Research Ethics & New Investigators Melody Lin, Ph.D. Dec. 12, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

VCOM Conflict of Interest Policy Overview of Financial Conflict of Interest Related to Research December 4, 2013.
Criteria For Approval 45 CFR CFR Minimized risks Reasonable risk/benefit ratio Equitable subject selection Informed consent process Informed.
IRB Member Conflict of Interest Presentation for IRB Members.
The Institutional Review Board. What is an IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Protecting the Privacy of Family Members in Survey and Pedigree Research Jeffrey R. Botkin, MD, MPH University of Utah.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
THE ETHICS OF HUMAN PARTICIPANT RESEARCH Office for Research Protections The Pennsylvania State University.
Subject Selection and Recruitment David Wendler Department of Clinical Bioethics NIH, USA.
Use of Children as Research Subjects What information should be provided for an FP7 ethical review?
John Naim, PhD Director Clinical Trials Research Unit
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.
Human Investigation Committee  Is it research?  If yes, does it involve human subjects?  If yes, can it be exempt?  If no, will a Request for.
Ethics in research involving human subjects
Ethical Issues in Research
Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCPs)
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
1 Wheaton College INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB)
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
Research Conflicts of Interest: Identifying and Minimizing COI from the Perspectives of Sponsors, Faculty and the IRB Research Conflicts of Interest: Identifying.
Regulatory Authority Governing Clinical Trials Anthony J. Minisi, MD Director, Cardiology Fellowship Program.
Glenn Rivard, Department of Justice 02/XI/22 Research Involving Humans Federal Governance.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Farida Lada October 16, 2013
Ethics In Research: Duties, Decisions and Dilemmas Colleen M. Gallagher, PhD, FACHE Chief & Executive Director Section of Integrated Ethics Associate Professor,
ORO Reviews: Frequent Findings Related to IRBs Bob Brooks Associate Director Research Compliance Education and Policy VHA Office of Research Oversight.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
 Tracy L. LeGrow, Psy.D. Associate Professor Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine.
Planned Emergency Research Exception from Informed Consent Requirements September 2007.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ARE HERE TO STAY: PROTECTING SCIENCE FROM BIAS Susan S. Ellenberg, Ph.D. Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA Boston,
Privacy and Confidentiality. Definitions n Privacy - having control over the extent, timing, and circumstances of sharing oneself (physically, behaviorally,
Special Consideration in Public Health Practice & Research Delia Wolf, MD, JD, MSCI Associate Dean, Regulatory Affairs and Regulatory Compliance Lecturer,
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
Ethics in Research: APA code & Review Boards. Definition the study of proper action Morality right versus wrong it is the shared responsibility of the.
Retha Britz Copyright 2013 All rights reserved for this presentation 1 Other important considerations for RECs Retha Britz.
Human Subject Protection Research Imperatives. History World War II - Nuremberg Tuskegee Study Belmont Report Modern Problems - Inadequacy of “Good Intentions”
Chapter 5 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
Conflicts of Interest in the Academy: Recognition and Management Dave Broome Senior Associate General Counsel NC State University 20 March 2002.
AAHRPP ACCREDITATION (Association for the Accreditation of Human Protection Programs)
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
$100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 Terms Clinical Trial Facts.
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
Regulatory requirements: children, assent, and consent waivers and waiver of documentation Bob Craig, 2007.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
M6728 Ethics in Research Informed Consent/IRBs Reporting Research Results.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Second Annual Medical Research Summit March 25, 2002 Washington, D.C.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
8 th November 2007 Research: ethics and research governance Rossana Dowsett Research and Regional Development Division [Pre Award Support] University of.
Chapter 2: Ethical Issues in Program Evaluation. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Federal mandate for IRBs –Concern during 1970s about unethical research.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin A McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Susan Sonne, PharmD, BCPP Chair, MUSC IRB II
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Research Compliance and Institutional Review Boards
Patricia M. Alt, Ph.D. Dept. of Health Science Towson University
The HIPAA Privacy Rule: Implications for Medical Research
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
Human Participants Research
Research, Experimentation, & Clinical Trials
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Research Ethics & New Investigators Melody Lin, Ph.D. Dec. 12, 2012

