PHYSPAG JANUARY 2015 DARK ENERGY UPDATE RACHEL BEAN (CORNELL UNIVERSITY) Image Credit: NASA/GSFC Image Credit: ESA 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
JDEM Update 1 Richard Griffiths (NASA HQ) JDEM Program Scientist Neil Gehrels (NASA GSFC) JDEM Project Scientist February 3, 2010.
Advertisements

General Astrophysics with TPF-C David Spergel Princeton.
Extremely Large Telescopes and Surveys Mark Dickinson, NOAO.
LISA in the light of eLISA, April 2013PhysPAG APS, Denver LISA in the light of eLISA Neil Cornish for GWSAG APS Meeting Denver
Dark Energy with Clusters with LSST Steve Allen Ian Dell’Antonio.
CMB Decadal Study: What We Did Activities funded by NASA proposal: PI Steve Meyer + entire CMB community Workshops: The Path to CMBPOL: Upcoming Measurement.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE Office of High Energy Physics, Cosmic Frontier Mid-Scale Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (MS-DESI) Experiment Fermilab PAC Oct.
1 Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee Astrophysics Division FY2008 Budget February 8, 2007 Rick Howard Astrophysics Division Director (acting)
WFIRST & Euclid Jason Rhodes NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Copyright 2011 California Institute of Technology. Government.
Extragalactic science with the Herschel Space Observatory Marc Sauvage CEA/DSM/DAPNIA Service d'Astrophysique UMR AIM.
The National Science Foundation The Dark Energy Survey J. Frieman, M. Becker, J. Carlstrom, M. Gladders, W. Hu, R. Kessler, B. Koester, A. Kravtsov, for.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Future Dark Energy Surveys R. Wechsler Assistant Professor KIPAC.
KDUST Supernova Cosmology
Nikos Nikoloudakis and T.Shanks, R.Sharples 9 th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Athens, Greece September 20-24, 2009.
The SNAP Project at SLAC Phil Marshall SLAC/KIPAC Slide 1.
Synergies with multi-wavelength surveys Matt Jarvis University of Hertfordshire.
The Dark Energy Survey and The Dark Energy Spectrograph Josh Frieman DES Project Director Portsmouth, June 2011.
X-ray Optical microwave Cosmology at KIPAC. The Survey 5000 square degrees (overlap with SPT and VISTA) Five-band (grizY) + VISTA (JHK) photometry to.
LSST CD-1 Review SLAC, Menlo Park, CA November 1 - 3, 2011 Analysis Overview Bhuv Jain and Jeff Newman.
Astro 101 Slide Set: Multiple Views of an Extremely Distant Galaxy 0 Topic: Distant galaxies Concepts: Galaxy development, Gravitational lensing Missions:
ExoPlanet Imaging Coronagraph: ExoPIC Macintosh, Traub, Kasdin, Greene, Breckinridge, Staplefeldt, Marcy, Savransky, et al.
P olarized R adiation I maging and S pectroscopy M ission Probing cosmic structures and radiation with the ultimate polarimetric spectro-imaging of the.
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
NAOKI YASUDA, MAMORU DOI (UTOKYO), AND TOMOKI MOROKUMA (NAOJ) SN Survey with HSC.
Eric V. Linder (arXiv: v1). Contents I. Introduction II. Measuring time delay distances III. Optimizing Spectroscopic followup IV. Influence.
Quotes from NWNH 2/3/ Two complementary approaches to understanding dark energy have been considered by this survey: one on the ground and the.
Cosmic shear results from CFHTLS Henk Hoekstra Ludo van Waerbeke Catherine Heymans Mike Hudson Laura Parker Yannick Mellier Liping Fu Elisabetta Semboloni.
Activities of and Prospective Issues before the Committee on Astronomy and Astrophysics Report by David Spergel, CAA Co-Chair Disclaimer: These slides.
Padua: 1604 → 2004 – Supernovae as cosmological lighthouses SNLS – The SuperNova Legacy Survey Mark Sullivan (University of Toronto) on behalf of the SNLS.
THE DARK ENERGY SURVEY Science Goals: Perform a 5000 sq. deg. survey of the southern galactic cap Map the cosmological density field to z=1 Constrain the.
Observational test of modified gravity models with future imaging surveys Kazuhiro Yamamoto (Hiroshima U.) Edinburgh Oct K.Y. , Bassett, Nichol,
Jenam 2010 Exoplanet Targets for Upcoming Cosmic Visions Space Missions James Frith September 8 th 2010 University of Hertfordshire.
Consortium Meeting La Palma October PV-Phase & Calibration Plans Sarah Leeks 1 SPIRE Consortium Meeting La Palma, Oct. 1 – PV Phase and.
