ECE 477 Design Review Team 4  Fall 2010 (L to R) Andy Sydelko, Chris Cadawallader, Mike Wiliams, Craig Pilcher.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Greg Beau SerajAnanya. Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale  Packaging design.
Advertisements

ECE 477 Design Review Team 6  Spring 2010 Shao-Fu ShihSteve AndersonMike Goldfarb Josh Smith.
Outline Project overview Project-specific success criteria Block diagram Component selection rationale Packaging design Schematic and theory of operation.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 13  Spring 2006 Elmer Chao (not pictured), Matt Cozza (not pictured), Joe Waugh (not pictured), Evan Zelkowitz (not pictured)
ECE 477 Design Review Team 15  Spring 2013 Jackson McCormick, Andrew Batek, Carey Woolet, Justin Lindley.
Jason CrayJoseph Mundackal Michael WarscoRyan Sherlock.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 7  SPRING 2013 COST ROBOT CAROLINE TRIPPEL, ANDREW LOVELESS, ERIC OSBORNE, BRYAN DALLAS.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 13  Spring 2008 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Srichand Varun Madhu Anvesh.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 9  Spring 2005 Omar Shaikh - Nathan Smith - Jeff Huston - Ryan Koors.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 1  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
Jordan Wagner Justin Spencer Mark Sears John Jachna.
ECE 477 Design Review – Spring 2010 Team 15. Team Members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 1  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 19  Spring 2013 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Calvin Mwesigwa John Marston Noah.
Ryan McLean John-Michael Mulesa Joe Perrin Zach Schoenberger Formal Design Review.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 01  Fall 2013 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 4  Spring 2008 Zach Dicklin Amy Ritter Ian Bacon Eric Yee.
Xin Jin Zelun Tie Ranmin Chen Hang Xie. Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale.
ARISSat-1 Critical Design Review Orlando, Feb 15, 2010 Inter-Connect Board (ICB) Jerry Zdenek
ECE 477 Design Review Team 2  Spring 2010 Digi-Brush Josh LongCaleb Ayew-ewKatie Schremser.
Solar Telematics System ECE 477 Design Review, Team 8, Spring 2012 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Craig Lechlitner,
ECE 477 Design Review Team 5  Fall 2007 Wes Chris Josh Dave.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 2  FALL 2011 Members: Bo Yuan, Yimin Xiao, Yang Yang, Jintao Zhang.
Shiv Yukeun Donghan Robert.  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale  Packaging design.
ECE Grande ECE 477 Design Review Team 3 - Fall 2008.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 01  Fall 2010 Jigar Gandhi Chandler Wall John-Taylor Smith Eric Zarowny.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 2  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 11  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 9  Fall 2009 Josh Piron, Jacob Pfister Kevin Templar, Mike Phillips,
ECE 477 Design Review Team 7  Spring 2007 Joe Land Ben Fogle James O’Carroll Elizabeth Strehlow.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 14  Spring 2006 Jason, Nathanael, David, David.
 “Zigbee is a suite of high level communication protocols using small, low power digital radios based on an IEEE 802 standard.”  Basically- short-range.
Team 6 DOODLE DRIVE Alexander Curtis Peachanok Lertkajornkitti | Jun Pan | Edward Kidarsa |
ATtiny23131 A SEMINAR ON AVR MICROCONTROLLER ATtiny2313.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 02  Fall Outline Project overview - KProject overview - K Project-specific success criteria -KProject-specific success.
TCSP Presentation #3 Team 14 SPOT DASH. Schematics 3 Pages 3 Pages Page 1: Buttons, LEDs, sensors related circuits Page 1: Buttons, LEDs, sensors related.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 3  Fall 2007 Steven Kingsley (Analog) Roy Scheck (Leader) Tony Liechty (Digital) Charles Lan (Software)
ECE 477 Design Review Team 8(SLOW)  Spring 2006.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW FEST – FALL OUTLINE  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 3  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 12  Spring 2006 EricDaniel Atandra Sriharsha Aasenda Silva Burman Vengapaty.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 4  SPRING 2015 Matt Carpenter, Grant Gumina, Chris Holly, and Michael Pak.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 5  Spring Project Overview Inertial based character recognition deviceInertial based character recognition device Battery.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 3  SPRING 2015 Garrett Bernichon Bryan Marquet John Skubic Tim Trippel.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 5  Spring 2010 Fred Grandlienard Andrew Gregor Kevin Mohr Ryan DeFord.
Treasure Chess ECE 477 Team 2 - Spring 2013 Parul Schroff, Brock Caley, Sidharth Malik, Jeremy Stork Design Review.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 10  Spring 2009 Scott Shaw Hussain Vasi Matt Sbai John Fawcett.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 2  Fall 2006 Wirelessly Integrated Menu System (WIMS) Ryan Coppa Lee Bush Aaron Replogle Neil Bedwell.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 5  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 14  SPRING Project Overview  Target Audience: Amateur Musicians  Obtain a “Guitar Tab” format of music  View Tabs.
ECE 477 Design Review Team BOAR  Fall 2011 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Left to Right:
Vehicle Monitoring System Michael Jermann Chris Blount Team: 35 TA: Justine Fortier.
SmartCup – Team 42 Harington Lee, Chirag Patil, Arjun Sharma 1.
DOODLE DRIVE Presenter: Edward Kidarsa Team 6 Tablet Controlled Vehicle.
Application Case Study Christmas Lights Controller
ECE 477 Design Review Team 13  Spring 2007
ECE477 MIDTERM DESIGN REVIEW: TEAM #08
ECE 477 Design Review Team 8  Spring 2007
ECE 477 Design Review Team 21 - Spring 2013
ECE 477 Design Review Group 3  Fall 2005
ECE 477 Design Review Team 6 - Spring 2012
Joe Trefilek Jeff Kubascik Paul Scheffler Matt Rockey
ECE 477 Design Review Group 6  Fall 2005
Team 4: Project Forget-Me-Not
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 4  Fall 2010
Project Forget-Me-Not
Project Forget-Me-Not
Project Forget-Me-Not
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 14  SPRING 2010
Team RAPTORS Joe Trefilek Jeff Kubascik Paul Scheffler Matt Rockey
Presentation transcript:

ECE 477 Design Review Team 4  Fall 2010 (L to R) Andy Sydelko, Chris Cadawallader, Mike Wiliams, Craig Pilcher

Outline Project overview Project-specific success criteria Block diagram Component selection rationale Packaging design Schematic and theory of operation PCB layout Software design/development status Project completion timeline Questions / discussion

Project Overview - Motivation “A child safety-system that prevents parents and caretakers from accidentally leaving children in vehicles.” Average number of U.S. child hyperthermia fatalities per year since 1998: 37  41 so far in 2010 alone Our goal is to prevent as many deaths as possible If the caretaker cannot be warned, the child protection system will try to act on its own Extensible, could be modified for other uses, e.g. pets or seat belt verification on a school bus

Project Specific Success Criteria An ability to determine the operating state of the vehicle via the OBD-II port An ability to determine the presence of a child in a safety seat An ability to use multiple safety seats in one vehicle An ability to sound an audible alarm when the ignition is turned off An ability to interface directly to the internal vehicle CAN

Block Diagrams – Car Side

Block Diagram – Child Side

Component Selection Rationale - Micro Extensive onboard peripherals are available  Multiple CAN ports, PWM for audio output, ATD converters, dual SCI ports, timers, etc. Large amounts of available flash (512KB) for audio sample storage Controllable power consumption –Effectively battery powered when the car is off Cost – expensive, but perfect for this stage –Eventual goal is to scale down to the smallest 9S12(X) that handles all peripheral, total audio samples, and speed requirements