Objectives Research Ethics & HSP Research Ethics & HSP Pharmaceutical Incentives Pharmaceutical Incentives Conflict of Interest Conflict of Interest Tissue Issues Tissue Issues

Research Ethics Definition Definition A set of guidelines to assist the researcher conduct ethical research A set of guidelines to assist the researcher conduct ethical research

Research Ethics Ethical concerns Ethical concerns Relationship Between Society and Science Relationship Between Society and Science Professional Issues Professional Issues Protection of Research Subjects Protection of Research Subjects

Relationship Between Society and Science Society Society Government funding research Government funding research Congressional influence on which studies are funded Congressional influence on which studies are funded Corporate funding research Corporate funding research Culture Culture Scientist ’ s own culturally based interests Scientist ’ s own culturally based interests

Professional Issues Scientific Misconduct Scientific Misconduct Fabricating, Falsifying or Plagiarizing (FFP) Fabricating, Falsifying or Plagiarizing (FFP) proposing proposing performing performing reviewing reviewing reporting reporting

Protection of Research Subjects Right and welfare of the research subjects ought not be disregarded in favor of science Right and welfare of the research subjects ought not be disregarded in favor of science

Trust Researchers maintains a relationship of trust with the subjects Researchers maintains a relationship of trust with the subjects Compromised Compromised Deception Deception Confidentiality not maintained Confidentiality not maintained

Monitoring Research Sponsor Sponsor Regulatory agencies Regulatory agencies IRB IRB DSMB DSMB Public interest groups Public interest groups

Sponsor Responsibilities Monitor the conduct of the research

Monitors Check the work of the EC or IRB Check the work of the EC or IRB Make sure the protocol is followed Make sure the protocol is followed Verify data Verify data Check safety issues Check safety issues

Regulatory Agencies Government agencies have oversight responsibilities Government agencies have oversight responsibilities FDA monitors clinical trials FDA monitors clinical trials

Pharmaceutical Incentive $$$ Recruit & retain subjects vs ss. Vulnerability Recruit & retain subjects vs ss. Vulnerability May stretch inclusive/exclusive criteria May stretch inclusive/exclusive criteria Influence professional judgment Influence professional judgment Finder’s fee Finder’s fee

Physician Investigators Prospects of Peer Prospects of Peer Recognition Recognition Publication Publication Financial gain Financial gain Economic incentives may create pressures Economic incentives may create pressures Compromise Compromise Appearance of compromise Appearance of compromise Integrity Integrity Research Research Researcher Researcher

Issues need Address Respect Respect Beneficence Beneficence Justice Justice

Conflict of Interest Situation in which the integrity of academic activity, especially research, may be, or may be perceived to be, compromised by financial or other interests.

Conflicts of Interest vs

Government Scientist Pleads Guilty Senior Alzheimer’s Researcher Admits Taking $285,000 In Fees, Expenses A senior government scientist working in Alzheimer’s disease research pleaded guilty today to accepting $285,000 in consulting fees and travel expenses from the world’s largest drug manufacturer without proper approval from his bosses. As part of his agreement with federal prosecutors, Pearson “Trey” Sunderland III, chief of the geriatric psychiatry branch of the National Institute of Mental Health, which is part of the National Institutes of Health, will be sentenced to two years of supervised probation and must forfeit $300,000. Baltimore Sun December 8, 2006 By Matthew Dolan

Sources of Potential Conflict  Consultant  Speaker  Stock or Other Equity  Management Position  Income from Royalties or Licensing Fees  Board or Scientific Advisory Board Member  Gift  Relationship with Competitor  Loans (To or From)  Family Member has Relationship

Does conflict of interest present a legitimate concern? Financial interests steer the Research activity to the point where it is compromised Financial interests steer the Research activity to the point where it is compromised Financial interest gives the appearance that the research activity may be compromised Financial interest gives the appearance that the research activity may be compromised Maintaining full research integrity would compromise the business plan and/or require excess resources Maintaining full research integrity would compromise the business plan and/or require excess resources

What’s the worst that could happen?

