Presentation on New HEC Ranking Criteria

SCHEME OF PRESENTATION Parameters of old & new Ranking Criteria Comparative Study - HEC Ranking Criteria Old & New Current BU Status Recommendations

OLD & NEW PARAMETERS OF RANKINGS S.No Old Ranking Criteria (2010) ScoreS.No New Ranking Criteria (2012) Score 1 Implementation of QA Criteria 181 Quality Assurance & Enhancement 20 2Teaching Quality422Teaching Quality35 3Research403Research35 4Employer Perception5 5Peer Perception5 Total Score100 Total Score100

COMPARATIVE STUDY - HEC RANKING CRITERIA NEW & OLD 1. QA Criteria / Sub parameters S#Old Ranking Criteria (2010) MAX Points New Ranking Criteria (2012) MAX Points System for Assessment & Marking 1 Implementation of QA Criteria 18 Quality Assurance & Enhancement 20 aPlagiarism policy implementation6a 6 Based on evidence on various stages of implementation : 1. Constitution of Plagiarism standing committee (PSC) 2. Notifications/Minutes of Syndicate/BOG/Statutory body meetings. 3. Functioning of the committee (PSC) by resolving the plagiarism cases. b Eligibility Criteria for appointments of faculty members 4b 4 Based on adherence HEC criteria appointments of faculty members : 1. Notifications/Minutes of Syndicate/BOG/Statutory body meetings for implementation of criteria by university. c Criteria for M.Phil./MS & Ph.D. Programmes 4c Compliance of M.Phil./MS & Ph.D. criteria 4 Based on compliance of HEC criteria : 1. Notifications/Minutes of Syndicate/BOG/Statutory body meetings for implementation of criteria by university. d Quality Enhancement Cell Categorization 4d 6 As per scorecard developed and shared with Universities by QAA of HEC. Total Score18 Total Score20

S#Old Ranking Criteria (2010) MAX Points New Ranking Criteria (2012) MAX Points System for Assessment & Marking 2Teaching Quality42Teaching Quality35 a Student Teacher Ratio12 a Student Teacher Ratio 7 Total regular faculty and FTE (Full Time Equivalent) faculty will be considered for calculating overall Student Teacher Ratio. b Ratio of PhD faculty to total faculty 9 b 6 It is the PhD faculty divided by total faculty. For medical FRCS, FCP etc. will be treated as terminal degrees. c Selectivity5 c 5 It is the ratio of the total applicants seeking admission in the university and students actually selected. d Computers (Number of computers provided to students by university) 4 d Computers4 The total number of computers available to students and faculty of university. e Library books4 e 4 Total number of books at campus library excluding electronic books. f Full Time PhD faculty3N/A g Total PhD output for N/A f Ratio of Full time faculty to part time 3 It is the ratio of full time faculty to part time faculty. Full time faculty is regular and contractual faculty whereas part time faculty is the visiting faculty. N/A g Teacher Evaluation3 Mechanism of teacher evaluation established within the framework of QEC or universities’ own conducted faculty evaluation survey. N/A hTraining of faculty3 As per HEC record and data provided by universities on ranking proforma will be used for this component. Other faculty training information (National as well as international) as per evidence provided by universities will be considered. Total Score42 Total Score35 2. Teaching Quality/Sub-Parameters

3.Research/Sub-Parameters S.No Old Ranking Criteria (2010) MAX Points New Ranking Criteria (2012) MAX Points System for Assessment & Marking 3Research403Research35 i HEC Approved supervisors 5 i Approved supervisors 5 HEC Approved supervisors are those who can enroll HEC scholars. Whereas HEC registered supervisors are those who can only supervise scholars which are not funded by HEC. ii Indigenous scholarship 4 ii Indigenous scholarship 4 Total number of HEC indigenous scholars enrolled in university as per records of HEC scholarship section. iii Research grants approved 2 iii Research grants approved other than HEC 2 As per the record of HEC R&D Division the number of research grants approved by the HEC will be used. Documentary evidence viz. MOUs etc. will be required for those research grants received by the university other than the HEC. Last 3 years data will be considered. iv Travel Grants approved 2 iv Travel Grants approved 2 As per the record of HEC R&D Division, number of travel grants received by the faculty members of the universities will be used. Documentary evidence will be required for those travel grants received by the university faculty other than the HEC sources. Last 3 years data will be considered.

