improvement.
Less Red Tape, More Learning: the Interactive Illinois Report Card and Illinois e-Plans Dr. Harvey Smith, Director of Interactive IL Report Card, Northern.
Tips for SIPs and DIPs Lessons Learned from the 2006 Plans Title I Director’s Conference Sept 2007 To access this presentation, go to:
Tips for Improvement Planning: Lessons Learned
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Presentation transcript:

Tips for Improvement Planning: Lessons Learned ISBE Innovation and Improvement

2 The Resource Manual Innovation and Improvement Division The Interactive Illinois Report Card (815) Resources

3 The Mega System: Handbook for Continuous School Improvement Sam Redding Handbook on Restructuring and Substantial School Improvement Herbert J. Walberg Exploring the Pathway to Rapid District Improvement Brett Lane Center on Innovation and Improvement

4 District Improvement Plans Submission Date 90 days following initial notification of status at IWAS

5 School Improvement Plan Submission date 135 days after the initial IWAS notification to district superintendent

6 Targeted Feedback

7 Tools for a Specific End Less Red Tape and More Learning Minimized hoop- jumping Focused planning on –key audience –overall good sense

8 Harsh Realities Perfect plans improved student achievement Plans are required by NCLB and state law Clear and critical need to focus on learning

9 Winning Winning Plans Measurable Implemented with fidelity Monitored Focused on what works

10 How? All plans submitted via the Interactive Illinois Report Card

11 The Interactive Illinois Report Card passwords: Sample login screen

12 District in District Involvement in School Planning Increasing assistance with planning as school does not make AYP

13 Lessons Learned from the Best Foster little doubt about implementation Build a strong relationship between data, strategies/activities, and monitoring Detail roles, responsibilities, expectations Plan critical changes in classroom practice

14 Plan implementation is the Huge Assumption- What do plan users have to know to implement the plan with fidelity and monitor progress?

15 Tip 1: Write for the Right Audience The primary audience for the plan is the userthose who will implement this plan.

16 Tip 2: Look Beyond AYP

17 Tip 3: Take Care to Consider the Factors Contributing to Achievement Whats contributing to your progress? Are these factors internal or external? Are you blaming the kids?

18 Coarse and fine grain internal factors Whats preventing students from learning? School culture doesnt foster shared responsibility for all kids learning Supplemental support is weak or not rigorous Failure to use the intended curriculum by all staff for all kids Teachers do not have adequate coaching or support to implement strategies Mile wide and inch deep curriculum Teachers arent clear about whats expected in classrooms Instruction doesnt span cognitive levels Insufficient teacher learning/team time School culture doesnt reflect rigor, relevance, relationship Kids dont have equitable access to the curriculum Kids arent in the least restrictive educational environment Teachers need ELL training

19 Doing What Works dww.ed.gov/ Indicators of Effective Practice

20 Tip 4: Be Specific and Thorough Is the plan specific enough? Is the action plan sufficient? Is it clear how you will track progress?

21 Tip 5: Focus and Coordinate Strategies and Activities

22 Objective: While the current achievement in math for students with disabilities subgroup is 66.5% meeting/exceeding for ISAT, this subgroup will make AYP of at least 85% in 2011 and 92.5% for 2012 or Safe Harbor. Strategies: 1 double block math instruction 2 coaching for math staff 3 student and staff review of student work 4 beef up test taking skills 5 progress monitoring to drive instruction

23 Tip 6: Focus on Student Learning

24 Sample Plans While no plan is perfect, planners can learn lots from models and we have lots of them to share. Time will tell how good…. Contact your ROE/ISC for samples.

25 For assistance Contact your ROE/ISC The Interactive Illinois Report Card (815) Carol Diedrichsen