1 System wide optimization for dark energy science: DESC-LSST collaborations Tony Tyson LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration meeting June 12-13, 2012.
WFIRST-AFTA Mission Science Alan Dressler, AAS Seattle, January 7, /30/2014WFIRST-AFTA SDT Report 1.
Physics of the Cosmos Program Analysis Group John Nousek Penn State University International Workshop on Astronomical X–Ray Optics Prague, Czech Republic.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy DETF Recommendations I 2.1Science (Charge questions 1, 2, 7) Andy Albrecht & Nicholas Suntzeff 2.1.2Comments.
DARK ENERGY IN SPACE: WFIRST AND EUCLID RACHEL BEAN (CORNELL UNIVERSITY) ON BEHALF OF THE PHYSPAG DARK ENERGY COMMUNITY Image Credit: NASA/GSFC Image Credit:
Weak Lensing from Space with SNAP Alexandre Refregier (IoA) Richard Ellis (Caltech) David Bacon (IoA) Richard Massey (IoA) Gary Bernstein (Michigan) Tim.
What’s going on with Dark Energy? Bill Carithers Aspen 2008.
Michael Levi (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), M. Lampton (UCBerkeley Space Sciences Lab), and M. Sholl (UCBerkeley Space Sciences Lab) WFIRST:
A. Ealet, S. Escoffier, D. Fouchez, F. Henry-Couannier, S. Kermiche, C. Tao, A. Tilquin September 2012.
Wide Field Astronomy from Space Steven Beckwith Space Telescope Science Institute January 9, 2002.
DMD Spectroscopy Yun Wang Yun Wang (with DMD slides from Massimo Robberto) WFIRST SDT #2, March, 2011.
VISTA Hemisphere Survey Dark Energy Survey VHS & DES Francisco Javier Castander.
1 Imaging Surveys: Goals/Challenges May 12, 2005 Luiz da Costa European Southern Observatory.
The Far-Infrared Universe: from the Universe’s oldest light to the birth of its youngest stars Jeremy P. Scott, on behalf of Locke D. Spencer Physics and.
Precision Studies of Dark Energy with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope David L. Burke SLAC for the LSST Collaboration Rencontres de Moriond Contents.
LSST and Dark Energy Dark Energy - STScI May 7, 2008 Tony Tyson, UC Davis Outline: 1.LSST Project 2.Dark Energy Measurements 3.Controlling Systematic Errors.
1 Douglas Hudgins Exoplanet Exploration Program Scientist Presentation to ExoPAG#8, Denver Colorado October 5, 2013.
NRO Telescopes David Spergel. History meter telescopes meter mirror “Residual space hardware” from Future Imagery Architecture, failed program.
Astrophysics Missions in ESA’s Cosmic Vision Program
DRM 2 What to do?. A: Remind you of the charge Develop a final DRM for WFIRST that does not duplicate the capabilities of Euclid and LSST. Assess options.
1 1 Dark Energy with SNAP and other Next Generation Probes Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
Future observational prospects for dark energy Roberto Trotta Oxford Astrophysics & Royal Astronomical Society.
ISWG - December 7, Destiny, The Dark Energy Space Telescope.
FIRST LIGHT A selection of future facilities relevant to the formation and evolution of galaxies Wavelength Sensitivity Spatial resolution.
Brenna Flaugher for the DES Collaboration; DPF Meeting August 27, 2004 Riverside,CA Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 Dark Energy and.
NIRSS: the Near-Infrared Sky Surveyor WFIRST Meeting 2011 February 3 Daniel Stern (JPL/Caltech)
The Euclid Mission Jason Rhodes (Caltech/JPL) March 7, 2013 © 2013, government sponsorship acknowledged.
DESpec in the landscape of large spectrographic surveys Craig Hogan University of Chicago and Fermilab.
Jochen Weller Decrypting the Universe Edinburgh, October, 2007 未来 の 暗 黒 エネルギー 実 験 の 相補性.
Next Generation Data Sets: An Overview of CMB-S4 and WFIRST David Spergel Princeton University Center for Computational Astrophysics, Flatiron Institute.
Map-making leads to understanding When we understand the evolution from one map to another, we can understand  the sociological, economic, and political.
The Dark Energy Science Collaboration Andy Connolly (DESC Computing Coordinator), Rachel Bean (DESC Spokesperson)
Euclid Big Data Opportunities Tom Kitching (UCL MSSL) – Euclid Science Lead.
Wide-Field InfraRed Survey Telescope U.S. Radio/mm/sub-mm Science Futures in the 2020’s 12/17/15 1 Jeff Kruk (NASA-GSFC)
Preparing for the Future: NASA's Planning for the Decadal Survey
C.Baltay and S. Perlmutter December 15, 2014
NEW Telescope Meeting , Princeton
Presentation transcript:

PHYSPAG JANUARY 2015 DARK ENERGY UPDATE RACHEL BEAN (CORNELL UNIVERSITY) Image Credit: NASA/GSFC Image Credit: ESA 1

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Seattle January 2015 A single survey can’t give the full dark energy picture Trade offs in Techniques (SN1a, BAO,RSD, WL, Clusters + lensing, peculiar motions, positions) Photometric speed vs. spectroscopic precision Angular and spectral resolution Astrophysical tracers used (LRGs, ELGs, Lya/QSOs, clusters) Epochs, scales and environs being studied (cluster vs dwarf galaxies) Much more than a DETF FoM: Astrophysical & instrumental systematic control mitigation not so easily summarized. Readiness vs technological innovation Survey area vs depth - repeat imaging, dithering, cadence and survey area overlap/config. WFIRST and Euclid are distinct and highly complementary, with each other and with ground based LSS surveys (LSST, DESI and others) Planck and ground-based CMB gravitational lensing measurements 2

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Seattle January 2015 Summary Starts, duration WFIRST-AFTA ~2023, 5-6 yr Imaging/ weak lensing (0<z<2.) SN1a 68 gal/arcmin 2 3 bands nm 2700 SN1a z = 0.1–1.7 IFU spectroscopy BAO/RSD 20m Hα ELGs z = 1–2, 2m [OIII] ELGS z = 2–3 Spec. res.  (slitless) Diameter2.4 FoV (deg 2 )0.281 Spec. range  m Area (deg 2 )2,400 (S)* pixel (arcsec)0.12 Euclid 2020 Q2, 7 yr gal/arcmin 2 1 broad vis. band 550– 900 nm ~20-50M Hα ELGs z~ (slitless)  m 15,000 (N + S) 0.13 DESILSST ~2018, 5 yr2020, 10 yr gal/arcmin 2 5 bands nm SN1a/yr z = 0.–0.7 photometric 20-30m LRGs/[OII] ELGs 0.6 < z < 1.7, 1m QSOs/Lya 1.9<z< (N fib =5000) 4 (less 1.8+) nm 14,000 (N)20,000 (S) 0.7 Next generation Now & near term: e.g. DES, HSC; BOSS, eBOSS, PFS; J-PAS, JWST; Planck, ACT+, Spider, SPT+ 3

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Seattle January 2015 AFTA SDT final report due this month Flexible observing strategy being considered Deep in first 4 months on LSST deep drilling fields To understand systematics in lensing and photometric redshifts Cover 2200 sq deg to robustly tackle systematics, or sq deg H-band only and rely on LSST photo-zs, to aim for higher FoM but less control of systematics Advantages of a big telescope can go in either direction Aim is 2023 launch, observing WFIRST: update 4

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Seattle January 2015 WFIRST: WFIRS2014 conference 210 registrants interested in broad science using WFIRST Dark Energy Exoplanetary Milky Way + Local Group Beyond the Local Group Lessons from current missions Spitzer, Kepler, Hubble, Planck, WISE & Herschel Synergies with Euclid, LSST, Gaia, JWST, VLASS, HSC, and others 5

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Seattle January 2015 Covered all areas of WFIRST science including supernovae, galaxy redshift surveys, weak lensing, exoplanet microlensing, coronagraphy, and other surveys & GO science. Supporting development of WFIRST-centered simulations and models. 53 Proposals received on July Selections have been made. Expectation (in November) was ~12 proposals to be funded, total $1.8M in first year. WFIRST: ROSES WFIRST Preparatory Science 6

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Seattle January 2015 FY14 appropriation ($56M) and FY15 request ($50M) supports technology development for detectors and coronagraph, and Agency/ Administration decision for formulation to begin FY 2017, should funding be available. Funds will also support assessment of the 2.4m telescopes, mission design trades, payload accommodation studies, and observatory performance simulations. NASA decision not expected on new start before early 2016 WFIRST: funding/support status 7

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Seattle January 2015 NASA has established the Euclid NASA Science Center at IPAC (ENSCI) to support US-based investigations using Euclid data. ENSCI will Participate in the Euclid Consortium’s Science Ground Segment to “learn by doing” Support the US research community by providing expert insight into the Euclid surveys, data processes, calibration, and products. Host an archive of detector characterization data For more details, see Euclid: NASA Science Center at IPAC

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Seattle January 2015 Both instruments VIS (visible) and NISP (Near Infrared Spectrometer and Photometer) had successful reviews in the past year. Yun Wang is Deputy Lead for the Galaxy Clustering Work Group. Number of US Euclid team members now leading key work packages. Euclid scheduled for 2020 launch. Euclid: instrument and US team updates 9

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Seattle January 2015 DES: analyzing year 1 data DESI: P5 report supports, “Build DESI as a major step forward in dark energy science, if funding permits” Passed DoE CD-1 in September HSC: taking data with 0.6 arcsec seeing. LSST: August 1, NSF authorized construction with $27.5M in FY14 and a budget plan through 2022 within a $473M overall budget cap. highly ranked DoE P5 Dark Energy Science Collabor n Some ground based updates 10

PhysPAG meeting, HEAD, Seattle January 2015 Theory has advanced, don’t presume a strong theoretical prior a-priori Data will be good enough to test beyond w=-1 or w0-wa Investigate growth and expansion history, in a more general way Search for a diverse array of signatures: Geometry and inhomogeneity across multiple epochs Multiple tracers sampling distinct gravitational environments Probe non-linear regimes (more modes + gravitational screening) Recognizes importance of complementarity to maximize cosmological discovery and systematic control in realizing survey potential WFIRST and Euclid play critical roles in the advancement of our understanding of dark energy 11