S.No Old Ranking Criteria (2010) MAX Points S.NoNew Ranking Criteria (2012) MAX Points System for Assessment & Marking v Publications in Impact Factor Journals 5 v 4 ISI web of knowledge will be benchmark and (research output extracted by HEC Digital Library will be used. Details of Research Publications of Universities by HEC as flashed vi Number of papers published by the university 3 vi Number of papers published by the university 3 vii Citations 4 viiCitations3 viii University H Index 4 viiiUniversity H Index2 ix Number of W, X, Y, Z Journals Published by the University 5 ix Number of W, X, Y, Z Journals Published by the University 3 As per Quality Assurance Division’s record,, number of HEC recognized journals published by the university in W, X, Y, Z category will be used. x Internet Bandwidth (PERN) utilization 4 x 3 Average utilization of Internet bandwidth by the universities acquired through PERN and other ISPs will be used. Documentary proof MRTG (Multi Router Traffic Grapher), PRTG (Paessier Router Traffic Grapher) etc. of Internet bandwidth utilization will be required of other ISPs. xi Number of Conferences Organized 2 xi Number of Conferences Organized 2 As per the record of R&D Division, HEC the number of seminars, conferences, workshops & symposia organized by university through HEC funding will be used. In addition conferences etc. organized by universities through national/international collaboration from sources other than HEC funding will also be accounted, for which documentary evidence will be required. Last 3 years data will be considered. -- xiiTotal PhD output for Data provided by universities through ranking proforma and records of PhD Country Directory data will be used. Total Score40 Total Score35

S#Old Ranking Criteria (2010) MAX Points New Ranking Criteria (2012) MAX Points System for Assessment & Marking 3Employer Perception Survey3 5 N/A Employer Perception Survey All Universities have been requested to Provide the 05 top recruiters information in the relevant field. Employer perception survey will be finalized based on responses received from potential employers of university graduates. 4 Peer Perception 4 5 N/ANil Peer Perception Each university has been given opportunity to consider academic standing of other universities among peers and rank them as1,2,3, …. to 10, accordingly. Each university has to rate other one falling in the same category, excluding itself. Universities in ‘General Category’ will be providing peer perception according to respective size of distributed on enrollment basis, given below: Large>=7000 Medium>=3000 & <7000 Small <3000 The relevant list has been provided by HEC to each university. Total ScoreNil Total Score New Parameters added Note: Relative method of scoring or grading will be used among 18 General Large Universities

STATUS OF BU AMONG GENERAL UNIVERSITY (LARGE) OLD RANKING 2010 S.N o Institute Name Teaching Quality (42) QA Criteria (18) Research (40) Total Score (100) 1University of Punjab, Lahore University of Karachi Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan University of Peshawar Intemational Islamic University, Islamabad Govt College University, Faisalabad Federal Urdu University,Arts, Science & Technolgy University of Sargodha University of Sindh, Jamshoro The Islamia University, Bahawalpur Hazara University, Mansehra Bahria University University of Education, Lahore National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad University of Gujrat Preston University, Kohat University of Lahore

BU STATUS Old V/S New S.No Status (2010) Points scored out Status (2012) Max Points 1 Implementation of QA Criteria 18 Quality Assurance & Enhancement 20 1 Plagiarism Standing Committee 3 Out of 6 Plagiarism policy implementation 2 Appointment Criteria 4 Out of 4 Eligibility Criteria for appointments of faculty members 3 Criteria for MS/Mphil & Phd 4 Out of 4 Compliance of M.Phil./MS & Ph.D. criteria 4 QEC Categorization 4 Out of 4 Quality Enhancement Cell Categorization Total 15 Out of 18

