August 6, 2009 Using the Indicator 13 Checklist to Support Accurate Data Entry, Engage Staff Development, and Improve Transition Planning Results Presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IEP Planning Process Beginning at age 14 the IEP should be focused on meeting the student’s postsecondary goals. The IEP is a plan for preparing the student.
Advertisements

Question 8 Virginia Department of Education 8. Does the IEP consider the strengths, interests, preferences, and needs of the student? (34 C.F.R §300.43(a)(2)
Administrative Rules Impacting Secondary Transition Florida Department of Education Revised June 2011.
Changes to Administrative Rules Impacting Secondary Transition Florida Department of Education Dr. Eric J. Smith, Commissioner.
Guideposts --Quality Work-Based Learning Programs
Secondary Transition Overview of State Performance Plan Indicators 1 – Graduation Rates, 2 – Dropout Rates, 13 – Transitional IEPs, and 14 – Post-school.
MACCRAY Special Education Work-Based Learning Program Helping Students Climb the Ladder of Career Success By: Elyse Hagen, LD/DCD Special Education Teacher.
DR. JASON M. NARANJO UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON-BOTHELL & DR. JOHN R. JOHNSON SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY PRESENTED TO: CA TRANSITION ALLIANCE & THE SECONDARY.
Transition IEP Using Your IEP to Plan for Your Life After High School
We know what we need to do for students what barriers prevent us from doing it? Transition 2011.
Agenda The HS IEP Review HS Curriculum/Supports HS Panel Round Table.
Transition to Adult Living
Indicator 13: Postsecondary Transition Requirements Spring
Transition: Indicator 13
TRANSITION SUMMER INSTITUTE 2014 INDICATOR 13 BASIC REQUIREMENTS.
B13 Secondary Transition Updates
Improving Secondary Transition Services: Meeting the Requirements of Indicator 13 1-Hour Presentation National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance.
1 Transition FUTURE. 2 WHY FOCUS ON TRANSITION? One of the primary purposes of Public Law , the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA),
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
STEP Transition Workshop Memphis November 8, 2008 STEP Transition Workshop Memphis November 8, 2008 Secondary Transition Update Secondary Transition Update.
L everaging the IDEA for S uccessful T ransition P lanning Transition Planning Conference November 15, 2014 Law Offices of Mark B. Martin, P.A.
March 2009Oregon Department of Education1 Indicator B13: Secondary Transition Services.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
Transition 101 I-13 Compliance: Transition Activities for Before, During and After the IEP Meeting.
Continuous Improvement Monitoring System (CIMS) Indicator B13 Secondary Transition January 2015.
Each Year, nationwide, 1.2 million students fail to graduate from high school!
Transition and Indicator 13 Writing Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) That Meet the Legal Mandate A Webinar Series Presented by The California Community.
Pre-test Please come in and complete your pre-test.
New York City Department of Education Office of Special Education Initiatives Placement and Referral Center Transition Services: An Overview.
Transition and the IEP Why is effective transition planning important?
What Is TRANSITION & Transition PLANNING?
Writing Post-School Outcome Goal Statements Patricia L. Anderson, Ph.D. CT State Department of Education Bureau of Special Education
State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report Indicator 13 Effective Transition Susan Beck, Ghaski Browning and Karen Ruddle Office of Special Programs.
Texas Transition Conference February 16, 2010 Dr. Ed O’Leary Texas Transition Conference February 16, 2010 Dr. Ed O’Leary.
Quality Transition Services Guiding Students To Early Adulthood March 20, 2012.
Hand In Hand: The IGP and IEP Working Together 9/15/20151.
Transition Planning Parent Information Meeting Brooke Gassman, Keystone AEA Parent - Educator Coordinator Lori Anderson, DCSD Transition Facilitator Stephanie.
A webinar hosted by the New Hampshire Transition Community of Practice Professional Development Workgroup and UNH Institute on Disability Facilitated by.
Beyond Perkins Addressing the Needs of Students with Special Needs.
Transition Plans A results-oriented process that focuses on improving the academic and functional achievement of the child with a disability to facilitate.
Transition Planning for Students with Disabilities.
( ':~
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Secondary Transition Services YTP Statewide Conference Hood River, Oregon February 18, 2010 February 2010Oregon Department of Education1.
District 214 – Transition Planning System Buffalo Grove High School Special Education Department.
Transition Outcomes Project Data Collection for Program Improvement NSTTAC Secondary Transition State Planning Institute May 2, 2007 Ed O’Leary, MPRRC.
How to write great transition IEPs and meet compliance for Indicator 13!
IEP Development for Students of Transition Age. ODE is Finding….. Based on paper reviews/on-sites, the most common areas of non-compliance for PSG are:
2 Fine Tuning the IEP: Effective Practices for Transition Planning.
Getting to Know Indicator 13 MITS Summit 2010 Bonnie Boaz, Coordinator.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education California Department of.
Improving Secondary Transition Services: Meeting the Requirements of Indicator 13 National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Improving Special Education Services November 2010 Sacramento, CA SPP/APR Update.
Road to Discovery: Transition to Adult Living, Learning and Working 1 Funded by the Iowa Department of Education Developed by PACER Center®
ALIGNING TRANSITION REQUIREMENTS IN THE IEP PAM HUMPHREY, TRANSITION CONSULTANT.
Secondary Transition for Children with Disabilities 1 August 30, 2012.
IEP Team. Develops the IEP including the transition component for a single student.
Secondary Transition Overview Douglas County ESD Jackie Burr Secondary Transition Specialist November 15, 2007.
Improving Secondary Transition Services: Meeting the Requirements of Indicator 13 National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center.
Transition Plan Writing for the School Year.
TRANSITION AND THE IEP:
WDE Division of Individual Learning
Transition: Preparing for Life after High School
Mission Possible: Planning a Successful Life for Students with Intellectual Disabilities TAC it up! VCU T/TAC May 2010.
Using the Transition Planning Form (28M/9)
Indicator 13, Secondary Transition IEP Record Reviews
Transition Planning in the Jaguar Nation
Maryland Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #8
Transition Outcomes Project Report Out Meeting
The Transition Planning Process
Presentation transcript:

August 6, 2009 Using the Indicator 13 Checklist to Support Accurate Data Entry, Engage Staff Development, and Improve Transition Planning Results Presented by: Larry Kortering National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center (NSTTAC) Sue Walter Statewide Transition Consultant Illinois State Board of Education

$8, 777,221,240,095 ($29,200 Per Citizen) REFERS TO WHAT? WHAT ___% OF SWD REPORT, AS 9TH GRADERS, WANTING A HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION? THE EMPLOYMENT RATE OF ALL DROPOUTS IS ____ THAT OF PEERS COLLEGE ATTENDANCE RATES OF SWD IS ABOUT ____% A LIFE OF CRIME COSTS OVER $___ MILLION 70% TO 80% OF WHOM ARE SCHOOL DROPOUTS? $380,000 MORE TO $1.3 MILLION MORE REFERS TO _______ THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SPENDS THE MOST ON WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING: IRAQ WAR; DISABILITY SUBSIDIES FOR ADULTS; SPECIAL EDUCATION THE EMPLOYED DROPOUT TAKES 3 AND 11 YEARS TO FIND INITIAL AND STABLE EMPLOYMENT, RESPECTIVELY IN TERMS OF IMPROVING HIGH SCHOOL, THE TOP THREE SUGGESTIONS FROM STUDENTS ARE:

Indicator 13: Percent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals that are annually updated and based upon an age appropriate transition assessment, transition services, including courses of study, that will reasonably enable the student to meet those postsecondary goals, and annual IEP goals related to the students transition services needs. There also must be evidence that the student was invited to the IEP Team meeting where transition services are to be discussed and evidence that, if appropriate, a representative of any participating agency was invited to the IEP Team meeting with the prior consent of the parent or student who has reached the age of majority. [20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(B)] Note: This definition includes changes recently made by OSEP.

Illinois has already been collecting 6 of the 8 items. Two additions – Is the post-secondary goal(s) updated annually? i.e., is the post-secondary goal(s) documented in the students current IEP? Is there evidence that the student was invited to the IEP team meeting where transition services were discussed?

Defining Age Appropriate Transition Assessment Measurable Post-School Goals in the IEP AND Updated Annually Defining Courses of Study Defining Coordinated Set of transition-related activities (services) Measurable Annual Goals connected to and flowing from the transition services by way of the post-secondary goals Inviting the student to the IEP team meeting when transition is a topic

Provides a basis for selecting appropriate post-secondary goals Ongoing and involves multiple sources of information Appropriate for ones chronological age group Use of formal and informal methods

Can be as limited as a measure of a students preferences and interests Conceptually, we prefer a level one and two and person-centered planning framework Level one for 8 th and 9 th graders with high incidence conditions (e.g., interest inventory, personal preferences, and survey) Level two for 10 th and 11 th graders (add measure of aptitudes & redo level one) Person-centered planning approach for those with more involved conditions

Should reflect high but realistic expectations Should reflect a forward movement instead of a dead-end approach Can be mixed considering the students stamina, endurance and ability level Can incorporate external supports May initially be less specific, increasing in detail as the student approaches graduation May change from year to year, sometimes slightly, sometimes drastically

Areas of Employment, Education or Training, and, if appropriate, Independent Living MUST BE MEASURABLE (e.g., counted or observed) Must be updated annually, i.e., documented in the students current IEP

No official guidance on this concept, it will evolve Many states have existing courses (or programs) of study that prepare one for select outcomes (e.g., levels of higher education, trade or technical school, employment) May entail an initial list of required and elective courses One OCR ruling held that schools must provide parents with a formal process to request course changes Must be linked to student post-secondary goals (e.g., given the students goal(s) for life after graduation from HS, what are the required and relevant courses that build to the goal)

