METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT FACILITY INSPECTIONS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May, 2006 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cathy Beahm Technical Assistance Specialist NH DES, Air Resources
Advertisements

SPCC PLAN OVERVIEW - SLIDE 1 OF 45 © Copyright SafetyInstruction 2008 SAFETY TRAINING CORPORATE SAFETY TRAINING © Copyright SafeyInstruction 2008 EPA 40.
© 3M All Rights Reserved. Innovations in Permitting and Flexible Air Permitting as Well as Methods to Improve the Permitting Process Mark Manninen,
Municipal Solid Waste Landfill NSPS/EG Requirements Illinois EPA Bureau of Air Mike Davidson 217/
MSW NESHAP Control Requirements Contains the same requirements as NSPS/EG. Requires gas collection and control system (GCCS) for same landfill as NSPS/EG.
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Municipal Solid Waste Landfills.
Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Surface Coating
Inspections at MSW Landfills
METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART RRRR July 2006.
SUBPART N MACT AMENDMENTS QUESTIONS & ANSWERS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART N.
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006.
IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT OVERVIEW
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006.
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT QUESTION & ANSWERS
DRAFT IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT FACILITY INSPECTIONS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART EEEEE.
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June 2006.
METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING MACT FACILITY INSPECTIONS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART RRRR July, 2006.
METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
METAL COIL SURFACE MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006 May 2006.
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT FACILITY INSPECTIONS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June, CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June, 2006.
METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING MACT CLOSING 40 CFR PART 63 SUBPART RRRR July 2006.
Compliance Dates The final rule was published on January 25, 1995,
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT CLOSING METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT CLOSING 40 CFR PART 63 SUBPART SSSS May CFR PART 63 SUBPART SSSS May 2006.
METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING MACT QUESTION & ANSWERS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART RRRR July 2006.
IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT QUESTION & ANSWERS
IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT QUESTION & ANSWERS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June, CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June, 2006.
CFC/HCFC Requirements & Enforcement Issues Don Gansert Managing Consultant November 20, 2008 trinityconsultants.com.
1 According to PETROSAFE safety policy, the company is keen that: Introduction All Egyptian Petroleum companies and foreign companies working in A.R.E.
Field Operations and State-Managed Plugging Overview
Regulatory Drivers for Reducing Solvent Emissions Barbara Johnson, PE Kansas State University Kansas Small Business Environmental Assistance Program March.
Tuesday Oct. 7, 2014 Implementation of Permit Exemption Criteria Category No. 38 Tom Corbett, Governor Dana Aunkst, Acting Secretary.
2010 Sign Sales Meeting NESHAP Subpart 6H NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLUTANTS.
New Federal Regulations for Internal Combustion Engines Doug Parce.
Hazardous Waste Issues Associated with Municipal Operations Dan Sowry Environmental Specialist Office of Compliance Assistance and Pollution Prevention.
1 MASSACHUSETTS UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK (UST) PROGRAM Baseline Compliance Assessment 1 MassDEP 8/2/2011.
2015 NCMA EPA Enforcement Policies and How They Affect Your Facility Michael Pjetraj, P.E. DAQ Stationary Source Compliance Branch Supervisor.
Air Permitting Overview.
Compliance Update NCMA 2015.
ISO Standard is based on the management model of plan – do - check – act. Today we all be discussing the elements of the standard that deal with.
Frank Steitz Air Quality Permitting Program 10/12/2012
New Air Quality Regulation “NSPS OOOO” Oil and Natural Gas Industry Workshop October 24, 2012 Robert Keatley, PE Senior Engineer/Supervisor DEP – Division.
Air Toxics in Region 4 A&WMA Annual Conference August 6, 2008 Lee Page Air Toxics Assessment and Implementation Section EPA, Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia.
Miscellaneous Organic NESHAP Compliance for a New Countermeasure Flare Production Facility at the Milan Army Ammunition Plant FRANKLIN engineering group,
New Orleans / ACC / SOCMA November 2003 Randy McDonald, OAR, USEPA.
Construction and Demolition Inert Processing Operations Compliance First: Evaluation of Solid Waste Facilities’ State Standards Training Provided By: California.
Compliance Assistance and Ambient Air Monitoring Brian Hutchins Supervisor, Air Quality Bureau July 2014.
Where to find Information About Facilities. Overview of Title V Permits.
Our Vision – Healthy Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.
Support Programs version 2 March 2010 Cleaning and Sanitation
Air Quality 101 Kansas Air Quality Program overview.
Idaho Solid Waste Facility Record Keeping June 20, 2006 Idaho Department of Environmental Quality.
Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world 1 © COPYRIGHT 2010 ERM.
Air Regulations for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills Dana Podell Air Pollution Control Division.
Notices to Comply (NTC) and Notices of Violation (NOV) March 22, 2006 Peter Moore Yorke Engineering, LLC x24
Title V Operating Permit Program 1 Section 1: Intro to Title V Laura McKelvey U.S. EPA.
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of Rules and Permitting Issues Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
Asbestos NESHAP Inspection and Safety Procedures Workshop Section Seventeen Legal Perspectives October 2008.
The Paper and Other Web Coating (POWC) MACT – Executive Summary The executive summary is a power point presentation designed to be used for basic education.
Region 9 Title V Permit Review Guidelines Ray Vogel EPA/OAQPS.
1 Conducting Reasonable Progress Determinations under the Regional Haze Rule Kathy Kaufman EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards January 11,
Blue Skies Delaware; Clean Air for Life 10/8/08 Minor New Source Review Alberto Roybal.
Best Available Control Technology/Lowest Achievable Emission Rate Evaluation Sarah Fuchs Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Update on Methane Regulations Affecting Landfills Pat Sullivan Senior Vice President SCS Engineers Nov. 10, 2015.
DRAFT: 9/10/98 REINFORCED PLASTICS MACT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT FOR EXISTING OPEN MOLDING SOURCES Briefing Package for Outreach Meeting with Small Businesses.
Start Do you own or operate a facility that engages in the coating of paper, plastic film, metallic foil or any other web surfaces? Your facility is not.
2015 Definition of Solid Waste Rule
EPA Options for the Federal Regulation of Coal Combustion Waste Lisa Evans Earthjustice October 22, 2010.
Boiler Sheltered Initiative
Kansas Air Quality Seminar March 5, 2008
Presentation transcript:

METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT FACILITY INSPECTIONS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May, CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May, 2006

An Affected Source is... The collection of all the metal coil coating lines at your facility. Coil Coating Lines are... The collection of equipment used to apply an organic coating to the surface of metal coil. Coating lines include web unwind or feed stations, wet section, coating application stations, curing oven, and quench station. An Affected Source is... The collection of all the metal coil coating lines at your facility. Coil Coating Lines are... The collection of equipment used to apply an organic coating to the surface of metal coil. Coating lines include web unwind or feed stations, wet section, coating application stations, curing oven, and quench station.

Applicability (contd.) Metal Coil is... A continuous metal strip that is at least 0.15 mm (0.006 in) thick and is packaged in a roll or coil prior to coating, but does not include metal webs that are coated for use in flexible purchasing. Metal Coil is... A continuous metal strip that is at least 0.15 mm (0.006 in) thick and is packaged in a roll or coil prior to coating, but does not include metal webs that are coated for use in flexible purchasing.

Applicability (contd.) The collection of all coating operations; storage containers and mixing vessels used for coatings, thinners and/or other additives, cleaning materials and wastes; and manual and automated conveying equipment and containers used for coatings, thinners and/or other additives, cleaning materials and wastes.

Reasons for Inspections Compliance determination Complaint Investigation Source Plan Approval Review or Renewal of Permits Special Studies Compliance determination Complaint Investigation Source Plan Approval Review or Renewal of Permits Special Studies

Inspections at Effected Sources Basically; determine how each facility is demonstrating compliance. Compliance demonstration can be with: Emission rate w/add on controls Emission rate w/add on controls Operating limits Operating limits (Contd. on next slide)

Inspections at Effected Sources (Contd.) Work Practice Requirements Work Practice Requirements Emission Limits Emission Limits Determination of Mass Fraction of organic HAP density volume used Determination of Mass Fraction of organic HAP density volume used Other Other

What emission standards must an effected source follow? [§ ] If you are an existing or new source, limit your organic HAP emissions to no more than... If you are an existing or new source, limit your organic HAP emissions to no more than... Option 1…2% of the organic HAP applied during each month during the 12-month compliance period (98% reduction) Option 1…2% of the organic HAP applied during each month during the 12-month compliance period (98% reduction) If you are an existing or new source, limit your organic HAP emissions to no more than... If you are an existing or new source, limit your organic HAP emissions to no more than... Option 1…2% of the organic HAP applied during each month during the 12-month compliance period (98% reduction) Option 1…2% of the organic HAP applied during each month during the 12-month compliance period (98% reduction)

