ELearning Frameworks: What, Why and Who, Where & When Daniel Rehak, Learning Systems Architecture Lab, USA Kerry Blinco, Dept. Education Science and Training,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The e-Framework Bill Olivier Director Development, Systems and Technology JISC.

Advertisements

Optimising metadata workflows in a distributed information environment R. John Robertson & Jane Barton Centre for Digital Library Research University of.

Digital Repositories: interoperability & common services Closing Remarks Dr Liz Lyon, UKOLN, University of Bath, UK

CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT DEM Leo G. Adap. PREPARING STUDENTS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY SKILLS.

© Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Open Knowledge Initiative ™ Open Knowledge Initiative International Symposium on Open Educational.

An e-Learning Strategy to promote technology enabled learning i n UCC Teaching & Learning workshop 30 October, 2012.

e-Framework Components and Responsibilities.

CSCL and Standards for Learning Technologies Ola Berge Netværket IKT og Læring, e-Learning Lab at Aalborg University,

Supporting education and research E-learning tools, standards and systems Sarah Porter Head of Development, JISC.

T.H.E. Forum, 2002www.cancore.org1 Canadian Core Learning Resource Metadata Application Profile Norm Friesen

Educational Modelling Language (EML): Adding instructional design to existing learning technology specifications Rob Koper

A sustainable approach to developing e- learning technologies Howard Noble University of Oxford, Learning Technologies Group 16 th June 2004.

Thee-Framework for Education & Research The e-Framework for Education & Research an Overview TEN Competence, Jan 2007 Bill Olivier,

FREMA: e-Learning Framework Reference Model for Assessment Yvonne Howard David Millard Hugh Davis Gary Wills Lester Gilbert Learning Societies Lab University.

FREMA: e-Learning Framework Reference Model for Assessment David Millard Yvonne Howard IAM, DSSE, LTG University of Southampton, UK.

Selecting and Implementing an LMS for your Company Session Code #2411.

THE JOINED UP WORLD OF E-RESEARCH Professor Neil McLean National Technical Standards Adviser to the Department of Education Science and Training (DEST)

ELearning Frameworks: What, Why and Who, Where & When Daniel Rehak, Learning Systems Architecture Lab, USA Kerry Blinco, Dept. Education Science and Training,

Using virtual learning environments to support learners in virtual worlds Kerri McCusker, Michael Callaghan, Daniel Livingstone, Anna Peachey, Peter Bloomfield,

Recommendations Adopting Standards and Specifications for Educational Content.

Update: © Copyright 2002, Carnegie Mellon University All Right Reserved 1/59 ADL/SCORM - What Does it Mean for Developers of ICT Projects? Daniel.

LCMS: What is thriving the Dutch, hype or need? Jocelyn Manderveld Educational Technology Expertise Centre Open University of the Netherlands.

Diana Laurillard Head, e-Learning Strategy Unit Overview of e-learning: aims and priorities.

Malaysian Grid for Learning October DC 2004, Shanghai, China. © 2004 MIMOS Berhad. All Rights Reserved Metadata Management System DC2004: International.

Interuniversity Center for Educational Research and Advanced Training Paolo Tosato, Juliana Raffaghelli European Distance and E-Learning Network Teachers’

Standards and interoperability - a Norwegian perpective Project Coordinator Tore Hoel, the Norwegian eStandard project

International Seminar on E - Learning. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 4-5 December 2007.

The Global Grid for Learning: Presented by Dr. Theo Lynn and Neil Bruton 23rd of March 2010.

1 The NSDL: A Case Study in Interoperability William Y. Arms Cornell University.

Research on Technology Enhanced Learning in the EU TELEBALT,

Using an Application Profile Based Service Registry Ann Apps Mimas, The University of Manchester, UK.

JISC CETIS Conference, Oxford, November 2004 Repositories: State of ELF “volunteer”: Martin Morrey Intrallect Ltd.

METADATA QUALITY IN EUROPEANA , Den Haag.

ELearning 2008 Day 1 Julie Collareda. TAFE NSW – Sydney Institute.

Ensemble Computing in the National Science Digital Library (NSDL)

Group-based Repositories in Oz Diane Costello Council of Australian University Librarians ICOLC Montreal 2007.

EUN Learning Resource Exchange Jim Ayre Multimedia Ventures.

The DART Project: building the new collaborative e- research infrastructure Presentation to 2006 AusWeb Conference.

Digital Portfolio Supporting collaborative, customizable faculty development.

Linking research & learning technologies through standards 1 Lyle Winton lylejw AT unimelb.edu.au.

Common challenges, common issues Lorcan Dempsey School for scanning The Hague, 16 October 2002.

EdReNe, 2nd Strategic Seminar (Lisbon, June 2008) (c) 2008, Daniel Weiler, Centre of Technology of Education Luxembourg’s Educational Portal Enabling Connected.

UNINETT, Harstad, June 2004 Developing Sustainable E- Learning Frameworks to Support Teaching and Learning Lorna M. Campbell, CETIS

Learning Object Metadata Application Profiles: Lithuanian Approach E. Kurilovas S. Kubilinskienė Centre for IT in Education, MoE Lithuania.