Services that will occur after high school Services and/or activities that flow from the post-secondary goals Services to help them get or keep jobs, get into and succeed in college, and live as independently as possible Community resource maps Based on established needs, including strengths, preferences, and interests Role of parental consent when sharing information

Annual goals that will take the student to their post-secondary goals (academic and functional achievement) At least one annual goal in connection with the students transition services/activities (i.e., that follow from the post-secondary goal) Goals that represent the next logical step toward the students post-secondary goals

Documentation of the invitation to the IEP meeting for the student…signed by the school district and dated prior to the date of the IEP meeting Practices that impact beyond Indicator 13 compliance, e.g., Indicators 1, 2 and 14 Student active involvement in planning for the IEP as well as active participation at the IEP meeting Self-directed IEP and other self-determination skill building tools support active student involvement and engagement over the long term

To meet Illinois Indicator 13 data entry requirements, there is a Transition Tab available in iePoint The Illinois Indicator 13 Checklist Will be updated along with iePoint by mid to late August to encompass changes finalized by OSEP in July Great for data collection at the IEP meeting (we know some districts problems with meeting Indicator 13 are the result of getting the correct data from the IEP table to data entry) Laid out in the same order and format as iePoint Use NSTTAC Web-based Examples and Non-Examples for SPP/APR Indicator 13 as a reference, resource and/or training tool.NSTTAC Web-based Examples and Non-Examples for SPP/APR Indicator 13 Dont forget to go to ISBEs Indicator 13 web page!

There is a measurable post-secondary goal stated for each of the following post-secondary goal areas: Employment (required) Education and/or Training (required) Independent Living (if applicable) If N/A is chosen for Independent Living, responses are not required for the remainder of the Independent Living columns. BUT dont confuse the data collection requirement with good IEP transition planning for students There is at least one IEP annual goal for each applicable post-secondary goal. Are there annual goals that will help the student make progress towards the stated post-secondary goal(s)?

There is evidence of coordination between the LEA and other post- secondary services for each post-secondary goal area. A continuum of options is available to meet this requirement: 1. Is there evidence that the IEP team discussed and listed potential post- school service providers? (this option could be appropriate for younger transition-aged students) 2. Is there evidence of family and/or student input regarding potential post-school service and providers? (also a good option for younger students) 3. Are there transition services listed on the IEP that are likely to be provided or paid for by an outside agency? 4. Was parent consent (or child consent once the age of majority is reached) obtained to invite any outside agencies? 5. Is there evidence in the IEP or the students file that any of the following agencies/services were invited to participate in the IEP development: post- secondary education, vocational education, integrated employment (including supported employment), continuing and adult education, adult services, independent living or community participation? 6. For those invited post-school service providers who declined and/or were unable to attend the IEP meeting, is there evidence that alternate forms of communication and information gathering were used to support networking/access for the IEP team and specifically the family and/or student?

There is evidence that age-appropriate transition assessments were used for each post-secondary goals area. Is there evidence that the measurable post-secondary goals were based on data from age-appropriate transition assessments? Is there evidence that age-appropriate transition assessments – formal and/or informal – provided information on the students needs, taking into account strengths, preferences, and interests A course of study is indicated which is aligned to all of the students post-secondary goals. Does the transition plan include documentation of a course of study (a long-range educational plan or multi-year description of the education program) that focuses on improving the academic and functional achievement of the student to facilitate his/her movement from school to post-school?

There is at least one transition service listed for each post-secondary goal area. Are there transition services in the IEP that focus on improving the academic and functional achievement of the student to facilitate his/her movement from school to post-school? Is there at least one transition service listed in connection with each post-secondary goal? Transition service types include instruction, related services, community experiences, development of employment and other post-school living objectives, and if appropriate, acquisition of daily living skills and provision of a functional vocational evaluation. iePoint is set up so that appropriate services can be chosen for each post-school goal area (e.g., Counseling and Guidance (02) could be applicable to any of the post-school goal areas but Job-Related Services (09) would only be an available choice for the post-school goal area of employment).

Two new items finalized by OSEP in July 2009 – will be added to eiPoint in August to ensure smooth data entry for the 2009 – 2010 school year Is the post-secondary goal(s) updated annually? i.e., is the post-secondary goal(s) documented in the students current IEP? Is there evidence that the student was invited to the IEP team meeting where transition services were discussed?

POST SECONDARY GOALS COORDINATED TRANSITION SERVICES COURSES OF STUDY TRANSITION ASSESSMENT ANNUAL GOALS

Help students to understand the idea of a rewarding career and education Help students identify with an adult at the school Get students involved in some aspect of their high school Actively get students involved in the Indicator 13 process Start lining up adult services that can help Provide direct links between what they do in school and their future Get in touch with Sue at ISBE or Larry, Pat or NSTTAC

(*) Transition_Assessment_Manual.pdf Transition_Assessment_Manual.pdf Note: * has a user fee

ning_doors_employment.pdf ning_doors_employment.pdf ning_doors_education.pdf ning_doors_education.pdf

Thank You! Questions?