CMB & Foreground Polarisation CMB 2003 Workshop, Minneapolis Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA/ISAS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The estimation of the SZ effects with unbiased multifilters Diego Herranz, J.L. Sanz, R.B. Barreiro & M. López-Caniego Instituto de Física de Cantabria.
Advertisements

6dFGS spectra of radio sources at 20 and 100 GHz (12 and 3mm) Elaine M. Sadler (University of Sydney) The AT20G survey - first all-sky radio continuum.
The Ability of Planck to Measure Unresolved Sources Bruce Partridge Haverford College For the Planck Consortium.
Cosmic Microwave Background, Foregrounds and Component Separation What are foregrounds and how to deal with them in CMB data analysis Carlo Baccigalupi,
S-PASS, a new view of the polarized sky Gianni Bernardi SKA SA On behalf of the S-PASS team CMB2013, Okinawa, June th 2013.
Foreground cleaning in CMB experiments Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA, Trieste.
WMAP observations: Foreground Emission Adric Riedel
Cleaned Three-Year WMAP CMB Map: Magnitude of the Quadrupole and Alignment of Large Scale Modes Chan-Gyung Park, Changbom Park (KIAS), J. Richard Gott.
1 Thesis Defense Talk Tuhin Ghosh (IUCAA) under the supervision of Prof. Tarun Souradeep (IUCAA) 5 th of March, 2012 Galactic and Cosmological Signals.
GHz Measurements of anomalous dust emission Richard Davis, Clive Dickinson, Rod Davies, Anthony Banday Paris.
EOR Detection Strategies Somnath Bharadwaj IIT Kharagpur.
FastICA as a LOFAR-EoR Foreground Cleaning Technique Filipe Abdalla and Emma Woodfield University College London with Saleem Zaroubi, Vibor Jelic, Panos.
Cambridge CMB meeting 20 th July 2009 CMB B-modes: Foregrounds Paddy Leahy, Clive Dickinson, Mike Preece, Mike Peel (Manchester)
Systematic effects in cosmic microwave background polarization and power spectrum estimation SKA 2010 Postgraduate Bursary Conference, Stellenbosch Institute.
SPECTRA OF GALACTIC COMPONENTS OBSERVED BY WMAP R.D.Davies, R.J.Davis Jodrell Bank Observatory C.Dickinson California Institute of Technology A.J.Banday,
Hamburg, 18 September 2008 LOFAR Wokshop1/44 Thermal and non-thermal emission from galaxy clusters: X-ray and LOFAR observations Chiara Ferrari Observatoire.
Contamination of the CMB Planck data by galactic polarized emissions L. Fauvet, J.F. Macίas-Pérez.
Galactic Diffuse Gamma-ray Emission, the EGRET Model, and GLAST Science Stanley D. Hunter NASA/GSFC Code 661
Component Separation of Polarized Data Application to PLANCK Jonathan Aumont J-F. Macías-Pérez, M. Tristram, D. Santos
Latest results on Anomalous Galactic Microwave Emission from the Cosmosomas Experiment José Alberto Rubiño Martín (IAC-Tenerife) Orsay, October 27 th,
K.S. Dawson, W.L. Holzapfel, E.D. Reese University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA J.E. Carlstrom, S.J. LaRoque, D. Nagai University of Chicago,
T.G.Arshakian MPI für Radioastronomie (Bonn) Exploring the weak magnetic fields with LOFAR.
Observations of anomalous dust emission (AME) with AMI
N. Ponthieu Polarization workshop, IAS, Orsay, 09/15/ N. Ponthieu (IAS) The conquest of sky polarization The upper limits era First detections Prospects.
WHAT DOES THE UNIVERSE LOOK LIKE THROUGH POLARISED SUNGLASSES? Measuring the Angular Clustering of the Polarised Sky Supervised by: Bryan Gaensler (University.
A Primer on SZ Surveys Gil Holder Institute for Advanced Study.
Foreground limits on the detectability of the B-mode by Bpol Enrique Martínez-González (IFCA) Marco Tucci (IAC) Bpol Meeting, 27-October-2006, Orsay.
Contour statistics, depolarization canals and interstellar turbulence Anvar Shukurov School of Mathematics and Statistics, Newcastle, U.K.
Constraining Galactic Halos with the SZ-effect
Multidimensional Data Analysis : the Blind Source Separation problem. Outline : Blind Source Separation Linear mixture model Principal Component Analysis.
Separating Cosmological B-Modes with FastICA Stivoli F. Baccigalupi C. Maino D. Stompor R. Orsay – 15/09/2005.