BU STATUS Old V/S New S.No Status (2010) Ratio / Nos Status (2012) Ratio/ Nos Teaching Quality (6.35 out of 42) Teaching Quality (35) 1 Student Teacher Ratio (8308:593) 14:1 Student Teacher Ratio (9867:813) 12:1 2 Ratio of PhD faculty to total faculty 40:1007 1:25 Ratio of PhD faculty to total faculty (76:737) 1:9 3 Selectivity (No of applicants against available seats) 8500:2500 3:1 Selectivity (No of applicants against available seats) 12000:3000 4:1 4 Computers (No of computers for the students provided by university) 642 Computers (No of computers for the students and faculty provided by university) Library books 50,000 Library books 55,001 6 Full Time PhD faculty 41 Full Time PhD faculty 40 7 Full Time faculty 406 Full Time faculty Part Time Faculty 560 Part Time Faculty Full Time Equivalent Faculty 593 Not Asked 10 Total PhD output for Not Asked 11 Not Asked - Ratio of Full time faculty to part time (392:345) 1:1 12 Not Asked - Teacher Evaluation 13 Not AskedTraining of faculty 226

BU STATUS Old V/S New S.No Status (2010) Nos Status (2012) Nos iHEC Approved supervisors7Approved supervisors15 iiIndigenous scholarship6 16 iiiResearch grants approved4 Research grants approved other than HEC 24 ivTravel Grants approved10Travel Grants approved13

BU STATUS Old V/S New S.No Status (2010) Nos Status (2012) Nos v Publications in Impact Factor Journals - 14 (July 11-June12) vi Number of papers published by the university 10 Number of papers published by the university 25 vii Citations 3 7 viii University H Index2 - ix Number of W, X, Y, Z Journals Published by the University 0 - x Internet Bandwidth (PERN) utilization 18 Mbs out of 48 Mbs Internet Bandwidth (PERN) utilization 28.64% Utilization in Islamabad Campus 25.91% Utilization in Karachi Campus xi Number of Conferences Organized 0 28 Total PhD output for 20110

BU STATUS Old V/S New S.No Status (2010) Max Points Status (2012) Max Points Employer Perception Survey 1 Not AskedEmployer Perception Survey Peer Perception 2 Not Asked Peer Perception

COMPARATIVE STUDY – QA CRITERIA GENERAL UNIVERSITIES (LARGE) S.NoInstitute Name Appointment Criteria Criteria for MS/Mphil & Phd QEC Categorization Plagiarism Standing Committee Total Govt. College University, Faisalabad Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science & Technology University of The Punjab, Lahore Bahria University, Islamabad International Islamic University University of Education, Lahore National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad University of Gujrat Hazara University Mansehra, KPK University of Sargodha Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan University of Sindh The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan University of Karachi University of Peshawar Preston University, Kohat University of Lahore, Lahore National University of Science & Technlogy (NUST)

COMPARATIVE STUDY - TEACHING QUALITY GENERAL UNIVERSITIES (LARGE) S.No Institute Name Student / Teacher Ratio ComputersApplicantsLibraryPhD Output Graduate/ Postgraduate students Undergraduate Students FT PhD Faculty FT FacultyPT Faculty FTE Faculty BZU 17:1 3,500 35, , ,256 7, Bahria University 14:118: ,476 11,539 50,000 55, , , FUUAST 14: , , ,509 5, GCU, Faisalabad 16: ,942 19, ,530 8, Hazara University Mansehra 19: , , ,175 7, IIUI 23:1 3,478 16, , ,333 11, IUB 21:1 2,100 22, , ,974 6, KU 23:1 5,500 30, , ,042 15, ,276 1,164 9NUML 26: , , ,741 4, NUST 17:1 6,519 46, , , PU 25:1 6, ,054 1,223, ,715 16, , , Preston University, Kohat 27:1 2,630 4,693 51, ,689 7, UOE, LHR 47: , , ,213 5, UOS, Sargodha 25:1 1,500 18,263 78, ,521 8, UOP, Peshawar 22:1 1,350 20, , ,938 5, UOS, Sindh 33:1 1,458 15, , ,628 16, University of Gujrat 20: ,942 25, ,668 7, University of Lahore 16:1 1,680 11,693 25, ,679 11,

