Enhancing the Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service A Program to Develop A Low-Flow/Stage Database for Selected NWS Forecast Points in the Upper Colorado.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBRFC Peak Flow Forecast Webinar April 9th, 2014 Greg Smith & Ashley Nielson These slides: Presentation are available.
Advertisements

NOAA’s NWS and the USGS: Partnering to Meet America’s Water Information Needs Ernie Wells Hydrologic Services Division NOAA National Weather Service May.
Streamgaging Task Force Final Report Advisory Committee on Water Information Herndon, Virginia April 3, 2002.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mid-West Electric Consumers Association September 16, 2014 Corps of Engineers US Army Missouri River Mainstem.
Climate Change Effects and Assessment of Adaptation Potential in the Russian Federation. Julia Dobrolyubova Expert on Climate Change and Kyoto Protocol.
Negotiating our Water Future in Colorado & the Colorado River Basin Colorado’s Water Plan & the Colorado Basin Plan February 2015 Update Presentation developed.
Source: Bureau of Reclamation Diverse communities making beneficial use of all available water Agriculture Agriculture Municipal and Domestic Municipal.
Enhancing the Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service: A Program to Develop A Low-Flow/Stage Database for Selected NWS Forecast Points in the Upper Colorado.
Defining the Status Quo. Definition of Status Quo The “Status Quo” describes existing or anticipated conditions of a water resources system if policies,
Negotiating our Water Future in Colorado & the Colorado River Basin Colorado’s Water Plan & the Colorado Basin Plan February 2015 Update Presentation developed.
Clarence Cannon Dam and Mark Twain Lake Flood Control – damage reduction Navigation Hydropower Recreation Water supply Fish and Wildlife Conservation.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® St. Louis District Low Water Operations Russell Errett Water Control St. Louis District February 2013.
Carly Jerla Bureau of Reclamation Michael Hayes National Drought Mitigation Center University of Nebraska-Lincoln Risk Assessment Scoping Workshop for.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® USACE – ACF Operations Bailey Crane Water Management USACE, Mobile District.
Mid-Range Streamflow Forecasts for River Management in the Puget Sound Region Richard Palmer Matthew Wiley Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources: Is it an Issue for Emergency Managers? Richard Palmer Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University.
Kansas City Industrial Council Hydrology and Hydraulics
June 23, 2011 Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center 1 NOAA / CBRFC Water forecasts and data in support of western water management.
Evaluation of Potential Performance Measures for the Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service Gary A. Wick NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory On Rotational.
Drought and the Central Valley Project August 2014.
How Much Do We Have Left? Coming to Terms With the Colorado River Water Availability Study Annual Colorado Water Workshop July 21, 2010 Ben Harding – AMEC.
Bureau of Reclamation Overview Christopher Cutler Deputy Chief Boulder Canyon Operations Office.
National Weather Service North Central River Forecast Center Mississippi River Forecast Procedure.
One Corps Serving The Army and the Nation Tulsa District The Tulsa District Corps of Engineers and Its Cooperative Partners.
USGS Water Resource Monitoring and Assessment Activities Salinity and other topics presented to the Garfield County Energy Advisory Board Dec. 1, 2005.
Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium Tempe, AZ September 28, 2011 Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center : A Year of Extremes.
Future of the Columbia River Treaty A British Columbia Perspective 2014 PNWA Summer Conference Coeur d’Alene June 23, 2014 Kathy Eichenberger B.C. Ministry.
U.S. Geological Survey Streamgaging Program U.S. Geological Survey Streamgaging Program J. Michael Norris Coordinator, National Streamflow.
National Weather Service Des Moines, IA National Weather Service Des Moines, IA Iowa Weather & Flood Outlook February 10, 2010 Jeff Johnson & Jeff Zogg.
Conservation Action Committee April 17, 2014 Drought Watch 2014 Lake Oroville, 2014.
California Data Exchange Center Hydrologic Database System
