Virginia Assessment Scenario Tool VAST Developed by: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

Planning for Our Future:
RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Economic Study of Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake.
Howard County, MD Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan October 6, 2011 Howard Saltzman Howard County Department of Public Works.
Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Tracking Thursday, May 31, 2012 Martin Hurd, Vladislav Royzman, Tetra Tech, Inc. Brian Burch, Megan Thynge,
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
Overview of TMDL Plans TMDL Plan Workshop April 24, 2015 Karl Berger, COG staff Outline: Details Schedule Plan Elements Issues 1.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Mark Dubin Agricultural Technical Coordinator University of Maryland Extension-College Park Modeling Quarterly Review Meeting April 17, 2012.
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA) 1 CBP Program Update Citizens Advisory Committee February 27, 2014.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
The Chesapeake Bay Program’s Scenario Builder Gary Shenk CCMP workshop 5/11/2010.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
Best Management Practices and the Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model Jeff Sweeney University of Maryland Chesapeake Bay Program Office
Chesapeake Assessment Scenario Tool CAST Olivia H. Devereux Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 12/13/2011.
DC Draft Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan Stakeholder Meeting March 1, 2012 Metropolitan Washington Council Of Governments Hamid Karimi Deputy Director.
Update on the Development of EPA’s Chesapeake Bay TMDL and Virginia’s Watershed Implementation Plan Russ Perkinson Potomac Roundtable October 8, 2010.
Review of Scenario Builder BMP crediting Christopher F. Brosch University of Maryland Extension Chesapeake Bay Program Office
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Updating Background Conditions and BMP Efficiencies Jeff Sweeney Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
VIRGINIA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS ANNUAL MEETING DECEMBER 9, 2013 Richard Street Tri-county & City SWCD Fredericksburg VA.
Non-point Source Update Marc T. Aveni Regional Manager.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Support System Management Actions Watershed Model Bay Model Criteria Assessment Procedures Effects Allocations Airshed.
Lake Jesup BMAP Adoption Environmental Protection Division February 23, 2010.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
Clifton Bell, P.E., P.G. Chesapeake Bay Modeling Perspectives for the Regulated Community.
Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup (TMAW) Meeting February 7, 2013 Annapolis, MD Katie Foreman and Liza Hernandez University of Maryland Center for.
1 Phase 5.3 Calibration Gary Shenk 3/31/ Calibration Method Calibration method largely unchanged for several years –P5.1 – 8/ first automated.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Moving towards a restored Chesapeake Bay watershed
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Potomac Round Table Bay TMDL Update 4/1/2011. Schedule Dec 29,2010 EPA established Bay TMDL Dec 29,2010 EPA established Bay TMDL March/April/May/June.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
Milestones, Progress and the Mid-point Assessment APPROACHING 2017 James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager Department of Environmental Quality.
Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Moving to Phase II: Watershed Implementation Plans
WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler
Local Planning Process…
Watershed Implementation Plan
Local Government Engagement Initiative January 16, 2018
Commonwealth of Virginia
Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
MDE’s Phase III WIP Inventory 2018 Fall Regional WIP Meetings
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager
Chesapeake Bay Program Climate Change Modeling 2.0
Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
Presentation transcript:

Virginia Assessment Scenario Tool VAST Developed by: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin

VALUE FOR JURISDICTIONS 1/6/20122 Builds load reduction strategies (by local area) Identifies the BMPs that give the greatest load reductions Specifies the extent these BMPs are to be implemented Meets the allocations Compares among scenarios Produces CBP Scenario Builder m odel inputs Assesses WIPs and 2-Year Milestones

VAST FEATURES Is Replicable, Consistent, and Transparent – Consistent with EPA Phase and WIP Phase II Available/approved load reduction practices with efficiencies – Continuous no-till is calculated differently than the Chesapeake Bay Program Serves as a data management system Facilitate stakeholder involvement, teach stakeholders implications of decisions Facilitate an adaptive process, scenario development is iterative 1/6/20123

PLANNING YOUR SCENARIO What do I need to know? Chesapeake Bay Program vocabulary – Land Use names – BMP names Initial idea of which BMPs you want to implement – VAST will help you refine BMP choices You don’t have to know how the BMPs are calculated. VAST does the calculations for you. Documentation on the website steps through all the BMPs calculations. 1/6/20124

VAST OUTPUTS Land use acres available Changes in the acres of each land use BMPs submitted – Lists the BMPs in your scenario – Shows your notes for each BMP. The notes field is your justification. – Shows which BMPs it was not possible to credit Loads for each land use – Edge of stream (EOS) – Delivered to the Chesapeake Bay (DEL) Inputs to the Chesapeake Bay Program’s Scenario Builder 1/6/20125

DATA INPUT SEQUENCE 1/6/20126 LOG IN SCENARIO LIST URBAN BMPs SEPTIC BMPs WASTE WATER FOREST BMPs ANIMAL BMPs MANURE TRANSPORT AGRICULTURAL BMPs SUMMARY SCENARIO DETAILS COMPARE SCENARIOS

VASTTOOL.ORG 1/6/20127

FINE TUNE TO MAXIMIZE REDUCTIONS Calculations and the sequence in which they are done are critical— And VAST does them for you! Target implementation to areas where the pre-BMP load and the delivery to the Bay is highest Land use change BMPs provide more of a reduction than effectiveness value BMPs because they are always calculated before effectiveness value BMPs, where the pre-BMP load is similar – Effectives BMPs are calculated after the land use changes, so prioritize land use change BMPs since they will be applied to the greater portion of land Where BMPs are mutually exclusive (in the same group in the table, such as with NM), prioritize the BMP in the group with the higher effectiveness. – Nutrient Management – Stormwater practices – Cover crops 81/6/2012

General Features and Users Guide – Available via the link on the VAST website BMP Definitions Chesapeake Bay Program Land Use Definitions BMP Calculation Sequence and Groups BMP effectiveness values by land use and HGMR and pollutant And more. REFERENCE MATERIAL 1/6/20129

FUTURE REFINEMENTS Users input acres or percent implementation BMP costs Data Quality – P on AFO/CFO – Improved estimation of animal BMPs – Additional testing Speed—upgrade tool to accommodate increased usage, larger scenarios Show results as percent implementation, not just loads Continued technical support and updating documentation 1/6/201210

Olivia Devereux Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin/ Potomac Valley Conservancy District /6/201211

VIRGINIA’S PHASE II APPROACH LOCAL DELIVERABLES & DEADLINES Desired local deliverables – Current BMPs Update progress in current model – Land Use / Land Cover Work with EPA for use in Phase 6 model – 2017/2025 BMP Scenarios – Strategies to implement BMP scenarios – Resource needs Final opportunity to submit data – Deadline – 2/01/2012 – Incorporation into Final WIP II 12 1/6/201212

ASSESSING OUTPUT The Chesapeake Bay Program’s Watershed Model has some illogical loadings in some locations in Virginia Use of some BMPs can increase loads in these locations – Nutrient management in Loudoun and Henrico, among others VAST models the BMPs the same as the Chesapeake Bay Program, so the results may seem illogical 1/6/201213

GEOGRAPHICAL AREAS NOT ENTIRELY WITHIN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED The tool models the state’s portion of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. The percent implementation the user enters is only for the land use area or number of animals shown in the Pre=BMP table on the left of the BMP screen. The Pre-BMP land use table shows only the portion of the geographical area within the Watershed The animals and manure transport pages show the number of animals in the entire county (data is not available at a finer scale) BMPs entered on the animal pages are applied to the entire number of animals in the county. Manure transport is applied proportionally to the portion of the county in the Watershed 1/6/201214