Introduction to Research Ethics Africa RWG Workshop 21 May 2003 Stella Kirkendale Wayne Wilson
Four Corners: Values Clarification Exercise
What is “Ethics”? What is “Bioethics”? Ethics are ways of understanding and examining the moral life, or right and wrong human conduct. Bioethics is a way of understanding and examining the moral aspects of biomedical research and practice.
Fundamental Principles of Human Research Ethics FHI / N. Herndon Respect for persons Beneficence Justice
Vulnerable people or groups needing special protection. Who might this be? –… Respect for Persons Autonomy, self-determination
Respect for Persons Respect for Persons (continued) — those with limited education — the poor — those with out easy access to health services — women — people in prison — sex workers — gay or lesbian people Informed consent Autonomy, self-determination Vulnerable people or groups needing special protection
Physical, mental and social well-being Risks reduced to a minimum Protection of the participant is the most important responsibility of the researcher FHI / N. Herndon Beneficence
Justice Equal distribution of risk and benefit Equitable recruitment of research participants Special protection for vulnerable groups
What is “Ethical Obligation”? An ethical obligation is a required action that must be met “all things considered.” Obligations may be strong or weak, or vary from one person to another
What is an “Ethical Dilemma”? When two or more obligations require mutually exclusive actions When some evidence suggests that an act is right but other evidence suggests it is wrong.
How are “Ethical Dilemmas” resolved? Consider whether obligations are being violated Examine all viewpoints carefully, critically and openly Respect legitimate diversity
Two important ideas to know about: Genuine uncertainty about the effectiveness of what is being researched (Equipoise) Research being confused with care (Therapeutic misconception) Research Issues Important to Ethics
Necessary to understand connection of other key issues and ethics: Informed consent Standards of care Partnerships Issues Important to Ethics Issues Important to Ethics continued
Informed Consent Challenges –cross-cultural variability in decision-making –understanding and exposure to to the scientific research model –beliefs about disease causality –language and literacy levels –undue inducement –social harms – gender or HIV status related
Meaningful Informed Consent Process – pre-enrollment, enrollment and study participation Community and CAB involvement Adequate time for counseling Lexicon of locally used terms Managing rumours – egs blood draws; “Devil’s money” Diverse range of methods – drama, quizzes, comics, role-play, focus groups
Standard of Care Prevailing standards so minimal – upgrading of services essential to conducting research Goal – implement reasonable overall improvements through progressively “ratcheting- up” Benefit all research participants; local health care system, community; ongoing and future research – avoid two-tier system
Partnerships in Research An important aspect of conducting research is ensuring the research partners have a role in the research process. Often the discussion comes down to: Are they …. Advisors/ Partners/ Consultants Collaborators
Responsible Conduct of Research Shared responsibilities in research process Well-designed research Adequately reviewed Ethically conducted Properly disseminated
Partnerships for ensuring research is “ethical” in the HPTN Protocol teams HPTN Review Committees (including DAIDS as a member) Investigators Institutional Review Boards/Ethics Committees Community Advisory Processes ( for example, CABs)
Three Partners of Research Community/ CAB Site StaffEC/IRB
Partner Responsibilities Community/ CAB Site StaffEC/IRB
Site Staff Responsibilities Protection of human participants Scientific correctness Appropriate informed consent Confidentiality protection FHI / N. Herndon Site Staff
Researcher’s Responsibilities Researcher’s Responsibilities (continued) Conduct research according to protocol Compliance with Ethics Committee requirements — Report adverse experiences, protocol violations, participant complaints Post-study — Long-term interests of participants
Researcher’s Human Qualities Integrity Respect Compassion Professionalism Courtesy Sensitivity FHI / R. Kohler
Sponsor’s Responsibilities Select qualified researchers Ensure appropriate review, approval and supervision by an Ethics Committee Provide policies and procedures Monitor the research
Sponsor’s Responsibilities in International Research Comply with the local ethical, regulatory and legal requirements Ensure the local relevance of the research while involving local partners in the development stages Promote research integrity
Ethics Committees: Research Supervision Required by ethical guidelines Names of committees vary by location Primary purpose is to protect human research participants EC/IRB
Ethics Committee Membership Qualified Area of expertise aligned with type of research Local community representatives Clergy or other community leaders Former study participants Diverse Sex Age Cultural Background
Initiate and provide feedback on research specific issues Voice concerns from the community and study participants Take the initiative to understand research and community issues CAB Members: Connections to the Community Community/ CAB
Ensuring community input is based mainly on the role community has in the process, particularly the role of the CAB. Are they advisors or partners? Advisors/ Partners/ Consultants Collaborators Community Partnership in Research
Potentially, there are many different people and organizations who will be affected by research in the community have an investment in what happens to in their community. All these people and organizations are called: Stakeholders Stakeholders
stakeholders who are directly affected and invested in an outcome of the research (Women in prenatal clinics, actual IV Drug Users) people or organizations that are interested in the outcomes but are not directly affected by it (Family members of substance users, NGOS providing services, politicians, religious institutions, government, PSB, the Researchers, etc.) Stakeholders Stakeholders (continued) Indirect Direct Two types of stakeholders:
Inform the research team of local issues and concerns that might affect the research Advise research team on the development and implementation of recruitment and retention plans and other study documents Review and advise protocol team and site staff on the development of the Informed Consent processes to improve informed decision making. Ensuring participants’ rights are considered. Responsibilities of CAB Members
Participants’ Rights Information Access Choice Safety Privacy Respect Referrals / follow-up care
CABs should be involved: At a minimum: At the FRONT END of a study in formulating research questions and approaching the community IN THE MIDDLE serving as a check point for how things are going. At the BACK END in interpreting and applying the findings
Community participation is a component of larger Network ethics agenda Community partnerships must occur at all levels of the research process Community processes are key to ethical conduct of research “Community Participation is Ethics In Action!”