Professor James Byrne Oct. 30 th 2014.  The Classic experiment has three components:  1. independent and dependent variables  2. pretesting and post-testing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experimental Design True Experimental Designs n Random assignment n Two comparison groups n Controls threats to internal validity n Strongest evidence.
Advertisements

Exploring Marketing Research William G. Zikmund
Experimental Research Neuman and Robson, Ch. 9. Introduction Experiments are part of the traditional science model Involve taking “action” and observing.
Part Three Modes of Observation. Chapter 8 Experiments.
Group Discussion Describe the fundamental flaw that prevents a nonequivalent group design from being a true experiment? (That is, why can’t these designs.
Internal Threats to Validity
CHAPTER 8, experiments.
Research Design: The Experimental Model and Its Variations
Who are the participants? Creating a Quality Sample 47:269: Research Methods I Dr. Leonard March 22, 2010.
Chapter 9 Group-Level Research Designs. CHARACTERISTICS OF “IDEAL” EXPERIMENTS Controlling the Time Order of Variables Manipulating the Independent Variable.
Soc Week 3 Causation and Experiments
What Works? Programme Evaluations. Approaches to Delinquency Prevention and Control Predelinquent Intervention –Individual Treatment –Area Projects Preadjudication.
Hypotheses & Research Design
Group-Level Research Designs
Sampling; Experiments. Sampling  Logic: representative sampling  Sample should have the same variations existing in the larger population  Biased samples.
Criteria for Establishing Causal Relationships Concomitant variation Temporal ordering of variables Control over other possible causal factors.
Research Methods Experiment.
Group Discussion Describe the similarities and differences between experiments , non-experiments , and quasi-experiments. Actions for Describe the similarities.
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 34. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH.
Experiments Explanatory research True experiments Experimental designs
Experiments Pierre-Auguste Renoir: Barges on the Seine, 1869.
Experimental Design 264a Marketing Research. Criteria for Establishing a Causal Relationship Concomitant variation Temporal variation Control over other.
Experimental Research Take some action and observe its effects Take some action and observe its effects Extension of natural science to social science.
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs
Group Discussion Explain the difference between assignment bias and selection bias. Which one is a threat to internal validity and which is a threat to.
Modes of Observations (Research Designs) –Experiments –Survey Research –Field Research –Unobtrusive Research –Evaluation Research Each of these methods.
ECON ECON Health Economic Policy Lab Kem P. Krueger, Pharm.D., Ph.D. Anne Alexander, M.S., Ph.D. University of Wyoming.
CHAPTER 8, experiments.
Research Strategies Chapter 6. Research steps Literature Review identify a new idea for research, form a hypothesis and a prediction, Methodology define.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Experimental and Pre (Quasi) Experimental Designs.
By: Valerie Passalacqua Alana Goldstein Gloren Brown.
Experimental Designs Leedy and Ormrod, Ch. 10. Introduction Experiments are part of the traditional science model Involve taking “action” and observing.
Experimental Research
Experimental & Quasi-Experimental Designs Dr. Guerette.
Research Design. Time of Data Collection Longitudinal Longitudinal –Panel study –Trend study –Cohort study Cross-sectional Cross-sectional.
SOCW 671: #6 Research Designs Review for 1 st Quiz.
Chapter 8 Experiments Topics Appropriate to Experiments The Classical Experiment Selecting Subjects Variations on Experimental Designs An Illustration.
 The basic components of experiments are: 1) taking action 2) observing the consequence of that action  Experimental model is most closely linked to.
Chapter Eight: Quantitative Methods
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS. Categories Lab experiments –Experiments done in artificial or contrived environment Field experiments –Experiments done in natural.
IREL 561: Research Methods Fall 2013 Week 10 Based largely on Neuman’s Basics of Social Research, Chapter 8 Prepared by Craig Webster, Ph.D.
Journalism 614: Experimental Methods Experimental Research  Take some action and observe its effects –Extension of natural science to social science.
CHAPTER 8 EXPERIMENTS.
Unit 4 Experimental Research Designs. Four Part to the Classical Experiment (What works best, flea collar or flea drops?) Independent and Dependent Variables.
Experimental Research Design Causality & Validity Threats to Validity –Construct (particular to experiments) –Internal –External – already discussed.
CJ490: Research Methods in Criminal Justice UNIT #4 SEMINAR Professor Jeffrey Hauck.
1. /32  A quasi-experimental design is one that looks like an experimental design but lacks the key ingredient -- random assignment. 2.
Can you hear me now? Keeping threats to validity from muffling assessment messages Maureen Donohue-Smith, Ph.D., RN Elmira College.
Experimental Research Neuman and Robson, Ch. 9. Introduction Experiments are part of the traditional science model Involve taking “action” and observing.
Research Methodology Lecture No :19 (Experimental Design-Cont)
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research
Experimental Research
Experiments Why would a double-blind experiment be used?
Chapter 8 Experimental Design The nature of an experimental design
New Media Research Methods
Experiments: Part 3.
Experiments and Quasi-Experiments
Social Research Methods Experimental Research
Journalism 614: Experimental Methods
Experiments and Quasi-Experiments
The Nonexperimental and Quasi-Experimental Strategies
Experiments: Part 2.
Experiments: Part 3.
Experiments: Part 3.
Chapter 18: Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research
Experimental Research
Study on Method of Mass Communication Research 传播研究方法 (7&8) Dr
Chapter 11 EDPR 7521 Dr. Kakali Bhattacharya
Experimental Research
Types of Designs: R: Random Assignment of subjects to groups
Presentation transcript:

Professor James Byrne Oct. 30 th 2014

 The Classic experiment has three components:  1. independent and dependent variables  2. pretesting and post-testing  3. experimental and control groups created via random assignment( variation on a theme: double blind experiments where neither the researcher or the subjects knows who is in experimental and control group)

 The Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment: examined the short term impact of mandatory arrest( compared to counseling, and business as usual) in misdemeanor DV cases  The Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment: impact of police on crime, fear, and arrests. Random assignment to one of 3 conditions--control beats (normal level of preventive patrol);proactive( 2x level of preventive patrol); reactive beats( no preventive patrol)  The Newark Foot Patrol Experiment: impact of foot patrol on crime, fear, and arrests. Random assignment to foot patrol vs motorized patrol.

 1. Misapplication of treatment( e.g. Minneapolis Experiment)  2. No difference in intervention between treatment and control groups( Newark Foot Patrol)  3. External Validity: the experiment does not work in real world( boutique programs; research rich interventions)

 1. History: outside events that could also explain findings( e.g. research in 70’s on impact of laws to reduce drunk driving)  2. Maturation: people change: example-age and binge drinking  3. Testing: subjects become sensitive to responses example- drinking/drug use surveys( pre-post)  4. Instrumentation: changes in measurement over time ( example-hate crime)  5. Statistical Regression: selecting subjects with extreme scores on a dependent variable, such as chronic offenders.  6.Selection Bias: picking good risks example- drug courts, bail research  7.Experimental Mortality: Dallas Women in Policing Study; boot camp  8. Diffusion of Tx( targeted community policing) and Compensatory Tx( Kansas City Ex )

 1. Sample Size: Rand Study of ISP in 14 locations  2. Target group selection ( e.g. research study on certainty of incarceration by Weisburd; ISP refusals at two sites)  3. Lack of researcher control over random assignment: Minneapolis Experiment  4. After the fact random assignment: Project Hope in Hawaii