SWASFAA Conference December 10, 2009 Gallegos Legal Group Yolanda R. Gallegos.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Miscellaneous Topics Program Integrity. Evaluating the Validity of High School Diplomas.
Advertisements

Ability to Benefit (ATB) Program Integrity Final Rule.
High School Diplomas and the Ability-to-Benefit Alternative Carney McCullough U.S. Department of Education 1.
Deborah Agee & Gloria DeLeon Assistant Directors Student Financial Services The University of Texas at Austin.
Satisfactory Academic Progress: Does your Policy make the Grade? Presented by David Bartnicki Federal Training Officer
Final Regulations Published 10/29/10.  Repeating Coursework  Ability to Benefit rules  Validity of High School Diploma  Gainful Employment  Definition.
Michigan National Guard
Session #37 A Student Eligibility Toolkit: New Guidance for Decisions You Make Marty Guthrie Carney McCullough U.S. Department of Education.
© 2013 Cooley LLP, Five Palo Alto Square, 3000 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA The content of this packet is an introduction to Cooley LLP’s capabilities.
National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators The following is a presentation prepared for: MASFAA Indianapolis, IN October 6 – 9, 2013.
2011 NJASFAA FALL CONFERENCE DANIELLE MASON, SR. NATIONAL DIR OF F/A LINCOLN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES EVELYNNE BLATT, DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL AID UNION COUNTY.
Program Integrity’s Greatest Hits Presenters: Mary Heid and Matt McCreary.
 Institutional Eligibility  Program Eligibility  Student Eligibility  They all work together to create a framework for which financial aid is built.
Jamie A. Malone | Nov U.S. Department of Education 2012 Fall Conference Foreign Schools Satisfactory Academic Progress Session 38.
Satisfactory Academic Progress –Managing the Components Qualitative (grade-based) and Quantitative (time-based) measures.
New Aid Officer Training Cathy Crawley Georgia College & State University.
STUDENT FINANCIAL AID UPDATE University Seminar Instructors Workshop
Written Agreements Between Schools WVASFAA Conference April 1, 2015 Consortiums & Contracts: Craig D. Rorie, Training Officer Federal Student Aid US Department.
Dealing with Modular Courses and Other Unique Scheduling Options Carol Egan PHEAA Compliance Services.
Compliance Concerns: R2T Spring Conference WASFAA Federal Issues Committee Susan Johnson, UW-Whitewater Kristina Klemens, UW-Parkside Julie Waldvogel-Leitner,
Basics of Satisfactory Academic Progress
Clock-to-Credit Hour Conversion 1. No Conversion Required - §668.8(k)(1) An undergraduate GE program may use credit hours as defined in §600.2 without.
Satisfactory Academic Progress Standards Claire “Micki” Roemer School Services and Training Federal Student Aid Dan Klock Federal Student Aid.
2015 PACE/USO TDN Conference Angela Smith, Training Officer U.S. Department of Education Return of Title IV Funds – The Basics.
TASFAA Annual Conference 2010 Galveston, Texas. So What? The Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, requires an institution of higher education participating.
Regulatory Update – Program Integrity Presented by: Betsy Mayotte Presented to: ANZFAA Conference via Skype Date: September, 2010.
Carney McCullough and Greg Martin | Dec U.S. Department of Education 2014 FSA Training Conference for Financial Aid Professionals Calculating Pell.
The Federal Pell Grant Cynthia Thornton Trevor Summers Training Officers Dallas Regional Office.
Session 6 ACG & National SMART Grant Update: Transfer Student, Rigorous Secondary School Programs of Study, and Academic Major Issues Sophia McArdle Office.
Session 21 Requirements and Suggested Practices for ACG and National SMART Grants Sophia McArdle.
Session 39 The Big Picture Linda Burkhardt Kevin Campbell.
Session #29 Foreign Schools R2T4 Greg Martin Byron Scott U.S. Department of Education.
Return of Title IV Funds R2T4 NYSFAAA REGION VII PRESENTER DEBRA HANSEN STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY.
Session FF-02 The Big Picture Michael Roberts Angela Smith U.S. Department of Education.
Chief Academic Officers Minneapolis, MN June 19,
Jeff Baker Federal Student Aid U.S. Department of Education Federal Update October 26, 2012.
Federal Update Janet Dodson. July 1 The measure prohibits first disbursements of Federal Family Education Loan Program loans after June 30. Allocate $61.
National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators Presents … © NASFAA 2011 Return of Title IV Funds.
Jeff Baker U.S. Department of Education 2012 Software Developers Webinar #3 Policy Update.
David Bartnicki ; PELL GRANT ********** “Two is Better than One” HIGHLIGHTS.
Hot Off the Press The Negotiated Rulemaking Process and Final Regulations Brendan Furey American Student Assistance Zack Goodwin Harvard University.
MASFAP CSU/UC/CCC Federal Update Jeff Baker March 25, 2011.
New Aid Officer Training Satisfactory Academic Progress Alicia Scott Atlanta Metropolitan College.
Year Round Pell Grant – Credit Hour Schools Presented by Melissa Ibañez.
1 Two Pell Grants In One Award Year Jeff Baker U.S. Department of Education Session #29.
Session 107 Study Abroad Issues Marianna Deeken Federal Student Aid Anthony Jones Office of Postsecondary Education.
U.S. Department of Education Federal Update Jeff Baker Federal Student Aid November 9,
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Program Integrity Final Rule.
Title IV Administration for Clock-Hour Programs MAFAA 2012 Spring Conference.
Federal Update Jeff Baker Dan Madzelan U.S. Department of Education 1.
44 th NYSFAAA Conference “On Track for Excellence” Satisfactory Academic Progress Thomas J. Dalton, Excelsior College & Curt Gaume, Canisius College.
APOLLO GROUP, INC. 1 Bob Collins, VP Student Financial Aid Indianapolis, IN June 11, 2010 CAAHE - Financial Aid in Changing Times Apollo Federal Relations.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Notices of Proposed Rulemaking Carol Lindsey – TG, Vice President, Policy and Compliance Joe Pettibon, Assistant Provost, Texas A&M University.
Return of Title IV (R2T4) The basics of R2T4 plus a look at the rules for programs offered in modules.
Satisfactory Academic Progress To be eligible for FSA funds, a student must make Satisfactory Academic Progress, and your school must have a reasonable.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Roundtable
The following is a presentation prepared for:
Chief Academic Officers Minneapolis, MN June 19, 2012
2016–17 Return of Title IV Funds A NASFAA Authorized Event Presented by [Name of Presenter/Association] [Location] [Date], 2016.
PRASFAA 2009 Fall Conference
Director of Financial Assistance Services
Excelsior Scholarship Program
Assistant Director of Financial Aid
Monitoring Satisfactory Academic Progress
MASFAA Conference November , 2015
It’s Time to Light the Lights 2016 ILASFAA Annual Conference
Clock Hour Basics – Administering Title IV Programs
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP)
Today’s Topics “Pay-As-You Earn” Loan Repayment Programs
Presentation transcript:

SWASFAA Conference December 10, 2009 Gallegos Legal Group Yolanda R. Gallegos

Statute Negotiated Rulemaking between ED and Public Negotiators Proposed Regulations Public Submits Comments to ED ED Issues Final Regulations Final Regulations Become Effective 5/26/20162

Effective for 3-year period ending FY /26/20163

 Over 40% in one year = loss of FFEL & Direct;  3 consecutive years at or over threshold =, loss of FFEL, Direct, & Pell;  Loss of eligibility of FY in which school notified and for next 2 FYs;  Loss of eligibility not in effect while request for adjustment or appeal pending;  Panoply of appeals still available. 5/26/20164

OLD LAW  Statutory threshold set at 25% for FYs after 1993 HEOA  Statutory threshold increased to 30% for FY 2012 and thereafter 5/26/20165

OLD LAW  Counted loans that defaulted before end of fiscal year following FY in which students entered repayment (2-yr period). HEOA  Counts loans that default before end of second FY following FY in which students entered repayment (3-yr period). 5/26/20166

Institution TypeProjected 4-Year Rate Projected 3-Year Rate Current 2-Year Rate Public9.5%7.2% (+53%)4.7% Private (non-profit) (+57%)3.0 Proprietary (+94%)8.6 Less than 2-year (+108%)8.9 2-to 3-year (+97%)9.9 4-year or more (+88%)7.3 5/26/20167

When CDR for FY 2009, 2010, and 2011 are all issued. 5/26/20168

9 No. of Yrs. Considered In CDR FY Student Entered Repayment * Threshold Percentage Yr. CDR Released

 December 7, 2009:  ED publishes projected “unofficial trial” CDRs based on 3- year methodology for FYs 2005, 2006, and  Available only to schools:  December 14, 2009:  ED make these projected rates available to public  Will publish on website separate from website for official CDRs to avoid confusion: No benefits or sanctions associated with these unofficial rates. 5/26/201610

