1 Establishing Performance Indicators in Support of The Illinois Commitment Presented to the Illinois Board of Higher Education December 11, 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Prioritization Framework Principles
Advertisements

Rhode Island Model for Educator Evaluation Systems August 2010.
Manatt manatt | phelps | phillips New York State Health Information Technology Summit Initiative Overview and Update Rachel Block, Project Director United.
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Pat Picariello, Director, Developmental Operations 1 Strategic Planning & New Activity Development.
September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop Strategic Planning & New Activity Development September 2013.
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Results Based Monitoring (RBM)
1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
Board of Early Education and Care Strategic Planning Update February 10, 2009.
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
New EU Forest Strategy and Update on Forest Information and Monitoring
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
Overview for Parents and Guardians Fall 2010
Strategic Visioning Process Pleasant Valley District #62
What is an M and E Plan?. Organizing the Work of M and E An M and E System -- the 12 components as a whole – Sets out broad vision at national level An.
1 Looking at the TPBs Draft Participation Plan Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board July 18, 2007 Sarah Crawford Transportation Planner Department.
QEP BASICS.
SAI Performance Measurement Framework
Development of an Illinois Energy Efficiency Policy Manual A Proposed Process and Approval Plan Presented by: Karen Lusson Illinois Attorney General’s.
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
A A member of the U.N. Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction An international scientific organization dedicated to the reduction of disaster risk.
Labour Market Planning LMDA Service Delivery Advisory Group September 28, 2006 CONFIDENTIAL – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION.
The key steps in an annual cycle Produce the annual work programme Create an annual Internal Audit plan for approval by the Audit Committee, typically.
Office of Academic Affairs June 1, 2007 Academic Priorities: Next Steps Spring Symposium 2007.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Purpose of the Standards
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
Professional Standards 2009 Suzanne Scott, Ph.D., IDEC, ASID, Megan Scanlan, Director of Accreditation,
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
Higher Education Opportunity Act Measuring Performance Next Steps Higher Education Advisory Committee November 7, 2011 Jim Alessio Higher Education Restructuring.
Developing an accessibility policy. In this talk we will discuss What is an accessibility policy Why do we need one? Getting started - steps to consult.
IBHE Presentation 1 Performance Funding Discussion Topics Performance Funding Steering Committee Meeting September 28, 2011.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Regional Workshop on Performance Management and Performance-Based.
THE NATURE AND PURPOSE OF STRATEGIC PLANNING
Developing an accessibility strategy. In this talk we will discuss an accessibility strategy an accessibility policy getting started - steps to consultation.
Strengthening Institutional Frameworks for Sustainable Development Pre-event on Institutional Frameworks for Sustainable Development in Africa: Integrating.
Formative Evaluation of UNGEI Findings and Selected Recommendations Presentation to UNGEI GAC 14 February 2012.
Green Paper on National Strategic Planning The Presidency November 2009.
Strategic Planning A Tool for “Charting our Future” Strategic Planning Team May 24-25, 2012.
CONTEXT FOR ACADEMIC STRATEGIC PLANNING AT UM Foundation for upcoming Accreditation process Identify key issues and opportunities to address over the next.
A Proposed Accountability Framework for California Higher Education Recommendations from the Advisory Group November 4, 2003.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
European Commission Joint Evaluation Unit common to EuropeAid, Relex and Development Methodology for Evaluation of Budget support operations at Country.
THECB 07/03 A Short History of Assessment and Developmental Education in Texas from The Texas Academic Skills Program to the Texas Success Initiative.
Connecticut PEAC meeting Today’s meeting Discussion of draft principal evaluation guidelines (1 hour) Evaluation and support system document.
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
The context for the revised guidance Alan Inglis Assistant Principal, John Wheatley College.
Dr. ERINDA PAPA.  This manual is a clear proof of “Fan S. Noli” University’s commitment to assure its internal quality. It demonstrates not only that.
Monitoring and Oversight: College Completion and Attainment Dr. Kevin Reilly & Dr. Sheila Stearns AGB Consultants December 7th, 2015.
A Fundamentally New Approach to Accountability: Putting State Policy Issues First Nancy Shulock Director, Institute for Higher Education Leadership & Policy.
CCSSO Task Force Recommendations on Educator Preparation Idaho State Department of Education December 14, 2013 Webinar.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
REVIEW OF JAR EXPERIENCES MAIN FINDINGS IHP+ Nairobi Meeting December
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation Giovanni Rum, Chao Xing GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.
Board of Early Education and Care Strategic Planning Update October 14, 2008.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Meredith Davison Mike Roscoe
Universal Standards for Social Performance Management
Principles of Good Governance
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Texas Association of Community Colleges
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Strategic Plan Implementation July 18, 2018
Foothill College Strategic Objective - Governance
Presentation transcript:

1 Establishing Performance Indicators in Support of The Illinois Commitment Presented to the Illinois Board of Higher Education December 11, 2001

2 Presentation Overview The Need for Performance Indicators Developing a System of Performance Indicators: Lessons Learned Overview of the Illinois Higher Education Policy Context Proposed Framework for Developing Indicators and Next Steps

3 Why Establish Performance Indicators? The Illinois Commitment is based on demonstrating accountability for meeting the six primary goals. To date, this has been implemented through the budget and annual Results Reports. Developing a set of performance indicators is a critical next step in further evaluating how well Illinois system of higher education is meeting the goals.

4 Lessons Learned Nationally The impetus, mechanisms, and actual indicators used by other states vary; there is no one best model. The most effective systems of performance indicators: Are driven by specific state goals and objectives (a direct linkage); and, Have been developed with significant input from internal and external stakeholders.

5 Related Issues for Consideration Performance expectations should be clearly set forth at the beginning. Embrace simplicity; Avoid indicator proliferation; Build on existing data and reporting systems to the extent possible. Recognize that institutional starting points in assessing performance will vary.

6 Policy Context for Indicator Development The Illinois Commitment The National Higher Education Report Card Commissions on Persistence and Degree Completion, and Access and Diversity. Other Board policy initiatives have had, or will have, relevance to the development of performance indicators including IAI, Underrepresented Groups report, and ad hoc policy studies.

7 Proposed Guiding Principles The indicators adopted will be directly linked to the goals of The Illinois Commitment. The indicators adopted will achieve a balance between demonstrating progress toward statewide goals while recognizing differences in institutional mission. The indicators will be consistent with National Report card metrics, to the extent possible.

8 Proposed Guiding Principles (Continued) The total number of indicators will be minimized. The indicators will build on existing data sources and reporting mechanisms to the extent possible. Each institution will propose specific performance goals in consultation with the Board of Higher Education.

9 Proposed Guiding Principles (Continued) The indicators will be developed through broad consultation with all stakeholders. The indicators will remain in place for several years. The indicators and reporting process will continue to be refined in the coming years.

10 Proposed Framework Three types of indicators directly related to The Illinois Commitment: State-level – pertaining to performance of Illinois system of higher education as a whole. Core institutional – a common set reported by all institutions. Mission-specific – related to each institutions unique role and mission.

11 Proposed Framework

12 Key Aspects of Proposed Process A broad-based Advisory Committee will be established to assist Board staff in the development of state-level and core institutional indicators. Institutions will be asked to propose their own goals for each core institutional indicator. Institutions will also be asked to propose mission-specific indicators and related goals.

13 Proposed Timeline Proposed Schedule Winter – Initial Review and Consultation Winter/Spring 02 – Refinement and Consensus Building (Recommendations on Indicators will be Presented at June Board Meeting) Summer/Fall 02 – Data Gathering and Report Preparation

14 Proposed Timeline (Continued) Proposed Schedule (Continued) Fall 02 – Finalize and Publish Initial Reports (Staff report on state-level and core institutional indicators to be presented at the December 2002 Board Meeting) There will be ongoing refinement of this process with an overall assessment five years out.