Focused Monitoring: The District Improvement Plan Process-- Tips for Improvement Planning Lessons Learned from the 2007-2009 District Improvement Plans.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
My AmeriCorps Release 3 State Commissions and Programs User Roles and Management – Implementing Presentation developed for the Corporation for National.
Advertisements

Educational Consultant
Alabama Primary Health Care Association
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Response to Intervention in Illinois November 22, 2008 Presented by: Beth Hanselman and Marica Cullen Illinois State Board of Education.
Title One Parent Involvement
Todays presentation slides will be available at under the Resources Section Thanks for supporting ISBEs quest to Go Green.
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Writing the Response to Intervention (RtI) District Plan September 4, 2008 Presented by:Beth Hanselman and Marica Cullen Illinois State Board of Education.
My AmeriCorps AmeriCorps and VISTA Programs Create and Manage an eGrants Account Presentation developed for the Corporation for National and Community.
1 Balloting/Handling Negative Votes September 22 nd and 24 th, 2009 ASTM Virtual Training Session Christine DeJong Joe Koury.
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
NCATS REDESIGN METHODOLOGY A Menu of Redesign Options Six Models for Course Redesign Five Principles of Successful Course Redesign Four Models for Assessing.
Quality Education Investment Act of 2006 (QEIA) 1 Quality Education Investment Act (QEIA) of 2006 County Superintendents Oversight and Technical Assistance.
State of New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services Patient Safety Reporting System Module 2 – New Event Entry.
1 Mt. Diablo Unified Technology Plan What and Why? The Technology Plan is required by the CA Department of Education for technology funding.
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
Tips for Improvement Planning: Lessons Learned ISBE Innovation and Improvement.
The RtI Plan Special Education Directors Conference August 1, 2008 Elizabeth Hanselman and Marica Cullen Illinois State Board of Education.
AYP and Beyond: Improvement Planning for Successful Implementation DIRECTORS CONFERENCE AUGUST 2009.
Program Goals, Objectives and Performance Indicators A guide for grant and program development 3/2/2014 | Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
A Guided Tour of the 1% Exception Process From Documentation to Approval.
Targeted Assistance & Schoolwide Programs NCLB Technical Assistance Audio April 18, :30 PM April 19, :30 AM Alaska Department of Education.
Leading for High Performance. PKR, Inc., for Cedar Rapids 10/04 2 Everythings Up-to-Date in Cedar Rapids! Working at classroom, building, and district.
Welcome School Improvement Advisory Committee Members We are happy youre here!
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
APS Teacher Evaluation
PBM The Staging Process. Check the dates August In late August, districts receive their PBMAS summary report.
Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment Summit Massachusetts Tiered System of Support MTSS – Academic - AM Massachusetts Department of Elementary and.
Providing Effective Feedback
1 SESSION 5- RECORDING AND REPORTING IN GRADES R-12 Computer Applications Technology Information Technology.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
1 Title I Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session May 23, 2011.
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
Technology Integration Plan (TIP) Overview Meeting Welcome TIP Teams.
Green Eggs and Ham.
VOORBLAD.
Promoting Regulatory Excellence Self Assessment & Physiotherapy: the Ontario Model Jan Robinson, Registrar & CEO, College of Physiotherapists of Ontario.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Data Management Seminar, 8-11th July 2008, Hamburg Survey System – Overview & Changes from the Field Trial.
District Advisory Council (DAC) 1 October 22, 2012 Westlawn Elementary School.
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
How creating a course on the e-lastic platform 1.
25 seconds left…...
1 Begin the Transformation: Mapping the Course DOWNLOAD ME!
1 Wiki Tutorial. 2 Outline of Wiki Tutorial 1) Welcome and Introductions 2) What is a wiki, and why is it useful for our work in moving forward the program.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
How to Fill out a PAR for a New Standard Revised 8 July 2010.
PSSA Preparation.
ACD Training.
1 New Hampshire’s preK-16 Literacy Action Plan for the 21 st Century Deb Wiswell & Linda Stimson NH Literacy Task Force July 23, 2007.
1 Office of New Teacher Induction Introducing NTIMS New Teacher Induction Mentoring System A Tool for Documenting School Based Mentoring Mentors’ Guide.
Teacher Evaluation System LSKD Site Administrator Training August 6, 2014.
Profile. 1.Open an Internet web browser and type into the web browser address bar. 2.You will see a web page similar to the one on.
Educator Evaluation: A Protocol for Developing S.M.A.R.T. Goal Statements.
Graduate Admission System User Guide for Applicants 1 Last updated: April 2014.
Connecting the Process to: -Current Practice -CEP -CIITS/EDS 1.
RESPRO Area 1C Area 1C RESPRO Meeting RESPRO Area 1C November 24, 2009.
Less Red Tape, More Learning: the Interactive Illinois Report Card and Illinois e-Plans Dr. Harvey Smith, Director of Interactive IL Report Card, Northern.
Tips for SIPs and DIPs Lessons Learned from the 2006 Plans Title I Director’s Conference Sept 2007 To access this presentation, go to:
Tips for Improvement Planning: Lessons Learned
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Presentation transcript:

Focused Monitoring: The District Improvement Plan Process-- Tips for Improvement Planning Lessons Learned from the District Improvement Plans July 2008 Special Education Directors Conference

2 Review Sections I and II of the sample plan Do the strategies and activities of the action plan flow logically from the data and analysis? If you were a teacher in this district, would you know your role in this plan?