Award of Pell from Two Scheduled Awards in One Award Year 5/26/201611

 A student is entitled to a second Pell Grant to permit the student to “accelerate the student’s progress” toward a degree or certificate if student is enrolled:  at least a half-time basis;  for a period of more than one academic year, or more than two semesters or an equivalent period of time;  during a single award year; and  in a degree or certificate program 5/26/201612

What does “to accelerate the student’s progress” mean? 5/26/201613

NON-FED NEGOTIATORS Even part-time students should be able to get second Pell where courses cross over to second academic year within one award year. US DEP’T OF EDUCATION Student must complete one full academic year’s worth of credits of first academic year before becoming eligible for second Pell. Special circumstances waiver. 5/26/201614

 Student Enrolled: ▪ On at least half-time basis; ▪ For credit or clock hours that are attributable to the student’s second academic year; ▪ During a single award year; and ▪ In a degree or certificate program 5/26/201615

* Assumption of 24-credit academic year 16 Sept. 2010TermJan TermMay 2011 Term 6 credits12 credits $1250$2500$1250+ $1250 for second Pell

AWARD YEAR  To Eligible Students as Determined by:  NPRM language  Final regulation requirements; OR  Statutory Requirements Only: ▪ Enrolled in certificate, associate, or baccalaureate program; AND ▪ Enrolled at least half-time at time any funds from the Second Scheduled Award are awarded AWARD YEAR AND ON  To Eligible Students as Determined by Final Regulations:  Enrolled in certificate, associate, or baccalaureate program;  Enrolled on at least half-time;  Enrolled in credit or clock hours that are attributable to student’s second academic year. 5/26/201617

What to Expect 5/26/201618

Under Consideration  Retakes: Eliminate ability of students to obtain Title IV funds for course re-takes of courses students did not fail.  Increments: Increase frequency of SAP review from every academic year or half the published length of program. Require each increment to include schedule with minimum percentage of amount of work required to successfully complete within MTF.  Successful Completion: Add provision clarifying that SAP standards must lead to successful completion of program within maximum timeframe.  C Average: Require “C” average not just of students in 2-year and longer programs, but of all students. 5/26/201619

Under Consideration  Probationary Period: Define as time period after student has successfully appealed SAP status and require student to be making SAP at end of probationary period.  Warning Periods: Define as period during which student may continue to receive Title IV despite not making SAP. Limited to time period shorter than regulatory minimum for SAP increments.  Appeals: Require student to show “special circumstances” and what has changed that will allow progress by end of next increment.  Graduate Programs: May implement provisions directed to graduate students specifically. E.g., require graduate institution to define “maximum timeframe” in accordance with the length of the academic program. 5/26/201620

Under Consideration  ED is considering eliminating safe harbors;  ED takes position that all 12 safe harbors, at least indirectly, compensate individuals for success in securing enrollment;  ED wants to broaden applicability of prohibition to include not only those involved with recruitment, admission, or award of Title IV, but also to those involved with award of any student financial assistance. 5/26/201621

Under Consideration  ED Considering Implementing Standards for Assessing Whether Employment “Gainful”:  OPTION 1: Reasonable Relationship Between Cost of Program and Expected Earnings: Cost of Program Is Less Than 3x Value Added  OPTION 2: Debt/Income Ratio: Student’s Starting Annual Income Adequate to Repay Average Debt Service Obligation For Program and Cover Living Expenses 5/26/201622

Under Consideration PRESENT RULE  Institution Required to Take Attendance if :  “Outside entity,” such as accrediting or State agency so requires. RULE UNDER CONSIDERATION  Institution Required to Take Attendance if:  “Outside entity,” such as accrediting or State agency so requires;  Institution itself requires instructor to take attendance; or;  Institution or outside entity has requirement that students in program demonstrate class attendance in program or part of program and compliance can be determined only by taking attendance or comparable process. 5/26/201623

PRESENT GUIDANCE  If student completes at least one course in module- based term, student is not considered withdrawn even if student fails to attend all modules. RULE UNDER CONSIDERATION  If a student withdraws without completing all the courses for which the student is enrolled or expected to attend in the them, the student is considered a withdrawal, regardless of whether the student has completed any courses. 5/26/201624

PRESENT RULES  Institutions must verify some or all of 5 items, as specified by ED.  Institutions are required to verify applicant information of at least 30% of Title IV applicants  Institutions must require students to verify any information on FAFSA used to calculate EFC that it has reason to believe is inaccurate. RULES UNDER CONSIDERATION  Items to be verified not limited to present 5 items; ED will publish items subject to verification annually in Fed. Reg.  Increase limit on % of students that must be verified.  Institutions must require students to verify any information on FAFSA that is has reason to believe is inaccurate. 5/26/201625

