Ams/awma_000111 PROCESS-BASED ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF THE GULF BREEZE IN SIMULATING OZONE CONCENTRATIONS ALONG THE EASTERN GULF COAST Sharon G. Douglas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Surface ozone modelling with wind field and orography in Kyiv. 1 A.V. Shavrina, 2 V.A. Dyachuk, 3 V. I.Nochvaj, 4 A.A. Veles 1 Main Astronomical Observatory.
Advertisements

A numerical simulation of urban and regional meteorology and assessment of its impact on pollution transport A. Starchenko Tomsk State University.
Implementation of the Particle & Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) for the CMAQ Modeling System: Sulfur & Nitrogen Tagging 5 th Annual CMAS Conference.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results: Base B and Emissions Sensitivities Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly.
AIR POLLUTION. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMICAL TRANSPORT MODELS Why models? incomplete information (knowledge) spatial inference = prediction temporal inference.
Atmospheric modelling activities inside the Danish AMAP program Jesper H. Christensen NERI-ATMI, Frederiksborgvej Roskilde.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Carolina Environmental Programs Emissions and meteorological Aspects of the 2001 ICAP Simulation Adel Hanna,
1 icfi.com | 1 HIGH-RESOLUTION AIR QUALITY MODELING OF NEW YORK CITY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN FUELS FOR BOILERS AND POWER GENERATION 13 th Annual.
Session 9, Unit 17 UAM and CAMx. UAM and CAMx UAM - Urban Airshed Model Currently available versions:  UAM-V 1.24  UAM-V 1.30  Available from Systems.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer Evaluating.
Krish Vijayaraghavan, Prakash Karamchandani Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA 3rd Annual CMAS Models-3 Conference October 18-20, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC.
1 CCOS Seasonal Modeling: The Computing Environment S.Tonse, N.J.Brown & R. Harley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University Of California at Berkeley.
A Modeling Investigation of the Climate Effects of Air Pollutants Aijun Xiu 1, Rohit Mathur 2, Adel Hanna 1, Uma Shankar 1, Frank Binkowski 1, Carlie Coats.
Examination of the impact of recent laboratory evidence of photoexcited NO 2 chemistry on simulated summer-time regional air quality Golam Sarwar, Robert.
November 15, 2006CRPAQS TC Meeting1 Photochemical Modeling Investigation of an Extended Winter PM Episode in Central California 1. Air Resources Board,
Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,
Importance of Lightning NO for Regional Air Quality Modeling Thomas E. Pierce/NOAA Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory.
Implementation of the Particle & Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) for the CMAQ Modeling System: Mercury Tagging 5 th Annual CMAS Conference Research.
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
Further Development and Application of the CMAQ Ozone and Particle Precursor Tagging Methodologies (OPTM & PPTM) 7 th Annual CMAS Conference Chapel Hill,
1 CCOS Update November 3, 2006 PC Meeting Project Status –Completed Projects Results –On-Going Projects Status Plan for CCOS Final Phase –Guiding Principles.
Use of Airmass History Models & Techniques for Source Attribution Bret A. Schichtel Washington University St. Louis, MO Presentation to EPA Source Attribution.
10/28/2014 Xiangshang Li, Yunsoo Choi, Beata Czader Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University of Houston The impact of the observational meteorological.
1 Neil Wheeler, Kenneth Craig, and Clinton MacDonald Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, California Presented at the Sixth Annual Community Modeling and.
Modeling Compliance with the 8-Hour Standard Jay Olaguer Houston Advanced Research Center 10/06/04.
Overview and Status of the Emissions Data Analysis and Modeling Portions of the Virginia Mercury Study 1 st Technical Meeting Richmond, VA 31 May 2007.
4. Atmospheric chemical transport models 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Box model 4.3 Three dimensional atmospheric chemical transport model.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation 2 T. W. Tesche Dennis.
Georgia Institute of Technology Initial Application of the Adaptive Grid Air Quality Model Dr. M. Talat Odman, Maudood N. Khan Georgia Institute of Technology.