COMPARATIVE STUDY - RESEARCH GENERAL UNIVERSITIES (LARGE) S.N o Institute Name ConferencesPERNH-INDEXCitations Research Papers HEC Aprvd Suprvsrs HEC Travel Grants Indigenous Scholars Research Grants W CategoryX CategoryY CategoryZ Category BZU Bahria University FUUAST GCU, Faisalabad Hazara UniversityM ansehra IIUI IUB KU NUML NUST PU Preston University, Kohat UOE, LHR UOS, Sargodha UOP, Peshawar UOS, Sindh University of Gujrat University of Lahore

RECOMMENDATIONS There must be some benchmark to measure performance. Despite weaknesses and flaws in the assessment, HEC benchmark be followed in letter & spirit. Any suggestion on proposed New Criteria of Ranking be forwarded to QA Dte for onward submission to HEC for consideration / review. Number of HEC enrolled indigenous scholars be increased Number of Research Grants from HEC & from other sources like: USAID, JICA, Corporate sector & NGOs etc be increased. Number of travel grants from HEC & other services be increased More utilization of PERN Organizing Conferences, National & International with the funding from HEC or atleast HEC may be intimated

Thank You

No.Institute Teaching Quality QA CriteriaResearchTotal Score 1Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad Government College University, Lahore Gomal University, D.I Khan Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur The University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir, AJ&K Riphah International University, Islamabad Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi University of Balochisan, Quetta University of Management & Technology, Lahore Forman Christian College, Lahore Mohammad Ali Jinnah University, Karachi Hamdard University, Karachi Jinnah University for Women, Karachi University of Central Punjab, Lahore GENERAL UNIVERSITIES MEDIUM

No.Institute Teaching Quality QA Criteria Research Total Score 1Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad University of Faisalabad, Faisalabad Sardar Bahadur Khan Women's University, Quetta National Defence University, Islamabad Karakurum International University, Gilgit Textile Institute of Pakistan, Karachi University of Malakand, Dir, Malakand Foundation University, Islamabad Beaconhouse National University, Lahore Dadabhoy Institute of Higher Education, Karachi Frontier Women University, Peshawar Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar University of South Asia, Lahore GIFT University, Gujranwala Indus Institute of Higher Education, Karachi Mohiuddin Islamic University, AJ&K Hajvery University, Lahore Kinnaird College For Women, Lahore The Superior College, Lahore Karachi Institute of Economics & Technology, Karachi Newport Institute of Communications & Economics, Karachi Greenwich University, Karachi Minhaj University, Lahore Preston Institute of Management, Science and Technology, Karachi Preston University, Karachi GENERAL UNIVERSITIES SMALL

No. Institute Teaching Quality QA CriteriaResearch Total Score 1 Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Islamabad National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences & Technology, Topi University of Engineering and Technology- Lahore University of Engineering and Technology-Taxila Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad KPK University of Engineering and Technology Mehran University of Engineering & Technology, Jamshoro NED University of Engineering & Technology, Karachi Air University, Islamabad National Textile University, Faisalabad Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science & Technology, Nawabshah Balochistan University of Engg & Technology, Khuzdar Sir Syed University of Engineering & Technology, Karachi Mirpur University of Science & Technology, AJ&K Dawood College of Engineering & Technology, Karachi ENGINEERING

No.Institute Teaching Quality QA Criteria Research Total Score 1 Lahore University of Management Sciences, Lahore Institute of Business Administration Karachi Iqra University,Karachi Sukkar, Institute of Business Administration, Sukkar National College of Business Administration & Economics, Lahore Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science & Technology, Karachi Institute of Management Sciences,Peshawar Lahore School of Economics, Lahore Imperial College of Business Studies, Lahore Institute of Management Sciences, Lahore Institute of Business Management, Karachi Institute of Business and Technology, Karachi KASB Institute of Technology, Karachi Business Education

No.Institute Teaching Quality (42) QA Criteria (18) Research (40) Total Score Position 1 COMSATS Institute of Information Technology (CIIT), Islamabad National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences (NU-FAST), Islamabad Qurtaba University of Science and Information Technology, D I Khan Balochistan University of Information Technology and Management Sciences, Quetta City University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar CECOS University of Information Technology and Emerging Sciences, Peshawar Computer Sciences & IT Category