What emission standards must an effected source follow? (Contd.) Option 2…0.046 kg organic HAP/liter coating solids applied during each 12- month compliance period Option 2…0.046 kg organic HAP/liter coating solids applied during each 12- month compliance period Option 3…20 parts per million by volume on a dry basis when an oxidizer is used in combination with a capture system that achieves 100% capture Option 3…20 parts per million by volume on a dry basis when an oxidizer is used in combination with a capture system that achieves 100% capture Option 2…0.046 kg organic HAP/liter coating solids applied during each 12- month compliance period Option 2…0.046 kg organic HAP/liter coating solids applied during each 12- month compliance period Option 3…20 parts per million by volume on a dry basis when an oxidizer is used in combination with a capture system that achieves 100% capture Option 3…20 parts per million by volume on a dry basis when an oxidizer is used in combination with a capture system that achieves 100% capture

Inspections at Affected Sources Coating Lines Coating Lines Storage handling (containers & Mixing Vessels) Storage handling (containers & Mixing Vessels) Work Practices Work Practices Coating Lines Coating Lines Storage handling (containers & Mixing Vessels) Storage handling (containers & Mixing Vessels) Work Practices Work Practices

Inspections at Affected Sources (Contd.) Material transport Material transport Excess materials handling Excess materials handling General M/R General M/R Material transport Material transport Excess materials handling Excess materials handling General M/R General M/R

Typical Control Systems Thermal Oxidizers Carbon Adsorbers Solvent Recovery Emission Capture Systems Thermal Oxidizers Carbon Adsorbers Solvent Recovery Emission Capture Systems

Typical Control Systems (Contd.) Subpart SSSS requires specific data and compliance calculations for each of the above control systems. O & M plans for these systems are also required in the regulation.

Pre-Inspection Procedures File Review MACT Initial Notification Report Initial Compliance Status Report Performance Test Report including capture File Review MACT Initial Notification Report Initial Compliance Status Report Performance Test Report including capture

Pre-Inspection Procedures (Contd.) Continuing Compliance Report Title V Reports VOC/HAP reduction through NSPS/MACT implementation Regulation Review Equipment Checks

Facility File Review Semiannual Compliance Reports Control Equipment Removal Reports Previous Inspection Reports Enforcement Action Complaints Complaints Notice of Violations Notice of Violations Enforcement Actions taken Variance history Semiannual Compliance Reports Control Equipment Removal Reports Previous Inspection Reports Enforcement Action Complaints Complaints Notice of Violations Notice of Violations Enforcement Actions taken Variance history

Facility File Review (Contd.) Compliance test data Compliance test data Equipment Malfunction reports Equipment Malfunction reports SSM Plan and any events SSM Plan and any events Permit to construct P/C and permit to operate P/O Permit to construct P/C and permit to operate P/O Collection and control system design plan Collection and control system design plan Compliance test data Compliance test data Equipment Malfunction reports Equipment Malfunction reports SSM Plan and any events SSM Plan and any events Permit to construct P/C and permit to operate P/O Permit to construct P/C and permit to operate P/O Collection and control system design plan Collection and control system design plan

Pre-Inspection Meeting

On-site Physical Inspection Collection and control equipment Comparison between source records and visual inspection Observation of leaks and maintenance Operation according to site specific collection system and design plan Collection and control equipment Comparison between source records and visual inspection Observation of leaks and maintenance Operation according to site specific collection system and design plan

Post-Inspection Meeting Discuss any additional information needed from the owner/operator Advise source representative of the facility specific requirements in the rules based on the type of compliance demonstration Discuss any additional identified issues Discuss any additional information needed from the owner/operator Advise source representative of the facility specific requirements in the rules based on the type of compliance demonstration Discuss any additional identified issues

Inspection/Documentation Report Documentation of each determined violation Documentation of each determined violation Recommendations for source testing/capture or engineering evaluation Recommendations for source testing/capture or engineering evaluation Assessment of fugitive emissions and potential impacts Assessment of fugitive emissions and potential impacts Documentation of each determined violation Documentation of each determined violation Recommendations for source testing/capture or engineering evaluation Recommendations for source testing/capture or engineering evaluation Assessment of fugitive emissions and potential impacts Assessment of fugitive emissions and potential impacts