Modelling radio galaxies in simulations: CMB contaminants and SKA / Meerkat sources by Fidy A. RAMAMONJISOA MSc Project University of the Western Cape.
US Planck Data Analysis Review 1 Christopher CantalupoUS Planck Data Analysis Review 9–10 May 2006 CTP Working Group Presented by Christopher Cantalupo.
VLASS – Galactic Science Life cycle of star formation in our Galaxy as a proxy for understanding the Local Universe legacy science Infrared GLIMPSE survey.
Low Frequency Background and Cosmology Xuelei Chen National Astronomical Observatories Kashigar, September 10th 2005.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
Joint analysis of Archeops and WMAP observations of the CMB G. Patanchon (University of British Columbia) for the Archeops collaboration.
Galactic Radioemission – a problem for precision cosmology ? Absolute Temperatures at Short CM-Waves with a Lunar Radio Telescope Wolfgang Reich Max-Planck-Institut.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 4: The cosmic microwave background Expectations Experiments: from COBE to Planck  COBE  ground-based experiments  WMAP  Planck.
PHY418 PARTICLE ASTROPHYSICS Radio Emission 1. Radio emission and particle astrophysics 2 Why are the.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
SUNYAEV-ZELDOVICH EFFECT. OUTLINE  What is SZE  What Can we learn from SZE  SZE Cluster Surveys  Experimental Issues  SZ Surveys are coming: What.
Radio Astronomy Emission Mechanisms. NRAO/AUI/NSF3 Omega nebula.
Diffuse Galactic components in the Gould Belt System Richard Davis 8/7/20131EWASS Torku Finland.
Cosmic magnetism ( KSP of the SKA)‏ understand the origin and evolution of magnetism in the Galaxy, extragalactic objects, clusters and inter-galactic/-cluster.
Observing Strategies at cm wavelengths Making good decisions Jessica Chapman Synthesis Workshop May 2003.
INFRARED-BRIGHT GALAXIES IN THE MILLENNIUM SIMULATION AND CMB CONTAMINATION DANIEL CHRIS OPOLOT DR. CATHERINE CRESS UWC.
EBEx foregrounds and band optimization Carlo Baccigalupi, Radek Stompor.
The low frequency Galactic polarisation foreground Xiaohui Sun & Wolfang Reich MPIfR
1 The Planck view of CMB Contamination from Diffuse Foregrounds Carlo Baccigalupi On Behalf of the Planck Collaboration KITP Conference, April 2013.
Radio Emission in Galaxies Jim Condon NRAO, Charlottesville.
Observation and Data Analysis Activityin SPOrt and BaR-SPOrt Exp.s Ettore Carretti Bologna 7-9 January 2004.
Blind Component Separation for Polarized Obseravations of the CMB Jonathan Aumont, Juan-Francisco Macias-Perez Rencontres de Moriond 2006 La.
Tim Pearson US Planck Data Analysis Review 9-10 May 2006 US Planck Data Analysis Review Source Extraction Tim Pearson.
Gamma-ray Measurements of the distribution of Gas and Cosmic Ray in the Interstellar Space Yasushi Fukazawa Hiroshima University.
150GHz 100GHz 220GHz Galactic Latitude (Deg) A Millimeter Wave Galactic Plane Survey with the BICEP Polarimeter Evan Bierman (U.C. San Diego) and C. Darren.
US Planck Data Analysis Review 1 Kevin Huffenberger, JPLUS Planck Data Analysis Review 9–10 May 2006 Point Sources Kevin Huffenberger Caltech postdoctoral.
Searching for the Synchrotron Cosmic Web with the Murchison Widefield Array Bryan Gaensler Centre for All-sky Astrophysics / The University of Sydney Natasha.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
The large-scale structure of the Galactic magnetic field & Faraday tomography --desh Raman Research Institute, Bangalore.
Planck working group 2.1 diffuse component separation review Paris november 2005.
The Planck view of CMB Contamination from Diffuse Foregrounds
Point source contamination in Galaxy cluster
G. Mevi1,2, G. Muscari1, P. P. Bertagnolio1, I. Fiorucci1
Towards the first detection using SPT polarisation
G. Mevi1,2, G. Muscari1, P. P. Bertagnolio1, I. Fiorucci1
Cosmological constraints from tSZ-X cross-correlation
Science from Surveys Jim Condon NRAO, Charlottesville.
Separating E and B types of CMB polarization on an incomplete sky Wen Zhao Based on: WZ and D.Baskaran, Phys.Rev.D (2010) 2019/9/3.
Galactic Dust D Fixsen University of Maryland / Goddard Space Flight Center.
Presentation transcript:

CMB & Foreground Polarisation CMB 2003 Workshop, Minneapolis Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA/ISAS

What We Know What We Guess CMB Contamination CMB Cleaning Known (Polarisation) Foregrounds Existing Data Existing Simulations Microwave Frequency Scaling Approaching from Low Frequency E, B & TE Contamination Sky Distribution Experience The Magic New Spells Magic Limitations & Future Arts

PhysicsFrequency Angle Relevance Frequency ScalingAll Sky DataPatchy DataSimulations Synchrotron Synchrotron electrons spinning Galactic magnetic field < 100 GHz 1 o or more Not Uniform Electrom Density Fluctuations, Not Uniform Electrom Density Fluctuations,   Yes, 0.5 MHz FWHM 1 deg Yes, 1-3 GHz FWHM 5 arcmin All Sky All Frequencies Free-FreeBremsstrahlung Galactic electron-ion scattering < 100 GHz 1 o or more Not Uniform Electrom Spectral Distribution, Not Uniform Electrom Spectral Distribution,  - 2  -2.2 Yes, Traced by H  emission From All Sky All Sky All Frequencies Thermal Dust Grey Body by dust grains reprocessing UV star radiation >100 GHz 1 o or more Not Uniform Temperature Fluctuations Yes, 100 m FWHM 6 arcmin From All Sky All Sky All Frequencies Non-Thermal Dust SZ Inverse Compton of CMB through thermal, non-thermal and kinetic intracluster gas All arcmin Uniform, CMB Rayileigh- Jeans-Wien shift, dependence on intracluster physics All Sky Thermal, All Frequencies Radio Sources See Synchrotron with different populations: internal structures,... < 100 GHz arcmin Not Uniform different populations: flat, inverse,... Yes, 1-20 GHz FWHM arcsec All Sky All Frequencies Infrared Sources See Thermal Dust with different populations: elliptical, spirals, starburst,... >100 GHz arcmin Not Uniform different populations, Not Uniform different populations, elliptical, spirals, starburst, cold sources,... Yes, m FWHM 2 arcmin Yes, m FWHM arcsec 850 m, 23 arcsec All Sky All Frequencies... Foreground Chart: Total Intensity

PhysicsFrequency Angle Relevance Frequency ScalingAll Sky DataPatchy DataSimulations Synchrotron Synchrotron electrons spinning Galactic magnetic field < 100 GHz All Scales Not Uniform Electrom Density Fluctuations, Not Uniform Electrom Density Fluctuations,   Yes, 0.5 MHz FWHM 1 deg Yes, 1-3 GHz FWHM 5 arcmin All Sky All Frequencies Free-FreeBremsstrahlung Galactic electron-ion scattering; expected vanishing in polarisation Thermal Dust Alligned Dust Grains grain magnetic moment alligned with Galactic magnetic field Non-Thermal Dust SZ Inverse Compton multiple scattering, intracluster peculiar velocities All arcmin Not Uniform, CMB Rayileigh-Jeans-Wien shift, dependence on intracluster physics Radio Sources See Synchrotron with different populations: internal structures,... < 100 GHz arcmin Not Uniform different populations: flat, inverse,... Yes, 1-20 GHz FWHM arcsec Infrared Sources See Thermal Dust with different populations, internal structures,... >100 GHz arcmin Not Uniform different populations, Not Uniform different populations, elliptical, spirals, starburst, cold sources, Foreground Chart: Polarisation

CMB & Radio Source Polarisation

Radio Sources: Recipe Study polarised sources from the NVSS catalogue at 1.4 GHz

Radio Sources: Recipe Study polarised sources from the NVSS catalogue at 1.4 GHz Look for common sources in the GB6 catalogue at 4.85 GHz in total intensity for estimating the spectral index distribution

Radio Sources: Recipe Study polarised sources from the NVSS catalogue at 1.4 GHz Look for common sources in the GB6 catalogue at 4.85 GHz in total intensity for estimating the spectral index distribution Calculate the radio polarisation degree:  1GHz 2 %