3 Updated Resources for 2008 For the latest resources including planning guides sample plans presentations See ent_process.htm

4 Lets Celebrate! Feedback for all who submitted plans for 2007!

5 Targeted Feedback

6 Tools for a specific end Less Red Tape and More Learning Whats the impact of a system of supportwith school and district plans as central documents with Minimized hoop-jumping Focused planning on –the key audience and –the overall good sense the plan Will these improvement plans lead to improved student achievement?

7 Harsh Realities 1. Perfect plans improved student achievement 2. Plans are required by NCLB and state law 3. Clear and critical need to focus on learning

8 Winning Winning Plans Measurable Implemented with fidelity Monitored

9 You may be asking yourself: Am I required to submit a plan NOW? Yes, you need to submit a revised plan if both the following are true. My school/district is in academic status. I do not have a locally board approved plan submitted in the template for 2007 at the Interactive Illinois Report Card site.

10 When must the plan based on 2008 data be submitted? For plans in response to Academic Status District Improvement 90 days School Improvement 135 days

11 For plans required as part of the Title III grant application (This may be the same plan as in response to academic status.) Current district improvement plans are required with Title III grant applications June 30 every year. ISBE can not approve these grants without the district improvement plans.

12 For plans required in response to special education compliance monitoring You may modify your existing improvement plan Revisions to the plan must be made in consultation with special education monitoring staff.

13 How? All plans submitted via the Interactive Illinois Report Card Your area RESPRO, Title III, or special education consultant can assist in completing these plans.

14 E-Plans User Names and Passwords They are not changed annually Need yours? Still not getting in? You may need to back out of the browser and reenter the username and password.

15 Sample login screen

16 On-line resources at the Interactive Illinois Report Card (IIRC) Guides –description of required content. Templates interactive screens with the language of the guide and directions Monitoring prompts ISBEs checklist for feedback Schools access school plans at the school dashboard. Districts access all types of plans at the district main menu.

17 District in District Involvement in School Planning Increasing assistance with planning as school does not make AYP

18 Lessons Learned from the Best Plans The best plans foster little doubt that the plan will be implemented Strong relationship between the data, strategies/activities, and monitoring process Detailed roles, responsibilities, expectations Critical changes in classroom practice

19 The Huge Assumption- plan implementation What do users of the plan have to know to be able to implement the plan with fidelity and monitor progress?

20 Tip 1: Write for the Right Audience The primary audience for the plan is the userthose who will implement this plan. Other audiences-- Planners Reviewers Wider community

21 Tip 2: Look Beyond AYP Report Card and other data are more than AYP deficiencies See the monitoring prompt Strengths and weaknesses

22 Tip 3: Take Care to Consider the Factors Contributing to Achievement Whats contributing to your progress? Are these factors internal or external? Are you blaming the kids?

23 Whats Coarse and fine grain internal factors Whats preventing students from learning? school culture doesnt foster shared responsibility for all kids learning Supplemental support is weak or not rigorous Failure to use the intended curriculum by all staff for all kids Teachers do not have adequate coaching or support to implement strategies mile wide and inch deep curriculum Teachers arent clear about whats expected in classrooms Instruction doesnt span cognitive levels Insufficient teacher learning/team time School culture doesnt reflect rigor, relevance, relationship Kids dont have equitable access to the curriculum Kids arent in the least restrictive educational environment Teachers need ELL training

24 Tip 4: Be Specific and Thorough Is the plan specific enough? Does the action plan sufficiently address the areas where improvement is needed?

25 Tip 5: Focus and Coordinate Strategies and Activities Objective Statements Measurable Minimally in terms of AYP May be global Use the objective page to outline strategies, if youd like.

26 While the current achievement in math for students with disabilities subgroup is 24.5% meeting/exceeding for ISAT, this subgroup will make AYP of at least 62.5% in 2008 and 70% in 2009 or Safe Harbor. Strategies: 1 double block math instruction 2 coaching for math staff 3 student and staff review of student work 4 beef up test taking skills 5 progress monitoring to drive instruction

27 Tip 6: Focus on Student Learning Strategies for students necessary to meet the objective –necessary for staff –necessary for parents –Effecting change at the classroom What about on-going strategies and activities? or strategies for global objectives?

28 Improvement Planningongoing work Working towards improvement Coordinating efforts Measuring progress Keeping the big picture in sight

29 Note from the field… Has the planning process been hoop jumping? It is definitely not an administrative hoop. It has given me a much clearer focus and I have already used the document at my Curriculum Committee Meetings to try to keep my staff focused on the big picture….

30 Sample Plans While no plan is perfect, planners can learn lots from models and we have good plans to share. Time will tell how good See sample 2007 plans at: ment_process.htm

31 Section II – Objective addressing deficiencies and an action plan that spans two years ( ) Section III – All items Section IV – Board Approval - Submitted to IIRC SHOW STOPPERS

32 For assistance Contact your area RESPRO ISBE Agency Directory The Interactive Illinois Report Card (815) Julie EvansCarol Diedrichsen