HIC MEETING July 12, 2005 Streamflow Regulation Accounting by Tom Gurss Missouri Basin River Forecast Center National Weather Service Pleasant Hill, MO.
IMPROVING MILLERTON LAKE FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS TO INCREASE WATER SUPPLY Mr. Antonio M. Buelna, P.E. Mr. Douglas DeFlitch Ms. Katie Lee October 29, 2009.
Hydrology in the National Weather Service Mark Fuchs Service Hydrologist National Weather Service St. Louis, MO Presentation to local Media Partners November.
CORPS OF ENGINEERS NWS Meeting Tallahassee, FL, July 19, 2006.
Drought Alert System for the Upper Trinity River Basin NWS/TVA Meeting October 24, 2006 Ben Weiger, Hydrologic Services Branch National Weather Service.
Managing Western Water as Climate Changes Denver, CO February 20-21, 2008.
National Weather Service Des Moines, IA National Weather Service Des Moines, IA Mid American Energy Spring Flood Outlook February 16, 2010 Jeff Zogg.
NE Drought Conditions CARC Update: April 2011 Mark Svoboda and Brian Fuchs National Drought Mitigation Center University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Presented by: Diane Cooper NWS - Southern Region Headquarters.
Advisory Committee on Water Information Streamgaging Task Force Charge: Determine the streamflow information needs of the Nation, identify the optimal.
Advisory Committee on Water Information Streamgaging Task Force Charge: Determine the streamflow information needs of the Nation, identify the optimal.
HYDROLOGIC DATA. BACKGROUND Analysis and synthesis of data is required to perform any hydrologic computation. The engineer needs to: Identify and define.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Inter-Agency Coordination BLM PILOT VERNAL & GLENWOOD SPRINGS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers & U.S. Bureau of Land.
CBRFC March Peak Flow Forecast Webinar March 11, 2014 Greg Smith & Brenda Alcorn These slides: Presentation.
Stream Gages CBRFC Stakeholder Forum July 31, 2012.
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE
RFC Climate Requirements 2 nd NOAA Climate NWS Dialogue Meeting January 4, 2006 Kevin Werner.
CANADIAN COLUMBIA RIVER FORUM U.S. Flood Control and Operational Perspective Jim Barton, Chief of Corps of Engineers Columbia Basin Water Management Division.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mark Twain Lake Water Control Manual Update Joan Stemler St. Louis District Water Control.
Design of meteorological data networks Dr. Anil Kumar Lohani National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee India Hydro-Met Network Design Workshop, April 6-11,
ASTRA Applied Science and Technology for Reservoir Assessment A research and service program of A research and service program of The Kansas Biological.
National Weather Service Des Moines, IA National Weather Service Des Moines, IA Iowa Spring Flood Outlook March 5, 2010 Jeff Zogg, Senior Hydrologist.
1 Scenario formulation Scenario-based planning is a structured way of thinking about what might happen in the future Scenarios are descriptions of possible.
NE Drought Conditions CARC Update: November 17, 2015 Brian Fuchs National Drought Mitigation Center University of Nebraska-Lincoln School of Natural Resources.
OREGON IDAHO WYOMING COLORADO NEVADA NEW MEXICO TEXAS UTAH ARIZONA CALIFORNIA Rene Vermeeren, P.E., D.WRE Chief, Hydrology and Hydraulics Branch Los Angeles.
Note: This presentation contains only preliminary research results. If you have any questions, please contact Julie Vano at Thanks.
June 2009: How severe is the current drought in the Hill Country?
Reclamation and Hoover Dam It’s All About The Water.
Strategies for Colorado River Water Management Jaci Gould Deputy Regional Director Lower Colorado Region.
1 Bonneville Power Administration. 2 BPA markets power from 31 federally owned dams, one non-federal nuclear plant, and wind energy generation facilities.
Climate Change Threat Reduced Snowpack 1. Potential Impacts Related to Reduced Snowpack How might our community be impacted by reduced snowpack? 2.
NIDIS Project - Drought Alert System for the Upper Trinity River Basin NWS/USGS/COE Meeting November 15, 2006 Ben Weiger, Hydrologic Services Branch National.
Yuma Agriculture Water - Rights and Supply Terry Fulp Director, Lower Colorado Region Yuma Agriculture Water Conference January 13, 2016.
The Drought Impact Reporter
Savannah River Projects
OBJECTIVE 1 Irrigation District Infrastructure Studies
Scoping Workshop for the Upper Colorado River Basin
Flood Monitoring Tools 2011 OFMA Annual Conference
Presentation transcript:

Enhancing the Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service A Program to Develop A Low-Flow/Stage Database for Selected NWS Forecast Points in the Upper Colorado River Basin Dr. Donna L. Woudenberg, Drought Management Specialist, NDMC Mark Svoboda, NDMC · Doug Kluck, NWS CRHQ

Outline The existing AHPS System High-flows vs. Low-flows Completed Low-flow Projects Upper Colorado River Basin Project Potential for the Future

Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service Flood early warning system Network of >4000 stream gauges Providing current river flow/stage data Up to 7-day forecasts at many forecast points 90-day probabilistic forecasts at about 1/3 of the forecast points

AHPS Regional Map

Current Observations and 7-Day Forecast

Minor Flooding: minimal or no property damage, but possibly some public threat or inconvenience. Moderate Flooding: some inundation of structures and roads near stream. Some evacuations of people and/or property to higher elevation is necessary. Major Flooding: extensive inundation of structures and roads. Significant evacuations of people and/or transfer of property to higher elevations. AHPS Flood Classifications

River Stage and Flood Impact Information Arkansas River at Canon City (Photo taken by Ken Dewey, 2001)

Photos, Maps, Flood Stages, and Historical Data

Cumulative Chance of Exceeding Levels (90 day outlook) The values along the x axis show the probability of reaching a particular flow (y axis). CS = conditional simulation; HS = historical simulation

Weekly Chance of Exceeding Levels (90 day forecast)

High-flows vs. Low-flows

Although providing great benefits for flood protection, the AHPS system does not provide the same information for low flow events. Low flows in rivers and streams can have similar deleterious effects in terms of health, economic, and environmental consequences.

Objective 1: Identify low flow/stage related impacts near NWS forecast points Objective 2: Use impact information to establish low flow/stage warning triggers (drought stages) Objective 3: Develop low flow/stage river forecasts Incorporate data into the NWS National Hydrologic Database and the AHPS system Led to the development of a low flow/stage impacts database for AHPS forecast points

Completed Low-flow Projects

Upper Mississippi River Basin (2004) MN – 21 forecast points North Platte River Basin (2005) CO, WY, and NE – 17 forecast points Upper Missouri Basin (2006) WY, MT, and ND – 45 forecast points Upper Trinity River Basin (2007) TX – 29 forecast points Red River of the North (2007) ND & MN – 35 forecast points Conducted internet and literature reviews Collected information on potential low flow impacts from federal, state, and local water experts Completed Low Flow Projects

Experts Were Asked to Provide Information on: The impacts of low river levels The stage/flow at which impacts occur Which AHPS site(s) best reflect the impacts Other factors that affect particular impacts/locations Key Findings 1. Several potential impacts identified loss of municipal, industrial, and agricultural water activation of water rights regulation procedures activation of state and local drought response plans reduced recreational opportunities hydropower losses dredging to maintain navigation fish and wildlife losses exposure of infrastructure increased effluent testing (NPDES)

2. River basins have common and unique vulnerabilities and management strategies Upper Mississippi River Basin: mainly municipal water for large cities (St. Paul and Minneapolis), navigation, hydropower, recreation, and fish and wildlife concerns. river gauging stations are often used to trigger low flow management plans (i.e., Q90 flow) North Platte River Basin: mainly agricultural irrigation, municipal water (small and large cities), hydropower, recreation, and fish and wildlife concerns reservoir levels and flow volumes used to trigger low flow management plans (i.e., North Platte Project – 1.1 million acre-feet in reservoirs)