Radio Sources: Recipe Study polarised sources from the NVSS catalogue at 1.4 GHz Look for common sources in the GB6 catalogue at 4.85 GHz in total intensity for estimating the spectral index distribution Calculate the radio polarisation degree:  1GHz 2 % Check on higher frequencies (up to 10 GHz, Mack et al. 2002) and correct for Faraday depolarisation:  10GHz 3   1GHz (steep),  10GHz 1-3   1GHz (flat spectra)

Radio Sources: Recipe Tucci et al. 2003, Mesa, Baccigalupi et al. A&A 2002 Study polarised sources from the NVSS catalogue at 1.4 GHz Look for common sources in the GB6 catalogue at 4.85 GHz in total intensity for estimating the spectral index distribution Calculate the radio polarisation degree:  1GHz 2 % Check on higher frequencies (up to 10 GHz, Mack et al. 2002) and correct for Faraday depolarisation:  10GHz 3   1GHz (steep),  10GHz 1-3   1GHz (flat spectra) Extrapolate the NVSS polarised population to the microwave band using the recipe by Toffolatti (1998) or applying the estimated spectral index distribution and correcting for steepening at 15 GHz (Taylor et al. 2001)

Radio Sources: CMB Contamination 30 GHz 100 GHz Tucci et al. 2003, Mesa et al. A&A 2002

Radio Sources: Perspects Analyse ATCA Polarised Sources at 18.5 GHz Ricci et al. in preparation Measure Microwave Sources Polarisation Degree Check Faraday Depolarisation with Radio Band Investigate the Physics of the Sources Improve CMB Contamination Estimate

CMB & Synchrotron Polarisation

Synchrotron: Giardino et al Analyse the Haslam radio Synchrotron template assuming theoretical polarisation emission Analyse low & medium Galactic latitude data (Duncan 1997, 1999, Uyaniker 1999) Extrapolate Haslam to small angles and convolve with radio polarisation angle statistics from D97, D99, U99 Extrapolate to Microwave Build Q & U templates assuming random polarisation angle

Synchrotron: Tucci et al. 2000, Baccigalupi et al Analyse low & medium Galactic latitudes data (Duncan 1997, 1999, Uyaniker 1999) Extrapolate to Microwave as Giardino (2002) rescaling power to match Baccigalupi (2001) Take Brouw & Spoelstra (1976) as representative of the degree and sub-degree angular scales Check depolarisation with known rotation measures and removing bright HII regions on the Galactic plane

Synchrotron: E & B CMB Contamination

Synchrotron: TE CMB Contamination

S , -3.2 <  < –2.5 Synchrotron: Non-Rigid Frequency Scaling Giardino et al. 2002

Synchrotron: Riddles Are our predictions reliable? What is the structure of the spectral index on degree and sub-degree sngular scales? What is the statistics of the polarisation angle? Why in Duncan et al. (1997, 1999) and Uyaniker (1999) the signal does not depend on latitude up to b=20 o ?

Component Separation Polarisation Non-blind: Tegmark Efstathiou 1996, Bouchet & Gispert 1998, Hobson et al. 1998, Stolyarov et al Blind: Baccigalupi et al. 2000, Delabrouille et al. 2002, Maino et al. 2002, Delabrouille, Cardoso, Patanchon 2003 Data: Barreiro et al. 2003, Maino et al Polarisation: Baccigalupi et al. 2003

Pixels or ModesComponents Frequencies Components Experience the Magic

Components Frequencies Pixels or Modes Experience the Magic

Frequencies Pixels or Modes Experience the Magic

Frequencies Pixels or Modes Experience the Magic

217, 353 GHz, dust + CMB CMB recovery OUTIN

OUTIN 217, 353 GHz, dust + CMB dust recovery

Noiseless, 70 & 100 GHz Uniform Synchrotron Spectral Index Component Separation in Polarisation

Noiseless, 70 & 100 GHz Non-uniform Synchrotron Spectral Index

Component Separation in Polarisation The effect of non-uniform spectral index

Noisy, 70 & 100 GHz, Non-Uniform Synchrotron Spectral Index S/N=0.5 Crash at S/N=0.2 Crash at S/N=0.5 S/N=0.5 Component Separation in Polarisation Games

Is that so easy? Simulations indicate that Planck is sensitive to T/S=30% in presence of foregrounds Systematics: beam asymmetry, noise sky and spectral distribution. (Hu et al. 2003) Foreground knowledge still poor

Conclusions CMB Contaminations from Radio Sources: under control CMB Contamination to E and TE: under control CMB Contamination to B: significant on all sky New data analysis techniques make at least conceivable to face such a contamination