Minnesota’s GDP Growth Rate Exceeded the US Average, 1967-2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tax Base Volatility (Update) Thomas Stinson Matthew Schoeppner July 22, 2008.
Advertisements

Tax Base Volatility Thomas Stinson Matthew Schoeppner June 24, 2008.
VARIANS DAN STANDAR DEVIASI PORTFOLIO Pertemuan 10 Matakuliah: F Analisis Kuantitatif Tahun: 2009.
Demographic Trends Northeast Landscape Plan Update 2012 Minnesota Forest Resources Council April 18, 2012.
Quadratic Portfolio Management Variance - Covariance Analysis EMIS 8381 Prepared by Carlos V Caceres SID:
Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Seventh Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown Chapter.
Florida The Economy, Taxes and Results - A Balanced Approach is Needed Presentation to the National Association of Social Workers - Florida John Hall Florida.
Today Risk and Return Reading Portfolio Theory
Manufacturing STILL Matters  The Milken Institute’s “Manufacturing 2.0” report  CMTA’s observations on California industry California Manufacturers &
Laclede County Economic Analysis and Baseline Anna Kovalyova Program Coordinator University of Missouri, Columbia.
Variability Measures of spread of scores range: highest - lowest standard deviation: average difference from mean variance: average squared difference.
Labor Markets II Labor Markets and the Business Cycle.
Chapter 6 An Introduction to Portfolio Management.
Overview of US Economy September 4, GDP Increases 6 Times since 1950; Has Doubled in Your Lifetime.
“Real Estate Principles for the New Economy”: Norman G. Miller and David M. Geltner Chapter 21 Institutional Investment and REITs.
BOE Advisory Council July 25, 2013 The Economic Outlook Joe Fitz Chief of Research and Statistics Board of Equalization.
AN INTRODUCTION TO PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
Long Term Revenue Outlook Tom Stinson John Peloquin August, 2008.
CORPORATE FINANCE V ESCP-EAP - European Executive MBA Dec. 2005, London Risk, Return, Diversification and CAPM I. Ertürk Senior Fellow in Banking.
Measuring Returns Converting Dollar Returns to Percentage Returns
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Chapter.
Risk Premiums and Risk Aversion
Version 1.2 Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. Requests for permission to make copies of any part of the work should be mailed to:
Portfolio Management-Learning Objective
Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Seventh Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown Chapter 7.
Some Background Assumptions Markowitz Portfolio Theory
Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Chapter 7.
Yale School of Management Portfolio Management I William N. Goetzmann Yale School of Management,1997.
Investment and portfolio management MGT 531. Investment and portfolio management  MGT 531.
Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management First Canadian Edition By Reilly, Brown, Hedges, Chang 6.
Tennessee Economy and State Budget Outlook FISCAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF January 20, 2010.
Growth and the Business Cycle Chapter 8 Time period: 1 week.
RUSSIA. GDP = 5.6% “Gross Domestic Product” means all of a countries production. It is what everything that country owns added all together. Inflation.
Finance 300 Financial Markets Lecture 3 Fall, 2001© Professor J. Petry
US Economic Overview James F. Smith, Ph.D. SIOR Chief Economist MIPIM 2004.
Intensive Actuarial Training for Bulgaria January 2007 Lecture 16 – Portfolio Optimization and Risk Management By Michael Sze, PhD, FSA, CFA.
1 Multi-Objective Portfolio Optimization Jeremy Eckhause AMSC 698S Professor S. Gabriel 6 December 2004.
Jobs and Minnesota’s Future Tom Stinson, State Economist January, 2011.
1 Estimating Return and Risk Chapter 7 Jones, Investments: Analysis and Management.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Chapter 8 Investor Choice: Risk and Reward.
The Economic Outlook Thomas F. Stinson University of Minnesota November
Return and Risk: The Asset-Pricing Model: CAPM and APT.
Travis Wainman partner1 partner2
1 CHAPTER FOUR: Index Models and APT 2 Problems of Markowitz Portfolio Selection There are some problems for Markowitz portfolio selection: Huge number.
THE STRUCTURE OF TURKISH ECONOMY FALL 2011 CLASS 1.
Chapter 7 An Introduction to Portfolio Management.
CHAPTER 9 Investment Management: Concepts and Strategies Chapter 9: Investment Concepts 1.
European Commission / Taxation and Customs Union Taxation trends in the European Union Edition 2009 Marco Fantini Head of Sector “Quantitative Analysis.
The Great Recession – A Historical Perspective. Headlines.
Risky Business: Mathematical Analysis of Minimizing Variance in Stock Portfolios Glen Bradford Amanda Fricke Thor Brown Brandon Kelly “ For an efficient.
September 14, 2009 Review of General Fund Revenues and the Virginia Economy for Fiscal Year 2009 The Interim Economic Outlook and Revenue Forecast for.
State of the States Brian Sigritz Director of State Fiscal Studies NASBO NASACT Middle Management April 12, 2016.
Scottish Enterprise Denmark’s economy and comparisons with Scotland SE Board performance Committee November 2006.
Expected Return and Variance
Today’s Economic Situation: The Great Recession, The Recovery, Where We (May Be) Going? Principles of Macroeconomics 2/24/12.
Economic Policy Division
Return and Risk: The Capital Asset Pricing Models: CAPM and APT
Portfolio theory Lecture 7.
Principles of Investing FIN 330
Saif Ullah Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and.
Financial Market Theory
Risk, Return, and Portfolio Allocation
Risky Business: Glen Bradford Amanda Fricke Thor Brown Brandon Kelly
Estimation Error and Portfolio Optimization
Math in Our World Section 12.4 Measures of Variation.
Financial Market Theory
The Great Recession – A Historical Perspective
Budget and Economic Forecast
FIGURE 11.1 GDP and the Circular Flow
Minnesota’s GDP growth rate relative to the United States’ GDP growth rate, , %
Presentation transcript:

Minnesota’s GDP Growth Rate Exceeded the US Average,

Payroll Employment Growth

Payroll Employment in Minnesota Has Grown Faster than the US Average

Manufacturing Employment

Minnesota’s Unemployment Rate Has Been Well Below the US Average

From 2004 to 2007 Minnesota Underperformed the US Averages Personal income growth US 6.2% MN4.4% Per capita personal income growth US 16.6% MN13.5% GDP growth US 8.4% MN4.8% GDP per capita growth US 5.4% MN2.6%

Minnesota Payroll Employment Has Struggled Since Early 2006

Minnesota’s Unemployment Rate Now Is Similar to the US Average

US Manufacturing Employment Fell Faster Than MN,

Minnesota Ranked 30 th in Employment Growth,

Minnesota Ranked 24 th in Real Per Capita GDP Growth,

Real Per Capita GDP Growth Compared to Neighboring States

Real Per Capita GDP Growth Compared to Midwestern States

Real Per Capita GDP Compared to High Tech States

Portfolio Theory Suggests Using a Tax System that Minimizes Volatility for a Given Growth Rate Given the trend growth rate, variance and covariance of each major tax, an Efficiency Frontier Line (EFL) can be estimated – The EFL shows combinations of taxes that provide the lowest volatility for each growth rate – Points below the frontier are suboptimal. The EFL is determined using quadratic programming to minimize state tax revenue volatility, σ 2 T, given growth rates g T – Minimize – Subject to: and and where ω is the weight of each tax.

Actual FY Portfolio Efficient Tax Mix Portfolio Difference: (Efficient Less Actual) Trend Growth Rate7.70% 0.00% Volatility (Standard Deviation) 3.26%3.09%-0.17% Share of Total Tax Revenue General Sales 31.2%60.3%+29.2% Corporate Income 7.4%13.1%+5.6% Individual Income 48.1%9.2%-39.0% Other Revenues 13.3%17.4%+4.2% Total 100.0% Actual vs. Efficient MN One-Year Tax-Mix Given the Current Trend Growth Rate

Estimating the Volatility of a System of Taxes Markowitz’s modern portfolio theory used as a guide: – The expected growth rate in revenues is the weighted sum of the individual growth rates – Portfolio volatility is the square root of the weighted sum of the variances and covariances of the individual components