Flow (cfs) Stage (ft) ImpactsTiming/Other Considerations Information Sources 2000Recreational activities such as boating may become difficult DNR Trails and Waterways Division (2004) 1400Hydropower facilities at Champion Dam and St. Cloud Dam will adjust river flows as part of the Mississippi River Low-Flow Management Plan DNR System-Wide Low-Flow Management Plan (2004) 974The St. Cloud Water Treatment Facility can meet a maximum pumping demand of 16 million gallons of water per day Lisa Vollbrecht, St. Cloud Water Services Manager 973.5The North Intake Structure for the St. Cloud Water Treatment Facility will not be able to draw water 970.5The St. Cloud Water Treatment Facility can meet a maximum pumping demand of 12 million gallons of water per day 970The South Intake Structure for the St. Cloud Water Treatment Facility won’t be able to draw water Reported Impacts at St. Cloud Forecast Point, MN

Flow (cfs) Stage (ft) ImpactsTiming/Other Considerations Information Sources 40Irrigation releases for crops become sporadic; some fields may not receive full allotment of water Late summerBrian Artery, District Manager, Platte County Conservation District 20Recreation opportunities very limited, boat ramps at Greyrocks Reservoir are likely to be inaccessible Late summer 10Irrigation releases cease; crops will require alternative irrigation water supply Late summer 10Conditions are not favorable for aquatic life; fish and other aquatic organisms begin to die Late summer 10Conditions are not favorable for livestock and wildlife water, livestock producers must implement alternative livestock water supply Late summer Fort Laramie Forecast Point, Wyoming

3. Authorities could not describe at what stage/flow impacts at some sites would occur. Ex) “Our wells are affected by river flows but I don’t know exactly how much.” Ex) “Fish and wildlife are affected by low flows but we haven’t determined minimum flow requirements.” More research is needed in such cases to better understand low-flow vulnerabilities

Developing a better understanding of low river impacts at the local level will provide more detailed information for water resources planning applications at all levels, as well as in advancing the development of the AHPS system. Conclusion of Case Studies…

Upper Colorado River Basin Project

Upper Colorado River Low-Flow Project Identify potential low flow/stage impacts near 164 forecast points

ACT-ACF Basin Identify potential low flow/stage impacts near 50 forecast points

Potential Contacts NDMC staff will be contacting water experts in the region, such as: National Weather Service United States Geological Survey US Army Corp of Engineers US Bureau of Reclamation Natural Resources Conservation Service State and Regional Water Agencies and Organizations Community water managers near AHPS points They (you) will be asked to help identify potential low-flow related impacts that can be linked to river flow/stages at NWS AHPS forecast points.

Colorado Example 1) What effects would typically occur as the White River flow decreases at the AHPS forecast point near Meeker (WRMC2; #31)? 2) At what general stage/flow would those impacts occur? 3) Are these impacts seasonal? Or specifically drought-related?

Current White River AHPS Forecast Point at Meeker, Colorado What would happen as stage/flow decreases?

Potential for the Future

An example of a seven-day river forecast hydrograph with indicators of critical low flow and flood levels. The red line indicates the flood level. The tan line indicates the critical low flow level at this forecast point. The blue line shows the current river level and the green line is the actual forecast. North Central River Forecast Center Future Work for River Forecast Centers…

An example of a 90-day streamflow outlook for low water. The values along the x axis show the probability of reaching a particular flow (y axis). The brown zone at the bottom of the graph shows the critical level for this forecast point at which low water impacts begin to take effect. CS = conditional simulation; HS = historical simulation. North Central River Forecast Center

WHAT I NEED FROM YOU! Contacts – Name & title/agency/organization Phone number & address Mailing address, if possible Resources – References – Reports – Relevant Documents Any and all information on water management and/or water use State government – smallest municipalities / irrigation districts Low-flow Impacts Data and Information If you can directly provide info – let me know!

Thanks so much! Visit the NDMC Donna Woudenberg