Jesse Gelsinger

Spectrum of Conflicts

Financial Disclosure Not meant to censor investigators from participation Not meant to censor investigators from participation May reduce likelihood of investigators biasing results of their clinical studies May reduce likelihood of investigators biasing results of their clinical studies

Financial Disclosure Questions of concern:  Does compensation to the investigator/study staff affect the value of the study outcome?  Is there proprietary interest by investigators/study staff in tested product?  Is there significant equity interest in sponsor of the study?

Financial Disclosure  Is there significant payments by sponsor of other sorts  Grant to fund ongoing research  Compensation in the form of equipment  Retainers for ongoing consultation or honoraria Disclosure statements also apply to investigator/study staff spouse and dependent children. Disclosure statements also apply to investigator/study staff spouse and dependent children.

Tissue Issues Collection of new samples vs. use of existing samples Collection of new samples vs. use of existing samples Plans for linking samples to medical records, identifiable information Plans for linking samples to medical records, identifiable information Use/disclosure of research results Use/disclosure of research results Informed consent Informed consent Adequate disclosure Adequate disclosure Prospective Prospective Existing, stored samples Existing, stored samples

Classification of samples Not identified Not identified No “human subject” if truly not identified No “human subject” if truly not identified How much clinical and demographic data can be retained How much clinical and demographic data can be retained Identified Identified Directly (name/ID) Directly (name/ID) Coded/linkable Coded/linkable

Risks of using identified data Disclosure To third parties To third parties Potential for breach of privacy and confidentiality Potential for breach of privacy and confidentiality To patients/subjects To patients/subjects Privacy intrusion from undesired contact Privacy intrusion from undesired contact Harm from disclosure of results Harm from disclosure of results

Research design to reduce these risks Maximize confidentiality Maximize confidentiality The “least necessary” or “least identifiable” dataset The “least necessary” or “least identifiable” dataset Use of intermediary to hold link between code and identifiers Use of intermediary to hold link between code and identifiers Obtain maximal legal and practical protections Obtain maximal legal and practical protections e.g., data placed on computers not linked to the Internet e.g., data placed on computers not linked to the Internet Develop approach for re-contacting subjects Develop approach for re-contacting subjects Clinical relevance or value Clinical relevance or value Adequate counseling Adequate counseling

Informed consent for research on human biological materials If/when? If/when? For prospective collection For prospective collection Maybe for existing samples, depending on: Maybe for existing samples, depending on: Identifiability Identifiability Adequacy of prior consent Adequacy of prior consent Setting in which collected (research vs. clinical) Setting in which collected (research vs. clinical) How? How? Extent of detail Extent of detail Frequency Frequency

Research Conducted with unidentified samples is not human subjects research and is not regulated by the Common Rule.” Conducted with unidentified samples is not human subjects research and is not regulated by the Common Rule.” “Using coded or identified samples requires the consent, unless the criteria for a consent waiver have been satisfied.” “Using coded or identified samples requires the consent, unless the criteria for a consent waiver have been satisfied.” NBAC (1999)

Waiver of informed consent for use of existing samples (see 45 CFR ) Protocol must pose minimal risk Protocol must pose minimal risk Determination of whether it might be desirable to communicate directly with patients Determination of whether it might be desirable to communicate directly with patients If yes, then > minimal risk, and consent should be obtained If yes, then > minimal risk, and consent should be obtained Cannot adversely affect rights and welfare Cannot adversely affect rights and welfare Impracticability of obtaining consent Impracticability of obtaining consent From some or all participants From some or all participants

New Physician Investigators Ethical principles Ethical principles Right, safety & welfare as paramount Right, safety & welfare as paramount Do no harm Do no harm