Content and Tools Standards Will Ellis, Head of Digital Learning Resources “We need better digital resources more widely available and more flexible learning.

Sakai: A Higher Education Initiative Jim Farmer at the Aviation Industry CBT Committee Meeting 2 February 2004, Phoenix, Arizona USA.

UKOLN is supported by: Introduction to UKOLN Dr Liz Lyon, Director UKOLN, University of Bath, UK Grand Challenge Meeting, June a centre.

The DEER The Distributed European Electronic Resource.

1. Contents Context for Strategy Development What We Did Progress and Next Steps 2.

April 14, 2005MIT Libraries Visiting Committee Libraries Strategic Plan Theme III Work to shape the future MacKenzie Smith Associate Director for Technology.

EPOS IP Roadmap Massimo Cocco & PDB. EPOS IP project Timeline Implementation Validation Pre-operation.

Macquarie University Library E-Learning Standards “Perfecting the Irrelevant”? Maxine Brodie CAUL Meeting Teaching & Learning Forum Hobart 2004.

Making Content Interoperability Work: Structured Practice January 18, :00 a.m.(EST) Presented by: Jeff Kahn and Ed Walker.

Supporting further and higher education E-learning Framework and Tools Tish Roberts JISC Programme Manager.

Technology-enhanced Learning: EU research and its role in current and future ICT based learning environments Pat Manson Head of Unit Technology Enhanced.

JISC / CETIS eLearning Conference. Metadata Quality Expose Archive Federation Search Deliver Destroy Harvest Embedded Metadata [Metadata in, e.g. content.

UKOLN is supported by: Library futures in the new research landscape. Dr Liz Lyon, UKOLN, University of Bath, UK CURL Members Meeting October 2004, London.

FROM PRINCIPLE TO PRACTICE: Implementing the Principles for Digital Development Perspectives and Recommendations from the Practitioner Community.

IMS Developer Briefing ECC Singapore ADL BlackBoard FD Learning DEST.

Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.

12 th Meeting of the GBIF Participant Nodes Committee 6-7 October 2013, Berlin, Germany Towards a generic work programme for a Node Olaf Bánki Senior Programme.

Developing our Metadata: Technical Considerations & Approach Ray Plante NIST 4/14/16 NMI Registry Workshop BIPM, Paris 1 …don’t worry ;-) or How we concentrate.

Name - Date Technology-enhanced Learning: tomorrow’s school and beyond Pat Manson Head of Unit Technology Enhanced Learning Directorate General.

Event ELearning Frameworks and eAdmin Hugh Davis.

? What is Institutional Repository for Rutgers University

Implementing E-learning Framework and tools

Oya Y. Rieger Cornell University Library May 2004

Scott Thorne & Chuck Shubert

Brian Matthews STFC EOSCpilot Brian Matthews STFC

JISC and SOA A view Robert Sherratt.

Presentation transcript:

eLearning Frameworks: What, Why and Who, Where & When Daniel Rehak, Learning Systems Architecture Lab, USA Kerry Blinco, Dept. Education Science and Training, Australia Yuri Daschko, Industry Canada

eLearning Frameworks: What

eLearning Landscape Arrow Frodo LAMS CDLS OKI Learning Federation OCW Sakai SCORM Merlot NSDL Edusource CORDRA Prolearn Celebrate Universal ARIADNE Jorum IESR

What do we call it? design framework architecture systemapplication profile reference model pattern artifact abstraction representation model driven

Tools and systems A number of system models were here

What we have is: “interoperability” packaging metadata learning design repositories sequencing cmi resource lists profiles competencies assessment web services learner records accessibility harvest vocabulary tools query osid

What we don’t have is: “INTEROPERABILITY” repositories digital libraries vle lms/lcms collaboration portal elearning escience grid performance support simulation tutors administration

What we really don’t have is: a way to describe and talk about tools and systems a way to integrate diverse tools and systems a common understanding of what we have done a path forward to work on systems

eLearning Framework

ELF: An eLearning Framework

eLearning Framework: Why Supports diversity Technological Pedagogical Strategy independence Supports flexibility Modular flexible technology base Adaptability to changing business needs Faster response to community needs Staged adoption/implementation Technical benefits

eLearning Framework: Why Not just for the “techies” Communication Coherent vision of complex space Communicates technical policy Communicates domain view to other domains Policy support Supports collaboration, shows appropriate roles Supports strategic decision making and reporting “Framework” for supporting activities, standards, toolkit development, research etc Allows experimentation with different development strategies and partnerships

eLearning Framework: Why International Costs involved in developing too high for one country Opportunity to leverage expertise Opportunity to leverage political will Best opportunity to develop international interoperable systems Need systems interoperability in order to garner full benefit of the web

eLearning Frameworks: Who, Where & When International Currently involved, JISC, DEST (Australia), Industry Canada, LSAL Bulk of funding from JISC and DEST Nationally Officials and practitioners NOW!

Thank You