Component Selection Rationale – RF XCVRs Built-in pairing support Long range (up to 1km), allows the use of small, inefficient antennas Transmitter only powered when sending switch states  Critical for battery-powered child side  Receiver enters low-power polling state when not receiving Transceiver/Encoder pair operate with a microcontoller Extra input pins for future expansion  8 inputs = 256 possible status messages

Packaging Design – Car Side Car side box contains:  16-pin OBD-II cable  RS-232 connector  Two buttons (learn, reset)  Two LEDs (power, learning)  Speaker Also needs to mount easily under dash or near OBD-II port

Child Side Child side box will have 1 LED (power) and 1 button (learn) and a port for child detection device To be replaced for integration with specific devices Child side box must have access for battery replacement

General Schematic/Theory of Operation 2 CAN ports – Vehicle communication  High-speed CAN compatibility for vehicle state detection and unusual vehicles  Single-wire CAN for peripheral control, such as windows, alarm, etc. 2 SCI ports – RS232 (debugging) and RF RX 2 ATD – Car state detection for older OBD-II protocols PWM – Audio Output 11 GPIO – Control lines/DEBUG/DEC data, switch inputs

RF Decoder Decoder polls receiver to check for any incoming packets Baud rate tied to ground, same as encoder High transmission speed is irrelevant Digital outputs routed directly to microcontroller Learn button is now debounced through the microcontroller, which also allows the micro to track if we are in the “Learning state” and activate an audio confirmation when a seat is added.

SWCAN Transceiver Sits on SWCAN bus, speed controlled via microcontroller Circuitry simply as required by the transceiver Powered by the cars battery directly Can enter sleep mode where it is woken by SWCAN activity Responsible for rolling down windows, activating panic on most vehicles

Child Side – Theory of Operation

- Encoder sends button events to the transmitter - All button events tied to send function - Reduces power consumption to only when transmitting - “Change ID” button for the one in 2^20 chances of a conflict (probably useless) - Encoder connected directly to transmitter, power down line keeps transmitter off when buttons not being pressed - Status indication LED shows when ID generation is taking place

Car Side Layout – General Considerations RF Isolation is important Accurate clock sources are important for high-speed CAN communication Extensive debugging access and expandability Need multiple power supplies: –5V for most chips –3.3V for RF decoder –12V for SWCAN transceiver

Child Side Layout - General Considerations Two boards completed Important considerations  Remove ground plane from Antenna  Bring extra inputs to headers for expanding system Future improvements:  Debounce learn switch  Make sure to bring Vcc  Change antenna drill hole sizes

Microcontroller Layout Considerations Very specific oscillator layout required for accurate crystal operation. –Current layout should exceed Freescale recommendations Extensive bypass capacitors needed for power supplies, PLL, voltage reference for ATD converters, and internal 2.5V supply.

PCB - RF and Power Supply Considerations Short, low-impedance connection to the antenna No planes or traces under the decoder or antenna –Ground plane recommended for the receiver Receiver requires very clean, 3.3V power supply  Designed to operate from a battery with no bypass capacitors  Utilizes input filtering and resistance to reduce and clean supply to necessary levels Linear regulator chosen on car-side as a result of noise considerations

Software Design/Development Status Test Software Features - PWM audio output test - CAN debugging routines - Generic digital port dumps - ATD converter test Operational Software - Detection of cars on older protocols completed - Tracking of child seats state working with ID reception - Vehicle status state machine that integrates multiple protocols and seat tracking working - Audio output not start - Vehicle action via CAN not started

Project Completion Timeline TaskTimeline Final PCB Layout CheckOctober 20, 2010 PCB Fabrication~November 1 Car Detection Software via ATDOctober 22 CAN Decoding SoftwareOctober 29 Audio Warning System SoftwareNovember 5 PCB TestingNovember 16 PackagingDecember 1

Questions / Discussion