PRESENT RULE  Institutions may rely on self-certification that student has high school diploma or its recognized equivalent unless school has policy to require copy for admission. RULE UNDER CONSIDERATION  Requires institutions to maintain list of secondary schools in following categories:  Secondary schools that institution has determined from past experience or research are acceptable for Title IV purposes;  Secondary schools that institution has determined are not acceptable for Title IV purposes; and  Secondary schools that institution has preliminarily determined are acceptable for Title IV purposes, but must make final determination within 90 days of preliminary determination. 5/26/201626

PRESENT RULE  Provides no definition of “credit hour;” relies on accrediting agencies to assess sufficiency. RULE UNDER CONSIDERATION  Defines “credit hour” as:  Carnegie Unit= 1 hr classroom or direct faculty instruction + 2 hrs out-of –class work +approx 15 weeks (or wks for 1 quarter- hour of credit); or  Academic work comparable to Carnegie Unit;  If Carnegie Unit cannot be applied, institution must: ▪ Establish equivalencies based on amount of amount of academic work, learning outcomes, evidence of achievement; and ▪ Establish compliance with accrediting agency and State standards. 5/26/201627

PRESENT RULE  To be Title IV eligible, institution must be “legally authorized to provide an educational program beyond secondary education in the State in which the institution is located.” RULE UNDER CONSIDERATION  To be “legally authorized” by a State, institution must have:  Charter, license, or other document issued by State that conveys authority to operate postsecondary education and grant degrees in State;  Action and written documentation by State agency that authorizes, licenses, or otherwise approves institution to establish and operate non-degree program and postsecondary training; OR  Reciprocal agreement or documented relationship between 2 or more State agencies that approves postsecondary education, including distance education programs if main campus is located in another State. 34 C.F.R , & C.F.R

PRESENT RULE  Calls for a Subpart G LST proceeding for “substantial misrepresentation” to:  Enrolled or prospective student;  Family of enrolled or prospective student  Regarding:  Nature of educational program;  Financial charges; or  Employability of graduates. RULE UNDER CONSIDERATION  Expands consequences from LST to also include restrictions or denials of participation;  Applies to “misrepresentation” instead of “substantial misrepresentation;”  Expands targets of misrepresentation to include accrediting and state agencies;  Expands kinds of misrepresentation to include misrepresentation of advertising, promotional materials, or marketing or sales of courses or programs of instruction. 5/26/201629

Under Consideration  Would add successful completion of 6 semester or quarter credits or [225 or 180] clock hours in certificate or degree program as alternative to high school diploma, GED, ATB, “state process,” or home schooling;  Requires ATB publishers to:  Have process to identify and follow up on test score irregularities;  Take action to decertify test administrators if test administered improperly;  Report to ED names of test administrators it decertifies and actions taken resulting from test score analyses.  Requires test administrators be independent and approved by ED;  Requires tests publishers to:  Show compliance with Section 504 of Rehabilitation Act.  Report to Secretary credible information that test has been compromised;  Report to ED’s OIG credible information that a test administrator may have engaged in fraud or other criminal misconduct. 5/26/201630

PRESENT RULE  Agreements between 2 eligible institutions:  Require no accrediting agency approval or review; and  No limit on amount of instruction that may be contracted out.  No specific notification to students required. RULE UNDER CONSIDERATION  Agreements between 2 eligible institutions:  Require accrediting agency determination that arrangement meets accrediting agency standards if: ▪ More than 50% of the program is contracted out.  Agreements with eligible or ineligible institutions would requires institutions to disclose to students:  The portion of the program that the home institution is not providing;  The name of the institution that is providing that portion;  The method of delivery of that portion of the program;  The authorization of the institution to offer the program in the format being provided. 5/26/201631

PRESENT RULE  Requires Title IV funds to be disbursed on a payment period basis. RULE UNDER CONSIDERATION  Requires all Title IV funds to be disbursed to student for payment period on or before first day of class of payment period unless:  For FFEL and Direct, loan period is one payment period;  For Perkins, SEOG, Pell, TEACH, ACG, and SMART, if the institution makes multiple disbursements in one payment period, the first disbursement must be direct payment to student sufficient for student to pay for books and supplies. 5/26/201632

Gallegos Legal Group 315 Eighth Street, SW Albuquerque, NM (505) (505) (fax) Yolanda R. Gallegos