CMAQ APPLICATION TO OZONE POLLUTION IN THE PEARL RIVER DELTA OF CHINA Wei Zhou 1,2,Yuanghang Zhang 1,Xuesong Wang 1,Daniel Cohan 2 1.College of Environmental.
Application of Models-3/CMAQ to Phoenix Airshed Sang-Mi Lee and Harindra J. S. Fernando Environmental Fluid Dynamics Program Arizona State University.
New Techniques for Modeling Air Quality Impacts of DoD Activities Talat Odman and Ted Russell Environmental Engineering Department Georgia Institute of.
Application of the CMAQ Particle and Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) to Support Water Quality Planning for the Virginia Mercury Study 6 th Annual.
Regional Modeling Joseph Cassmassi South Coast Air Quality Management District USA.
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
Deguillaume L., Beekmann M., Menut L., Derognat C.
Role of Air Quality Modeling in the RIA Norm Possiel & Pat Dolwick Air Quality Modeling Group EPA/OAQPS.
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © A high-order accurate and monotonic advection scheme is used as a local interpolator to redistribute.
Impact of high resolution modeling on ozone predictions in the Cascadia region Ying Xie and Brian Lamb Laboratory for Atmospheric Research Department of.
Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.
Session 5, CMAS 2004 INTRODUCTION: Fine scale modeling for Exposure and risk assessments.
Georgia Institute of Technology Adaptive Grid Modeling for Predicting the Air Quality Impacts of Biomass Burning Alper Unal, Talat Odman School of Civil.
U.S. EPA and WIST Rob Gilliam *NOAA/**U.S. EPA
An Exploration of Model Concentration Differences Between CMAQ and CAMx Brian Timin, Karen Wesson, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Sharon Phillips EPA/OAQPS.
May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.
Lagrangian particle models are three-dimensional models for the simulation of airborne pollutant dispersion, able to account for flow and turbulence space-time.
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Georgia Institute of Technology SUPPORTING INTEX THROUGH INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE AND SUB-ORBITAL MEASUREMENTS WITH GLOBAL AND REGIONAL 3-D MODELS:
Western Air Quality Issues and Photochemical Modeling - An Industrial Perspective Doug Blewitt, CCM AQRM Dana Wood, PE BP.
Operational Evaluation and Model Response Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ for Ozone & PM2.5 Kirk Baker, Brian Timin, Sharon Phillips U.S. Environmental Protection.
Intro to Modeling – Terms & concepts Marti Blad, Ph.D., P.E. ITEP
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
Pearl River Delta (PRD) The distribution of city clusters in China Analysis and numerical simulation on a server Fan Qi 1,Yu Wei 1, Luo Xuyu 1, (1. Department.
Eastern US Transport Climatology During Average, High and Low Ozone Days Bret A. Schichtel and Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend.
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
Atmospheric Chemistry and Transport Science Questions.
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
Feature Tracking Process Analysis 5th Annual CMAS Conference Friday Center October 16-18, Barron Henderson, William Vizuete,
CENRAP Modeling and Weight of Evidence Approaches
Ozone Transport Analysis Using Back-Trajectories and CAMx Probing Tools Sue Kemball-Cook, Greg Yarwood, Bonyoung Koo and Jeremiah Johnson, ENVIRON Jim.
Models of atmospheric chemistry
Some thoughts on future air quality models from a WRF-Chem modeler
Regional Modeling for Stationary Source Control Strategy Evaluation
Diagnostic and Operational Evaluation of 2002 and 2005 Estimated 8-hr Ozone to Support Model Attainment Demonstrations Kirk Baker Donna Kenski Lake Michigan.
Development and Evaluation of a Hybrid Eulerian-Lagrangian Modeling Approach Beata Czader, Peter Percell, Daewon Byun, Yunsoo Choi University of Houston.
Improving Regional PM2.5 Modeling along Utah’s Wasatch Front
Presentation transcript:

ams/awma_ PROCESS-BASED ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF THE GULF BREEZE IN SIMULATING OZONE CONCENTRATIONS ALONG THE EASTERN GULF COAST Sharon G. Douglas Jay L. Haney Ana R. Alvarez ICF Consulting/SAI San Rafael, California AMS/AWMA 11 th Joint Conference on Air Pollution Meteorology Paper 6.4

ams/awma_ Overview of the UAM-V Process Analysis Technique u Concept introduced by Jeffries and Tonnesen (1994) u As implemented in UAM-V, provides detailed information on the physical and chemical process that occur during a simulation u Process-level information includes – photochemical production/consumption – horizontal advection/diffusion – vertical advection – vertical diffusion – deposition – emissions (for precursor pollutants)

ams/awma_ Typical Uses of UAM-V Process Analysis u Model performance evaluation and diagnostic analysis u Examination of the response of the UAM-V modeling system to emission reductions u Obtaining an improved understanding of the modeling results through quantification of the various simulation processes

ams/awma_ Gulf Coast Ozone Study Modeling/Analysis Components u Episode selection (using an objective/regional optimization approach)  4 multi-day simulation periods u Detailed emission inventory preparation (incorporating data from participating states and industries) u Meteorological and photochemical modeling (using MM5 and an enhanced version of UAM-V) u Future-year modeling for 2005/Examination of regional and sub-regional attainment strategies u Corroborative analyses of observed data

ams/awma_ Gulf Coast Ozone Study UAM-V Modeling Domain Approximate process analysis subregion 4 km grid FL,AL,MS,LA Gulf Coast

ams/awma_ Simulated Process Contributions to Ozone for Pensacola: 16 September 1997 OzoneppbOzoneppb Hour Simulated — and observed ozone concentration

ams/awma_ Simulated Process Contributions to Ozone for Pensacola: 16 September 1997 OzoneppbOzoneppb Hour Simulated — and observed ozone concentration

ams/awma_ Simulated Process Contributions to Ozone for Pensacola: 16 September 1997 OzoneppbOzoneppb Hour Simulated — and observed ozone concentration

ams/awma_ Simulated Process Contributions to Ozone for Pensacola: 16 September 1997 OzoneppbOzoneppb Hour Simulated — and observed ozone concentration

ams/awma_ Simulated Process Contributions to Ozone for Pensacola: 16 September 1997 OzoneppbOzoneppb Hour Simulated — and observed ozone concentration Onset of the gulf breeze

ams/awma_ Simulated Process Contributions to Ozone for Pensacola: 16 September 1997 OzoneppbOzoneppb Hour Simulated — and observed ozone concentration Breakup of the nocturnal inversion

ams/awma_ Simulated Process Contributions to Ozone for Pensacola: 16 September 1997 OzoneppbOzoneppb Hour Simulated — and observed ozone concentration Ozone production reverses when the effective mixing height collapses

ams/awma_ Simulated Process Contributions to Ozone for Pensacola: 16 September 1997 OzoneppbOzoneppb Hour Simulated — and observed ozone concentration Advection of ozone by the gulf breeze appears to contribute to the sustained/secondary peak

ams/awma_ Simulated Process Contributions to Ozone for Pensacola: 16 September 1997 OzoneppbOzoneppb Hour Simulated — and observed ozone concentration

ams/awma_ KEY FINDINGS RELATED TO THE ROLE OF THE GULF BREEZE u MM5 produces a gulf breeze circulation (that is consistent with conceptual models) u Horizontal advection of ozone into the region by the gulf breeze contributes to the sustained/secondary ozone peak on 16 September (as well as several other of the simulation days) u Recirculation of ozone by the gulf breeze may explain why areas along the gulf coast are potential non- attainment areas for 8-hour ozone (but not for 1-hour ozone) — gulf breeze extends the period over which relatively high ozone concentrations occur

ams/awma_ OTHER KEY FINDINGS FROM USING PROCESS ANALYSIS AS PART OF GCOS u Vertical resolution of the UAM-V – there appears to be a point beyond which increased vertical resolution does not enhance representation of the meteorological/simulation processes – for the GCOS modeling platform, use of more than 8 model layers does not alter the relative contribution of simulation processes u Deposition – deposition becomes negligible under very light wind speed conditions – modified/enhanced the calculation of friction velocity (u * ) for use in the deposition algorithm